Advertisement

Experimental study on thermal and morphological analyses of green composite sandwich made of flax and agglomerated cork

  • S. PrabhakaranEmail author
  • V. Krishnaraj
  • Shubham Sharma
  • M. Senthilkumar
  • R. Jegathishkumar
  • R. Zitoune
Article
  • 14 Downloads

Abstract

The building sector has been showing great interest in incorporating technologically advanced materials with lightweight, ecofriendly, high strength, and stiffness properties in flooring, roofing, and partition walls, etc. In addition to the mechanical properties, these materials should have good thermal properties as well. In response to these requirements, an attempt has been made to study the thermal behavior of green composite sandwich made of flax and agglomerated cork. Composite sandwiches were fabricated by using flax as skin reinforcement and agglomerated cork as core with different densities as 240, 280, and 340 kg m−3 using vacuum bagging method. Glass was also used as skin reinforcement for manufacturing composite sandwiches for comparison purpose. Experiments were conducted to predict thermal properties, viz. thermal conductivity, thermal expansion, flammability, and thermal stability. The experimental results show that the lowest thermal conductivity of 0.03 W m−1 K−1 was observed in flax-based composite sandwich having core density of 240 kg m−3; the lowest thermal expansion of 29.2 × 10−5 °C−1 was observed in glass-based composite sandwich having core density of 340 kg m−3; the highest value of time to ignition was 12 s, and minimum propagation rate was 0.25 mm s−1 in flax-based composite sandwich having core density of 340 kg m−3; The highest initial degradation temperature was 362 °C for glass-based skin and 263 °C for cork having density of 240 kg m−3.

Keywords

Green composite sandwich Flax Agglomerated cork Thermal properties 

Notes

Funding

The authors do not receive any research fund or grant from any organization.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by the author.

References

  1. 1.
    Al-Homoud MS. Performance characteristics and practical applications of common building thermal insulation materials. Build Environ. 2005;40:353–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zenkert D. The handbook of sandwich construction. North European Engineering and Science Conference Series. Cradley Heath: EMAS Publishing; 1997.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    La Rosa AD, Recca A, Gagliano A, Summerscales J, Latteri A, Cozzo G, Cicala G. Environmental impacts and thermal insulation performance of innovative composite solutions for building applications. Constr Build Mater. 2014;55:406–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Eskander SB, Tawfik ME, Tawfic ML. Mechanical, flammability and thermal degradation characteristics of rice straw fiber-recycled polystyrene foam hard wood composites incorporating fire retardants. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2018;132(2):1115–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Thakur VK, Singha AS, Thakur MK. Ecofriendly biocomposites from natural fibers: mechanical and weathering study. Int J Polym Anal Charact. 2013;18:64–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ramanaiah K, Ratna Prasad AV, Hema Chandra Reddy K. Thermal and mechanical properties of sansevieria green fiber reinforcement. Int J Polym Anal Charact. 2011;16:602–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Thakur VK, Singha AS, Mehta IK. Renewable resource-based green polymer composites: analysis and characterization. Int J Polym Anal Charact. 2010;15:137–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sabeelahmed K, Vijayarangan S, Senthilkumar M. Water absorption behaviour and strength degradation studies on isothalic polyster based Jute-Glass fabric hybrid composites. Natl J Technol. 2006;2(3):62–71.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Thakur VK, Thakur MK, Gupta RK. Review: raw natural fiber-based polymer composites. Int J Polym Anal Charact. 2014;19:256–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Samal S, Stuchlík M, Petrikova I. Thermal behavior of flax and jute reinforced in matrix acrylic composite. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2018;131(2):1035–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wambua P, Ivens J, Verpoest I. Natural fibres: can they replace glass in fibre reinforced plastics? Compos Sci Technol. 2003;63(9):1259–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mohanty AK, Misra M, Drzal LT. Natural fibers, biopolymers, and biocomposites. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Silva SP, Sabino MA, Fernandes EM, Correlo VM, Boesel LF, Reis RL. Cork: properties, capabilities and applications. Int Mater Rev. 2005;50(6):345–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Castro O, Silva JM, Devezas T, Silva A, Gil L. Cork agglomerates as an ideal core material in lightweight structures. Mater Des. 2010;31(1):425–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sarasini F, Tirillò J, Lampani L, Barbero E, Sanchez-Saez S, Valente T, Gaudenzi P, Scarponi C. Impact behavior of sandwich structures made of flax/epoxy face sheets and agglomerated cork. J Nat Fibers. 2018;24:1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mancuso A, Pitarresi G, Tumino D. Mechanical behaviour of a green sandwich made of flax reinforced polymer facings and cork core. Procedia Eng. 2015;109:144–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kawasaki T, Kawai S. Thermal insulation properties of wood-based sandwich panel for use as structural insulated walls and floors. J Wood Sci. 2006;52:75–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Alavez-Ramirez R, Chiñas-Castillo F, Morales-Dominguez VJ, Ortiz-Guzman M. Thermal conductivity of coconut fibre filled ferrocement sandwich panels. Constr Build Mater. 2012;37:425–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Vitale JP, Francucci G, Stocchi A. Thermal conductivity of sandwich panels made with synthetic and vegetable fiber vacuum infused honeycomb cores. J Sandw Struct Mater. 2017;19(1):66–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kandare E, Luangtriratana P, Kandola BK. Fire reaction properties of flax/epoxy laminates and their balsa-core sandwich composites with or without fire protection. Compos Part B. 2014;56:602–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kozłowskiy R, Władyka-Przybylak M. Flammability and fire resistance of composites reinforced by natural fibers. Polym Adv Technol. 2008;19:446–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Xu Y, Lv C, Shen R, Wang Z, Wang Q. Experimental investigation of thermal properties and fire behavior of carbon/epoxy laminate and its foam core sandwich composite. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019;136(3):1237–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yan L, Chouw N, Jayaraman K. Flax fibre and its composites—a review. Compos B Eng. 2014;56:296–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kymäläinen H-R, Sjöberg A-M. Flax and hemp fibres as raw materials for thermal insulations. Build Environ. 2008;43:1261–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chang LN, Jaafar M, Chow WS. Thermal behavior and flammability of epoxy/glass fiber composites containing clay and decabromodiphenyl oxide. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2013;112:1157–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Robotics and Automation EngineeringPSG College of TechnologyCoimbatoreIndia
  2. 2.Department of Production EngineeringPSG College of TechnologyCoimbatoreIndia
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical EngineeringCSIR - Central Leather Research Institute, RCED - JalandharJalandharIndia
  4. 4.Department of Mechanical EngineeringPSG College of TechnologyCoimbatoreIndia
  5. 5.Composite Materials and Structures Group, Institut Clément AderUniversité de ToulouseToulouseFrance

Personalised recommendations