Advertisement

Heat transfer enhancement in a single-pipe heat exchanger with fluidic oscillators

  • Soheil Ghanami
  • Mousa FarhadiEmail author
Article
  • 30 Downloads

Abstract

The current experimental study investigates the effects of installing three types of fluidic oscillators—feedback-free, single-feedback loop and two-feedback channel—on thermal performance of a single-pipe heat exchanger. Results are presented as Nusselt number and friction coefficient at the Reynolds number range of 5600–16,400 and two surface thermal conditions: (a) constant continuous heat flux (CCHF) and (b) constant periodically interrupted heat flux (CPIHF). All the three fluidic oscillators have the same square exit throat with the length of 5.67 mm and the same outer diffuser with the depth of 5.67 mm and 45° diverging angle which overlap the tube’s inner diameter. In the case of CCHF, up to 37%, 83%, and 23% heat transfer enhancement are observed for feedback-free, single-feedback loop and two-feedback channel fluidic oscillators, respectively. In the case of CPIHF, feedback-free and two-feedback channel fluidic oscillators showed no merit relative to the plain tube, but single-loop feedback fluidic oscillator still gives up to 57% thermal performance enhancement. Since fluidic oscillators are no-moving-part devices capable of generating self-induced self-sustained oscillating flows, the current study indicates the high capability of the fluidic oscillators for the passive heat transfer enhancement of heat exchangers.

Keywords

Fluidic oscillator Sweeping flow Passive method Heat transfer enhancement 

List of symbols

A

Heat transfer area (m2)

D

Pipe’s inner diameter (m)

f

Friction coefficient

F

Frequency (Hz)

have

Average heat transfer coefficient (W/m2 K)

I

Electric current (A)

Nu

Nusselt number

P

Pressure (Pa)

ΔP

Pressure drop (Pa)

Pe,i

Electric power input (W)

Pr

Prandtl number

qconv

Convective heat transfer rate (W)

qe,o

Effective heat generated by electricity (W)

qh

Enthalpy increase in flow inside the tube (W)

Q

Volumetric flow rate (m3/s)

Re

Reynolds number

Tb

Fluid bulk temperature (°C)

Tin

Fluid temperature at inlet (°C)

Tout

Fluid temperature at outlet (°C)

\(\tilde{T}_{\rm w}\)

Mean wall temperature (°C)

uin

Inlet flow velocity (m/s)

V

Voltage applied on heaters (V)

w

Width of the oscillators (m)

Greek symbols

ε

Roughness (m)

η

Performance evaluation criterion

μ

Dynamic viscosity (pa.s)

ρ

Density (kg/m3)

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the founding support of Babol Noshirvani University of Technology through grant program No. BNUT/370520/98.

References

  1. 1.
    Kakac S, Liu H, Pramuanjaroenkij A. Heat exchangers: selection, rating, and thermal design. 3rd ed. London: CRC Press; 2012.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bergles A. The implications and challenges of enhanced heat transfer for the chemical process industries. Chem Eng Res Des. 2001;79(4):437–44.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Amini Y, Akhavan S, Izadpanah E. A numerical investigation on the heat transfer characteristics of nanofluid flow in a three-dimensional microchannel with harmonic rotating vortex generators. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019;1:1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-019-08402-6.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mousavi SB, Heyhat MM. Numerical study of heat transfer enhancement from a heated circular cylinder by using nanofluid and transverse oscillation. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019;135(2):935–45.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pethkool S, Eiamsa-Ard S, Kwankaomeng S, Promvonge P. Turbulent heat transfer enhancement in a heat exchanger using helically corrugated tube. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2011;38(3):340–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2010.11.014.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fasano M, Ventola L, Calignano F, Manfredi D, Ambrosio EP, Chiavazzo E, et al. Passive heat transfer enhancement by 3D printed Pitot tube based heat sink. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2016;74:36–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2016.03.012.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Anbu S, Venkatachalapathy S, Suresh S. Convective heat transfer studies on helically corrugated tubes with spiraled rod inserts using TiO2/DI water nanofluids. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019;137(3):849–64.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Menni Y, Azzi A, Chamkha A. Enhancement of convective heat transfer in smooth air channels with wall-mounted obstacles in the flow path. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019;135(4):1951–76.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Omidi M, Darzi AAR, Farhadi M. Turbulent heat transfer and fluid flow of alumina nanofluid inside three-lobed twisted tube. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019;137(4):1451–62.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shadlaghani A, Farzaneh M, Shahabadi M, Tavakoli MR, Safaei MR, Mazinani I. Numerical investigation of serrated fins on natural convection from concentric and eccentric annuli with different cross sections. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019;135(2):1429–42.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jafari M, Farhadi M, Sedighi K. An experimental study on the effects of a new swirl generator on thermal performance of a circular tube. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2017;87:277–87.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2017.07.016.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bahiraei M, Mashaei PR. Using nanofluid as a smart suspension in cooling channels with discrete heat sources. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2015;119(3):2079–91.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang W, Wu Z, Li B, Sundén B. A review on molten-salt-based and ionic-liquid-based nanofluids for medium-to-high temperature heat transfer. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2018;136:1–15.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rashidi S, Eskandarian M, Mahian O, Poncet S. Combination of nanofluid and inserts for heat transfer enhancement. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019;135(1):437–60.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gündogdu M, Carpinlioglu M. Present state of art on pulsatile flow theory (part 1: laminar and transitional flow regimes). JSME Int J Ser B Fluids Therm Eng. 1999;42(3):384–97.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jun Z, Danling Z, Ping W, Hong G. An experimental study of heat transfer enhancement with a pulsating flow. Heat Transf—Asian Res. 2004;33(5):279–86.  https://doi.org/10.1002/htj.20020.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Roh CW, Kim MS. Enhancement of heat pump performance by pulsation of refrigerant flow using a solenoid-driven control valve. Int J Refrigeration. 2012;35(6):1547–57.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2012.04.018.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zohir A. Heat transfer characteristics in a heat exchanger for turbulent pulsating water flow with different amplitudes. J Am Sci. 2012;8(2):241–50.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kivisalu M, Gorgitrattanagul P, Narain A. Results for high heat-flux flow realizations in innovative operations of milli-meter scale condensers and boilers. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2014;75:381–98.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2014.03.056.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zohir A, Aziz AAA, Habib M. Heat transfer characteristics and pressure drop of the concentric tube equipped with coiled wires for pulsating turbulent flow. Exp Therm Fluid Sci. 2015;65:41–51.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2015.03.003.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wang X, Tang K, Hrnjak P. Evaporator performance enhancement by pulsation width modulation (PWM). Appl Therm Eng. 2016;99:825–33.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.12.049.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Havemann H, Rao NN. Heat transfer in pulsating flow. Nature. 1954;174:41.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Habib M, Attya A, Eid A, Aly A. Convective heat transfer characteristics of laminar pulsating pipe air flow. Heat Mass Transf. 2002;38(3):221–32.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s002310100206.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Liu C-l, von Wolfersdorf J, Zhai Y-n. Time-resolved heat transfer characteristics for periodically pulsating turbulent flows with time varying flow temperatures. Int J Therm Sci. 2015;89:222–33.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2014.11.008.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mehta B, Khandekar S. Local experimental heat transfer of single-phase pulsating laminar flow in a square mini-channel. Int J Therm Sci. 2015;91:157–66.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2015.01.008.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ghanami S, Farhadi M. Fluidic oscillators’ applications, structures and mechanisms—a review. Transp Phenom Nano Micro Scales. 2019;7(1):9–27.  https://doi.org/10.22111/tpnms.2018.25051.1153.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Camci C, Herr F. Forced convection heat transfer enhancement using a self-oscillating impinging planar jet. J Heat Transf. 2002;124(4):770–82.  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1471521.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Narumanchi S, Kelly K, Mihalic M, Gopalan S, Hester R, Vlahinos A, editors. Single-phase self-oscillating jets for enhanced heat transfer. In: 24th IEEE SEMI-THERM symposium; 2008 March 16–20; California: IEEE.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tesař V. Enhancing impinging jet heat or mass transfer by fluidically generated flow pulsation. Chem Eng Res Des. 2009;87(2):181–92.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2008.08.003.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hossain MA, Agricola L, Ameri A, Gregory JW, Bons JP, editors. Sweeping jet film cooling on a turbine vane. In: ASME Turbo Expo 2018: turbomachinery technical conference and exposition; 2018 June 11–15; Oslo: ASME.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ostermann F, Woszidlo R, Nayeri C, Paschereit CO, editors. Experimental comparison between the flow field of two common fluidic oscillator designs. In: 53rd AIAA aerospace sciences meeting; 2015 Jan. 5–9, 2015; Florida: AIAA SciTech.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bauer P, inventor; Chicago Rawhide Manufacturing Co Inc, assignee. Fluidic oscillator with resonant inertance and dynamic compliance circuit. United States patent US 4,231,519. 1980 Nov 4.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tomac MN, Gregory JW. Internal jet interactions in a fluidic oscillator at low flow rate. Exp Fluids. 2014;55:1730.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-014-1730-8.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Liu S, Sakr M. A comprehensive review on passive heat transfer enhancements in pipe exchangers. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2013;19:64–81.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.11.021.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kline S, McClintock F. Describing uncertainties in single-sample experiments. Mech Eng. 1953;75:3–8.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Bergman TL, Lavine AS, Incropera FP, DeWitt DP. Fundamentals of heat and mass transfer. 7th ed. Hoboken: Wiley; 2011.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Vatankhah AR, Kouchakzadeh S. Discussion of “Turbulent flow friction factor calculation using a mathematically exact alternative to the Colebrook-White equation” by Jagadeesh R. Sonnad and Chetan T. Goudar. J Hydraul Eng. 2008;134(8):1187.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Haaland SE. Simple and explicit formulas for the friction factor in turbulent pipe flow. J Fluids Eng. 1983;105(1):89–90.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kays WM, Crawford ME. Convective heat and mass transfer, vol. BOOK. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1993.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Hajmohammadi MR, Nourazar S, Campo A, Poozesh S. Optimal discrete distribution of heat flux elements for in-tube laminar forced convection. Int J Heat Fluid Flow. 2013;40:89–96.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2013.01.010.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Mechanical EngineeringBabol Noshirvani University of TechnologyBabolIslamic Republic of Iran

Personalised recommendations