Landscape Ecology

, Volume 22, Issue 5, pp 723–730 | Cite as

Effects of historical and present fragmentation on plant species diversity in semi-natural grasslands in Swedish rural landscapes

  • Sara A. O. Cousins
  • Helena Ohlson
  • Ove Eriksson
Research Article


Habitat loss and fragmentation of natural and semi-natural habitats are considered as major threats to plant species richness. Recently several studies have pinpointed the need to analyse past landscape patterns to understand effects of fragmentation, as the response to landscape change may be slow in many organisms, plants in particular. We compared species richness in continuously grazed and abandoned grasslands in different commonplace rural landscapes in Sweden, and analysed effects of isolation and area in three time-steps (100 and 50 years ago and today). Old cadastral maps and aerial photographs were used to analyse past and present landscape patterns in 25 sites. Two plant diversity measures were investigated; total species richness and species density. During the last 100 years grassland area and connectivity have been reduced by about 90%. Present-day habitat area was positively related to total species richness in both habitats. There was also a relationship to habitat area 50 years ago for continuously grazed grasslands. Only present management was related to species density: continuously grazed grasslands had the highest species density. There were no relationships between grassland connectivity, present or past, and any diversity measure. We conclude that landscape history is not directly important for present-day plant diversity patterns in ordinary landscapes, although past grassland management is a prerequisite for the grassland habitats that can be found there today. It is important that studies are conducted, not only in very diverse landscapes, but also in managed landscapes in order to assess the effects of fragmentation on species.


Area-effects Biological diversity Extinction Historical ecology Landscape change Management Old maps Remnants Resilience Thresholds 


  1. Ågren J (1996) Population size, pollinator limitation, and seed set in the self-incompatible herb Lythrum salicaria. Ecology 77:1779–1790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Austrheim G, Olsson EGA, Grøntvedt E (1999) Land-use impact on plant communities in semi-natural grasslands of Budalen, central Norway. Biol Conserv 87:369–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bellemare J, Motzkin G, Foster DR (2002) Legacies of the agricultural past in the forested present: an assessment of historical land-use effects on rich mesic forests. J Biogeogr 29:1401–1420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bruun HH (2000a) Patterns of species richness in dry grassland patches in agricultural landscape. Ecography 23:641–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bruun HH (2000b) Deficit in community species richness as explained by area and isolation of sites. Divers Distribut 6:129–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bruun HH, Fritzboger B (2002) The past impact of livestock husbandry on dispersal of plant seeds in the landscape of Denmark. Ambio 31:425–431PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cousins SAO (2001) Analysis of land-cover transitions based on 17th and 18th century cadastral maps and aerial photographs. Landscape Ecol 16:41–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cousins SAO (2006) Plant species richness in midfield islets and road verges—the effect of landscape fragmentation. Biol Conserv 127:500–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cousins SAO, Eriksson O (2001) The occurrence of plant biodiversity in a hemiboreal landscape: the effects of habitat and history. Ecography 24:461–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cousins SAO, Eriksson O (2002) The influence of management history and habitat on plant species richness in a rural hemiboreal landscape. Sweden. Landscape Ecol 17:517–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cousins SAO, Lavorel S, Davies I (2003) Modelling effects of landscape patterns and grazing regimes on the persistence of plant species with high conservation value in grasslands in south-eastern Sweden. Landscape Ecol 18:315–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Couvreur M, Christiaen B, Verheyen K, Hermy M (2004) Large herbivores as mobile links between isolated nature reserves through adhesive seed dispersal. Appl Veget Sci 7:229–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dauber J, Bengtsson J, Lenoir L (2006) Evaluating effects of habitat loss and land-use continuity on ant species richness in seminatural grassland remnants. Conserv Biol 20:1150–1160PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. de Blois S, Domon G, Bouchard A (2002) Landscape issues in plant ecology. Ecography 25:244–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Debinski DM, Holt RD (2000) A survey and overview of habitat fragmentation experiments. Conserv Biol 14:342–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dupré C, Ehrlén J (2002) Habitat configuration, species traits and plant distributions. J Ecol 90:796–805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Eriksson Å, Eriksson O (1997) Seedling recruitment in semi-natural pastures: the effects of disturbance, seed size, phenology and seed bank. Nordic J Bot 17:469–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Eriksson Å, Eriksson O, Berglund H (1995) Species abundance patterns of plants in Swedish semi-natural pastures. Ecography 18:310–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Eriksson O (1996) Regional dynamics of plants:a review of evidence for remnant. source-sink and meta-populations. Oikos 77:248–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Eriksson O, Ehrlén J (2001) Landscape fragmentation and the viability of plant populations. In: Silvertown J, Antonovics J (eds) Integrating ecology and evolution in a spatial context. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 157–175Google Scholar
  21. Eriksson O, Cousins SAO, Bruun HH (2002) Land use history and fragmentation of traditionally managed grasslands in Scandinavia. J Veget Sci 13:743–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ernoult A, Freiré-Diaz S, Langlois E, Alard D (2006) Are similar landscapes the result of similar histories? Landscape Ecol 21:631–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fischer M, Stöcklin J (1997) Local extinctions of plants in remnants of extensively used calcareous grasslands 1950–1985. Conserv Biol 11:727–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Foster DR (2002) Thoreau´s country: a historical-ecological perspective on conservation in the New England landscape. J Biogeogr 29:1537–1555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Grashof-Bokdam CJ, Geertsema W (1998) The effect of isolation on colonization patterns of plant species in secondary woodland. J Biogeogr 25:837–846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hanski I, Ovaskainen O (2002) Extinction debt at extinction threshold. Conserv Biol 16:666–673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hanski I (1999) Metapopulation Ecology. Oxford Series in Ecology and Evolution, Oxford University press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  28. Hansson M, Fogelfors H (2000) Management of a semi-natural grassland; results from a 15-year-old experiment in southern Sweden. J Veget Sci 11:31–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Harrison S, Bruna E (1999) Habitat fragmentation and large-scale conservation: what do we know for sure? Ecography 22:225–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Harrison S, Safford HD, Grace JB, Viers JH, Davies KF (2006) Regional and local species richness in an insular environment: serpentine plants in California. Ecol Monogr 76:41–56Google Scholar
  31. Hayes GF, Holl KD (2003) Cattle grazing impacts on annual forbs and vegetation composition of mesic grasslands in California. Conserv Biol 17:1694–1702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Helm A, Hanski I, Pärtel M (2006) Slow response of plant species richness to habitat loss and fragmentation. Ecol lett 9:72–77PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Hodkinson DJ, Thompson K (1997) Plant dispersal: the role of man. J Appl Ecol 34:1484–1496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hubbell SP (2001) The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Princeton University press, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  35. Krok OBN, Almquist S (2003) Svensk flora. Liber, FalköpingGoogle Scholar
  36. Kull K, Zobel M (1991) High species richness in an Estonian wooded meadow. J Veget Sci 2:711–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kumm KI (2005) Economically sustainable preservationof grazing-dependent biodiversity in Sweden with Canadian ranching systems. Outlook Agric 34:255–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Leach MK, Givnish TJ (1996) Ecological determinants of species loss in remnant prairies. Science 273:1555–1558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lennartsson T (2002) Extinction thresholds and disrupted plant-pollinator interactions in fragmented plant populations. Ecology 83:3060–3072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lindborg R, Ehrlén J (2002) Evaluating the extinction risk of a perennial herb—demographic data versus historical records. Conserv Biol 16:683–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lindborg R, Eriksson O (2004) Historical landscape connectivity affects present plant species diversity. Ecology 85:1840–1845Google Scholar
  42. Löfgren A, Jerling L (2002) Species richness, extinction and immigration rates of vascular plants on islands in the Stockholm Archipelago, Sweden, during a century of ceasing management. Folia Geobotanica 37:297–308Google Scholar
  43. Lovett-Doust J, Biernacki M, Page R, Chan M, Natgunarajah R, Timis G (2003) Effects of land ownership and landscape-level factors on rare-species richness in natural areas of southern Ontario, Canada. Landscape Ecol 18:621–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lunt ID, Spooner PG (2005) Using historical ecology to understand patterns of biodiversity in fragmented agricultural landscapes. J biogeogr 32:1859–1873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Luoto M, Rekolainen S, Aakkula J, Pykälä J (2003) Loss of plant species richness and habitat connectivity in grasslands associated with agricultural change in Finland. Ambio 32:447–452PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. MacArthur R, Wilson EO (1967) The theory of island biogeography. Princeton Univ. PressGoogle Scholar
  47. Maurer K, Durka W, Stöcklin J (2003) Frequency of plant species in remnants of calcareous grassland and their dispersal and persistence characteristics. Basic appl ecol 4:307–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McIntyre S, Hobbs R (1999) A framework for conceptualizing human effects on landscapes and its relevance to management and research models. Conserv Biol 13:1282–1292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. McIntyre S, McIvor JG, MacLeod N (2000) Principles for sustainable grazing in eucalypt woodlands: Landscape-scale indicators and the search for thresholds. In: Hale P, Petrie A, Moloney D, Sattler P (eds) Management for Sustainable Ecosystems. Centre for Conservation Biology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, pp 92–100Google Scholar
  50. Motzkin G, Eberhardt R, Hall B, Foster DR, Harrod J, MacDonald D (2002) Vegetation variation across Cape Cod, Massachusetts: environmental and historical determinants. J Biogeogr 29:1439–1454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Murphy HT, Lovett-Doust J (2004) Context and connectivity in plant metapopulations and landscape mosaics: does the matrix matter? Oikos 105:3–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Myklestad A, Saetersdal M (2003) Effects of reforestation and intensified land use on vascular plant species richness in traditionally managed hay meadows. Annales Botanici Fennici 40:423–441Google Scholar
  53. Oostermeijer JGB, Brugman ML, DeBoer ER, DenNijs HCM (1996) Temporal and spatial variation in the demography of Gentiana pneumonanthe, a rare perennial herb. J Ecol 84:153–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pärtel M, Zobel M (1999) Small-scale plant species richness in calcareous grassland determined by the species pool, community age and shoot density. Ecography 22:153–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pärtel M, Mändla R, Zobel M (1999) Landscape history of a calcareous (alvar) grassland in Hanila. western Estonia during the last three hundred years. Landscape Ecol 14:187–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Piessens K, Honnay O, Hermy M (2005) The role of fragment area and isolation in the conservation of heathland species. Biol Conserv 122:61–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Poschlod P, Bonn S (1998) Changing dispersal processes in the central European landscape since the last ice age: an explanation for the actual decrease of plant species richness in different habitats? Acta Bot Neerl 47:27–44Google Scholar
  58. Poschlod P, WallisDeVries MF (2002) The historical and socioeconomic perspective of calcareous grasslands—lessons from the distant and recent past. Biol Conserv 104:361–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pykälä J (2003) Effects of restoration with cattle grazing on plant species composition and richness of semi-natural grasslands. Biodivers Conserv 12:2211–2226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Safford HD, Harrison SP (2001) Grazing and substrate interact to affect native vs. exotic diversity in roadside grasslands. Ecol Appl 11:1112–1122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Soulé ME (1987) Viable populations for conservation. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  62. Stromberg MR, Griffin JR (1996) Long-term patterns in coastal California grasslands in relation to cultivation, gophers, and grazing. Ecol Appl 6:1189–1211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Tilman DR, May M, Lehman CL, Nowak MA (1994) Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature 371:65–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Turnbull LA, Crawley MJ, Rees M (2000) Are plant populations seed-limited? A review of seed sowing experiments. Oikos 88:225–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Van Groenendael JM, Ouborg NJ, Hendriks JJ (1998) Criteria for the introduction of plant species. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 47:3–13Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sara A. O. Cousins
    • 1
    • 2
  • Helena Ohlson
    • 1
  • Ove Eriksson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BotanyStockholm UniversityStockholmSweden
  2. 2.Department of Physical Geography and Quaternary GeologyStockholm UniversityStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations