Selecting suitable oxygen carriers for chemical looping oxidative dehydrogenation of propane by thermodynamic method

  • Tianwei Wu
  • Qingbo YuEmail author
  • Limin Hou
  • Wenjun Duan
  • Kun Wang
  • Qin Qin


The growing demand of propene and its derivatives promotes the development of on-purpose propene production technology. Chemical looping oxidative dehydrogenation of propane (CL-ODHP) is an alternative with several advantages. The research in this paper focuses on selecting suitable oxygen carrier for CL-ODHP process by a comprehensive thermodynamic method. The Gibbs free energy changes of propane oxidative dehydrogenation reactions to temperature for 45 different oxygen carriers are calculated to evaluate their reactivity and availability for propane oxidative dehydrogenation. Meanwhile, the chemical stability including gas oxygen releasing and hydroxides formation of different oxygen carrier systems are considered. Furthermore, the Gibbs free energy minimization method is used to calculate the equilibrium compositions of CL-ODHP reactions system considering side reactions. And propane conversion and propene selectivity of different oxygen carriers under different conditions are obtained. Other important properties are also qualitatively estimated. Among the studied oxygen carriers, Mn-based and Mo-based oxygen carriers would be more suitable for CL-ODHP process than others. And Al2O3, SiO2, TiO2, ZrO2 and Y2O3 can be the suitable binder candidates.


Propane oxidative dehydrogenation Propene production Chemical looping Oxygen carrier Metal oxide Thermodynamic method 



This research was supported by the China Scholarship Council [CSC201806080086]; the National Natural Science Foundation of China [51604078, 51704071]; the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [N182504011].


  1. 1.
    Kang KH, Kim TH, Choi WC, Park Y-K, Hong UG, Park DS, et al. Dehydrogenation of propane to propylene over CrOy–CeO2–K2O/γ–Al2O3 catalysts: effect of cerium content. Catal Commun. 2015;72:68–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fukudome K, Ikenaga N, Miyake T, Suzuki T. Oxidative dehydrogenation of propane using lattice oxygen of vanadium oxides on silica. Catal Sci Technol. 2011;1:987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Haribal VP, Neal LM, Li F. Oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane under a cyclic redox scheme—process simulations and analysis. Energy. 2017;119:1024–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lapidus AL, Agafonov YA, Gaidai NA, Trushin DV, Nekrasov NV. Effect of the introduction of alkaline promoters into chromium oxide catalysts for propane dehydrogenation in the presence of CO2. Solid Fuel Chem. 2012;46:14–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wu T, Yu Q, Qin Q. Energy analysis of chemical looping oxidative dehydrogenation of propane. Pet Sci Technol. 2018;36:266–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wang K, Yu Q, Qin Q. The thermodynamic method for selecting oxygen carriers used for chemical looping air separation. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2013;112:747–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wang K, Yu Q, Qin Q, Zuo Z, Wu T. Evaluation of Cu-based oxygen carrier for chemical looping air separation in a fixed-bed reactor. Chem Eng J. 2016;287:292–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shah K, Moghtaderi B, Wall T. Selection of suitable oxygen carriers for chemical looping air separation: a thermodynamic approach. Energy Fuels. 2012;26:2038–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Xuan Y, Yu Q, Qin Q, Wang K, Duan W, Liu K, et al. Selection of desulfurizer and control of reaction products on flue-gas desulfurization using chemical-looping technology. Energy Fuels. 2018;32:889–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Faungnawakij K, Kikuchi R, Eguchi K. Thermodynamic evaluation of methanol steam reforming for hydrogen production. J Power Sources. 2006;161:87–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ayandiran AA, Bakare IA, Binous H, Al-Ghamdi S, Razzak SA, Hossain MM. Oxidative dehydrogenation of propane to propylene over VOx/CaO–γ-Al2O3 using lattice oxygen. Catal Sci Technol. 2016;6:5154–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Azimi G, Leion H, Mattisson T, Rydén M, Snijkers F, Lyngfelt A. Mn–Fe oxides with support of MgAl2O4, CeO2, ZrO2 and Y2O3–ZrO2 for chemical-looping combustion and chemical-looping with oxygen uncoupling. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2014;53:10358–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Huang W-C, Kuo Y-L, Su Y-M, Tseng Y-H, Lee H-Y, Ku Y. A facile method for sodium-modified Fe2O3/Al2O3 oxygen carrier by an air atmospheric pressure plasma jet for chemical looping combustion process. Chem Eng J. 2017;316:15–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hossain MM. Kinetics of oxidative dehydrogenation of propane to propylene using lattice oxygen of VOx/CaO/γ-Al2O3 catalysts. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2017;56:4309–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tianwei Wu
    • 1
  • Qingbo Yu
    • 1
    Email author
  • Limin Hou
    • 1
  • Wenjun Duan
    • 1
  • Kun Wang
    • 1
  • Qin Qin
    • 1
  1. 1.School of MetallurgyNortheastern UniversityShenyangPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations