Making Use of Paradoxes: Law, Transboundary Hydropower Dams and Beyond the Technical
Law’s regulation of transboundary hydropower dams is a field of study brimming with paradoxes. The most notable being the paradox of a hydropower dam solving one problem and creating another. From a logical perspective, such a paradox would typically be viewed as an obstacle to be avoided because it brings everything to a standstill. But from a social perspective, paradoxes are not necessarily negative, as managing them also potentially enlightens and transforms planning systems. The latter perspective, which brings to analysis a kind of dynamism, is employed in this text. In order to work out the reoccurring patterns under which law might productively make use of paradoxes, this text therefore proposes the methodological tools of exposing and building upon paradoxes. Exposing paradoxes sets out to make more visible some of the unthought limitations, self-deceptions and self-contradictions which arise in modern planning practices, while building upon paradoxes attempts to open up headways towards a more adequate conceptualisation of the solutions which law can offer. The overall intention here being to offer a Luhmannian-inspired theoretical framework which illuminates the value of social systems theory as a methodological tool for describing the communicative challenges facing law’s regulation of transboundary hydropower power dams.
KeywordsHydropower dams Law Niklas Luhmann Paradoxes Planning systems Social systems theory
I would like to thank David Devlaeminck and the two anonymous peer reviewers for their detailed and insightful comments made on previous drafts of this paper.
- Allmendinger, Philip. 2002. Planning theory. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
- Arendt, Hannah. 1958. The human condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Barret, Scott. 2003. Environment and statecraft: The strategy of environmental treaty-making. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Bond, Patrick. 2012. The right to the city and the eco-social communing of water: Discursive and political lessons from South Africa. In The right to water: Politics, governance, and social struggles, ed. Farhana Sultana, and Alex Loftus, 190–205. New York: Earthscan.Google Scholar
- Clarke, Bruce. 2014. Systems, media, narrative: From the trace to the telepathic imaginary. In Neocybernetics and narrative, ed. Gary Wolfe. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
- D’Amato, Anthony. 2009. Softness in international law: A self-serving quest for new legal materials: A reply to Jean d’Aspremont. European Journal of International Law 20 (3): 1057–1093.Google Scholar
- Firuz, Paul A. 2012. Looking forward: The Columbia river treaty. Washington Journal of Environmental Law and Policy 2 (1): 170–192.Google Scholar
- Fischer-Lescano, Andreas, and Gunther Teubner. 2004. Regime-collisions: The vain search for legal unity in the fragmentation of globlal law. Michigan Journal of International Law 25 (4): 999–1046.Google Scholar
- Groenfeldt, David. 2013. Water ethics: A values approach to solving the water crisis. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Hepler, Thomas E. 2006. Overview of proposed USSD guidelines on dam decommissioning: Bureau of reclamation, in the role of dams in the 21st century. http://geotechpedia.com/Publication/Show/2806/OVERVIEW-OF-PROPOSED-USSD-GUIDELINES--ON-DAM-DECOMMISSIONING. Accessed 28 March 2017.
- Hofstadter, Douglas. 2007. I am a strange loop. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Imhof, Aviva, and Guy Lanza. 2010. Greenwashing hydropower: The problems with big dams. World Watch Magazine 23 (1): 8–17.Google Scholar
- International Court of Justice. 2010. Case concerning pulp mills on the river Uruguay (Argentina/Uruguay). Judgment of 20 April 2010, ICJ reports 2010. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/135/15877.pdf. Accessed 26 Feb 2017.
- International Rivers. 2012. Infrastructure for whom? A critique of the infrastructure strategies of the Group of 20 and the World Bank. International rivers. https://www.internationalrivers.org/sites/default/files/attached-files/infrastructure_for_whom_report.pdf. Accessed 16 Oct 2016.
- Kerwer, Dieter. 2004. Governance in a world society: The perspective of systems theory. In Observing international relations: Niklas Luhmann and world politics, ed. M. Albert, and L. Hilkermeier, 196–207. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- King, Michael. 2009. Systems, not people, make society happen. Wilmington, DC: Holcombe Publishing.Google Scholar
- Koskenniemi, Martti. 1996. The place of law in collective security. Michigan Journal of International Law 17.Google Scholar
- Luhmann, Niklas. 1976. The future cannot begin: Temporal structures in modern society. Social Research 43 (1): 130–152.Google Scholar
- Luhmann, Niklas. 1989. Ecological communication. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Luhmann, Niklas. 1990a. Political theory in the welfare state. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
- Luhmann, Niklas. 1990b. Sthenography. Stanford Literature Review 7: 137.Google Scholar
- Luhmann, Niklas. 1993. Risk: A sociological theory. Trans. R. Barret. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
- Luhmann, Niklas. 1995. Social systems. Trans. John Bednarz, and Dirk Baecker. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Luhmann, Niklas. 1998. Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft: The Society of Society. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
- Luhmann, Niklas. 1999. Politique et complexité. Paris: CERF.Google Scholar
- Luhmann, Niklas. 2004. Law as a social system. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Luhmann, Niklas. 2012. Theory of society (Volume 1). Trans. Rhodes Barret. Cultural memory in the present. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Luhmann, Niklas. 2013. A sociological theory of law 2. Routledge: Aufl. Glasshouse Books.Google Scholar
- Magsig, Bjorn-Oliver. 2011. Overcoming state-centrism in international water law: Regional common concern as the normative foundation of water security. Goettingen Journal of International Law 3: 317.Google Scholar
- Mathias, Albert, and Lena Hilkermeier. ed. 2004. Organizations in/and world society: A theoretical prolegomenon. In Observing international relations. Niklas Luhmann and world politics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Maturana, Humberto R., and Francisco J. Varela. 1987. The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding. Boston: New Science Library/Shambhala Publications.Google Scholar
- Moeller, Hans-Georg. 2005. Luhmann explained: From souls to systems. Chicago, IL: Open Court Publishing.Google Scholar
- Nassehi, Armin. 2002. Politik des staates oder politik der gesellschaft? Kollektivität als problemformel des politischen. In Theorie der politik, ed. K.U. Hellmann, and R. Schmalz-Bruns. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
- Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, Andreas. 2006. Absent environments: Theorising environmental law and the city. London: Routledge-Cavendish.Google Scholar
- Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, Andreas. 2013. Critical autopoiesis and the materiality of law. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law: 13.Google Scholar
- Pribáñ, Jiri. 2001. Legitimation between the noise of politics and the order of law. In Law’s new boundaries: The consequences of legal autopoiesis, ed. J. Pribáñ, and D. Nelken. Aldershot: Dartmouth Ashgate.Google Scholar
- Rieu-Clarke, Alistair. 2015. Transboundary hydropower projects seen through the lens of three international legal regimes—foreign investment, environmental protection and human rights. International Journal of Water Governance 3 (1): 27–48.Google Scholar
- Ruo, Liao. 2011. Lessons from the Irrawaddy. China dialogue. https://www.chinadialogue.net/article/show/single/en/4574-Lessons-from-the-Irrawaddy. Accessed 16 October 2016.
- Teubner, Gunther. 2011. And god laughed: Indeterminacy, self-reference and paradox in law. German Law Journal 12 (1): 376–406.Google Scholar
- UN-Water. 2008. Transboundary waters: Sharing benefits, sharing responsibilities. UN-Water Thematic Paper.Google Scholar
- Wilson, Jessica. 2002. The sponsorship scam. In Battling big business: Countering greenwash front groups and other forms of corporate bullying, ed. Lorenzo R. Scupoli, 44–52. Monroe: Common Courage Press.Google Scholar
- World Wildlife Fund. 2004. Rivers at risk: Dams and the future of freshwater ecosystems. WWF Dams Initiative.Google Scholar
- Zeitoun, Mark, Marisa Goulden, and David Tickner. 2013. Current and future challenges facing transboundary river basin management. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 4 (5): 331–349.Google Scholar