Deception Detection Expertise
- 543 Downloads
A lively debate between Bond and Uysal (2007, Law and Human Behavior, 31, 109–115) and O’Sullivan (2007, Law and Human Behavior, 31, 117–123) concerns whether there are experts in deception detection. Two experiments sought to (a) identify expert(s) in detection and assess them twice with four tests, and (b) study their detection behavior using eye tracking. Paroled felons produced videotaped statements that were presented to students and law enforcement personnel. Two experts were identified, both female Native American BIA correctional officers. Experts were over 80% accurate in the first assessment, and scored at 90% accuracy in the second assessment. In Signal Detection analyses, experts showed high discrimination, and did not evidence biased responding. They exploited nonverbal cues to make fast, accurate decisions. These highly-accurate individuals can be characterized as experts in deception detection.
KeywordsDynamic eye tracking Deception detection Nonverbal cues Expertise Novices Cues
The author wishes to thank Drs. Adrienne Lee, Anne Hubbell, Douglas Gillan, Dominic Simon, Timothy Ketelaar, and Daniel Malloy for assistance. Special thanks to Dr. Charles Bond, Jr., who provided statistical assistance and comments; and to Dr. Maureen O’Sullivan for comments. Thanks to graduate students Carlo González and Johnny Ramirez, and undergraduates Caroline Encarnacion, Timothy Dixon, and Ryan Brewer (New Mexico State University); Jennifer Johnson, Lassiter Speller, Amaris Lyles, Deidre Herring, Kristin Peoples, and Deandra Keys (Winston-Salem State University). Thanks to the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center in Artesia for their assistance.
- CBS News. (Producer). (1997). Stalkers: Against the law [Television broadcast]. (Available from CBS News, 524 W. 57th Street, New York, NY 10019).Google Scholar
- Charness, N., Reingold, E. M, Pomplun, M., & Stampe, D. M. (2001). The perceptual aspect of skilled performance in chess: Evidence from eye movements. Memory and Cognition, 29, 1146–1152.Google Scholar
- Ekman, P. (1985). Telling lies: Clues to deceit in the marketplace, marriage, and politics. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
- Ekman, P. (1992). Telling lies: Clues to deceit in the marketplace, marriage, and politics (2nd ed.). New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
- Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Revised edition. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Gudjonsson, G. H. (2003). The psychology of interrogations and confessions: A handbook. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
- O’Sullivan, M., & Ekman, P. (2004). The wizards of deception detection. In P. A. Granhag & L. Strömwell (Eds.), The detection of deception in forensic contexts. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Strömwall, L. A., & Granhag, P. A. (2004). The detection of deception in forensic contexts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar