Landscape Ecology

, Volume 21, Issue 8, pp 1195–1205 | Cite as

Interactions between plant life span, seed dispersal capacity and fecundity determine metapopulation viability in a dynamic landscape

Research Article

Abstract

Classical metapopulation models do not account for temporal changes in the suitability of habitat patches. In reality, however, the carrying capacity of most habitat types is not constant in time due to natural succession processes. In this study, we modeled plant metapopulation persistence in a successional landscape with disappearing and emerging habitat patches, based on a realistic dune slack landscape at the Belgian–French coast. We focused on the effects of the variation of different plant traits on metapopulation persistence in this changing landscape. Therefore, we used a stage based stochastic metapopulation model implemented in RAMAS/Metapop, simulating a large variation in plant traits but keeping landscape characteristics such as patch turnover rate and patch lifespan constant. The results confirm the conclusions of earlier modeling work that seed dispersal distance and seed emigration rate both have an important effect on metapopulation persistence. We also found that high population growth rate or high recruitment considerably decreased the extinction risk of the metapopulation. Additionally, a long plant life span had a strong positive effect on metapopulation persistence, irrespective of the plant's dispersal capacity and population growth rate. Plant species that invest in life span require less investment in offspring and dispersal capacity to avoid extinction, even in dynamic landscapes with deterministic changes in habitat quality. Moreover, metapopulations of long-lived plant species were found to be much less sensitive to high levels of environmental stochasticity than short-lived species.

Keywords

Clonality Extinction risk Population growth rate RAMAS/Metapop Seed dispersal Stage structured model 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Akçakaya, H.R., Root, W. 2002RAMAS Metapop: Viability Analysis for Stagestructured Metapopulations (version 4.0)Applied Biomathematics SetauketNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Akçakaya, H.R., Radeloff, V.C., Mladenoff, D.J., He, H.S. 2004Integrating landscape and metapopulation modeling approaches: viability of the sharptailed grouse in a dynamic landscapeConserv. Biol. 18526537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amarasekare, P., Possingham, H. 2001Patch dynamics and metapopulation theory: the case of successional speciesJ. Theor. Biol. 209333344PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baguette, M. 2004The Classical metapopulation theory and the real, natural world: a critical appraisalBasic Appl Ecol5213224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bossuyt, B., Honnay, O., Hermy, M. 2003An island biogeographical view of succession in a chronosequence of wet dune slacksJ. Veg. Sci.14781788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boughton, D., Malvadar, U. 2002Extinction risk in successional landscapes subject to catastrophic disturbancesConserv. Ecol.62(online) URL: http://www.consecol.org/vol6/iss2/art2Google Scholar
  7. Brachet, S., Olivieri, I., Godelle, G., Klein, E., Frascaria-Lacoste, N., Goyon, P.H. 1999Dispersal and metapopulation viability in a heterogeneous landscapeJ. Theor. Biol.198479495PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown, J.H., Kodrick Brown, A. 1977Turnover rates in insular biogeography: effects of immigration on extinctionEcology58445449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Drake, J.M., Lodge, D.M. 2004Effects of environmental variation on extinction and establishmentEcol. Lett.72630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Durrett, R., Levin, S.A. 1994The importance of being discrete (and spatial)Theor. Pop. Biol.46363394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ehrlén, J., Groenendael, J.M. 1998The tradeoff between dispersability and longevity – an important aspect of plant species diversityAppl. Veg. Sci.12936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ehrlén, J., Lehtilä, K. 2002How perennial are perennial plants?Oikos98308322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ehrlén, J., Eriksson, O. 2003Large scale spatial dynamics of plants: a response to Freckleton and WatkinsonJ. Ecol.91316320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ellner, S.P., Fussmann, G. 2003Effects of successional dynamics on metapopulation persistenceEcology84882889Google Scholar
  15. Eriksson, O. 1994Stochastic population dynamics of clonal plants: numerical experiments with ramet and genet modelsEcol. Res.9257268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eriksson, O. 1996Regional dynamics of plants: a review of evidence for remnant sourcesink and metapopulationsOikos77248258Google Scholar
  17. Eriksson, O. 2000Functional roles of remnant populations in communities and ecosystemsGlobal Ecol. Biogeogr.9443449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Eriksson, O., Ehrlén, J. 2001

    Landscape fragmentation and the viability of plant populations

    Silvertown, J.Antonovics, J. eds. Integrating Ecology and Evolution in a Spatial ContextBlackwell ScienceOxford157174
    Google Scholar
  19. Freckleton, R.P., Watkinson, A.R. 2002Large scale spatial dynamics of plants: metapopulations regional ensembles and patchy populationsJ. Ecol.90419434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Freckleton, R.P., Watkinson, A.R. 2003Are all plant populations metapopulations?J. Ecol.91321324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hanski, I. 1994A practical model of metapopulation dynamicsJ. Anim. Ecol.63151162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hastings, A. 2003Metapopulation persistence with age dependent disturbance or successionScience30115251526PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Honnay, O., Bossuyt, B. 2005Prolonged clonal growth: escape route or route to extinction?Oikos108427432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Husband, B.C., Barrett, S.C.H. 1996A metapopulation perspective in plant population biologyJ Ecol84461469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Johnson, M.P. 2000The influence of patch demographics on metapopulations with particular reference to successional landscapesOikos886774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Johst, K., Brandl, R., Eber, S. 2002Metapopulation persistence in dynamic landscapes: the role of dispersal distanceOikos98263270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Keymer, J.E., Marquet, P.A., Velasco-Hernandez, J.X., Levin, S.A. 2000Extinction thresholds and metapopulation persistence in dynamic landscapesAm. Nat.156478494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kneitel, J.M., Chase, J.M. 2004Tradeoffs in community ecology: linking spatial scales and species coexistenceEcol. Lett.76980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Levins, R. 1969Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological controlBull. Entomol. Soc. Am.15237240Google Scholar
  30. Lindborg, A., Eriksson, O. 2004Historical landscape connectivity affects present plant species diversityEcology8518401845Google Scholar
  31. Matlack, G., Monde, J. 2004Consequences of low mobility in spatially and temporally heterogeneous ecosystemsJ. Ecol.9210251035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Olivieri, I., Michalakis, Y., Gouyon, P.H. 1995Metapopulation genetics and the evolution of dispersalAm. Nat.146202228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ouborg, N.J., Eriksson, O. 2004

    Toward a metapolation concept for plants

    Hanski, I.Gaggiotti, O. eds. Ecology Genetics and Evolution of MetapopulationsElsevier Academic PressBurlington447469
    Google Scholar
  34. Perry, J.N., Gonzalez Andujar, J.L. 1993Dispersal in a metapopulation neighbourhood model of an annual plant with a seedbankJ. Ecol.81453463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ronce, O., Olivieri, I. 1997Evolution of reproductive effort in a metapopulation with local extinctions and ecological successionAm. Nat.150220249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Verheyen, K., Vellend, M., Calster, H., Peterken, G., Hermy, M. 2004Metapopulation dynamics in changing landscapes: a new spatiallyrealistic model applied to forest plants in central Lincolnshire United KingdomEcology8533023312Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Terrestrial Ecology Unit, Department of BiologyUniversity of GhentGentBelgium
  2. 2.Division of Plant Systematics and Ecology, Department of BiologyKULeuvenHeverleeBelgium

Personalised recommendations