Advertisement

Application of TG technique to determine spontaneous heating propensity of coals

  • Niroj Kumar MohalikEmail author
  • Edward Lester
  • Ian S. Lowndes
Article
  • 12 Downloads

Abstract

The TG method is applied to eleven coal samples of varying rank collected from across the Jharia coalfield, India, to determine spontaneous heating susceptibility. Previous literature does not agree as to the TG experimental parameter that characterizes the spontaneous heating susceptibility of coal. A series of TG experiments were performed on triplicate samples of each coal to determine the susceptibility of coal to spontaneous heating. Each prepared sample had the following properties: mass–10 mg, size distribution − 212 µm, and was subjected to a sample gas flow rate of 40 mL min−1 and a balance gas flow rate of 60 mL min−1 under the following four different heating rates: 1, 5, 15 and 30 °C min−1. The study concludes that the heating rate of 5 °C min−1 should be used to determine the spontaneous heating susceptibility. The experimental data obtained are subjected to chemo-metric tools, i.e. principal component analysis and hierarchical clustering analysis to establish any linkage between the coal characteristics parameters and spontaneous heating susceptibility indices. These analyses reveal that the self-heating (Tsh) and ignition temperature (Tign) determined from the TG experiment results may indicate the susceptibility of coal to spontaneous heating, which is corroborated by well-established standard experiments as well as with field observations.

Keywords

Coal Thermogravimetric analysis (TG) Spontaneous heating Jharia coalfield 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Authors are grateful to Commonwealth Scholarship Commission, UK and The University of Nottingham for their financial support (Commonwealth Scholarship and Fellowship Plan—2010, INCS-2010-192). The authors are obliged to Ministry of Human Resources and Development, Government of India and Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) for their kind permission to avail the above fellowship. Authors acknowledge thanks to Director, CSIR-CIMFR, all staffs of Mine Fire, Ventilation and Miner’s Safety Research Group, CSIR-CIMFR for necessary help for the sample collection.

References

  1. 1.
    Dhar BB. Keynote address on status of mine fires—trends and challenges. In: Proceedings of the conference on prevention and control of mine and industrial fires—trends and challenges, Calcutta, India; 1996. p. 1–8.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zutshi A, Ray SK, Bhowmick BC. Indian coal vis-à-vis spontaneous heating problems. J Mines Metals Fuels. 2001;44(5):123–8.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Banerjee SC. Prevention and combating mine fires. New Delhi: Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd; 2000. p. 33.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Banerjee SC, Chakraborty RN. Use of DTA in the study of spontaneous combustion of coal. J Mines Metals Fuels. 1967;15:1–5.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mohalik NK, Lester E, Lowndes IS. Review of experimental methods to determine spontaneous combustion susceptibility of coal—Indian context. Int J Min Reclam Environ. 2016;31:1–32.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kok M. Recent developments in the application of thermal analysis techniques in fossil fuels. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2008;91(3):763–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mohalik NK, Panigrahi DC, Singh VK. An investigation to optimise the experimental parameters of differential scanning calorimetry method to predict the susceptibility of coal to spontaneous heating. Arch Min Sci. 2010;55(3):669–89.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mohalik NK, Panigrahi DC, Singh VK. Application of thermal analysis techniques to assess proneness of coal to spontaneous heating. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2009;98(2):507–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Marinov VN. Self-ignition and mechanisms of interaction of coal with oxygen at low temperatures. 2. Changes in weight and thermal effects on gradual heating of coal in air in the range 20–300 °C. Fuel. 1977;56(2):158–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Marinov VN. Self-ignition and mechanisms of interaction of coal with oxygen at low temperatures. 1. Changes in the composition of coal heated at constant rate to 250 °C in air. Fuel. 1977;56(2):153–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Marinov VN. Self-ignition and mechanisms of interaction of coal with oxygen at low temperatures. 3. Changes in the composition of coal heated in air at 60 °C. Fuel. 1977;56(2):165–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Marinov SP, et al. Combustion behaviour of some biodesulphurized coals assessed by TGA/DTA. Thermochim Acta. 2010;497(1–2):46–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mahajan OP, Walker PL Jr. Water adsorption on coals. Fuel. 1971;50(3):308–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kok MV. Simultaneous thermogravimetry–calorimetry study on the combustion of coal samples: effect of heating rate. Energy Convers Manag. 2012;53(1):40–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhang Y, et al. Characteristics of mass, heat and gaseous products during coal spontaneous combustion using TG/DSC–FTIR technology. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2017;131:2963–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zeng Q, Pu Y, Cao Z. Kinetics of oxidation and spontaneous combustion of major super-thick coal seam in Eastern Junggar Coalfield, Xinjiang, China. J Loss Prev Process Ind. 2018;56:128–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Deng J, et al. Gases and thermal behavior during high-temperature oxidation of weathered coal. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019;138:1573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gao J, Chang M, Shen J. Comparison of bituminous coal apparent activation energy in different heating rates and oxygen concentrations based on thermo gravimetric analysis. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2017;130(2):1181–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wang K, et al. Kinetics and mechanisms of coal oxidation mass gain phenomenon by TG–FTIR and in situ IR analysis. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2018;132(1):591–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Avila CR. Predicting self-oxidation of coals and coal/biomass blends using thermal and optical methods. Ph.D. thesis, University of Nottingham; 2012.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Avila C, Wu T, Lester E. Estimating the spontaneous combustion potential of coals using thermogravimetric analysis. Energy Fuels. 2014;28:1765–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mohalik NK, Lester E, Lowndes IS. Development a modified crossing point temperature (CPTHR) method to assess spontaneous combustion propensity of coal and its chemo-metric analysis. J Loss Prev Process Ind. 2018;56:359–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rencher AC. Methods of Multivariate Analysis. Hoboken: Wiley; 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    STATISTICA-7.0. Electronic mannual statistica 7; 2004.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mine Fire, Ventilation Miner’s Safety and Health DivisionCSIR-Central Institute of Mining and Fuel ResearchDhanbadIndia
  2. 2.Faculty of EngineeringUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations