Landscape Ecology

, Volume 21, Issue 7, pp 989–1001 | Cite as

Occurrence pattern of Pararge aegeria (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) with respect to local habitat suitability, climate and landscape structure

  • Oliver Schweiger
  • Carsten F. Dormann
  • Debra Bailey
  • Mark Frenzel
Research article

Abstract

Distribution patterns of wild species are affected by environmental variables, such as climate, anthropogenic land use or habitat quality, which act simultaneously at different scales. To examine the relative importance of particular factors and scales on population response we investigated the speckled wood butterfly Pararge aegeria (L.) as a model organism occupying semi-natural habitats. Its distribution was recorded in 23 study sites (5×5 km) over a 2 year study period. The sites were located in agricultural landscapes within seven Temperate European countries. Environmental predictors were mapped at a local and a regional scale. Logistic regression models were then developed to represent humid (beneficial) and dry (adverse) weather conditions during larval development. The humid year model predicted that P. aegeria is equally but generally not very dependent on local and regional factors, resulting in generally high occurrence probabilities. In contrast, the dry year model predicted severe restrictions of P. aegeria to both high quality patches and landscapes with beneficial structural and climatic preconditions. As both models resulted in entirely different predictions, our study showed that the sensitivity of P. aegeria to local and landscape features might change, and that factors of less importance could easily become limiting factors. The results stress that high quality landscape is important at both the local and regional scale even for species that are considered relatively robust. They also sound a note of caution when predictions about population response for management purposes are based on just a single or a few year(s) of observation.

Key words

Butterfly Distribution Fragmentation Habitat quality Logistic regression Occurrence probability Predictive habitat model 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baguette, M., Mennechez, G., Petit, S., Schtickzelle, N. 2003Effect of habitat fragmentation on dispersal in the butterfly Proclossiana eunomiaComptes Rendus Biologies326200209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Breslow, N.E., Clayton, D.G. 1993Approximate inference in generalized linear mixed modelsJ. Am. Stat. Assoc.88925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brunzel, S. 2002Experimental density-related emigration in the cranberry fritillary Boloria aquilonarisJ. Insect Behav.15739750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bugter, R.J.F, Burel, F., Cerny, M., Edwards, P.J., Herzog, F., Maelfait, J.P., Klotz, S., Simova, P., Smulders, R., Zobel, M. 2001

    Vulnerability of biodiversity in the agro-ecosystems as influenced by green veining and land-use intensity: the EU project GREENVEINS

    Mander, U.Printsmann, A.Palang, H. eds. Development of European landscapes. Proceedings of the International Association for Landscape EcologyPublicationes Instituti Geographici Universitatis Tartuensis 92Tartu632637
    Google Scholar
  5. Chardon, J.P., Adriaensen, F., Matthysen, E. 2003Incorporating landscape elements into a connectivity measure: a case study for the Speckled wood butterfly (Pararge aegeria L.)Landscape Ecol.18561573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cowley, M.J.R., Thomas, C.D., Thomas, J.A., Warren, M.S. 1999Flight areas of British butterflies: assessing species status and declineProc. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. B – Biol. Sci.26615871592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cowley, M.J.R., Wilson, R.J., Leon-Cortes, J.L., Gutierrez, D., Bulman, C.R., Thomas, C.D. 2000Habitat-based statistical models for predicting the spatial distribution of butterflies and day-flying moths in a fragmented landscapeJ. Appl. Ecol.376072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crawley, M.J. 2002Statistical Computing: An Introduction to Data Analysis using S-PlusJohn Wiley & SonsChichesterGoogle Scholar
  9. Cumming, G.S. 2000Using between-model comparisons to fine-tune linear models of species rangesJ. Biogeogr.27441455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cushman, S.A., McGarigal, K. 2002Hierarchical, multi-scale decomposition of species-environment relationshipsLandscape Ecol.17637646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davies, N.B. 1978Territorial defence in the speckled wood butterfly (Pararge aegeria): The resident always winsAnim. Behav.26138147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Duelli, P. 1997Biodiversity evaluation in agricultural landscapes: an approach at two different scalesAgri. Ecosyst. Environ.628191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ebert, G., Rennwald, E. 1991Die Schmetterlinge Baden-Württembergs: Tagfalter IIUlmerStuttgart (Hohenheim)Google Scholar
  14. ESRI ArcGIS. [8.x] 2003. Redlands. Environmental Systems Research InstituteCalifornia. Google Scholar
  15. Fielding, A.H., Bell, J.F. 1997A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence modelsEnviron. Conserv.243849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gaston, K.J., Blackburn, T.M. 1999A critique for macroecologyOikos84353368Google Scholar
  17. Gibson, L.A., Wilson, B.A., Cahill, D.M., Hill, J. 2004Spatial prediction of rufous bristlebird habitat in a costal heathland: a GIS-based approachJ. Appl. Ecol.41213223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hanski, I. 1999Habitat connectivity, habitat continuity, and metapopulations in dynamic landscapesOikos87209219Google Scholar
  19. Hanski, I., Gilpin, E.M. 1997Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics, and EvolutionAcademic PressLondonGoogle Scholar
  20. Hanski, I., Ovaskainen, O. 2000The metapopulation capacity of a fragmented landscapeNature404755758PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Herzog F., Steiner B., Bailey D., Baudry J., Billeter R., Bukáèek R., de Blust G., de Cook R., Dirksen J., Dormann C.F., de Filippi R., Frossard E., Liira J., Schmidt T., Stöckli R., Thenal C., van Wingerden W. and Bugter R. 2006. Assessing the intensity of temperate European agriculture at the landscape scale. Eur. J. Agron. 24: 165–181.Google Scholar
  22. Hesselbarth, G., Oorschot, H., Wagener, S. 1995Die Tagfalter der TürkeiSelbstverlag Sigbert WagenerBocholtGoogle Scholar
  23. Hill, J.K., Collingham, Y.C., Thomas, C.D., Blakeley, D.S., Fox, R., Moss, D., Huntley, B. 2001Impacts of landscape structure on butterfly range expansionEcol. Lett.4313321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hill, J.K., Thomas, C.D., Huntley, B. 1999Climate and habitat availability determine 20th century changes in a butterfly's range marginProc. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. B – Biol. Sci.26611971206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hirzel, A., Guisan, A. 2002Which is the optimal sampling strategy for habitat suitability modellingEcol. Model.157331341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. IPCC1998The Regional Impacts of Climate Change: An Assessment of VulnerabilityCambridge University PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  27. Jeanneret, P., Schupbach, B., Luka, H. 2003Quantifying the impact of landscape and habitat features on biodiversity in cultivated landscapesAgri. Ecosyst. Environ.98311320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kuussaari, M., Nieminen, M., Hanski, I. 1996An experimental study of migration in the Glanville fritillary butterfly Melitaea cinxiaJ. Anim. Ecol.65791801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lawton, J.H. 1996Patterns in ecologyOikos75145147Google Scholar
  30. Legates, D.R., Willmott, C.J. 1990aMean seasonal and spatial variability global surface air temperatureTheor. Appl. Climatol.411121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Legates, D.R., Willmott, C.J. 1990bMean seasonal and spatial variability in gauge-correctedglobal precipitationInt. J. Climatol.10111127Google Scholar
  32. Legendre, P., Legendre, L. 1998Numerical EcologyElsevierAmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  33. Leon-Cortes, J.L., Cowley, M.J.R., Thomas, C.D. 1999Detecting decline in a formerly widespread species: how common is the common blue butterfly Polyommatus icarus?Ecography22643650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Manel, S., Williams, H.C., Ormerod, S.J. 2001Evaluating presence-absence models in ecology: the need to account for prevalenceJ. Appl. Ecol.38921931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mac Nally, R. 2000Regression and model-building in conservation biology, biogeography and ecology: the distinction between – and reconciliation of – ‘predictive’ and ‘explanatory’ modelsBiodiv. Conserv.9655671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mac Nally, R. 2002Multiple regression and inference in ecology and conservation biology: further comments on identifying important predictor variablesBiodiv. Conserv.1113971401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McGarigal, K., Marks, B.J. 1995FRAGSTATS: Spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structureGen. Tech. RepPortlandOregon, USAPNW-GTR-351.Google Scholar
  38. Mennechez, G., Petit, S., Schtickzelle, N., Baguette, M. 2004Modelling mortality and dispersal: consequences of parameter generalisation on metapopulation dynamicsOikos106243252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Merckx, T., Dyck, H. 2005Mate location behavior of the butterfly Pararge aegeria in woodland and fragmented landscapesAnim. Behav.70411416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Merckx, T., Van Dyck, H., Karlsson, B., Leimar, O. 2003The evolution of movements and behavior at boundaries in different landscapes: a common arena experiment with butterfliesProc. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. B – Biol. Sci.27018151821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Opdam, P., Verboom, J., Pouwels, R. 2003Landscape cohesion: an index for the conservation potential of landscapes for biodiversityLandscape Ecol.18113126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Parmesan, C., Ryrholm, N., Stefanescu, C., Hill, J.K., Thomas, C.D., Descimon, H., Huntley, B., Kaila, L., Kullberg, J., Tammaru, T., Tennent, W.J., Thomas, J.A., Warren, M. 1999Poleward shifts in geographical ranges of butterfly species associated with regional warmingNature399579583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Peterson, T.C., Vose, R.S. 1997An overview of the global historical climatology network temperature data baseBull. Am. Meteorol. Soc.7828372849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Petit, S., Moilanen, A., Hanski, I., Baguette, M. 2001Metapopulation dynamics of the bog fritillary butterfly: movements between habitat patchesOikos92491500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pollard, E. 1988Temperaturerainfall and butterfly numbersJ. Appl. Ecol.25819828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pollard, E., Rothery, P., Yates, T.J. 1996Annual growth rates in newly established populations of the butterfly Pararge aegeriaEcol. Entomol.21365369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Quinn, G.P., Keough, M.J. 2002Experimental Design and Data Analyses for BiologistsCambridge University PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  48. R Development Core Team2004R: A language and environment for statistical computingR Foundation for Statistical ComputingViennaAustriaGoogle Scholar
  49. Roy, D.B., Rothery, P., Moss, D., Pollard, E., Thomas, J.A. 2001Butterfly numbers and weather: predicting historical trends in abundance and the future effects of climate changeJ. Anim. Ecol.70201217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rushton, S.P., Ormerod, S.J., Kerby, G. 2004New paradigms for modelling species distributions?J. Appl. Ecol.41193200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sakamoto, Y., Ishiguro, M., Kitagawa, G. 1986Akaike Information Criterion StatisticsD. Reidel Publishing CompanyDordrecht/TokyoGoogle Scholar
  52. Shreeve, T.G. 1984Habitat selection, mate location, and microclimatic constrains on the activity of the speckled wood butterfly Pararge aegeriaOikos42371377Google Scholar
  53. Shreeve, T.G. 1986aEgg-laying by the speckled wood butterfly (Pararge aegeria): the role of female behaviorhost plant abundance and temperatureEcol. Entomol.11229236Google Scholar
  54. Shreeve, T.G. 1986bThe effect of weather on the life cycle of the speckled wood butterfly Pararge aegeriaEcol. Entomol.11325332Google Scholar
  55. Shreeve, T.G. 1992

    Monitoring butterfly movements

    Dennis, R.L.H. eds. The Ecology of Butterflies in BrittainOxfordOxford University Press120138
    Google Scholar
  56. Shreeve, T.G. 1995

    Butterfly mobility

    Pullin, A.S. eds. Ecology and the Conservation of ButterfliesChapman and HallLondon3745
    Google Scholar
  57. Shreeve, T.G., Dennis, R.L.H., Dyck, H. 2004Resources, habitats and metapopulations – whither reality?Oikos106404408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Settele, J. 1999Die Tagfalter DeutschlandsUlmerStuttgardGoogle Scholar
  59. Summerville, K.S., Crist, T.O. 2001Effects of experimental habitat fragmentation on patch use by butterflies and skippers (Lepidoptera)Ecology8213601370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Thomas, C.D., Abery, J.C.G. 1995Estimating rates of butterfly decline from distribution maps – the effect of scaleBiol. Conserv.735965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Thomas, C.D., Hanski, I. 1997

    Butterfly metapopulations

    Hanski, I.Gilpin, M.E. eds. Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics, and EvolutionAcademic PressLondon359386
    Google Scholar
  62. Thomas, C.D., Kunin, W.E. 1999The spatial structure of populationsJ. Anim. Ecol.68647657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Thomas, J.A., Telfer, M.G., Roy, D.B., Preston, C.D., Greenwood, J.J.D., Asher, J., Fox, R., Clarke, R.T., Lawton, J.H. 2004Comparative losses of British butterflies, birds, and plants and the global extinction crisisScience30318791881PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Tilman, D., Kareiva, P. 1997Spatial EcologyPrinceton University PressPrincetonGoogle Scholar
  65. Dyck, H., Matthysen, E., Dhondt, A.A. 1997The effect of wing colour on male behavioural strategies in the speckled wood butterflyAnim. Behav.533951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Venables, W.N., Ripley, B.D. 2002Modern Applied Statistics with S. 4th edSpringerNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  67. Wagner, H.H., Wildi, O., Ewald, K.C. 2000Additive partitioning of plant species diversity in an agricultural mosaic landscapeLandscape Ecol.15219227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Warren, M.S., Hill, J.K., Thomas, J.A., Asher, J., Fox, R., Huntley, B., Roy, D.B., Telfer, M.G., Jeffcoate, S., Harding, P., Jeffcoate, G., Willis, S.G., Greatorex-Davies, J.N., Moss, D., Thomas, C.D. 2001Rapid respones of British butterflies to opposing forces of climate and habitat changeNature4146569PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wettstein, W., Schmid, B. 1999Conservation of arthropod diversity in montane wetlands: effect of altitudehabitat quality and habitat fragmentation on butterflies and grasshoppersJ. Appl. Ecol.36363373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Wiklund, C., Persson, A. 1983Fecundity, and the relation of egg weight variation to offspring fitness in the speckled wood butterfly Pararge aegeriaor why don’t butterfly females lay more eggs?Oikos405363Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Oliver Schweiger
    • 1
  • Carsten F. Dormann
    • 2
  • Debra Bailey
    • 3
  • Mark Frenzel
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Community EcologyUFZ – Centre for Environmental Research Leipzig-HalleHalleGermany
  2. 2.Department of Applied Landscape EcologyUFZ – Centre for Environmental Research Leipzig-HalleLeipzigGermany
  3. 3.FAL Swiss Federal Research Station for Agroecology and AgricultureZürichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations