Landscape Ecology

, Volume 22, Issue 5, pp 731–745 | Cite as

Effect of fragmentation, habitat loss and within-patch habitat characteristics on ant assemblages in semi-arid woodlands of eastern Australia

  • Valerie J. Debuse
  • Judith King
  • Alan P. N.  House
Research Article

Abstract

The reliability of ants as bioindicators of ecosystem condition is dependent on the consistency of their response to localised habitat characteristics, which may be modified by larger-scale effects of habitat fragmentation and loss. We assessed the relative contribution of habitat fragmentation, habitat loss and within-patch habitat characteristics in determining ant assemblages in semi-arid woodland in Queensland, Australia. Species and functional group abundance were recorded using pitfall traps across 20 woodland patches in landscapes that exhibited a range of fragmentation states. Of fragmentation measures, changes in patch area and patch edge contrast exerted the greatest influence on species assemblages, after accounting for differences in habitat loss. However, 35% of fragmentation effects on species were confounded by the effects of habitat characteristics and habitat loss. Within-patch habitat characteristics explained more than twice the amount of species variation attributable to fragmentation and four times the variation explained by habitat loss. The study indicates that within-patch habitat characteristics are the predominant drivers of ant composition. We suggest that caution should be exercised in interpreting the independent effects of habitat fragmentation and loss on ant assemblages without jointly considering localised habitat attributes and associated joint effects.

Keywords

Landscape Functional groups Variance partitioning 

References

  1. Abensperg–Traun M, Smith GT, Arnold GW et al (1996) The effects of habitat fragmentation and livestock–grazing on animal communities in remnants of gimlet Eucalyptus salubris woodland in the Western Australian wheatbelt. 1. Arthropods. J Appl Ecol 33:1281–1301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersen AN (1995) A classification of Australian ant communities, based on functional groups which parallel plant life forms in relation to stress and disturbance. J Biogeogr 22:15–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersen AN (1997) Using ants as bioindicators: multiscale issues in ant community ecology. In: Conservation Ecology 1:8. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol1/iss1/art8. Cited 17 December 2004
  4. Andersen AN, Majer JD (2004) Ants show the way Down Under: invertebrates as bioindicators in land management. Front Ecol Environ 2:291–298Google Scholar
  5. Andrén H (1994) Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review. Oikos 71:355–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bestelmeyer BT, Wiens JA (2001) Ant biodiversity in semiarid landscape mosaics: the consequences of grazing vs. natural heterogeneity. Ecol Appl 11:1123–1140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bhar R, Fahrig L (1998) Local vs. landscape effects of woody field borders as barriers to crop pest movement. In: Conservation Ecology 2:3. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol2/iss2/art3. Cited 22 December 2005
  8. Borcard D, Legendre P, Drapeau P (1992) Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation. Ecology 73:1045–1055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bowman DMJS, Prior LD (2004) Impact of Aboriginal landscape burning on woody vegetation in Eucalyptus tetrodonta savanna in Arnhem Land, northern Australia. J Biogeogr 31:807–817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown JH, Kodric–Brown A (1977) Turnover rates in insular biogeography: effects of immigration on extinction. Ecology 58:445–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chust G, Pretus JL, Ducrot D et al (2003) Identification of landscape units from an insect perspective. Ecography 26: 257–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cushman SA, McGarigal K (2002) Hierarchical, multi–scale decomposition of species–environment relationships. Landsc Ecol 17:637–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Davies KF, Margules CR, Lawrence JF (2000) Which traits of species predict population declines in experimental forest fragments? Ecology 81:1450–1461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Davies KF, Melbourne BA, Margules CR (2001) Effects of within– and between–patch processes on community dynamics in a fragmentation experiment. Ecology 82:1830–1846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Davis–Carter JG, Sheppard DC (1993) Redistribution of metals and nutrients by fire ants in a flue dust contaminated pasture. Soil Biol Biochem 25:747–750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. de Bruyn LAL (1993) Ant composition and activity in naturally–vegetated and farmland environments on contrasting soils at Kellerberrin, Western Australia. Soil Biol Biochem 25:1043–1056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Debinski DM, Holt RD (2000) A survey and overview of habitat fragmentation experiments. Cons Biol 14:342–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Didham RK, Lawton JH (1999) Edge structure determines the magnitude of changes in microclimate and vegetation structure in tropical forest fragments. Biotropica 31:17–30Google Scholar
  19. Fahrig L (1997) Relative effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on population extinction. J Wildl Manage 61:603–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fahrig L (2003) Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:487–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fensham RJ, Fairfax RJ, Archer SR (2005) Rainfall, land use and woody vegetation cover change in semi-arid Australian savanna. J Ecol 93:596–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Foley P (1997) Extinction models for local populations. In: Hanski IA, Gilpin ME (eds) Metapopulation biology: ecology, genetics and evolution. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  23. Gardner SM, Cabido MR, Valladares GR et al (1995) The influence of habitat structure on arthropod diversity in Argentine semi-arid Chaco forest. J Veg Sci 6:349–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Greenslade PJM (1964) Pitfall trapping as a method for studying populations of Carabidae (Coleoptera). J Anim Ecol 33:301–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Greenslade PJM, Greenslade P (1977) Some effects of vegetation cover and disturbance on tropical ant fauna. Insectes Soc 24:163–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Greenslade PJM, Halliday RB (1983) Colony dispersion and relationships of meat ants Iridomyrmex purpureus and allies in an arid locality in South Australia. Insectes Soc 30:82–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Guinto DF, Saffigna PG, Xu Z et al (1999) Soil nitrogen mineralisation and organic matter composition revealed by 13C NMR spectroscopy under repeated prescribed burning in eucalypt forests of south-east Queensland. Aust J Soil Res 37:123–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hansen RA (2000) Effects of habitat complexity and composition on a diverse litter microarthropod assemblage. Ecology 81:1120–1132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hanski I (1999) Metapopulation ecology. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  30. Hobbs R (2001) Synergisms among habitat fragmentation, livestock grazing, and biotic invasions in Southwestern Australia. Cons Biol 15:1522–1528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hoffmann BD, Andersen AN (2003) Responses of ants to disturbance in Australia, with particular reference to functional groups. Austr Ecol 28:444–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. Springer–Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  33. Jackson GP, Fox BJ (1996) Comparison of regeneration following burning, clearing or mineral sand mining at Tomago, NSW. II. Succession of ant assemblages in a coastal forest. Aust J Ecol 21:200–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jellinek S, Driscoll DA, Kirkpatrick JB (2004) Environmental and vegetation variables have a greater influence than habitat fragmentation in structuring lizard communities in remnant urban bushland. Austr Ecol 29:294–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jules ES, Shahani P (2003) A broader ecological context to fragmentation: why matrix habitat is more important that we thought. J Veg Sci 14:459–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lassau SA, Hochuli DF (2004) Effects of habitat complexity on ant assemblages. Ecography 27:157–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Laurance WF, Bierregaard RO Jr (eds) (1997) Tropical forest remnants: ecology, management, and conservation of fragmented communities. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  38. Lawton JH (1987) Are there assembly rules for successional communities In: Gray AJ, Crawley MJ, Edwards PJ (eds) Colonisation, succession and stability. Blackwell Scientific Publications, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  39. Lindenmayer DB, Margules CR, Botkin D (2000) Indicators of biodiversity for ecologically sustainable forest management. Cons Biol 14:941–950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lunt ID, Spooner PG (2005) Using historical ecology to understand patterns of biodiversity in fragmented historical landscapes. J Biogeogr 32:1859–1873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. MacArthur RH, Wilson EO (1967) The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  42. McGarigal K, Marks BJ (1995) FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Station, GTR–351, PortlandGoogle Scholar
  43. McIntyre S, Barrett GW (1992) Habitat variegation, an alternative to fragmentation. Cons Biol 6:146–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mac Nally R, Bennett AF, Horrocks G (2000) Forecasting the impacts of fragmentation. Evaluation of species–specific predictions of the impact of habitat fragmentation on birds in the box–ironbark forests of central Victoria, Australia. Biol Conserv 95:7–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Manly BFJ (1991) Multivariate statistical methods: a primer. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  46. Martin TG, Green JL (2002) Wildlife and core conservation areas In: McIntyre S, McIvor JG, Heard KM (eds) Managing and conserving grassy woodlands. CSIRO Publishing, CollingwoodGoogle Scholar
  47. Melbourne BA (1999) Bias in the effect of habitat structure on pitfall traps: an experimental evaluation. Aust J Ecol 24: 228–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Niemelä J (2001) Carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) and habitat fragmentation: a review. Eur J Entomol 98:127–132Google Scholar
  49. Økland RH (1999) On the variation explained by ordination and constrained ordination axes. J Veg Sci 10: 131–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ottonetti L, Tucci L & Santini G (2006) Recolonization patterns of ants in a rehabilitated lignite mine in central Italy: potential for the use of Mediterranean ants as indicators of restoration processes. Restor Ecol 14: 60–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pharo EJ, Lindenmayer DB, Taws N (2004) The effects of large–scale fragmentation on bryophytes in temperate forests. J Appl Ecol 41:910–921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Queensland Department of Natural Resources and Water (2003) Land cover changes in Queensland 1999–2003: a statewide land and tree study report (SLATS). Queensland Department of Natural Resources and Water, BrisbaneGoogle Scholar
  53. Ross KA, Fox BJ, Fox MD (2002) Changes to plant species richness in forest fragments: fragment age, disturbance and fire history may be as important as area. J Biogeogr 29:749–765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Russell–Smith J, Stanton P (2002) Fire regimes and fire management of rainforest communities across northern Australia In: Bradstock RA, Williams JE, Gill, AM (eds) Flammable Australia: the fire regimes and biodiversity of a continent. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  55. Samways M, Osborn R, Carliel F (1997) Effect of a highway on ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) species composition and abundance, with a recommendation for roadside verge width. Biodivers Conserv 6:903–913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sattler PS, Williams RD (eds) (1999) The conservation status of Queensland’s bioregional ecosystems. Environmental Protection Agency, BrisbaneGoogle Scholar
  57. Saunders DA, Hobbs RJ, Margules CR (1991) Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: a review. Cons Biol 5:18–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Schoereder JH, Sobrinho TG, Ribas CR et al (2004) Colonization and extinction of ant communities in a fragmented landscape. Aust Ecol 29:391–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sobrinho TG, Schoereder JH, Sperber C F et al (2003) Does fragmentation alter species composition in ant communities (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)? Sociobiol 42:329–342Google Scholar
  60. Spence JR, Niemelä JK (1994) Sampling carabid assemblages with pitfall traps: the madness and the method. Can Entomol 126: 881–894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Suarez AV, Bolger DT, Case TJ (1998) Effects of fragmentation and invasion on native ant communities in coastal southern California. Ecology 79:2041–2056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. ter Braak CJF, Šmilauer P (2002) CANOCO reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows users guide: software for canonical community ordination. Microcomputer Power, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  63. Tews J, Brose U, Grimm V et al (2004) Animal species diversity driven by habitat heterogeneity/diversity: the importance of keystone structures. J Biogeogr 31:79–92Google Scholar
  64. Tscharntke T, Steffan-Dewenter I, Kruess A et al (2002) Characteristics of insect populations on habitat fragments: a mini review. Ecol Res 17:229–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Vanderwoude C (1999) An evaluation of ant communities as indicators of ecological change resulting from anthropogenic disturbance in spotted gum (Corymbia variegata) forests in south-east Queensland. Dissertation, University of New EnglandGoogle Scholar
  66. Vanderwoude C, Andersen AN, House APN (1997) Community organization, biogeography and seasonality of ants in an open forest of south-eastern Queensland. Aust J Zool 45:523–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wiens JA (1997) Metapopulation dynamics and landscape ecology In: Hanski IA, Gilpin ME (eds) Metapopulation biology: ecology, genetics and evolution. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  68. Wu J, Shen W, Sun W et al (2002) Empirical patterns of the effects of changing scale on landscape metrics. Landsc Ecol 17:761–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Valerie J. Debuse
    • 1
    • 2
  • Judith King
    • 3
  • Alan P. N.  House
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Primary Industries and FisheriesHorticulture and Forestry ScienceGympieAustralia
  2. 2.The Centre for Innovative Conservation StrategiesGriffith UniversityGold Coast MCAustralia
  3. 3.Department of Primary Industries and FisheriesHorticulture and Forestry ScienceIndooroopillyAustralia
  4. 4.CSIRO Sustainable EcosystemsSt LuciaAustralia

Personalised recommendations