Landscape Ecology

, Volume 19, Issue 6, pp 663–675 | Cite as

Bird assemblages in forest fragments within Mediterranean mosaics created by wild fires

  • Lluís Brotons
  • Sergi Herrando
  • Jean-Louis Martin
Research Article


The role of habitat heterogeneity as a key factor in determining species pools in habitat mosaics has been acknowledged, but we still know little on the relative importance of the different ecological processes acting within such complex landscapes. We compared species richness and distribution in forest fragments imbedded in shrub-lands to those in continuous forests or in continuous shrublands. We examined the consistency of our data with the predictions of two hypotheses: 1) the “Habitat fragmentation hypothesis” which states that fragmentation has negative effects on the species from the original continuous habitat; 2) the “Habitat supplementation /complementation hypothesis” which stipulates that the presence of a matrix habitat around the fragments will mitigate negative effects on the species from the original habitat (supplementation) or allow the presence of species that depend on the presence of both the fragment and matrix habitats (complementation). We show that: 1) species richness in forest fragments did not differ from species richness in segments of continuous forests of equal area; 2) the bird community of forest fragments got impoverished in some forest species but a higher proportion of species common in continuous forests were not affected by fragmentation; 3) fragment communities had a significant proportion of common species that were scarce in, or absent from both continuous forests and shrublands. While, a few forest species supported predictions from the fragmentation hypothesis, occurrence patterns observed in several other species were consistent with either the supplementation or the complementation hypotheses. Our results suggest that there is no single hypothesis that properly captures the consequences of a shift from continuous forests to a mosaic of forest fragments and shrublands and that different ecological mechanisms act in conjunction to determine species pools in habitat mosaics. Habitat heterogeneity at a local scale appears a key factor in maintaining bird diversity in fire driven Mediterranean landscapes.

Key words

Catalonia Forest avifauna Fragmentation Habitat mosaics Mediterranean Resource supplementation and complementation Spain 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Andrén H. 1994. Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review. Oikos 71: 355–366.Google Scholar
  2. Bibby C.J., Burguess N.D. and Hill D.A. 1992. Bird Census Techniques. Cambridge Univ. Press., Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  3. Bissonette J.A. and Storch I. 2002. Fragmentation: is the message clear? Conservation Ecology 6(2): 14. URL: Scholar
  4. Blondel J. and Aronson J. 1999. Biology and Wildlife of the Mediterranean region. Oxford University press, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  5. Brotons L. and Herrando S. 2001. Factors affecting bird communities in fragments of secondary pine forests in the north-western Mediterranean basin. Acta Oecologica 22: 21–31.Google Scholar
  6. Brotons L., Mönkkönen M. and Martin J.L. 2003. Are fragments islands? Landscape context and density-area relationships in boreal forest birds. American Naturalist, 162: 343–357.Google Scholar
  7. Covas R. and Blondel J. 1998. Biogeography and history of the Mediterranean bird fauna. Ibis 140: 395–407.Google Scholar
  8. Crawley M.J. 1993. GLIM for ecologists. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  9. Debinski D.M. and Holt R.D. 2000. A Survey and Overview of Habitat Fragmentation Experiments. Conservation Biology 14: 342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Debussche M., Lepart J. and Dervieux A. 1999. Mediterranean landscapes changes: evidence from old postcards. Global Ecology and Biogeography 8: 3–15.Google Scholar
  11. Díaz M., Carbonell R., Santos T. and Tellería J.L. 1998. Breeding bird communities in pine plantations of the Spanish plateaux: biogeography, landscape and vegetation effects. Journal of Applied Ecology 35: 562–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Drapeau P., Leduc A. and McNeil R. 1999. Refining the use of point counts at the scale of individual points in studies of birdhabitat relationships. Journal of Avian Biology 30: 367–382.Google Scholar
  13. Dunning J.B., Brent J.D. and Pulliam H.R. 1992. Ecological processes that affect populations in complex landscapes. Oikos 65: 169–175.Google Scholar
  14. Fahrig L. 2003. Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 34: 487–515.Google Scholar
  15. Fischer J. and Lindenmayer D.B. 2002. Small patches can be valuable for biodiversity conservation: two case studies on birds in southeastern Australia. Biological Conservation, 106: 129–136.Google Scholar
  16. Folch R. 1986. La vegetació dels Països Catalans. Ketres Ed., Barcelona, Spain.Google Scholar
  17. Forman R.T.T. 1995. Land mosaics: the ecology of landscapes and regions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  18. Greenacre M.J. 1984. Theory and applications of correspondence analysis. Academic Press, New York, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  19. Haila Y. 2002. A conceptual genealogy of fragmentation research: from island biogeography to landscape ecology. Ecological Applications 12: 321–334.Google Scholar
  20. Hanski I. and Gilpin. M. 1991. Metapopulation dynamics: brief history and conceptual domain. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 42: 3–16.Google Scholar
  21. Hardy C.C. and Arno S.F. 1996. The use of fire in forest restoration. General Technical Report. Department of Agriculture. Forest Service, U.S., USA.Google Scholar
  22. Herrando S. and Brotons L. 2002. Forest bird diversity in Mediterranean areas affected by wild fires: a landscape perspective. Ecography 25: 161–172.Google Scholar
  23. Herrando S., Brotons L. and Llacuna S. 2003. Does fire increase the spatial heterogeneity of bird communities in Mediterranean landscapes? Ibis 145: 307–317.Google Scholar
  24. Izhaki I. and Adar M. 1997. The effects of Post-fire management on bird community succession. International Journal of Wildland Fire 7: 335–342.Google Scholar
  25. Law B.S. and Dickman C.R. 1998. The use of habitat mosaics by terrestrial vertebrate fauna: implications for conservation and management. Biodiversity and Conservation 7: 323–333.Google Scholar
  26. Legendre P. and Legendre L. 1998. Numerical ecology. Second English Edition. Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
  27. López G. and Moro M.J. 1997. Birds of Aleppo pine plantations in south-east Spain in relation to vegetation composition and structure. Journal of Applied Ecology 34: 1257–1272.Google Scholar
  28. Lloret F., Calvo E., Pons X. and Diaz-Delgado R. 2002. Wildfires and landscape patterns in the Eastern Iberian peninsula. Landscape Ecology 17: 745–759.Google Scholar
  29. MacArthur R.H. and Wilson E.O. 1967. The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, USA.Google Scholar
  30. Martin J.L. 1992. Niche expansion in an insular bird community: an autecological perspective. Journal of Biogeography 19: 375–381.Google Scholar
  31. Mazerolle D.F. and Hobson K.A. 2002. Physiological ramifications of habitat selection in territorial male ovenbirds: Consequences of landscape fragmentation. Oecologia 130: 356–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McCollin D. 1998. Forest edges and habitat selection in birds: a functional approach. Ecography 21: 247–260.Google Scholar
  33. McGarigal K. and Cushman S.A. 2002. Comparative evaluation of experimental approaches to the study of habitat fragmentation effects. Ecological Applications 12: 335–345.Google Scholar
  34. Moreira F., Ferreira P., Rego F.C. and Bunting S. 2001. Landscape changes and breeding bird assemblages in north-western Portugal: the role of fire. Landscape Ecology 16: 175–187.Google Scholar
  35. Murcia C. 1995. Edge effects in fragmented forests: implications for conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10: 58–62.Google Scholar
  36. Mönkkönen M. and Reunanen P. 1999. On critical thresholds in landscape connectivity - a management perspective. Oikos 84: 302–305.Google Scholar
  37. Norton M.R., Hannon S. and Schmiegelow F.K. 2000. Fragments are not islands: patch vs landscape perspectives on songbird presence and abundance in harvested boreal forest. Ecography 23: 209–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Paton P.W.C. 1994. The effect of edge on avian nest success: how strong is the evidence? Cons. Biol. 8: 17–26.Google Scholar
  39. Pausas J.G. 1998. Modelling fire-prone vegetation dynamics. In: Trabaud L. (eds), Fire Management and Landscape Ecology: 327–334. International Association of Wildland Fire, Fairland, Washington, USA.Google Scholar
  40. Perrins C.M. 1998. The complete birds of the Western Palaearctic on CD-ROM, version 1.0. Univ. Press. Oxford, Oxford, USA.Google Scholar
  41. Pino J. et al. 2000. Landscape structure and bird species richness: implications for conservation in rural areas between natural parks. Landscape and Urban Planning 49: 35–48.Google Scholar
  42. Piñol J., Terradas J. and Lloret F. 1998. Climate warming, wildfire hazard, and wildfire occurrence on coastal eastern Spain. Climatic Change 38: 345–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pons P. 1998. Bird site tenacity after prescribed burning in a Mediterranean shrubland. In: Trabaud L. (ed.), Fire management and landscape ecology: 261–270. Fairfield, Washington, USA.Google Scholar
  44. Pons P., Lambert B., Rigolot E. and Prodon R. 2003. The effects of grassland management using fire on habitat occupancy and conservation of birds in a mosaic landscape. Biodiversity and Conservation 12: 1843–1860.Google Scholar
  45. Preiss E., Martin J.L. and Debussche M. 1997. Rural depopulation and recent landscape changes in a Mediterranean region: Consequences to the breeding avifauna. Landscape Ecology 12: 51–61.Google Scholar
  46. Prodon R. and Lebreton J.D. 1981. Breeding avifauna of a Mediterranean succession: the holm oak and the cork oak series in the eastern Pyrenees. I. Analysis and modelling of the structure gradient. Oikos 37: 21–38.Google Scholar
  47. Pulido J.P. and Díaz M. 1992. Relationships between vegetation structure and breeding bird communities in Iberian Holm-oak dehesas: effects of human management. Ardeola 39: 63–72.Google Scholar
  48. Robinson S.K. and Holmes R.T. 1984. Effects of plant species and foliage structure on the foraging behaviour of forest birds. The Auk 101: 672–684.Google Scholar
  49. Retana J., Espelta J.M., Habrouk A., Ordonez J.L. and de Sola-Morales F. 2002. Regeneration patterns of three Mediterranean pines and forest changes after a large wildfire in northeastern Spain. Ecoscience 9: 89–97.Google Scholar
  50. Rocamora G. 1997. Mediterranean forest, shrubland and rocky habitats. In: Brooks D. (ed.), Habitat for birds in Europe: a conservation strategy for a wider environment. Birdlife International, Cambridge, UK, pp. 239–265.Google Scholar
  51. Santos T. and Tellería J.L. 1992. Edge effects of nest predation in Mediterranean fragmented forests. Biological Conservation 60: 1–5.Google Scholar
  52. Santos T., Tellería J.L. and Carbonell R. 2002. Bird conservation in fragmented Mediterranean forests of Spain: effects of geographical location, habitat and landscape degradation. Biological Conservation 105: 113–125.Google Scholar
  53. Saunders D.A., Hobbs R.J. and Margules C.R. 1991. Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: a review. Conservation Biology 5: 18–32.Google Scholar
  54. Schaefer T. and Vogel B. 2000. Why do woodlarks need field-forest ecotones? An analysis of possible factors. Journal fuer Ornithologie 141: 335–344.Google Scholar
  55. Schmiegelow F.K.A. and Mönkkönen M. 2002. Habitat loss and fragmentation in dynamic landscapes: avian perspectives from boreal forest. Ecological Applications 12: 375–389.Google Scholar
  56. Shochat E., Abramsky Z. and Pinshow B. 2001. Breeding bird species diversity in the Negev: effects if scrub fragmentation by planted forests. Journal of Applied Ecology 38: 1135–1147.Google Scholar
  57. Sisk T.D., Haddad N.M. and Ehrlich P.R. 1997. Bird assemblages in patchy woodlands: modelling the effects of edge and matrix habitats. Ecological Applications 7: 1170–1180.Google Scholar
  58. Tellería J.L. and Santos T. 1995. Effects of forest fragmentation on a guild of wintering passerines: the role of habitat selection. Biological Conservation 71: 61–67.Google Scholar
  59. Trabaud L. 1981. Man and fire: impacts on Mediterranean vegetation. In: Di Castri F., Goodall D.W. and Specht R.L. (eds), Mediterranean-type shrublands. Ecosystems of the world, 11. Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, pp. 523–537.Google Scholar
  60. Tye A. 1992. Assessment of territory quality and its effects on breeding success in a migrant passerine the Wheatear Oenanthe oenanthe. Ibis 134: 273–285.Google Scholar
  61. Wiens J.A. 1994. Habitat fragmentation: island vs. landscape perspectives on bird conservation. Ibis 137: 97–104.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lluís Brotons
    • 1
    • 2
  • Sergi Herrando
    • 3
  • Jean-Louis Martin
    • 1
  1. 1.Functional and Evolutionary Ecology Centre-CNRSMontpellier CedexFrance
  2. 2.Biodiversity sectionForest Technology Centre of CataloniaSolsonaSpain
  3. 3.Catalan Ornithological InstituteBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations