Landscape Ecology

, Volume 20, Issue 7, pp 791–798

Evaluating the Relative Roles of Ecological Regions and Land-cover Composition for Guiding Establishment of Nutrient Criteria

  • James D. Wickham
  • Kurt H. Riitters
  • Timothy G. Wade
  • K. Bruce Jones
Research Article

Abstract

The continuing degradation of United States surface waters by excessive nutrient loads has motivated the establishment of nutrient criteria for streams, lakes, and estuaries as a means to protect aquatic resources. Nutrient criteria have been established based on ecoregional differences, recognizing that geographic variation in climate, topography, geology, and land use require use of different criteria values for different regions of the continental United States. Several studies have demonstrated that land-cover composition also strongly influences nutrient concentrations and yields. We examined the relative importance of ecoregions and watershed land-cover composition in explaining variability in nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) concentrations by re-analyzing the National Eutrophication Survey (NES) data reported by Omernik (1977). The variance of N concentrations among land-cover composition classes within ecoregions was six times larger than the variance among ecoregions. For P concentrations, land-cover composition within ecoregions accounted for three times more variance than ecoregions themselves. Variance across ecoregions was only weakly significant after accounting for variance in land-cover composition within ecoregions. The results suggest that the relationship between land-cover composition and nutrient concentrations in aquatic systems should also be used to help guide establishment of nutrient criteria.

Keywords

Clean Water Act (CWA) Eutrophication Nitrogen Phosphorus Scale Variance component analysis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexander, R.B., Smith, R.A., Schwarz, G.E. 2000Effect of stream channel size on the delivery of nitrogen to the Gulf of MexicoNature403758761CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bailey R.G. 1995. Description of the ecoregions of the United States. 2nd ed. Revised and expanded (1st ed. 1980). Miscellaneous Publication Number 1391 (rev.). with separate map at 1:7,500,000, USDA Forest Service Washington, DC., USA, 108 p.Google Scholar
  3. Beaulac, M.N., Reckhow, K.H. 1982An examination of land use – nutrient export relationshipsWater Res. Bull.1810131024Google Scholar
  4. Carpenter, S.R., Caraco, N.F., Correll, D.L., Howarth, R.W., Sharpley, A.N., Smith, V.H. 1998Nonpoint pollution of surface waters with phosphorus and nitrogenEcol. Appl.8559568Google Scholar
  5. Dillon, P.J., Kirchner, W.B. 1975The effects of geology and land use on the export of phosphorous from watershedsWater Res.9135148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dodds, W.K., Welch, E.B. 2000Establishing nutrient criteria in streamsJ. North Am. Benthol. Soc.19186196Google Scholar
  7. Dodds, W.K., Smith, V.H., Lohman, K. 2002Nitrogen and phosphorus relationships to benthic algal biomass in temperate streamsCan. J. Fish Aquat. Sci.59865874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fisher, T.R., Lee, K.Y., Berndt, H., Benitez, J.A., Norton, M.M. 1998Hydrology and chemistry of the Choptank river basinWaterAir Soil Pollut.105387397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Frink, C.R. 1991Estimating nutrient exports to estuariesJ. Environ. Qual.20717724Google Scholar
  10. Griffith, G.E., Omernik, J.M., Woods, A.J. 1999Ecoregions, watersheds, basins, and HUCs: how state and federal agencies frame water qualityJ. Soil Water Conserv.54666677Google Scholar
  11. Halloway, J.M., Dahlgren, R.A., Hansen, B., Casey, W.H. 1998Contribution of bedrock nitrogen to high nitrate concentrations in streamsNature395785788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jones, K.B., Neale, A.C., Nash, M.S., Remortel, R.D., Wickham, J.D., Riitters, K.H., O’Neill, R.V. 2001Predicting nutrient and sediment loadings to streams from landscape metrics: a multiple watershed study from the United States mid-Atlantic regionLandscape Ecol.16301312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lewis, W.M. 2002Yield of nitrogen from minimally disturbed watersheds in the United StatesBiogeochemistry57/58375385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Omernik, J.M. 1977Non-point source – stream nutrient level relationships: a nationwide study. EPA Ecological Research Series EPA-600/3-77-105U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and DevelopmentEnvironmental Research LaboratoryCorvallis, Oregon, USA150Google Scholar
  15. Omernik, J.M. 1987Ecoregions of the conterminous United StatesAnn. Assoc. Am. Geograph.77118125(map supplementscale 1:2,500,000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Panuska, J.C, Lillie, R.A. 1995Phosphorus loadings from Wisconsin watersheds: recommended phosphorus export coefficients for agricultural and forested watershedsResearch Management Findings, Number 38, Bureau of ResearchWisconsin Department of Natural ResourcesMadison, Wisconsin, USA8Google Scholar
  17. Peterson, B.J., Wollheim, W.M., Mulholland, P.J., Webster, J.R., Meyer, J.L., Tank, J.L., Martí, E.M., Bowden, W.B., Valett, H.M., Hershey, A.E., McDowell, W.H., Dodds, W.K., Hamilton, S.K., Gregory, S., Morrall, D.D. 2001Control of nitrogen export from watersheds by headwater streamsScience2928090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rohm, C.M., Omernik, J.M., Woods, A.J., Stoddard, J.L. 2002Regional characteristics of nutrient concentrations in streams and their application to nutrient criteria developmentJ. Am. Water Res. Assoc.38213239Google Scholar
  19. Satterthwaite, F. 1946An approximate distribution of estimates of variance componentsBiometrics Bull.2110114Google Scholar
  20. Searle, S.R., Casella, G., McCulloch, C.E. 1992Variance ComponentsJohn Wiley and Sons Inc.New York, New York, USAGoogle Scholar
  21. Smith, R.A., Alexander, R.B., Schwarz, G.E. 2003Natural background concentrations of nutrients in streams and rivers of the conterminous United StatesEnviron. Sci. Technol.3730393047CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. U.S. EPA. 1998. National strategy for the development of regional nutrient criteria. EPA 822-R-98-002. Office of WaterU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., USA47 pp.Google Scholar
  23. U.S. EPA. 2000. Ambient water quality criteria recommendations: information supporting the development of state and tribal nutrient criteria for lakes and reservoirs in nutrient ecoregion XIII - southern Florida coastal plain. EPA 822-B-00-104. Office of WaterU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., USA77 pp.Google Scholar
  24. Wickham, J.D., Wade, T.G., Riitters, K.H., O’Neill, R.V., Smith, J.H., Smith, E.R., Jones, K.B., Neale, A.C. 2003Upstream-to-downstream changes in nutrient export riskLandscape Ecol.18193206CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • James D. Wickham
    • 1
  • Kurt H. Riitters
    • 2
  • Timothy G. Wade
    • 1
  • K. Bruce Jones
    • 3
  1. 1.National Exposure Research Laboratory (NERL)U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (E243-05)USA
  2. 2.Southern Research StationU.S. Forest ServiceUSA
  3. 3.National Exposure Research Laboratory (NERL)U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyLas VegasUSA

Personalised recommendations