Law and Human Behavior

, Volume 33, Issue 1, pp 96–109 | Cite as

The Reliability of Lie Detection Performance

  • Amy-May Leach
  • R. C. L. Lindsay
  • Rachel Koehler
  • Jennifer L. Beaudry
  • Nicholas C. Bala
  • Kang Lee
  • Victoria Talwar
Original Article

Abstract

We examined whether individuals’ ability to detect deception remained stable over time. In two sessions, held one week apart, university students viewed video clips of individuals and attempted to differentiate between the lie-tellers and truth-tellers. Overall, participants had difficulty detecting all types of deception. When viewing children answering yes–no questions about a transgression (Experiments 1 and 5), participants’ performance was highly reliable. However, rating adults who provided truthful or fabricated accounts did not produce a significant alternate forms correlation (Experiment 2). This lack of reliability was not due to the types of deceivers (i.e., children versus adults) or interviews (i.e., closed-ended questions versus extended accounts) (Experiment 3). Finally, the type of deceptive scenario (naturalistic vs. experimentally-manipulated) could not account for differences in reliability (Experiment 4). Theoretical and legal implications are discussed.

Keywords

Deception Lie detection Reliability Individual differences 

References

  1. Akehurst, L., Köhnken, G., Vrij, A., & Bull, R. (1996). Lay persons’ and police officers’ beliefs regarding deceptive behavior. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 461–471. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199612)10:6<461::AID-ACP413>3.0.CO;2-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, D. E., DePaulo, B. M., & Ansfield, M. E. (2002). The development of deception detection skill: A longitudinal study of same-sex friends. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 536–545. doi:10.1177/0146167202287010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, D. E., DePaulo, B. M., Ansfield, M. E., Tickle, J. J., & Green, E. (1999). Beliefs about cues to deception: Mindless stereotypes or untapped wisdom? Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 23, 67–89. doi:10.1023/A:1021387326192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bala, N., Ramakrishnan, K., Lindsay, R. C. L., & Lee, K. (2005). Judicial assessment of the credibility of child witnesses. Alberta Law Review, 42, 995–1017.Google Scholar
  5. Bond, G. D. (in press). Deception detection expertise. Law and Human Behaviour.Google Scholar
  6. Bond, C. F., Jr., & DePaulo, B. M. (2006). Accuracy of deception judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 214–234. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bond, C. F., Jr., & DePaulo, (in press). Individual differences in judging deception: Accuracy and bias. Psychological Bulletin.Google Scholar
  8. Bond, C. F., Jr., & Uysal, A. (2007). On lie detection “Wizards”. Law and Human Behavior, 31, 109–115. doi:10.1007/s10979-006-9016-1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bruck, M., Ceci, S. J., & Hembrooke, H. (1998). Reliability and credibility of young children’s reports: From research to policy and practice. American Psychologist, 53, 136–151. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.53.2.136.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Canada Customs and Revenue Agency. (1998). Student customs officer training program handbook – air. Rigaud, QC: Author.Google Scholar
  11. Ceci, S. J., & Bruck, M. (1995). Jeopardy in the courtroom: A scientific analysis of children’s testimony. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  12. Davis, M., Markus, K. A., & Walters, S. B. (2006). Judging the credibility of criminal suspect statements: Does mode of presentation matter? Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 30, 181–198. doi:10.1007/s10919-006-0016-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. DePaulo, B. M., & Kirkendol, S. E. (1989). The motivational impairment effects in the communication of deception. In J. Yuille (Ed.), Credibility assessment. Belgium: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  14. DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. J., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H. (2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 74–118. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. DePaulo, B. M., & Pfeifer, R. L. (1986). On-the-job experience and skill at detecting deception. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 249–267. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1986.tb01138.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. DePaulo, B. M., & Tang, J. (1994). Social anxiety and social judgment: The example of detecting deception. Journal of Research in Personality, 28, 142–153. doi:10.1006/jrpe.1994.1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Edelstein, R. S., Luten, T., Ekman, P., & Goodman, G. S. (2006). Detecting lies in children and adults. Law and Human Behavior, 30, 1–10. doi:10.1007/s10979-006-9031-2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ekman, P., & O’Sullivan, M. (1991). Who can catch a liar? American Psychologist, 9, 913–920. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.46.9.913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ekman, P., O’Sullivan, M., & Frank, M. G. (1999). A few can catch liars. Psychological Science, 10, 263–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Etcoff, N. L., Ekman, P., Magee, J. J., & Frank, M. G. (2000). Lie detection and language comprehension. Nature, 405, 139.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Feldman, R. S., Jerkins, L, & Popoola, O. (1979). Detection of deception in adults and children via facial expressions. Child Development, 50, 350–355. doi:10.2307/1129409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Feldman, R. S., & White, J. B. (1980). Detecting deception in children. Journal of Communication, 30, 121–128. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1980.tb01974.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Frank, F. G., & Ekman, P. (1997). The ability to detect deceit generalizes across different types of high-stakes lies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1429–1439. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.6.1429.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fritzley, V. H., & Lee, K. (2003). Do children always say yes to yes-no questions? A metadevelopmental study of the affirmation bias. Child Development, 74, 1297–1313. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00608.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Garrido, E., Masip, J., & Herrero, C. (2004). Police officer’s credibility judgments: Accuracy and estimated ability. International Journal of Psychology, 39, 254–275. doi:10.1080/00207590344000411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Granhag, P. A., & Strömwall, L. A. (2001). Deception detection based on repeated interrogations. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 6, 85–101. doi:10.1348/135532501168217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Inbau, F. E., Reid, J. E., Buckley, J. P., & Jayne, B. C. (2001). Criminal interrogation and confessions (4th ed.). Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen.Google Scholar
  28. Kassin, S. M., & Fong, C. T. (1999). “I’m innocent!”: Effects of training on judgments of truth and deception in the interrogation room. Law and Human Behavior, 23, 499–516. doi:10.1023/A:1022330011811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kassin, S. M., Leo, R. A., Meissner, C. A., Richman, K. D., Colwell, L. H., Leach, A.-M., & LaFon, D. (2007). Police interviewing and interrogation: A self-report survey of police practices and beliefs. Law and Human Behavior, 31, 381–400. doi:10.1007/s10979–006-9073-5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kraut, R. E., & Poe, D. (1980). Behavioral roots of person perception: The deception judgments of customs inspectors and laypersons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 784–798. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Köhnken, G. (1987). Training police officers to detect deceptive eyewitness statements: does it work? Social Behavior, 2, 1–17.Google Scholar
  32. Lane, J. D., & DePaulo, B. M. (1999). Completing Coyne’s cycle: Dysphorics’ ability to detect deception. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 311–329. doi:10.1006/jrpe.1999.2253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Leach, A.-M., Talwar, V., Lee, K., Bala, N. C., & Lindsay, R. C. L. (2004). “Intuitive” lie detection of children’s deception by law enforcement officials and university students. Law and Human Behavior, 28, 661–685. doi:10.1007/s10979-004-0793-0.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lewis, M., Stanger, C., & Sullivan, M. W. (1989). Deception in 3-year-olds. Developmental Psychology, 25, 439–443. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.25.3.439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mann, S., & Vrij, A. (2006). Police officers’ judgements of veracity, tenseness, cognitive load and attempted behavioural control in real-life police interviews. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 12, 307–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mann, S., Vrij, A., & Bull, R. (2004). Detecting true lies: Police officers’ ability to detect suspects’ lies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 137–149. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.137.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Meissner, C. A., & Kassin, S. M. (2002). “He’s guilty!”: Investigator bias in judgments of truth and deception. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 469–480. doi:10.1023/A:1020278620751.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. O’Sullivan, M. (2005). Emotional intelligence and deception detection: Why most people can’t “read” others, but a few can. In R. E. Riggio & R. S. Feldman (Eds.), Applications of nonverbal communication (pp. 215–253). Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  39. O’Sullivan, M. (2007). Unicorns or Tiger Woods: Are lie detection experts myths or rarities? A response to On lie detection “Wizards” by Bond and Ulysal. Law and Human Behavior, 31, 117–123. doi:10.1007/s10979-006-9058-4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. O’Sullivan, M., & Ekman, P. (2004). The wizards of deception detection. In P. A. Granhag & L. A. Strömwall (Eds.), Deception detection in forensic contexts (pp. 269–286). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Porter, S., Campbell, M. A., Stapleton, J., & Birt, A. R. (2002). The influence of judge, target, and stimulus characteristics on the accuracy of detecting deceit. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 34, 172–185.Google Scholar
  42. Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  43. Saarni, C., & Salisch, M. V. (1993). The socialization of emotional dissemblance. In M. Lewis & C. Saarni (Eds.), Lying and deception in everyday life (pp. 106–125). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  44. Sporer, S. (1997). The less travelled road to truth: Verbal cues in deception detection accounts of fabricated and self-experienced events. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11, 373–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Talwar, V., & Lee, K. (2002). Development of lying to conceal a transgression: Children’s control of expressive behaviour during verbal deception. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 26, 436–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Talwar, V., Lee, K., Bala, N., & Lindsay, R. C. L. (2006). Adults’ judgments of child witness credibility and veracity. Law and Human Behavior, 30, 561–570.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Vrij, A. (2005). Criteria-based content analysis: A qualitative review of the first 37 years. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11, 3–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Vrij, A., Akehurst, L., Brown, L., & Mann, S. (2006). Detecting lies in young children, adolescents, and adults. Applies Cognitive Psychology, 20, 1225–1237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Vrij, A., & Baxter, M. (1999). Accuracy and confidence in detecting truths and lies in elaborations and denials: Truth bias, lie bias and individual differences. Expert Evidence, 7, 25–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Vrij, A., Edward, K., & Bull, R. (2001). People’s insight into their own behaviour and speech content while lying. British Journal of Psychology, 92, 373–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Vrij, A., Edward, K., Roberts, K. P., & Bull, R. (2000). Detecting deceit via analysis of verbal and nonverbal behavior. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 24, 239–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Vrij, A., & Graham, S. (1997). Individual differences between liars and the ability to detect lies. Expert Evidence, 5, 144–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Vrij, A., & Mann, S. (2001a). Telling and detecting lies in a high-stake situation: The case of a convicted murderer. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 187–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Vrij, A., & Mann, S. (2001b). Who killed my relative? Police officers’ ability to detect real-life high-stake lies. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 7, 119–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Vrij, A., & Mann, S. (2004). Detecting deception: The benefit of looking at a combination of behavioral, auditory and speech content related cues in a systematic manner. Group Decision and Negotiation, 13, 61–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Vrij, A., Mann, S., Robbins, E., & Robinson, M. (2006). Police officers’ ability to detect deception in high stakes situations and in repeated lie detection tests. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 741–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Vrij, A., & Semin, G. R. (1996). Lie experts’ beliefs about nonverbal indicators of deception. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 20, 65–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wells, G. L., & Windshitl, P. D. (1999). Stimulus sampling in social psychological experimentation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1115–1125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zuckerman, M., DePaulo, B. M., & Rosenthal, R. (1981). Verbal and nonverbal communication of deception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 14, pp. 1–59). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© American Psychology-Law Society/Division 41 of the American Psychological Association 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amy-May Leach
    • 1
  • R. C. L. Lindsay
    • 2
  • Rachel Koehler
    • 2
  • Jennifer L. Beaudry
    • 2
  • Nicholas C. Bala
    • 2
  • Kang Lee
    • 3
  • Victoria Talwar
    • 4
  1. 1.Faculty of Criminology, Justice, and Policy StudiesUniversity of Ontario Institute of TechnologyOshawaCanada
  2. 2.Queen’s UniversityKingstonCanada
  3. 3.Institute of Child StudyUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  4. 4.McGill UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations