Advertisement

Simulation of thermal behavior of hybrid nanomaterial in a tube improved with turbulator

  • Ahmad Shafee
  • M. Jafaryar
  • Elham Abohamzeh
  • Nguyen Dang Nam
  • Iskander TliliEmail author
Article
  • 17 Downloads

Abstract

Simulation of swirl flow intensification with the use of new device inside a pipe was performed in the current investigation. To improve the feature of testing fluid, hybrid nanopowders were dispersed. Outputs were exhibited in terms of contours. Tangential velocity of nanomaterial augments with the increase in Re, and stronger convective mode is obtained with the rise in Re. Thinner thermal boundary layer close to the wall is an output of reducing pitch ratio and leads to greater Nu. Augmenting contact surface area with a decline in pitch ratio leads to stronger secondary flow.

Keywords

Swirl intensity Convection Darcy factor Nanoparticle Simulation 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Yang L, Du K. A comprehensive review on the natural, forced and mixed convection of non-Newtonian fluids (nanofluids) inside different cavities. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-019-08987-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vo DD, Hedayat M, Ambreen T, Shehzad SA, Sheikholeslami M, Shafee A, Nguyen TK. Effectiveness of various shapes of Al2O3 nanoparticles on the MHD convective heat transportation in porous medium: CVFEM modeling. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-019-08501-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Szilágyi IM, Kállay-Menyhárd A, Šulcová P, Kristóf J, Pielichowski K, Šimon P. Recent advances in thermal analysis and calorimetry presented at the 1st Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry Conference and 6th V4 (Joint Czech-Hungarian-Polish-Slovakian) Thermoanalytical Conference (2017). J Therm Anal Calorim. 2018;133:1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sheikholeslami M, Arabkoohsar A, Shafee A, Ismail KAR. Second law analysis of a porous structured enclosure with nano-enhanced phase change material and under magnetic force. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-019-08979-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yang L, Xu J, Du K, Zhang X. Recent developments on viscosity and thermal conductivity of nanofluids. Powder Technol. 2017;317:348–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sheikholeslami M, Rokni HB. Magnetic nanofluid flow and convective heat transfer in a porous cavity considering Brownian motion effects. Phys Fluids. 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5012517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ma X, Sheikholeslami M, Jafaryar M, Shafee A, Nguyen-Thoi T, Li Z. Solidification inside a clean energy storage unit utilizing phase change material with copper oxide nanoparticles. J Clean Prod. 2019.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sheikholeslami M, Mahian O. Enhancement of PCM solidification using inorganic nanoparticles and an external magnetic field with application in energy storage systems. J Clean Prod. 2019;215:963–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sheikholeslami M, Arabkoohsar A, Babazadeh H. Modeling of nanomaterial treatment through a porous space including magnetic forces. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-019-08878-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Aly AM, Raizah ZAS, Sheikholeslami M. Analysis of mixed convection in a sloshing porous cavity filled with a nanofluid using ISPH method. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-019-08575-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sheikholeslami M. Influence of coulomb forces on Fe3O4–H2O nanofluid thermal improvement. Int J Hydrog Energy. 2017;42:821–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sheikholeslami M, Vajravelu K. Nanofluid flow and heat transfer in a cavity with variable magnetic field. Appl Math Comput. 2017;298:272–82.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Qin Y. Pavement surface maximum temperature increases linearly with solar absorption and reciprocal thermal inertial. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2016;97:391–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sheikholeslami M. Magnetic field influence on nanofluid thermal radiation in a cavity with tilted elliptic inner cylinder. J Mol Liq. 2017;229:137–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sheikholeslami M, Shamlooei M. Fe3O4–H2O nanofluid natural convection in presence of thermal radiation. Int J Hydrog Energy. 2017;42(9):5708–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gao W, Yan L, Shi L. Generalized Zagreb index of polyomino chains and nanotubes. Optoelectron Adv Materi Rapid Commun. 2017;11(1–2):119–24.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sheikholeslami M, Gerdroodbary MB, Shafee A, Tlili I. Hybrid nanoparticles dispersion into water inside a porous wavy tank involving magnetic force. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-019-08858-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sheikholeslami M, Arabkoohsar A, Khan I, Shafee A, Li Z. Impact of Lorentz forces on Fe3O4–water ferrofluid entropy and exergy treatment within a permeable semi annulus. J Clean Prod. 2019;221:885–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Qin Y, Liang J, Tan K, Li F. A side by side comparison of the cooling effect of building blocks with retro-reflective and diffuse-reflective walls. Sol Energy. 2016;133:172–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sheikholeslami M, Rezaeianjouybari B, Darzi M, Shafee A, Li Z, Nguyen TK. Application of nano-refrigerant for boiling heat transfer enhancement employing an experimental study. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2019;141:974–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sheikholeslami M, Arabkoohsar A, Jafaryar M. Impact of a helical-twisting device on nanofluid thermal hydraulic performance of a tube. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-019-08683-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sheikholeslami M, Rokni HB. Influence of EFD viscosity on nanofluid forced convection in a cavity with sinusoidal wall. J Mol Liq. 2017;232:390–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sheikholeslami M. Effect of uniform suction on nanofluid flow and heat transfer over a cylinder. J Braz. Soc Mech Sci Eng. 2015;37:1623–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Qin Y, He Y, Wu B, Ma S, Zhang X. Regulating top albedo and bottom emissivity of concrete roof tiles for reducing building heat gains. Energy Build. 2017;156(Supplement C):218–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Seyednezhad M, Sheikholeslami M, Ali JA, Shafee A, Nguyen TK. Nanoparticles for water desalination in solar heat exchanger: review. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-019-08634-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sheikholeslami M. Lattice Boltzmann method simulation of MHD non-Darcy nanofluid free convection. Phys B. 2017;516:55–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sheikholeslami M. Influence of magnetic field on nanofluid free convection in an open porous cavity by means of Lattice Boltzmann Method. J Mol Liq. 2017;234:364–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Qin Y, He H. A new simplified method for measuring the albedo of limited extent targets. Solar Energy. 2017;157(Supplement C):1047–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sheikholeslami M. Magnetic field influence on CuO-H2O nanofluid convective flow in a permeable cavity considering various shapes for nanoparticles. Int J Hydrog Energy. 2017;42:19611–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Nguyen TK, Sheikholeslami M, Jafaryar M, Shafee A, Li Z, Chandra Mouli KVV, Tlili I. Design of heat exchanger with combined turbulator. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-019-08401-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sheikholeslami M. Numerical investigation for CuO-H2O nanofluid flow in a porous channel with magnetic field using mesoscopic method. J Mol Liq. 2018;249:739–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sheikholeslami M. Magnetohydrodynamic nanofluid forced convection in a porous lid driven cubic cavity using Lattice Boltzmann method. J Mol Liq. 2017;231:555–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Qin Y, Zhang M, Hiller JE. Theoretical and experimental studies on the daily accumulative heat gain from cool roofs. Energy. 2017;129:138–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sheikholeslami M, Sheremet MA, Shafee A, Li Z. CVFEM approach for EHD flow of nanofluid through porous medium within a wavy chamber under the impacts of radiation and moving walls. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-019-08235-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Qin Y, Zhao Y, Chen X, Wang L, Li F, Bao T. Moist curing increases the solar reflectance of concrete. Constr Build Mater. 2019;215:114–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sheikholeslami M. Investigation of Coulomb forces effects on Ethylene glycol based nanofluid laminar flow in a porous enclosure. Appl Math Mech (Engl Ed). 2018;39(9):1341–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sheikholeslami M, Vajravelu K, Rashidi MM. Forced convection heat transfer in a semi annulus under the influence of a variable magnetic field. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2016;92:339–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sheikholeslami M, Ellahi R. Three dimensional mesoscopic simulation of magnetic field effect on natural convection of nanofluid. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2015;89:799–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Farshad SA, Sheikholeslami M. Simulation of exergy loss of nanomaterial through a solar heat exchanger with insertion of multi-channel twisted tape. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-019-08156-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sheikholeslami M. New computational approach for exergy and entropy analysis of nanofluid under the impact of Lorentz force through a porous media. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2019;344:319–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Sheikholeslami M. Numerical approach for MHD Al2O3-water nanofluid transportation inside a permeable medium using innovative computer method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2019;344:306–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Qin Y, Liang J, Yang H, Deng Z. Gas permeability of pervious concrete and its implications on the application of pervious pavements. Measurement. 2016;78:104–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Sheikholeslami M, Rokni HB. Numerical simulation for impact of Coulomb force on nanofluid heat transfer in a porous enclosure in presence of thermal radiation. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2018;118:823–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Sheikholeslami M, Shehzad SA. Numerical analysis of Fe3O4–H2O nanofluid flow in permeable media under the effect of external magnetic source. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2018;118:182–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Sheikholeslami M, Jafaryar M, Shafee A, Li Z. Nanofluid heat transfer and entropy generation through a heat exchanger considering a new turbulator and CuO nanoparticles. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-018-7866-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Qin Y. A review on the development of cool pavements to mitigate urban heat island effect. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2015;52:445–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Sheikholeslami M, Sadoughi MK. Simulation of CuO-water nanofluid heat transfer enhancement in presence of melting surface. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2018;116:909–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Sheikholeslami M, Rokni HB. Simulation of nanofluid heat transfer in presence of magnetic field: a review. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2017;115:1203–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Gao W, Wang WF. The vertex version of weighted wiener number for bicyclic molecular structures. Comput Math Methods Med. 2015, Article ID 418106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/418106.
  50. 50.
    Sheikholeslami M, Sadoughi M. Mesoscopic method for MHD nanofluid flow inside a porous cavity considering various shapes of nanoparticles. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2017;113:106–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Sheikholeslami M, Bhatti MM. Forced convection of nanofluid in presence of constant magnetic field considering shape effects of nanoparticles. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2017;111:1039–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Sheikholeslami M, Gerdroodbary MB, Moradi R, Shafee A, Li Z. Application of neural network for estimation of heat transfer treatment of Al2O3-H2O nanofluid through a channel. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2019;344:1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Sheikholeslami M, Rokni HB. Numerical modeling of nanofluid natural convection in a semi annulus in existence of Lorentz force. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2017;317:419–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Qin Y, Luo J, Chen Z, Mei G, Yan L-E. Measuring the albedo of limited-extent targets without the aid of known-albedo masks. Sol Energy. 2018;171:971–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Sheikholeslami M, Seyednezhad M. Nanofluid heat transfer in a permeable enclosure in presence of variable magnetic field by means of CVFEM. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2017;114:1169–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Sheikholeslami M, Rokni HB. Melting heat transfer influence on nanofluid flow inside a cavity in existence of magnetic field. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2017;114:517–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Sheikholeslami M, Shehzad SA, Abbasi FM, Li Z. Nanofluid flow and forced convection heat transfer due to Lorentz forces in a porous lid driven cubic enclosure with hot obstacle. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2018;338:491–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Manh TD, Nam ND, Abdulrahman GK, Moradi R, Babazadeh H. Impact of MHD on hybrid nanomaterial free convective flow within a permeable region. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-019-09008-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Sheikholeslami M, Shehzad SA. Magnetohydrodynamic nanofluid convection in a porous enclosure considering heat flux boundary condition. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2017;106:1261–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Sheikholeslami M. Influence of magnetic field on Al2O3-H2O nanofluid forced convection heat transfer in a porous lid driven cavity with hot sphere obstacle by means of LBM. J Mol Liq. 2018;263:472–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Sheikholeslami M. Finite element method for PCM solidification in existence of CuO nanoparticles. J Mol Liq. 2018;265:347–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Qin Y, Hiller JE, Meng D. Linearity between pavement thermophysical properties and surface temperatures. J Mater Civ Eng. 2019.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Sheikholeslami M. Application of Darcy law for nanofluid flow in a porous cavity under the impact of Lorentz forces. J Mol Liq. 2018;266:495–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Sheikholeslami M. Solidification of NEPCM under the effect of magnetic field in a porous thermal energy storage enclosure using CuO nanoparticles. J Mol Liq. 2018;263:303–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Sheikholeslami M, Haq R, Shafee A, Li Z, Elaraki YG, Tlili I. Heat transfer simulation of heat storage unit with nanoparticles and fins through a heat exchanger. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2019;135:470–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Sheikholeslami M, Jafaryar M, Shafee A, Li Z, Haq R. Heat transfer of nanoparticles employing innovative turbulator considering entropy generation. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2019;136:1233–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Manh TD, Nam ND, Abdulrahman GK, Shafee A, Shamlooei M, Babazadeh H, Jilani AK, Tlili I. Effect of radiative source term on the behavior of nanomaterial with considering Lorentz forces. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-019-09077-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Sheikholeslami M, Haq R, Shafee A, Li Z. Heat transfer behavior of Nanoparticle enhanced PCM solidification through an enclosure with V shaped fins. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2019;130:1322–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Alrobaian AA, Alsagri AS, Ali JA, Hamad SM, Shafee A, Nguyen TK, Li Z. Investigation of convective nanomaterial flow and exergy drop considering CVFEM within a porous tank. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-019-08564-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Sheikholeslami M, Jafaryar M, Hedayat M, Shafee A, Li Z, Nguyen TK, Bakouri M. Heat transfer and turbulent simulation of nanomaterial due to compound turbulator including irreversibility analysis. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2019;137:1290–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Rafatijo H, Thompson DL. General application of Tolman’s concept of activation energy. J Chem Phys. 2017;147:224111.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5009751.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Rafatijo H, Monge-Palacios M, Thompson DL. Identifying collisions of various molecularities in molecular dynamics simulations. J Phys Chem A. 2019;123(6):1131–9.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.8b11686.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Jouybari BR, Osgouie KG, Meghdari A. Optimization of kinematic redundancy and workspace analysis of a dual-arm cam-lock robot. Robotica. 2016;34(1):23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Sheikholeslami M, Shehzad SA, Li Z, Shafee A. Numerical modeling for Alumina nanofluid magnetohydrodynamic convective heat transfer in a permeable medium using Darcy law. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2018;127:614–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Adldoost H, Jouibary BR, Zabihollah A. Design of SMA micro-gripper for minimally invasive surgery. In: 2012 19th Iranian conference of biomedical engineering (ICBME); 2012. p. 97–100.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Sheikholeslami M, Li Z, Shafee A. Lorentz forces effect on NEPCM heat transfer during solidification in a porous energy storage system. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2018;127:665–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Rezaeianjouybari B, Osgouie KG, Meghdari A. Employing neural networks for manipulability optimization of the dual-arm cam-lock robot. In: ASME international mechanical engineering congress and exposition, proceedings (IMECE); 2010, vol. 8.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Sheikholeslami M, Ghasemi A, Li Z, Shafee A, Saleem S. Influence of CuO nanoparticles on heat transfer behavior of PCM in solidification process considering radiative source term. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2018;126:1252–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Li Y, Aski FS, Barzinjy AA, Dara RN, Shafee A, Tlili I. Nanomaterial thermal treatment along a permeable cylinder. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-019-08706-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Sheikholeslami M, Darzi M, Li Z. Experimental investigation for entropy generation and exergy loss of nano-refrigerant condensation process. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2018;125:1087–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Sheikholeslami M, Shehzad SA, Li Z. Water based nanofluid free convection heat transfer in a three dimensional porous cavity with hot sphere obstacle in existence of Lorenz forces. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2018;125:375–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Yang L, Mao M, Huang JN, Ji W. Enhancing the thermal conductivity of SAE 50 engine oil by adding zinc oxide nano-powder: an experimental study. Powder Technol. 2019;356:335–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Sheikholeslami M, Ghasemi A. Solidification heat transfer of nanofluid in existence of thermal radiation by means of FEM. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2018;123:418–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Sheikholeslami M, Jafaryar M, Saleem S, Li Z, Shafee A, Jiang Y. Nanofluid heat transfer augmentation and exergy loss inside a pipe equipped with innovative turbulators. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2018;126:156–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Qin Y, He Y, Hiller JE, Mei G. A new water-retaining paver block for reducing runoff and cooling pavement. J Clean Prod. 2018;199:948–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Sheikholeslami M, Shehzad SA. CVFEM simulation for nanofluid migration in a porous medium using Darcy model. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2018;122:1264–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Tlili I, Alkanhal TA, Othman M, Dara RN, Shafee A. Water management and desalination in KSA view 2030: case study of solar humidification and dehumidification system. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-019-08700-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Sheikholeslami M, Darzi M, Sadoughi MK. Heat transfer improvement and pressure drop during condensation of refrigerant-based nanofluid: an experimental procedure. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2018;122:643–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Qin Y, He H, Ou X, Bao T. Experimental study on darkening water-rich mud tailings for accelerating desiccation. J Clean Prod. 2019.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Sheikholeslami M, Shehzad SA. Simulation of water based nanofluid convective flow inside a porous enclosure via Non-equilibrium model. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2018;120:1200–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Sheikholeslami M, Seyednezhad M. Simulation of nanofluid flow and natural convection in a porous media under the influence of electric field using CVFEM. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2018;120:772–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Sheikholeslami M, Shehzad SA. CVFEM for influence of external magnetic source on Fe3O4–H2O nanofluid behavior in a permeable cavity considering shape effect. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2017;115:180–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Sheikholeslami M, Zeeshan A. Analysis of flow and heat transfer in water based nanofluid due to magnetic field in a porous enclosure with constant heat flux using CVFEM. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2017;320:68–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Sheikholeslami M, Bhatti MM. Active method for nanofluid heat transfer enhancement by means of EHD. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2017;109:115–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Sheikholeslami M, Hayat T, Alsaedi A. Numerical study for external magnetic source influence on water based nanofluid convective heat transfer. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2017;106:745–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Qin Y, Hiller JE. Understanding pavement-surface energy balance and its implications on cool pavement development. Energy Build. 2014;85:389–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Sheikholeslami M. Numerical simulation for solidification in a LHTESS by means of nano-enhanced PCM. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng. 2018;86:25–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Gao W, Wang WF. The eccentric connectivity polynomial of two classes of nanotubes. Chaos Solitons Fractals. 2016;89:290–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Sheikholeslami M. Numerical modeling of Nano enhanced PCM solidification in an enclosure with metallic fin. J Mol Liq. 2018;259:424–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Qin Y. Urban canyon albedo and its implication on the use of reflective cool pavements. Energy Build. 2015;96:86–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Sheikholeslami M. Numerical investigation of nanofluid free convection under the influence of electric field in a porous enclosure. J Mol Liq. 2018;249:1212–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Sheikholeslami M, Shehzad SA. Thermal radiation of ferrofluid in existence of Lorentz forces considering variable viscosity. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2017;109:82–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Qin Y, Zhang M, Mei G. A new simplified method for measuring the permeability characteristics of highly porous media. J Hydrol. 2018;562:725–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Sheikholeslami M, Rokni HB. Nanofluid two phase model analysis in existence of induced magnetic field. Int J Heat and Mass Transf. 2017;107:288–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Sheikholeslami M, Hayat T, Alsaedi A, Abelman S. Numerical analysis of EHD nanofluid force convective heat transfer considering electric field dependent viscosity. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2017;108:2558–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Sheikholeslami M. CuO-water nanofluid flow due to magnetic field inside a porous media considering Brownian motion. J Mol Liq. 2018;249:921–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Yang L, Ji W, Huang JN, Xu G. An updated review on the influential parameters on thermal conductivity of nano-fluids. J Mol Liq. 2019;296:111780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Tiwari AK, Ghosh P, Sarkar J. Heat transfer and pressure drop characteristics of CeO2/water nanofluid in plate heat exchanger. Appl Therm Eng. 2013;57(1):24–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Do KH, Ha HJ, Jang SP. Thermal resistance of screen mesh wick heat pipes using the water-based Al2O3 nanofluids. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2010;53(25):5888–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Wang P-Y, Chen X-J, Liu Z-H, Liu Y-P. Application of nanofluid in an inclined mesh wicked heat pipes. Thermochim Acta. 2012;539:100–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Liu R, Xia GD, Du M. Characteristics of convective heat transfer in triangular microchannel heat sink using different nanofluids. Chin J Chem Eng. 2016;67:4936–43.Google Scholar
  112. 112.
    Sandhu H, Gangacharyulu D, Singh MK. Experimental investigations on the cooling performance of microchannels using alumina nanofluids with different base fluids. J Enhanc Heat Transf. 2018;25:283–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Maré T, Halelfadl S, Sow O, Estellé P, Duret S, Bazantay F. Comparison of the thermal performances of two nanofluids at low temperature in a plate heat exchanger. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci. 2011;35(8):1535–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Sheikholeslami M, Mehryan SAM, Shafee A, Sheremet MA. Variable magnetic forces impact on Magnetizable hybrid nanofluid heat transfer through a circular cavity. J Mol Liq. 2019;277:388–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Farshad SA, Sheikholeslami M. Nanofluid flow inside a solar collector utilizing twisted tape considering exergy and entropy analysis. Renew Energy. 2019;141:246–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    Sheikholeslami M, Jafaryar M, Li Z. Nanofluid turbulent convective flow in a circular duct with helical turbulators considering CuO nanoparticles. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2018;124:980–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    Kim D, Kwon Y, Cho Y, Li C, Cheong S, Hwang Y, Lee J, Hong D, Moona S. Convective heat transfer characteristics of nanofluids under laminar and turbulent flow conditions. Curr Appl Phys. 2009;9:119–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ahmad Shafee
    • 1
  • M. Jafaryar
    • 2
  • Elham Abohamzeh
    • 3
  • Nguyen Dang Nam
    • 1
  • Iskander Tlili
    • 4
    • 5
    Email author
  1. 1.Institute of Research and DevelopmentDuy Tan UniversityDa NangVietnam
  2. 2.Renewable Energy Systems and Nanofluid Applications in Heat Transfer LaboratoryBabol Noshirvani University of TechnologyBabolIran
  3. 3.Department of EnergyMaterial and Energy Research Center (MERC)KarajIran
  4. 4.Department for Management of Science and Technology DevelopmentTon Duc Thang UniversityHo Chi Minh CityVietnam
  5. 5.Faculty of Applied SciencesTon Duc Thang UniversityHo Chi Minh CityVietnam

Personalised recommendations