Advertisement

Significance of exponential space- and thermal-dependent heat source effects on nanofluid flow due to radially elongated disk with Coriolis and Lorentz forces

  • Basavarajappa Mahanthesh
  • Giulio LorenziniEmail author
  • Feteh Mebarek Oudina
  • Isac Lare Animasaun
Article
  • 16 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper, the nanofluid flow near an infinite disk which stretches in the radial direction in the presence of exponential space-based heat source (ESHS) and thermal-based heat source (THS) is investigated. The Brownian motion and thermophoresis effects are accounted to study the nanofluids. Effects of radial magnetism and the Coriolis force are also deployed. The pertinent nonlinear equations are approximated under boundary layer notion and modified von Kármán transformations. The subsequent nonlinear differential system is treated via shooting method. The impacts of controlling parameters on flow profiles are discussed and depicted with the aid of graphs. Results show that as the ESHS and THS parameters increase, the thermal field increases. However, ESHS phenomenon is highly influential than THS phenomenon on energy transport and its gradient. Further, it is found that thermophoresis slip mechanism has more effect on heat transport rate than the Brownian motion.

Keywords

Rotating disk Nanofluid Exponential heat source Buongiorno model Radial magnetic field Shooting method 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author (B Mahanthesh) is thankful to the Management of CHRIST (Deemed to be University), Bangalore, India, for their support to complete this research work. We would also like to thank the Editor and the anonymous reviewers for their constructive suggestions.

References

  1. 1.
    Choi SUS. Enhancing thermal conductivity of fluids with nanoparticles. In: ASME, FED 231/MD, vol 66, p 99–105. 1995.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kuznetsov AV, Nield DA. Natural Convective boundary-layer flow of a nanofluid past a vertical plate: a revised model. Int J Therm Sci. 2014;77:126–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sheikholeslami M, Mustafa MT, Ganji DD. Effect of Lorentz forces on forced convection nanofluid flow over a stretched surface. Particuology. 2016;26:108–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hayat T, Aziz A, Muhammad T, Alsaedi A, Mustafa M. On magnetohydrodynamic flow of second-grade nanofluid over a convectively heated nonlinear stretching surface. Adv Powder Technol. 2016;27:1992–2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hsiao KL. Micropolar nanofluid flow with MHD and viscous dissipation effects towards a stretching sheet with multimedia feature. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2017;112:983–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Reddy JR, Sugunamma V, Sandeep N. Thermophoresis and Brownian motion effects on unsteady MHD nanofluid flow over a slendering stretching surface with slip effects. Alex Eng J. 2018;57(4):2465–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Makinde OD, Animasaun IL. Thermophoresis and Brownian motion effects on MHD bioconvection of nanofluid with nonlinear thermal radiation and quartic chemical reaction past an upper horizontal surface of a paraboloid of revolution. J Mol Liq. 2016;221:733–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mahanthesh B, Gireesha BJ, Raju CSK. Cattaneo–Christov heat flux on UCM nanofluid flow across a melting surface with double stratification and exponential space dependent internal heat source. Inform Med Unlocked. 2017;9:26–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kumar RK, Raju CS, Mahanthesh B, Gireesha BJ, Varma SV. Chemical reaction effects on nano carreau liquid flow past a cone and a wedge with Cattaneo–Christov heat flux model. Int J Chem React Eng. 2017.  https://doi.org/10.1515/ijcre-2017-0108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sheikholeslami M, Ganji DD, Javed MY, Ellahi R. Effect of thermal radiation on magnetohydrodynamics nanofluid flow and heat transfer by means of two phase model. J Magn Magn Mater. 2015;374:36–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hayat T, Hussain Z, Muhammad T, Alsaedi A. Effects of homogeneous and heterogeneous reactions in flow of nanofluids over a nonlinear stretching surface with variable surface thickness. J Mol Liq. 2016;221:1121–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hayat T, Muhammad K, Muhammad T, Alsaedi A. Melting heat in radiative flow of carbon nanotubes with homogeneous-heterogeneous reactions. Commun Theor Phys. 2018;69(4):441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Koriko OK, Omowaye AJ, Sandeep N, Animasaun IL. Analysis of boundary layer formed on an upper horizontal surface of a paraboloid of revolution within nanofluid flow in the presence of thermophoresis and Brownian motion of 29 nm CuO. Int J Mech Sci. 2017;124:22–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hayat T, Waqas M, Shehzad SA, Alsaedi A. On model of Burgers fluid subject to magneto nanoparticles and convective conditions. J Mol Liq. 2016;222:181–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mahanthesh B, Gireesha BJ, Gorla RSR, Abbasi FM, Shehzad SA. Numerical solutions for magnetohydrodynamic flow of nanofluid over a bidirectional non-linear stretching surface with prescribed surface heat flux boundary. J Magn Magn Mater. 2016;417:189–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mebarek-oudina F, Bessaïh R. Numerical modeling of MHD stability in a cylindrical configuration. J Frankl Inst. 2014;351:667–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mahender D, Srikanth Rao P. Unsteady MHD free convection and mass transfer flow past a porous vertical plate in presence of viscous dissipation”. J Phys Conf Ser. 2015;662:012012.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/662/1/012012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mebarek-Oudina F, Bessaih R. Oscillatory magnetohydrodynamic natural convection of liquid metal between vertical coaxial cylinders. J Appl Fluid Mech. 2016;9(4):1655–65.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mebarek-Oudina F. Numerical modeling of the hydrodynamic stability in vertical annulus with heat source of different lengths. Eng Sci Technol Int J. 2017;20(4):1324–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gireesha BJ, Mahanthesh B, Rashidi MM. MHD boundary layer heat and mass transfer of a chemically reacting Casson fluid over a permeable stretching surface with non-uniform heat source/sink. Int J ind Math. 2015;7(3):247–60.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Von Karman T. Uber laminar and turbulent reibung. ZAMM. 1921;1:233–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fang T. Flow over a stretchable disk. Phys Fluids. 2007;19(12):128105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Turkyilmazoglu M. MHD fluid flow and heat transfer due to a stretching rotating disk. Int J Therm Sci. 2012;51:195–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mushtaq A, Mustafa M. Computations for nanofluid flow near a stretchable rotating disk with axial magnetic field and convective conditions. Results Phys. 2017;7:3137–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Aziz A, Alsaedi A, Muhammad T, Hayat T. Numerical study for heat generation/absorption in flow of nanofluid by a rotating disk. Results Phys. 2018;8:785–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mahanthesh B, Gireesha BJ, Shashikumar NS, Shehzad SA. Marangoni convective MHD flow of SWCNT and MWCNT nanoliquids due to a disk with solar radiation and irregular heat source. Phys E. 2017;94:25–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mahanthesh B, Gireesha BJ, Prasannakumara BC, Kumar PBS. Magneto-Thermo-Marangoni convective flow of Cu–H2O nanoliquid past an infinite disk with particle shape and exponential space based heat source effects. Results Phys. 2017;7:2990–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mahanthesh B, Gireesha BJ, Shehzad SA, Rauf A, Kumar PBS. Nonlinear radiated MHD flow of nanoliquids due to a rotating disk with irregular heat source and heat flux condition. Phys B. 2018;537:98–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Basavarajappa Mahanthesh
    • 1
  • Giulio Lorenzini
    • 2
    Email author
  • Feteh Mebarek Oudina
    • 3
  • Isac Lare Animasaun
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of MathematicsCHRIST (Deemed to be University)BangaloreIndia
  2. 2.Department of Engineering and ArchitectureUniversity of ParmaParmaItaly
  3. 3.Department of Physics, Faculty of SciencesUniversity of 20 août 1955 - SkikdaSkikdaAlgeria
  4. 4.Fluid Dynamics Research Group, Department of Mathematical SciencesFederal University of TechnologyAkureNigeria

Personalised recommendations