Landscape Ecology

, Volume 20, Issue 3, pp 289–300 | Cite as

Landscape-level movements of North American elk (Cervus elaphus): effects of habitat patch structure and topography

Research article

Abstract

We examined movements of North American elk (Cervus elaphus) in northeastern Oregon, USA. Movement vectors at 449 locations over a 7762 ha area were calculated based on 16,724 sequential observations of 94 female elk-year combinations during spring (15 April–14 May) 1993, 1995, 1996. We calculated movement vectors at the start of morning and evening feeding bouts (0500, 1900 h) and during periods of least activity (0100, 1500 h). Here, we measured characteristics of habitat patches (habitat type, mean patch size, coefficient of variation in patch size, edge density, mean shape index, and mean nearest neighbor) at two levels of habitat grain (eight habitat types, two habitat types) and at three spatial scales (250, 500, and 1000 m) around each movement vector. We also measured topographic features around each vector including distance to nearest stream, direction of drainage, elevation, slope, and convexity (a measure of ridge top vs. valley bottom land form). We used mixed models adjusted for positive spatial correlation among vectors to examine the relationship between vector length, or speed of movement, and habitat patch characteristics, and between vector direction and topographic features. Speed of movements by elk were not related to characteristics of habitat patches that we measured. The direction of movement, however, was dependent on topography. Elk were more likely to move parallel to major drainages than perpendicular to them. Furthermore, elk were less likely to move perpendicular to drainages when close to the nearest stream, in valley bottoms vs. ridge tops, and on steep slopes. The dendritic nature of movements by elk with respect to topography may help elucidate ecosystem processes such as nutrient flows, nutrient cycling, and successional trajectories of plant communities.

Keywords

Dendritic Habitat Landscape structure Movements North American elk Patch 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ager, A.A., Johnson, B.K., Kern, J.W., Kie, J.G. 2003Daily and seasonal movements and habitat use of Rocky Mountain elk and mule deerJournal of Mammalogy8410761088CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Augustine, D.J., McNaughton, S.J. 1998Ungulate effects on the functional species composition of plant communities: herbivore selectivity and plant toleranceJournal of Wildlife Management6211651183Google Scholar
  3. Beier, P., McCullough, D.R. 1990Factors influencing white-tailed deer activity patterns and habitat useWildlife Monographs109151Google Scholar
  4. Bergman, C.M., Schefer, J.A., Luttich, S.N. 2000Caribou movement as a correlated random walkOecologia123364374Google Scholar
  5. Bowman, G.B., Harris, L.D. 1980Effect of spatial heterogeneity on ground-nest predationJournal of Wildlife Management44806813Google Scholar
  6. Bowyer, R.T. 1981Activity, movementand distribution of Roosevelt elk during rutJournal of Mammalogy62574582Google Scholar
  7. Bowyer, R.T., Stewart, K.M., Wolfe, S.A., Blundell, G.M., Lehmkuhl, K.L., Joy, P.J., McDonough, T.J., Kie, J.G. 2002Assessing sexual segregation in deerJournal of Wildlife Management66536544Google Scholar
  8. Brillinger, D.R., Preisler, H.K., Ager, A.A., Kie, J.G. 2001

    The use of potential functions in modelling animal movement

    Saleh, A.K.Md.E. eds. Data Analysis from Statistical FoundationsNova Science Publishers Inc.Huntington, New York, USA369386
    Google Scholar
  9. Brillinger, D.R., Preisler, H.K., Ager, A.A., Kie, J.G. 2004An exploratory data analysis (EDA) of the paths of moving animalsJournal of Statistical Planning and Inference1224363CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. Brillinger, D.R., Preisler, H.K., Ager, A.A., Kie, J.G., Stewart, B.S. 2002Employing stochastic differential equations to model wildlife motionBulletin of the Brazilian Mathematical Society3393116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burnham, K.P., Anderson, D.R. 1998Model Selection and Inference: A Practical Information-theoretic ApproachSpringerNew York, USAGoogle Scholar
  12. Carter, J., Finn, J.T. 1999MOAB: a spatially explicitindividual-based expert system for creating animal foraging modelsEcological Modeling1192941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cleveland, W.S., Grosse, E., Shyu, W.M. 1992

    Generalized additive models

    Chambers, J.M.Hastie, T.J. eds. Statistical Models in SPacific GroveWadsworthPacific GroveCaliforniaUSA309376
    Google Scholar
  14. Clutton-Brock, T.H., Harvey, P.H. 1978Mammals, resources, and reproductive strategiesNature273191195PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Cole, E.K., Pope, M.D., Anthony, R.G. 1997Effects of road management on movement and survival of Roosevelt elkJournal of Wildlife Management6111151126Google Scholar
  16. Dana, P.H., Fowle, W., Hindman, D. 1989

    Automated animal-tracking system: tracking elk with retransmitted Loran-C

    Buekers, J.M. eds. Proceedings of the 18th Annual Technical Symposium of the International LORAN AssociationSanta BarbaraCaliforniaUSA5361
    Google Scholar
  17. Dempster, J.P., Pollard, E. 1986Spatial heterogeneity, stochasticity, and the detection of density dependence in animal populationsOikos46413416Google Scholar
  18. Dunning, J.B., Danielson, B.J., Pulliam, H.R. 1992Ecological processes that affect populations in complex landscapesOikos65169175Google Scholar
  19. ESRI2001ARC GIS Version 8.1Environmental Systems Research Institute Inc.Redlands, CaliforniaUSAGoogle Scholar
  20. Findholt, S.L., Johnson, B.K., Bryant, L.D., Thomas, J.W. 1996Corrections for position bias of a Loran-C radio telemetry system using DGPSNorthwest Science70273280Google Scholar
  21. Focardi, S., Marcellini, P.M., Montanaro, P. 1996Do ungulates exhibit a food density threshold? A field study of optimal foraging and movement patternsJournal of Animal Ecology65606620Google Scholar
  22. Forman, R.T.T. 1995Land Mosaics – The Ecology of Landscapes and RegionsCambridge University PressCambridgeUnited KingdomGoogle Scholar
  23. Good, S.V., Williams, D.F., Ralls, K., Fleischer, R.C. 1997Population structure of Dipodomys ingens (Heteromyidae): the role of spatial heterogeneity in maintaining genetic diversityEvolution5112961310Google Scholar
  24. Green, R.A., Bear, G.D. 1990Seasonal cycles and daily activity patterns of Rocky Mountain elkJournal of Wildlife Management54272279Google Scholar
  25. Gross, J.E., Zank, C., Hobbs, N.T., Spallinger, D.E. 1995Movement rules for herbivores in spatially heterogeneous environments: responses to small scale patternLandscape Ecology10209217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Grünbaum, D. 1998Using spatially explicit models to characterize foraging performance in heterogeneous landscapesAmerican Naturalist15197115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hastie, T.J. 1992

    Generalized additive models

    Chambers, J.M.Hastie, T.J. eds. Statistical Models in SWadsworthPacific GroveCaliforniaUSA195247
    Google Scholar
  28. Hobbs, N.T. 1996Modification of ecosystems by ungulatesJournal of Wildlife Management6095713Google Scholar
  29. Holt, R.D. 1984Spatial heterogeneity, indirect interactions, and the coexistence of prey speciesAmerican Naturalist124377406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Insightful Corporation2001S-Plus 6 for Windows user’s guideInsightful CorporationSeattleWashington, USAGoogle Scholar
  31. Ives, A.R. 1995Spatial heterogeneity and host–parasitoid population dynamics: do we need to study behavior?Oikos74366376Google Scholar
  32. Johnson, B.K., Kern, J.W., Wisdom, M.J., Findholt, S.L., Kie, J.G. 2000Resource selection and spatial separation of elk and mule deer in springJournal of Wildlife Management64685697Google Scholar
  33. Kie, J.G., Bowyer, R.T., Boroski, B.B., Nicholson, M.C., Loft, E.R. 2002Landscape heterogeneity at differing scales: effects on spatial distribution of mule deerEcology83530544Google Scholar
  34. Kie, J.G., Bowyer, R.T., Stewart, K.M. 2003

    Ungulates in western forests: habitat requirements, population dynamics, and ecosystem processes

    Zabel, C.J.Anthony, R.G. eds. Mammal Community Dynamics in the Coniferous Forests of Western North America: Management and ConservationCambridge University PressNew York, USA296340
    Google Scholar
  35. Kie, J.G., Lehmkuhl, J.F. 2001Herbivory by wild and domestic ungulates in the Intermountain WestNorthwest Science755561(special issue)Google Scholar
  36. Kvamme, K. 1988

    Development and testing of quantitative models

    Judge, J.Sebastian, L. eds. Quantifying the Present and Predicting the Past: Theory, Methods, and Applications of Archaeological Predictive ModelingUS Department of InteriorBureau of Land Management Service CenterDenverColoradoUSA325428
    Google Scholar
  37. Leckenby D.A. 1984. Elk use and availability of cover and forage habitat components in the Blue Mountains, northeast Oregon, 1976–1982. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Wildlife Research Report14. pp. 1–40.Google Scholar
  38. Lima, S.L., Zollner, P.A. 1996Towards a behavioral ecology of ecological landscapesTrends in Ecology and Evolution11131135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Littell, R.C., Milliken, G.A., Stroup, W.W., Wolfinger, R.D. 1996SAS System for Mixed ModelsSAS Institute Inc.Cary, North CarolineUSAGoogle Scholar
  40. Lloyd, A.L., May, R.M. 1996Spatial heterogeneity in epidemic modelsJournal of Theroetical Biology179111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McCorquodale, S.M. 1993Winter foraging behavior of elk in the shrub-steppe of WashingtonJournal of Wildlife Management57881890Google Scholar
  42. McGarigal K. and Marks B.J. 1995. FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-351. US Department of Agriculture Forest ServicePacific Northwest Research Station, PortlandOregon, USA.Google Scholar
  43. Moe, S.R., Wegge, P. 1994Spacing behavior and habitat use of axis deer (Axis axis) in lowland NepalCanadian Journal of Zoology7217351744Google Scholar
  44. Molvar, E.M., Bowyer, R.T., Van Ballenberghe, V. 1993Moose herbivory, browse quality, and nutrient cycling in an Alaskan treeline communityOecologia94472479Google Scholar
  45. Moorcroft, P.R., Lewis, M.A., Crabtree, R.L. 1999Home range analysis using a mechanistic home range modelEcology8016561665Google Scholar
  46. Pacala, S.W., Roughgarden, J. 1982Spatial heterogeneity and interspecific competitionTheoretical Population Biology2192113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Parker, K.L., Robbins, C.T., Hanley, T.A. 1984Energy expenditures for locomotion by mule deer and elkJournal of Wildlife Management48474488Google Scholar
  48. Pastor, J., Naiman, R.J. 1992Selective foraging and ecosystem processes in boreal forestsAmerican Naturalist139690705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Preisler H.K., Ager A.A., Johnson B.K. and Kie J.G. 2004. Modeling wildlife movements using stochastic differential equations. Environmetrics 15: 643–657.Google Scholar
  50. Preisler H.K., Brillinger D.R., Ager A.A. and Kie J.G. 1999. Analysis of animal movement using telemetry and GIS data. Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Volume on Statistics of the Environmentpp. 100–105.Google Scholar
  51. Preisler H.K., Brillinger D.R., Ager A.A., Kie J.G. and Akers R.P. 2001. Stochastic differential equations: a tool for studying animal movement. Proceedings of the IUFRO 4.11 Conference Session on Forest Biometry Modelling and Information Science 26–29 June 2001, GreenwichUnited Kingdompp. 1–9. (http://cms1.gre.ac.uk/conferences/iufro/proceedings/ preisler4.pdf).Google Scholar
  52. Rice, W.R. 1989Analyzing tables of statistical testsEvolution43223225Google Scholar
  53. Roth, R.R. 1976Spatial heterogeneity and bird species diversityEcology57773782Google Scholar
  54. Rowland, M.M., Bryant, L.D., Johnson, B.K., Noyes, J.H., Wisdom, M.J., Thomas, J.W. 1997The Starkey Project: history, facilities, and data collection methods for ungulate researchUS Department of AgricultureForest ServicePacific Northwest Research Station, PortlandOregon, USAGeneral Technical Report PNW-GTR-396.Google Scholar
  55. SAS Institute1999SAS/STAT User’s GuideVersion 8SAS InstituteInc.Cary, North CarolinaUSAGoogle Scholar
  56. Skovlin, J.M. 1967Fluctuations in forage quality on summer range in the Blue MountainsUS Department of Agriculture Forest ServicePacific Northwest Research Station, PortlandOregon, USAResearch Paper PNW-RP-44.Google Scholar
  57. Skovlin, J.M. 1982

    Habitat requirements and evaluations

    Thomas, J.W.Toweill, D.E. eds. Elk of North AmericaStackpole BooksHarrisburg, PennsylvaniaUSA369413
    Google Scholar
  58. Stenseth, N.C. 1980Spatial heterogeneity and population stability: some evolutionary consequencesOikos35165184Google Scholar
  59. Stewart, K.M., Bowyer, R.T., Kie, J.G., Cimon, N.J., Johnson, B.K. 2002Temporospatial distributions of elk, mule deerand cattle: resource partitioning and competitive displacementJournal of Mammalogy83229244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Strohmeyer, D.C., Peek, J.M. 1996Wapiti home range and movement patterns in a sagebrush desertNorthwest Science707987Google Scholar
  61. Turchin, P. 1998Quantitative Analysis of MovementSinauerSunderlandMAUSAGoogle Scholar
  62. Turner, M.G., Wu, Y., Romme, W.H., Wallace, L.L. 1993A landscape simulation model of winter foraging by large ungulatesEcological Modeling69163184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Vore, J.M., Schmidt, E.M. 2001Movements of female elk during calving season in northwest MontanaWildlife Society Bulletin29720725Google Scholar
  64. White, K.A., Murray, J.D., Lewis, M.A. 1996Wolf-deer interactions: a mathematical modelProceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B263299305Google Scholar
  65. Wu, H., Li, B.L., Springer, T.A., Neill, W.H. 2000Modeling animal movement as a persistent random walk in two dimensions: expected magnitude of net displacementEcological Modeling132115124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Zollner, P.A., Lima, S.L. 1999Search strategies for landscape-level interpatch movementsEcology8010191030Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Pacific Northwest Research StationU.S. Forest ServiceLa GrandeUSA
  2. 2.Department of Biological SciencesIdaho State UniversityPocatelloUSA

Personalised recommendations