Advertisement

Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry

, Volume 139, Issue 2, pp 1409–1418 | Cite as

Initial fuel depth effect on the burning characteristics of thin-layer pool fire in a confined enclosure

Bench scale experiment and thermal equilibrium analysis
  • Xiao ChenEmail author
  • Shouxiang Lu
  • Zhiwei Ding
Article

Abstract

This study reveals the effect of the initial fuel depth on the burning characteristics of thin-layer pool fire in a confined enclosure. A thin-layer heptane pool with 10 cm diameter was employed in the cone calorimeter to obtain the fundamental burning characteristics of pool fire in the free burning atmosphere under the initial fuel depths. Then, the different initial liquid depths (from 5 to 30 mm) of heptane pool fires were adopted to explore the burning characteristics in the confined enclosure with a central horizontal opening. Several parameters such as the burning rate, the flame height, the oxygen concentration at extinction time and smoke temperature distribution were investigated. Results show that the burning rate presents the different trends with the increase in the fuel depth in the free burning atmosphere and confined enclosure. The fuel depth presents an influence on the pool fire burning characteristic parameters. Moreover, the theoretical thermal equilibrium analysis in the confined enclosure was also studied to obtain relationship between the combustion coefficient and depth coefficient.

Keywords

Pool fire Fuel depth Confined enclosure Heat transfer Combustion coefficient 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51704268); the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2016M592068).

References

  1. 1.
    Gottuk DT, White DA. Liquid fuel fires. In: Hurley MJ, Gottuk DT, Hughes PE, Hall JR, Harada K, Kuligowski ED, Puchovsky M, Torero JL, Watts JM, Wieczorek CJ, editors. The SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering. 5th ed. Quincy: National Fire Protection Association; 2016. p. 2552–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wang C, Guo J, Ding Y, et al. Burning rate of merged pool fire on the hollow square tray. J Hazard Mater. 2015;290:78–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ni X, Zhang S, Zheng Z, et al. Application of water@ silica core-shell particles for suppressing gasoline pool fires. J Hazard Mater. 2018;341:20–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kong D, Zhang Z, Ping P, et al. Experimental study on burning behavior of crude oil pool fire in annular ice cavities. Fuel. 2018;234:464–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mealy C, Benfer M, Gottuk DT. A study of the parameters influencing liquid fuel burning rates. Fire Saf Sci. 2011;10:945–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hu Y, Zhou X, Wu Z, et al. Ignition and burning behaviors of automobile oil in engine compartment. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2017;132:1–12.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chen B, Lu S, Li C, et al. Unsteady burning of thin-layer pool fires. J Fire Sci. 2012;30(1):3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vali A, Nobes DS, Kostiuk LW. Fluid motion and energy transfer within burning liquid fuel pools of various thicknesses. Combust Flame. 2015;162(4):1477–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhao J, Huang H, Wang H, et al. Experimental study on burning behaviors and thermal radiative penetration of thin-layer burning. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2017;130(2):1153–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gottuk D, Scheffey J, Williams F, Gott J, Tabet R. Optical fire detection for military aircraft hangars: final report on OFD performance to fuel spill fires and optical stresses. Washington: Naval Research Laboratory NRL/MR/6180—00-8457; 2001. p. 1–341.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Putorti A. Flammable and combustible liquid spill burn patterns. Washington: National Institute of Justice NIJ-604-00; 2001. p. 1–55.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chen X, Lu S, Wang X, et al. Pulsation behavior of pool fires in a confined compartment with a horizontal opening. Fire Technol. 2016;52(2):515–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    He Q, Li C, Lu S, et al. Pool fires in a corner ceiling vented cabin: ghosting flame and corresponding fire parameters. Fire Technol. 2015;51(3):537–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    He Q, Ezekoye OA, Li C, et al. Ventilation limited extinction of fires in ceiling vented compartments. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2015;91:570–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nasr A, Suard S, El-Rabii H et al (2011) Experimental study on pyrolysis of a heptane pool fire in a reduced scale compartment. In: 7th mediterranean combustion symposium.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hamins AP, Yang JC, Kashiwagi T (1999) Global model for predicting the burning rates of liquid pool fires (NISTIR 6381). NIST Interagency/Internal Report (NISTIR)-6381.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chen X, Lu S, Li C, Zhang J, Liew KM. Experimental study on ignition and combustion characteristics of typical oils. Fire Mater. 2014;38(3):409–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Babrauskas V. The cone calorimeter. In: Hurley MJ, Gottuk DT, Hughes PE, Hall JR, Harada K, Kuligowski ED, Puchovsky M, Torero JL, Watts JM, Wieczorek CJ, editors. The SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering. 5th ed. Quincy: National Fire Protection Association; 2016. p. 952–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kong D, Liu P, Zhang J, et al. Small scale experiment study on the characteristics of boilover. J Loss Prevent Process. 2017;48:101–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Arai M, Saito K, Altenkirch RA. A study of boilover in liquid pool fires supported on water part I: effects of a water sublayer on pool fires. Combust Sci Technol. 1990;71(1–3):25–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chen B, Lu SX, Li CH, et al. Initial fuel temperature effects on burning rate of pool fire. J Hazard Mater. 2011;188(1–3):369–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chen ZB, Hu LH, Huo R, et al. Flame oscillation frequency based on image correlation. J Combust Sci Technol. 2008;14(4):367–71.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tang F, Hu LH, Delichatsios MA, et al. Experimental study on flame height and temperature profile of buoyant window spill plume from an under-ventilated compartment fire. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2012;55(1–3):93–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tao C, He Y, Zhuang Y, et al. The investigation of flame length of buoyancy-controlled gas fire bounded by wall and ceiling. Appl Therm Eng. 2017;127:1172–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Heskestad G. Fire plumes, flame height, and air entrainments. In: Morgan JH, editor. SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering. 5th ed. New York: Springer; 2016. p. 2016.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chen X, Lu S, Liew KM. An investigation of horizontal opening effect on pool fire behavior in a confined compartment: a study based on global equivalence ratio. J Fire Sci. 2016;34(1):13–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zhang JQ (2014) Fire dynamics in ship enclosures considering the effects of ceiling vent and fire locations. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ding Y, Lin F, Lu S, et al. The effect of azeotropic blended fuel on combustion characteristics in a ceiling vented compartment. Fuel. 2017;189:1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hamins A, Johnsson E, Donnelly M, et al. Energy balance in a large compartment fire. Fire Saf J. 2008;43(3):180–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Quintiere JG. Fundamentals of fire phenomena. Chichester: Wiley; 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mealy C, Benfer M, Gottuk DT. Fire dynamics and forensic analysis of liquid fuel fires. Columbus: BiblioGov; 2012.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Babrauskas V. Heat release rates. In: Morgan JH, editor. SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering. 5th ed. New York: Springer; 2016. p. 799–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Fire ScienceUniversity of Science and Technology of ChinaHefeiChina

Personalised recommendations