Heat transfer enhancement and optimization of a tube fitted with twisted tape in a fin-and-tube heat exchanger

  • Zahra Hajabdollahi
  • Hassan Hajabdollahi
  • Kyung Chun KimEmail author


This research examines the effects of a tube fitted with twisted tape on the optimal design of a fin-and-tube heat exchanger (FTHE). The twisted tape on the tube side results in a trade-off between the heat transfer and pressure drop, so both the effectiveness (which is related to the rate of heat transfer) and the total annual cost (which is related to the heat transfer area and pressure drop) were optimized simultaneously. All the physical parameters of the FTHE were considered as design parameters, and the optimization was performed using a genetic algorithm for different mass flow rates of the tube side. All the optimum results in the case with the twisted tape tube (TTT) were compared with the case of a plain tube (PT). The optimum results show that the Pareto front for the case of the TTT was completely dominant over the PT for lower mass flow rate (0.25 kg s−1). Both the effectiveness and annual cost were enhanced in the TTT compared with the PT at the lower mass flow rate. On the other hand, for higher mass flow rates, there was a marginal point for effectiveness at which the Pareto front of TTT is dominant over that of the PT. For example, the TTT was optimal for effectiveness higher than 0.73, while the PT was optimal for effectiveness lower than 0.73 at a mass flow rate of 0.5 kg s−1. For the low mass flow rate, the TTT is recommended for a wide range of effectiveness, while in the case of high mass flow rate, the TTT is recommended for just high effectiveness.


Fin-and-tube heat exchanger Effectiveness Total annual cost Twisted tape tube Multi-objective optimization Tube-side mass flow rate 

List of symbols


Minimum free-flow area (m2)


Heat transfer surface area (m2)


Minimum of Ch and Cc (W K−1)


Maximum of Ch and Cc (W K−1)


Heat capacity rate ratio (Cmin/Cmax)


Investment cost ($ year−1)


Cost of nanoparticles


Operational cost ($ year−1)


Heat capacity (J K−1)


Fin collar outside diameter (m)


Tube inside diameter (m)


Tube outside diameter (m)


Hydraulic diameter (m)


Friction factor (−)


Mass flux (kg m−2 s−1)


Convection heat transfer coefficient (W m−2 K−1)


Twisted tape pitch (m)


Modified Bessel function (−)


Interest rate (−)


Colburn factor (−)


Unit price of electricity ($ MWh−1)


Cold stream flow length (m)


Hot stream flow length (m)


No-flow length (m)


Number of transfer units (−)


Nusselt number (−)


System lifetime (year)


Number of plate in L1 direction (−)


Number of tube row (−)


Total number of tubes (−)


Fin pitch (m)


Prandtl number (−)


Heat exchanger with plain tube (−)


Rate of heat transfer (kW)


Reynolds number (−)


Stanton number (−)


Heat exchanger with twisted tape tube (−)


Overall heat transfer coefficient (W m−2 K−1)


Volumetric flow rate (m3 s−1)


Longitudinal pitch (m)


Transversal pitch (m)

Greek letters


Pressure drop (kPa)


Thermal effectiveness (−)


Hours of operation per year (h)


Overall efficiency of fin array (−)


Single fin efficiency (−)


Efficiency of pump/compressor (−)


Viscosity (Pa s)


Density (kg m−3)


Ratio between Aflow and Afront (Aflow/Afront)
















This research was supported by the International Research and Development Program of the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), which is funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT of Korea (NRF-2017K1A3A1A30084513). Partial support was also obtained from the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant, which is funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (Nos. 2011-0030013, 2018R1A2B2007117).


  1. 1.
    Bahiraei M, Jamshidmofid M, Heshmatian S. Entropy generation in a heat exchanger working with a biological nanofluid considering heterogeneous particle distribution. Adv Powder Technol. 2017;28(9):2380–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bahiraei M, Rahmani R, Yaghoobi A, Khodabandeh E, Mashayekhi R, Amani M. Recent research contributions concerning use of nanofluids in heat exchangers: a critical review. Appl Therm Eng. 2018;133:137–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bahiraei M, Jamshidmofid M, Amani M, Barzegarian R. Investigating exergy destruction and entropy generation for flow of a new nanofluid containing graphene–silver nanocomposite in a micro heat exchanger considering viscous dissipation. Powder Technol. 2018;336:298–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhang ZX, Wang YG, Zhao QX. Numerical study on performance optimization H-type finned tubes. J Chin Soc Power Eng. 2010;30:941–6.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wang H, Liu YW, Yang P, Wu RJ, He YL. Parametric study and optimization of H-type finned tube heat exchangers using Taguchi method. Appl Therm Eng. 2016;103:128–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Liu YZ, Yuan YC, Xu SY, Wu WB. Experimental study on the characteristics of heat transfer and flow resistance for H-type finned tube banks. J Univ Shanghai Sci Technol. 2004;26(5):457–60.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhao XB, Tang GH, Ma XW, Jin Y, Tao WQ. Numerical investigation of heat transfer and erosion characteristics for H-type finned oval tube with longitudinal vortex. Appl Energy. 2014;127:93–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wang ZJ, Zeng ZX, Xu YH. Study on heat transfer and resistance characteristics of H-type finned tube. Adv Mater Res. 2013;805–806:1817–22.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jin Y, Tang GH, He YL, Tao WQ. Parametric study and field synergy principle analysis of H-type finned tube bank with 10 rows. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2013;60:241–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nyamsi SN, Yang F, Zhang Z. An optimization study on the finned tube heat exchanger used in hydride hydrogen storage system—analytical method and numerical simulation. Int J Hydrog Energy. 2012;37:16078–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ameel B, Degroote J, T’Joen C, Huisseune H, Schampheleire SD, Vierendeels J, Paepe MD. Optimization of X-shaped louvered fin and tube heat exchangers while maintaining the physical meaning of the performance evaluation criterion. Appl Therm Eng. 2013;58:136–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sajedi R, Taghilou M, Jafari M. Experimental and numerical study on the optimal fin numbering in an external extended finned tube heat exchanger. Appl Therm Eng. 2015;83:139–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pongsoi P, Pikulkajorn S, Wongwises S. Effect of fin pitches on the optimum heat transfer performance of crimped spiral fin-and-tube heat exchangers. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2012;55:6555–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kundu B, Das PK. Performance and optimum dimensions of flat fins for tube-and-fin heat exchangers: a generalized analysis. Int J Heat Fluid Flow. 2009;30:658–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tang LH, Zeng M, Wang QW. Experimental and numerical investigation on air-side performance of fin-and-tube heat exchangers with various fin patterns. Exp Therm Fluid Sci. 2009;33:818–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yang DK, Lee KS, Song S. Fin spacing optimization of a fin-tube heat exchanger under frosting conditions. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2006;49:2619–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ameel B, Degroote J, T’Joen C, Huisseune H, Schampheleire SD, Vierendeels J, Paepe MD. Accounting for the effect of the heat exchanger length in the performance evaluation of compact fin and tube heat exchangers. Appl Therm Eng. 2014;65:544–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kang YT, Stout R, Christensen RN. The effects of inclination angle on flooding in a helically fluted tube a twisted insert. Int J Multiph Flow. 1997;23:1111–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Agarwalt SK, Rao MR. Heat transfer augmentation for the flow of a viscous liquid in circular tubes using twisted tape inserts. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 1996;39:3547–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kumara A, Prasad BN. Investigation of twisted tape inserted solar water heaters heat transfer, friction factor and thermal performance results. Renew Energy. 2000;19:379–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Al-Fahed S, Chamra LM, Chakroun W. Pressure drop and heat transfer comparison for both microfin tube and twisted-tape inserts in laminar flow. Exp Therm Fluid Sci. 1999;18:323–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Naphon P. Heat transfer and pressure drop in the horizontal double pipes with and without twisted tape insert. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2006;33:166–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hajabdollahi H, Hajabdollahi Z. Investigating the effect of nanoparticle on thermo-economic optimization of fin and tube heat exchanger. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part E. 2016;23:0954408916656677.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pusey A, Kim D, Park H-S, Kwon T-S, Kim H. Visualization method for cross-sectional two-phase flow structure during the condensation of steam in a tube. J Vis. 2017;20(3):591–605. Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jeong T-S, Yu J-H, Lim D-I, Kim H-B. Quantitative flow visualization in the distributor of a plate-fin heat exchanger. J. Vis. 2018;21(6):1031–41. Scholar
  26. 26.
    Damavandi MD, Forouzanmehr M, Safikhani H. Modeling and Pareto based multi-objective optimization of wavy fin-and-elliptical tube heat exchangers using CFD and NSGA-II algorithm. Appl Soft Comput. 2012;12:3648–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hatami M, Ganji DD, Gorji-Bandpy M. Experimental and numerical analysis of the optimized finned-tube heat exchanger for OM314 diesel exhaust exergy recovery. Energy Convers Manag. 2015;97:26–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dezan D, Salviano LO, Yanagihara JI. Heat transfer enhancement and optimization of flat-tube multilouvered fin compact heat exchangers with delta-winglet vortex generators. Appl Therm Eng. 2016;101:576–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bilir L, İlken Z, Erek A. Numerical optimization of a fin-tube gas to liquid heat exchanger. Int J Therm Sci. 2012;52:59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hajabdollahi H, Ahmadi P, Dincer I. Multi-objective optimization of plain fin-and-tube heat exchanger using evolutionary algorithm. J Thermophys Heat Transf. 2011;25(3):424–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bahiraei M, Mazaheri N, Rizehvandi A. Application of a hybrid nanofluid containing graphene nanoplatelet–platinum composite powder in a triple-tube heat exchanger equipped with inserted ribs. Appl Therm Eng. 2019;149:588–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bahiraei M, Salmi HK, Safaei MR. Effect of employing a new biological nanofluid containing functionalized graphene nanoplatelets on thermal and hydraulic characteristics of a spiral heat exchanger. Energy Convers Manag. 2019;180:72–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Franco A, Giannini N. Optimum thermal design of modular compact heat exchangers structure for heat recovery steam generators. Appl Therm Eng. 2005;25:1293–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Shah RK, Sekulic P. Fundamental of heat exchanger design. New York: Wiley; 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wang CC, Chi KU, Chang CJ. Heat transfer and friction characteristics of plain fin-and-tube heat exchanger, part 2: correlation. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2000;43:2693–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Naphon P. Heat transfer and pressure drop in the horizontal double pipes with and without twisted tape insert. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2006;33(2):166–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Deb K. Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. Chichester: Wiley; 2001.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Yu PL. Multiple-criteria decision making, concepts, techniques, and extensions. New York: Plenum Press; 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringPusan National UniversityBusanRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringVali-e-Asr University of RafsanjanRafsanjanIran

Personalised recommendations