Advertisement

Landscape Ecology

, Volume 20, Issue 2, pp 235–253 | Cite as

Urban domestic gardens (V): relationships between landcover composition, housing and landscape

  • Richard M. Smith
  • Kevin J. Gaston
  • Philip H. Warren
  • Ken Thompson
Research article

Abstract

The contribution to urban green space by private or domestic gardens in residential zones was investigated in the city of Sheffield, UK, as part of a wider study of the garden resource and its associated biodiversity. The attributes of 61 gardens, including patterns of landcover and vegetation cover, were explored in relation to housing characteristics and the nature of the surrounding landscape. The number of surrounding houses, and the areas of buildings and of roads were negatively correlated with garden area. The proportion of a housing parcel comprising garden increased with parcel size, although the proportion that was rear garden remained relatively constant. Garden size played an overwhelming role in determining garden composition: larger gardens supported more landcovers, contained greater extents of three-quarters of the recorded landcovers, and were more likely to contain trees taller than 2 m, vegetable patches, and composting sites. Unvegetated landcovers made greater proportional contributions as garden size declined. All categories of vegetation canopy increased with garden size, and large gardens supported disproportionately greater cover above 3 m. House age was a less significant factor determining garden landcover. Gardens of newer houses were more likely to occur towards the edge of the urban area, and older properties, that contained fewer hedges, possessed less canopy between 2–3 m. The extent and occurrence of different landcovers in gardens, and their consequences for wildlife, are considered for residential patches in urban areas. The implications for urban planners are discussed.

Keywords

Backyard Green space Home gardens Housing Land use Urbanisation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baines, C. 2000How to Make a Wildlife GardenElm Tree BooksLondon, UKGoogle Scholar
  2. Bolund, P., Hunhammar, S. 1999Ecosystem services in urban areasEcological Economics29293301Google Scholar
  3. Cannon, A. 2000Garden Bird Watch Handbook, 2nd edBritish Trust for OrnithologyThetfordUKGoogle Scholar
  4. Curds, T. 1985An experimental ecological study of a garden compost heapJournal of Biological Education197178Google Scholar
  5. Daily, G.C. 1997Introduction what are ecosystem services?Daily, G.C. eds. Nature’s Services Societal Dependence on Natural EcosystemsIsland PressWashington, DC110Google Scholar
  6. Davis, B.N.K. 1979The ground arthropods of London gardensLondon Naturalist581524Google Scholar
  7. DEFRA (Department for EnvironmentFood and Rural Affairs)2003Working with the grain of nature. A biodiversity strategy for EnglandDEFRALondon, UKGoogle Scholar
  8. DETR (Department of EnvironmentTransport and the Regions)1999Planning Policy Guidance 3: HousingStationery OfficeLondon, UKGoogle Scholar
  9. DETR (Department of EnvironmentTransport and the Regions),2000Our Towns and Cities: the future - delivering an urban renaissance //wwwetr.gov.uk/regeneration/policies/ourtowns/cm4911/index.htm.Google Scholar
  10. Denys, C., Schmidt, D. 1998Insect communities on experimental mugwort (Artemisia vulgaris L.) plots along an urban gradientOecologia113269277Google Scholar
  11. Dickman, C.R. 1987Habitat fragmentation and vertebrate species richness in an urban environmentJournal of Applied Ecology24337351Google Scholar
  12. Dickman, C.R., Doncaster, C.P. 1987The ecology of small mammals in urban habitats I. Populations in a patchy environmentJournal of Animal Ecology56629640Google Scholar
  13. Doncaster, C.P. 1994Factors regulating local variations in abundance: field tests on hedgehogs (Erinaceus europaeus)Oikos69182192Google Scholar
  14. Dunnett, N., Qasim, M. 2000Perceived benefits to human well-being of urban gardensHort Technology104045Google Scholar
  15. Fernández-Juricic, E. 2000Avifaunal use of wooded streets in an urban landscapeConservation Biology14513521Google Scholar
  16. Gaston K.J., Smith R.M., Thompson K. and Warren P.H. a. Urban domestic gardens (II): experimental tests of methods for increasing biodiversity. Biodiversity and Conservation, in press.Google Scholar
  17. Gaston K.J., Warren P.H., Thompson K. and Smith R.M. b. Urban domestic gardens (IV): the extent of the resource and its associated features. Biodiversity and Conservation, in press.Google Scholar
  18. Germaine, S.S., Wakeling, B.F. 2001Lizard species distributions and habitat occupation along an urban gradient in Tucson, ArizonaUSABiological Conservation97229237Google Scholar
  19. Goulson, D., Hughes, W.O.H., Derwent, L.C., Stout, J.C. 2002Colony growth of the bumblebeeBombus terrestrisin improved and conventional agricultural and suburban habitatsOecologia130267273Google Scholar
  20. Hamilton, G., Owen, J. 1992The Living GardenA practical guide to gardening the natural wayBCALondon, UKGoogle Scholar
  21. Hessayon, D.G., Hessayon, J.P. 1973The Garden Book of EuropeElm Tree BooksLondon, UKGoogle Scholar
  22. Hey, D. 1998A History of SheffieldCarnegie PublishingLancasterUKGoogle Scholar
  23. Hill, F. 1996Wildlife Gardening, A Practical HandbookDerbyshire Wildlife TrustDerby, UKGoogle Scholar
  24. Jokimäki, J. 1999Occurrence of breeding bird species in urban parks: effects of park structure and broad-scale variablesUrban Ecosystems32134Google Scholar
  25. Kinzig, A.P., Grove, J.M. 2001Urban-suburban ecologyLevin, S.A. eds. Encyclopaedia of Biodiversity Vol. 5Academic PressSan DiegoUSA733745Google Scholar
  26. Kuschel, G. 1990Beetles in a suburban environment a New Zealand case study. The identity and status of Coleoptera in the natural and modified habitats of LynfieldAuckland 1974–1989DSIR Plant Protection Report No. 3. DSIR Plant ProtectionAucklandNew ZealandGoogle Scholar
  27. Liu, J., Daily, G.C., Ehrlich, P.R., Luck, G.W. 2003Effects of household dynamics on resource consumption and biodiversityNature421530533PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. London Biodiversity Partnership,2001,Private Gardens,http://www.lbp.org.uk/hsgardens.htm.Google Scholar
  29. Mason, C.F. 2000Thrushes now largely restricted to the built environment in eastern EnglandDiversity and Distributions6189194Google Scholar
  30. McCall A,Doar N,1997 The State of Scottish Greenspace Scottish Natural Heritage Review No. 88Google Scholar
  31. Miotk, P. 1996The naturalized garden – a refuge for animals? – first resultsZoologischer Anzeiger235101116Google Scholar
  32. Miyashita, T., Shinkai, A., Chida, T. 1998The effects of forest fragmentation on web spider communities in urban areasBiological Conservation86357364Google Scholar
  33. Moran, M.D. 2003Arguments for rejecting the sequential Bonferroni in ecological studiesOikos100403405Google Scholar
  34. Niemelä, J. 1999Ecology and urban planningBiodiversity and Conservation8119131Google Scholar
  35. Ødegaard, F., Tømmerås, B.Å. 2000Compost heaps – refuges and stepping-stones for alien arthropod species in northern EuropeDiversity and Distribution64559Google Scholar
  36. Owen, J. 1991The Ecology of a Garden: the first fifteen yearsCambridge University PressCambridgeUKGoogle Scholar
  37. Robinson, R.A., Sutherland, W.J. 2002Post-war changes in arable farming and biodiversity in Great BritainJournal of Applied Ecology39157176Google Scholar
  38. Rondini, C., Doncaster, C.P. 2002Roads as barriers to movement for hedgehogsFunctional Ecology16504509Google Scholar
  39. Savard, J.-P.L., Clereau, P., Mennechez, G. 2000Biodiversity concepts and urban areasLandscape and Urban Planning48131142Google Scholar
  40. Saville, B. 1997The Secret Garden: report of the Lothian Secret Garden SurveyLothian Wildlife Information CentreEdinburghUKGoogle Scholar
  41. Soulé, M.E., Bolger, D.T., Alberts, A.C., Wright, J., Sorice, M., Hill, S. 1988Reconstructed dynamics of rapid extinctions of chaparral-requiring birds in urban habitat islandsConservation Biology27592Google Scholar
  42. Stace, C. 1997New Flora of the British Isles, 2nd edCambridge University PressCambridgeUKGoogle Scholar
  43. Swan, M.J.S., Oldham, R.S. 1993Herptile Sites Volume 1: National Amphibian Survey Final ReportEnglish Nature Research Report No. 38PeterboroughUKGoogle Scholar
  44. Sukopp, H., Starfinger, U. 1999Disturbance in urban ecosystemsWalker, L.R. eds. Ecosystems of the World 16. Ecosystems of Disturbed GroundElsevierLondon, UK397412Google Scholar
  45. Thompson, K., Austin, K.C., Smith, R.H., Warren, P.H., Angold, P.G., Gaston, K.J. 2003Urban domestic gardens (I): putting small-scale plant diversity in contextJournal of Vegetation Science147178Google Scholar
  46. Thompson, K., Hodgson, J.G., Smith, R.M., Warren, P.H., Gaston, K.J. 2004Urban domestic gardens (III): composition and diversity of lawn florasJournal of Vegetation Science15371376Google Scholar
  47. UNDP, UNEP, WB and WRI (United Nations Development ProgrammeUnited Nations Environment ProgrammeWorld Bank and World Resources Institute)2000World Resources 2000–2001: People and Ecosystems – the fraying web of lifeElsevier ScienceAmsterdamThe NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  48. UNDSD (United Nations Division for Sustainable Development),2003,Agenda 21,http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/documents/agenda21/english/agenda21toc.htm.Google Scholar
  49. Vickery, M.L. 1995Gardens the neglected habitatPullin, A.S. eds. Ecology and Conservation of ButterfliesChapman and HallLondon, UK123134Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard M. Smith
    • 2
  • Kevin J. Gaston
    • 1
  • Philip H. Warren
    • 1
  • Ken Thompson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Animal and Plant SciencesUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK
  2. 2.Richard M.SmithYorkUK

Personalised recommendations