Crocodile Tears: Facial, Verbal and Body Language Behaviours Associated with Genuine and Fabricated Remorse

  • Leanne ten Brinke
  • Sarah MacDonald
  • Stephen Porter
  • Brian O’Connor
Original Article

Abstract

Emotional deception is a common behaviour that can have major consequences if undetected. For example, the sincerity of an offender’s expressed remorse is an important factor in sentencing and parole hearings. The present study was the first to investigate the nature of true and false remorse. We examined facial, verbal and body language behaviours associated with emotional deception in videotaped accounts of true personal transgressions accompanied by either genuine or falsified remorse. Analyses of nearly 300,000 frames indicated that descriptions of falsified remorse were associated with a greater range of emotional expressions. Further, sequential analyses revealed that negative emotions were more commonly followed by other emotions—rather than a return to neutral emotion—in falsified versus sincere remorse. Participants also exhibited more speech hesitations while expressing deceptive relative to genuine remorse. In general, the results suggest that falsified remorse may be conceived as an emotionally turbulent display of deliberate, falsified expressions and involuntary, genuine, emotional leakage. These findings are relevant to judges and parole board members who consider genuine remorse to be an important factor in sentencing and release decisions.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the assistance of Brendan Wallace and Natasha Korva for their contributions to this research. This project was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC) through scholarships awarded to the first and second authors, as well as research grants awarded to the third and fourth authors.

References

  1. Balkissoon v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration). (2001). CanLII 26712 (I.R.B.).Google Scholar
  2. Cicchetti, D. V., & Sparrow, S. A. (1981). Developing criteria for establishing interrater reliability of specific items: Applications to assessment of adaptive behavior. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 86, 127–137.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Darwin, C. (1872). The expression of the emotions in man and animals. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. DePaulo, B., Kashy, D., Kirkendol, S., Wyer, M., & Epstein, J. (1996). Lying in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 979–995. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.70.5.979.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. DePaulo, B., Lindsay, J. J., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H. (2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 74–118. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Duchenne, G. B. (1862/1990). The mechanism of human facial expression. NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Ekman, P. (1992). Telling lies: Clues to deceit in the marketplace, politics, and marriage. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  8. Ekman, P. (2003a). Darwin, deception and facial expression. In P. Ekman, R. J. Davidson, & F. De Waals (Eds.), Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (Vol. 1000, pp. 205–221). New York: New York Academy of Sciences. doi: 10.1196/annals.1280.010.Google Scholar
  9. Ekman, P. (2003b). Emotions revealed: Recognizing faces and feelings to improve communication and emotional life. New York: Owl Books.Google Scholar
  10. Ekman, P. (2006, October 29). How to spot a terrorist on the fly. Retrieved November 17, 2008, from washingtonpost.com.Google Scholar
  11. Ekman, P., Davidson, R. J., & Friesen, W. V. (1990). The Duchenne smile: Emotional expression and brain physiology: II. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 342–353. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.58.2.342.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1975). Unmasking the face: A guide to recognizing emotions from facial clues. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  13. Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1976). Pictures of facial affect. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  14. Ekman, P., Friesen, W. V., & Hagar, J. C. (1976/2002). Facial action coding system: The manual on CD-ROM. Salt Lake City: Network Information Research Corporation.Google Scholar
  15. Ekman, P., Friesen, W. V., O’Sullivan, M., Chan, A., Diacoyanni-Tarlatzis, I., Heider, K., et al. (1987). Universals and cultural differences in the judgment of facial expressions of emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 712–717.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Fleiss, J. L. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  17. Fowler, K. A., Lilienfeld, S. O., & Patrick, C. J. (2009). Detecting psychopathy from thin slices of behavior. Psychological Assessment, 21, 68–78. doi: 10.1037/a0014938.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Frank, M. G., Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (2005). Behavioral markers and recognizability of the smile of enjoyment. In P. Ekman & E. L. Rosenberg (Eds.), What the face reveals (2nd ed., pp. 217–238). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Global Deception Research Team. (2006). A world of lies. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37, 60–74. doi: 10.1177/0022022105282295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gottman, J. M., & Levenson, R. W. (2000). The timing of divorce: Predicting when a couple will divorce over a 14-year period. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 737–745. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00737.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Haggard, E. A., & Isaacs, K. S. (1966). Micro-momentary facial expressions as indicators of ego mechanisms in psychotherapy. In L. A. Gottschalk & A. H. Auerback (Eds.), Methods of research in psychotherapy (pp. 154–165). New York: Appleton Century Crofts.Google Scholar
  22. Hancock, J. T. (2007). Digital deception: When, where and how people lie online. In K. McKenna, T. Postmes, U. Reips, & A. N. Joinson (Eds.), Oxford handbook of internet psychology (pp. 287–301). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Hancock, J. T., Curry, L., Goorha, S., & Woodworth, M. T. (2008). On lying and being lied to: A linguistic analysis of deception. Discourse Processes, 45, 1–23. doi: 10.1080/01638530701739181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hess, U., & Kleck, R. (1990). Differentiating emotional elicited and deliberate emotional facial expressions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 369–385. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2420200502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hess, U., & Kleck, R. (1994). The cues decoders use in attempting to differentiate emotion-elicited and posed facial expressions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 367–381. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2420240306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Izard, C. E. (1977). Human emotions. New York, NY: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  27. Keltner, D., & Buswell, B. (1996). Evidence for the distinctness of embarrassment, shame, and guilt: A study of recalled antecedents and facial expressions of emotion. Cognition & Emotion, 10, 155–172. doi: 10.1080/026999396380312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Newman, M. L., Pennebaker, J. W., Berry, D. S., & Richards, J. M. (2003). Lying words: Predicting deception from linguistic style. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 665–675. doi: 10.1177/0146167203029005010.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. O’Connor, B. (1999). Simple and flexible SAS and SPSS programs for analyzing lag-sequential categorical data. Behavior Research Methods, Instrumentation, and Computers, 31, 718–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Porter, S., Doucette, N., Earle, J., & MacNeil, B. (2008). ‘Halfe the world knowes not how the other halfe lies’: Investigation of cues to deception exhibited by criminal offenders and non-offenders. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 13, 27–38. doi: 10.1348/135532507X186653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Porter, S., & ten Brinke, L. (2008). Reading between the lies: Identifying concealed and falsified emotions in universal facial expressions. Psychological Science, 19, 508–514. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02116.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Porter, S., & ten Brinke, L. (2010). The truth about lies: What works in detecting high-stakes deception? Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15, 57–75. doi: 10.1348/135532509X433151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Porter, S., ten Brinke, L., & Wilson, K. (2009). Crime profiles and conditional release performance of psychopathic and non-psychopathic sexual offenders. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 14, 109–118. doi: 10.1348/135532508X284310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Porter, S., & Yuille, J. C. (1995). Credibility assessment of criminal suspects through statement analysis. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 1, 319–331. doi: 10.1080/10683169508411969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Porter, S., Yuille, J. C., & Lehman, D. (1999). The nature of real, implanted, and fabricated memories for emotional childhood events: Implications for the recovered memory debate. Law and Human Behavior, 23, 517–538. doi: 10.1023/A:1022344128649.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. R. v. B. (1990). 36 O.A.C. 307.Google Scholar
  37. R. v. W.W.M. (2006). 206 O.A.C. 342.Google Scholar
  38. R. v. Struve. (2007). BCSC 1316.Google Scholar
  39. Ruback, B., & Hopper, H. (1986). Decision making by parole interviewers: The effect of case and interview factors. Law and Human Behavior, 10, 203–214. doi: 10.1007/BF01046210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Smith, N. (2008). I was wrong: The meanings of apologies. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tangney, J. P., & Dearing, R. L. (2002). Shame and guilt. New York, NY: Guildford Press.Google Scholar
  42. ten Brinke, L., & Porter, S. (2009). Friend or foe? The role of intuition in interpersonal trustworthiness and vulnerability assessments. In A. Columbus (Ed.), Advances in psychology research (Vol. 74). New York: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  43. Tracy, J. L., & Robins, R. W. (2006). Appraisal antecedents of shame and guilt: Support for a theoretical model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1339–1351. doi: 10.1177/0146167206290212.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Vrij, A. (2008). Detecting lies and deceit: Pitfalls and opportunities. Chichester, England: Wiley.Google Scholar
  45. Vrij, A., & Heaven, S. (1999). Vocal and verbal indicators of deception as a function of lie complexity. Psychology, Crime & Law, 5, 203–215. doi: 10.1080/10683169908401767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Weinberger, S. (2010). Airport security: Intent to deceive? Nature, 465, 412–415. doi: 10.1038/465412a.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Willis, J., & Todorov, A. (2006). First impressions: Making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face. Psychological Science, 17, 592–598. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01750.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Psychology-Law Society/Division 41 of the American Psychological Association 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leanne ten Brinke
    • 1
  • Sarah MacDonald
    • 2
  • Stephen Porter
    • 1
  • Brian O’Connor
    • 1
  1. 1.University of British ColumbiaKelownaCanada
  2. 2.Memorial University of NewfoundlandSt. John’sCanada

Personalised recommendations