Landscape Ecology

, Volume 21, Issue 6, pp 821–836 | Cite as

Genetic analysis of landscape connectivity in tree populations

Research Article

Abstract

Genetic connectivity in plant populations is determined by gene movement within and among populations. When populations become genetically isolated, they are at risk of loss of genetic diversity that is critical to the long-term survival of populations. Anthropogenic landscape change and habitat fragmentation have become so pervasive that they may threaten the genetic connectivity of many plant species. The theoretical consequences of such changes are generally understood, but it is not immediately apparent how concerned we should be for real organisms, distributed across real landscapes. Our goals here are to describe how one can study gene movement of both pollen and seeds in the context of changing landscapes and to explain what we have learned so far. In the first part, we will cover methods of describing pollen movement and then review evidence for the impact of fragmentation in terms of both the level of pollen flow into populations and the genetic diversity of the resulting progeny. In the second part, we will describe methods for contemporary seed movement, and describe findings about gene flow and genetic diversity resulting from seed movement. Evidence for pollen flow suggests high connectivity, but it appears that seed dispersal into fragments may create genetic bottlenecks due to limited seed sources. Future work should address the interaction of pollen and seed flow and attention needs to be paid to both gene flow and the diversity of the incoming gene pool. Moreover, if future work is to model the impact of changing landscapes on propagule movement, with all of its ensuing consequences for genetic connectivity and demographic processes, we will need an effective integration of population genetics and landscape ecology.

Keywords

Gene flow Genetic diversity Genetic structure Habitat fragmentation Isolation Landscape connectivity Pollen dispersal Seed dispersal 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abramowitz, M., Stegun, I.A. 1964Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs and Mathematical TablesU.S. Govt. Print. OfficeWashingtonGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams, W.T., Griffin, A.R., Moran, G.F. 1992Using paternity analysis to measure effective pollen dispersal in plant populationsAm. Natural.140762780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aldrich, P.R., Hamrick, J.L. 1998Reproductive dominance of pasture trees in fragmented tropical forest mosaicScience281103105PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Austerlitz, F., Garnier-Gere, P.H. 2003Modeling the impact of colonisation on genetic diversity and differentiation of forest trees: interaction of life cyclepollen flow and seed long-distance dispersalHeredity90282290PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Austerlitz, F., Smouse, P.E. 2001Two-generation analysis of pollen flow across a landscape. II. Relation between τpollen dispersal and interfemale distanceGenetics157851857PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Austerlitz, F., Smouse, P.E. 2002Two-generation analysis of pollen flow across a landscape. IV. Estimating the dispersal parameterGenetics161355363PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Austerlitz, F., Dick, C.W., Dutech, C., Klein, E.K., Oddou-Muratorio, S., Smouse, P.E., Sork, V.L. 2004Using genetic markers to estimate the pollen dispersal curveMol. Ecol.13937954PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berry, O., Tocher, M.D., Sarre, S.D. 2004Can assignment tests measure dispersal?Mol. Ecol.13551561PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bossema, I. 1979Jays and oaks – eco-ethological study of a symbiosisBehaviour701117Google Scholar
  10. Brookshire, B., Hauser, C. 1993

    The Missouri forest ecosystem project

    Gillespie, A.R.Parker, G.R.Pope, P.E.Rink, G. eds. Proceedings of the 9th Central Hardwood Forest ConferenceUSDA, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment StationSt. Paul, Minnessota289306General Technical Report NC-161
    Google Scholar
  11. Burczyk, J., Adams, W.T., Moran, G.F., Griffin, A.R. 2002Complex patterns of mating revealed in a Eucalyptus regnans seed orchard using allozyme markers and the neighbourhood modelMol. Ecol.1123792391PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Burczyk, J., Chybicki, I.J. 2004Cautions on direct gene flow estimation in plant populationsEvolution58956963PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Burczyk, J., DiFazio, S.P., Adams, W.T. 2004Gene flow in forest trees: how far do genes really travel?Forest Genet.11179192Google Scholar
  14. Clark, J.S. 1998Why trees migrate so fast: confronting theory with dispersal biology and the paleorecordAm. Natural.152204224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cockerham, C.C., Weir, B.S. 1993Estimation of gene flow from F-statisticsEvolution47855863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cornuet, J.M., Piry, S., Luikart, G., Estoup, A., Solignac, M. 1999New methods employing multilocus genotypes to select or exclude populations as origins of individualsGenetics15319892000PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Dalling, J.W., Muller-Landau, H.C., Wright, S.J., Hubbell, S.P. 2002Role of dispersal in the recruitment limitation of Neotropical pioneer speciesJ. Ecol.90714727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Darley-Hill, S., Johnson, W.C. 1981Acorn dispersal by the blue jay Cyanocitta cristataOecologia50231232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Davis, M.B. 1981

    Quaternary history and the stability of forest communities

    West, D.C.Shugart, H.H.Botkin, D.B. eds. Forest Succession: Concepts and ApplicationSpringer-VerlagNew York132153
    Google Scholar
  20. Devlin, B., Ellstrand, N.C. 1990The development and application of a refined method for estimating gene flow from angiosperm paternity analysisEvolution44248259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dick, C.W., Etchelecu, G., Austerlitz, F. 2003Pollen dispersal of Neotropical trees (Dinizia excelsa: Fabaceae) by native insects and African honeybees in pristine and fragmented Amazonian rainforestMol. Ecol.12753764PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dow, B.D., Ashley, M.V. 1996Microsatellite analysis of seed dispersal and parentage of saplings in bur oak, Quercus macrocarpaMol. Ecol.5615627Google Scholar
  23. Dunphy, B.K., Hamrick, J.L., Schwagerl, J. 2004A comparison of direct and indirect measures of gene flow in the bat-pollinated tree Hymenaea courbaril in the dry forest life zone of southwestern Puerto RicoInt. J. Plant Sci.165427436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dyer R.J. 2002. Contemporary pollen movement in shortleaf pine, Pinus echinata Mill. Ph.D. Dissertion. Department of Biology, University of Missouri-St. Louis, 140 pp.Google Scholar
  25. Ellstrand, N.C. 1984Multiple paternity within the fruits of the wild radish Raphanus sativusAm. Natural.123819828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ellstrand, N.C., Elam, D.R. 1993Population genetics of small population size: implications for plant conservationAnnu. Rev. Ecol. Syst.23217242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Epperson, B.K. 2003Geographical GeneticsPrinceton University PressPrincetonGoogle Scholar
  28. Essen-Moller, E. 1938Die Beweiskraft der Ähnlichkeit im VatershaftsnachweisTheoretische Grundlagen. Mitt. Anthropol. Ges. Wien68953Google Scholar
  29. Excoffier, L., Smouse, P.E., Quattro, J.M. 1992Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction dataGenetics131479491PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Fernández-M J.J. and Sork V.L. 2005. Mating patterns of a subdivided population of the Andean oak (Quercus humboldtii Bonpl. Fagaceae). J. Hered.Google Scholar
  31. Fernández-M J.J. and Sork V.L. Patterns of genetic variation in fragmented forest stands of the Andean oak Quercus humboldtii Bonpl. (Fagaceae). Biotropica (in press).Google Scholar
  32. Frankham, R., Ballou, J.D., Briscoe, D.A. 2002Introduction to Conservation GeneticsCambridge University PressCambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  33. Fuchs, E.J., Lobo, J.A., Quesada, M. 2003Effects of forest fragmentation and flowering phenology on the reproductive success and mating patterns of the tropical dry forest tree Pachira quinataConserv. Biol.17149157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gerber, S., Chabrier, P., Kremer, A. 2003FAMOZ: a software for parentage analysis using dominantcodominant and uniparentally inherited markersMol. Ecol. Notes3479481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Godoy, J.A., Jordano, P. 2001Seed dispersal by animals: exact identification of source trees with endocarp DNA microsatellitesMol. Ecol.1022752283PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Grivet, D., Sork, V.L., Smouse, P.E. 2005A novel approach to an old problem: tracking dispersed seedsMol. Ecol.1435853595PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hamrick, J.L. 2004Response of forest trees to global environmental changesForest Ecol. Manage.197323335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hamrick, J.L., Nason, J.D. 2000

    Gene flow in forest trees

    Boyle, T.J.B.Young, A.Boshier, D. eds. Forest Conservation Genetics: Principles and PracticeCIFOR and CSIROAustralia8190
    Google Scholar
  39. Harrison, S., Hastings, A. 1996Genetic and evolutionary consequences of metapopulation structureTrends Ecol. Evol.11180183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. He, T.H., Krauss, S.L., Lamont, B.B., Miller, B.P., Enright, N.J. 2004Long-distance seed dispersal in a metapopulation of Banksia hookeriana inferred from a population allocation analysis of amplified fragment length polymorphism dataMol. Ecol.1310991109PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Holderegger R., Kamm U. and Gugerli F. The meaning of genetic diversity. Landscape Ecol.Google Scholar
  42. Irwin, A.J., Hamrick, J.L., Godt, M.J.W., Smouse, P.E. 2003A multi-year estimate of the effective pollen donor pool for Albizia julibrissinHeredity90187194PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. James, T., Vege, S., Aldrich, P., Hamrick, J.L. 1998Mating systems of three tropical dry forest tree speciesBiotropica30587594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kabrick, J.M., Jensen, R.G., Shifley, S.R., Larsen, D.R. 2002

    Wood vegetation following even-ageduneven-agedand no-harvest treatments on the Missouri Ozark Forest Ecosystem Project sites

    Shifley, S.R.Kabrick, J.M. eds. Proc. Second Missouri Ozark Forest Ecosystem Symposium: Post-treatment Results of the Landscape Experiment; 2000 October 17–18; St. Louis, MOU.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service North Central Forest Experiment StationSt. Paul, MN84101Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-227
    Google Scholar
  45. LeCorre, V., Machon, N., Petit, R.J., Kremer, A. 1997Colonization with long-distance seed dispersal and genetic structure of maternally inherited genes in forest trees: a simulation studyGenet. Res.69117125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ledig, F.T. 1992Human impacts on genetic diversity in forest ecosystemsOikos6387108Google Scholar
  47. Manel, S., Gaggiotti, O.E., Waples, R.S. 2005Assignment methods: matching biological questions with appropriate techniquesTrends Ecol. Evol.20136142PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Manel, S., Schwartz, M.K., Luikart, G., Taberlet, P. 2003Landscape genetics: combining landscape ecology and population geneticsTrends Ecol. Evol.18189197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Marshall, T.C., Slate, J., Kruuk, L.E.B., Pemberton, J.M. 1998Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populationsMol. Ecol.7639655PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. McLachlan, J.S., Clark, J.S., Manos Paul, S. 2005Molecular indicators of tree migration capacity under rapid climate changeEcology8620882098Google Scholar
  51. Meagher, T.R., Thompson, E. 1987Analysis of parentage for naturally established seedlings of Chamaelirium luteum LiliaceaeEcology68803812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Nason, J.D., Hamrick, J.L. 1997Reproductive and genetic consequences of forest fragmentation: two case studies of Neotropical canopy treesJ. Hered.88264276Google Scholar
  53. Nason, J.D., Herre, E.A., Hamrick, J.L. 1996Paternity analysis of the breeding structure of strangler fig populations: evidence for substantial long-distance wasp dispersalJ. Biogeogr.23501512Google Scholar
  54. Paetkau, D., Slade, R., Burden, M., Estoup, A. 2004Genetic assignment methods for the directreal-time estimation of migration rate: a simulation-based exploration of accuracy and powerMol. Ecol.135565PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Peakall, R., Smouse, P.E., Huff, D.R. 1995Evolutionary implications of allozyme and RAPD variation in diploid populations of dioecious buffalograss (Buchloë dactyloides (Nutt.) Engelm.)Mol. Ecol.4135147Google Scholar
  56. Pielou, E.C. 1979BiogeographyWiley-InterscienceNew York, New York, USAGoogle Scholar
  57. Pritchard, J.K., Stephens, M., Donnelly, P. 2000Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype dataGenetics155945959PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Rannala, B., Mountain, J.L. 1997Detecting immigration using multilocus genotypesProc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA9491979201PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ritland, K. 1989Correlated matings in the partial selfer Mimulus guttatusEvolution43848859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ritland, K. 1990A series of FORTRAN computer programs for estimating plant mating systemsJ. Hered.81235237Google Scholar
  61. Robledo-Arnuncio, J.J., Alía, R., Gil, L. 2004Increased selfing and correlated paternity in a small population of a predominantly outcrossing coniferPinus sylvestrisMol. Ecol.1325672577PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rocha, O.J., Aguilar, G. 2001Variation in the breeding behavior of the dry forest tree Enterolobium cyclocarpum (Guanacaste) in Costa RicaAm. J. Bot.8816001606Google Scholar
  63. Roeder, K., Devlin, B., Lindsay, B.G. 1989Applications of maximum likelihood methods to population genetic data for the estimation of individual fertilitiesBiometrics45363379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Russo, S.E., Augspurger, C.K. 2004Aggregated seed dispersal by spider monkeys limits recruitment to clumped patterns in Virola calophyllaEcol. Lett.710581067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Saunders, D.A., Hobbs, R.J., Margules, C.R. 1991Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: a reviewConserv. Biol.51832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Schnabel, A. 1998

    Parentage analysis in plants: mating systems, gene flow, and relative fitness

    Carvalho, G.R. eds. Advances in Molecular EcologyIOS PressBurke, Virginia, USA173189
    Google Scholar
  67. Schnabel, A., Nason, J., Hamrick, J. 1998Understanding the population genetic structure of Gleditsia triacanthos L.: seed dispersal and variation in female reproductive successMol. Ecol.7819832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Sezen, U.U., Chazdon, R.L., Holsinger, K.E. 2005Genetic consequences of tropical second-growth forest regenerationScience307891891PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Smouse, P.E., Chevillon, C. 1998Analytical aspects of population-specific DNA-fingerprinting for individualsJ. Hered.89143150PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Smouse, P.E., Dyer, R.J., Westfall, R.D., Sork, V.L. 2001Two-generation analysis of pollen flow across a landscape. I. Male gamete heterogeneity among femalesEvolution55260271PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Smouse, P.E., Meagher, T.R., Kobak, C.J. 1999Parentage analysis in Chamaelirium luteum (L.) Gray (Liliaceae): why do some males have higher reproductive contributions?J. Evol. Biol.1210691077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Smouse, P.E., Sork, V.L. 2004Measuring pollen flow in forest trees: a comparison of alternative approachesForest Ecol. Manage.1972138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Soons, M.B., Heil, G.W., Nathan, R., Katul, G.G. 2004Determinants of long-distance seed dispersal by wind in grasslandsEcology8530563068Google Scholar
  74. Sork, V.L., Nason, J., Campbell, D.R., Fernández, J.F. 1999Landscape approaches to historical and contemporary gene flow in plantsTrends Ecol. Evol.14219224PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Sork, V.L., Davis, F.W., Smouse, P.E., Apsit, V.J., Dyer, R.J., Fernandez, J.F., Kuhn, B. 2002Pollen movement in declining populations of California Valley oak, Quercus lobata: where have all the fathers gone?Mol. Ecol.1116571668PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Sork, V.L., Smouse, P.E., Apsit, V.J., Dyer, R.J., Westfall, R.D. 2005A two-generation analysis of pollen pool genetic structure in flowering dogwoodCornus florida (Cornaceae), in the Missouri OzarksAm. J. Bot.92262271Google Scholar
  77. Streiff, R., Ducousso, A., Lexer, C., Steinkellner, H., Gloessl, J., Kramer, A. 1999Pollen dispersal inferred from paternity analysis in a mixed oak stand of Quercus robur L. and Q. petraea (Matt.) LieblMol. Ecol.8831841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. White, G.M., Boshier, D.H., Powell, W. 2002Increased pollen flow counteracts fragmentation in a tropical dry forest: an example from Swietenia humilis ZuccariniProc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA9920382042PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Wright, S. 1943Isolation by distanceGenetics28114138Google Scholar
  80. Wright, S. 1946Isolation by distance under diverse systems of matingGenetics313959Google Scholar
  81. Wright, S.J., Duber, H.C. 2001Poachers and forest fragmentation alter seed dispersal, seed survival, and seedling recruitment in the palm Attalea butyraceaewith implications for tropical tree diversityBiotropica33583595Google Scholar
  82. Young, A.G., Boyle, T., Brown, T. 1996The population genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation for plantsTrends Ecol. Evol.11413418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Young, A.G.Clarke, G.M. eds. 2000Genetics, Demography, and Viability of Fragmented PopulationsCambridge University PressCambridge, UKGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology and Institute of the EnvironmentUniversity of California Los AngelesLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.Department of Ecology, Evolution & Natural ResourcesRutgers UniversityNew Brunswick

Personalised recommendations