Advertisement

Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry

, Volume 138, Issue 2, pp 1329–1343 | Cite as

Performance, combustion and emission characteristics on VCR multi-fuel engine running on methyl esters of rubber seed oil

  • S. MurugapoopathiEmail author
  • D. Vasudevan
Article

Abstract

This research work is proposed to test and evaluate the performance, combustion and emission characteristics of variable compression ratio engine fueled with methyl esters of rubber seed oil as biodiesel. Experiments are carried out on variable compression ratio engine by considering the compression ratio, load, fuel blends, injection pressure and supercharging pressure as variables. The response surface method prediction models for indicated mean effective pressure, brake thermal efficiency, specific fuel consumption, exhaust gas temperature, maximum combustion pressure, heat release rate, ignition delay, carbon monoxide, hydrocarbon and nitrogen oxides emission are developed using the experimental results. D-optimality test is carried out to get optimum engine-operating conditions with improved performance and emission. Test is conducted via the fuel blends of 20, 40, 60 and 80% biodiesel with neat diesel, with an injection pressure of 160 bar at a fixed compression ratio of 20 and at different supercharging conditions at 80% load. The results of the experiment are compared with that of diesel, which confirms that significant improvements in performance and emission characteristics are obtained with the help of supercharging. The combustion characteristics of biodiesel blends comprehend with that of standard diesel.

Keywords

Methyl esters of rubber seed oil Response surface methodology Nitrogen oxide emission Variable compression ratio engine 

Abbreviations

VCR

Variable compression ratio

MRSO

Methyl esters of rubber seed oil

IP

Injection pressure (bar)

CR

Compression ratio

BTE

Brake thermal efficiency (%)

BSFC

Brake specific fuel consumption (kg kW−1 h−1)

RSO

Rubber seed oil

ID

Ignition delay (ºCA)

SC

Supercharging

NA

Naturally aspirated

HRR

Heat release rate (J °CA−1)

IMEP

Indicated mean effective pressure (bar)

EGT

Exhaust gas temperature (°C)

CA

Crank angle

CO

Carbon monoxide (%)

CO2

Carbon dioxide (%)

HC

Hydrocarbon (ppm)

NOx

Oxides of nitrogen (ppm)

IS

Indian standards

RSM

Response surface methodology

ANOVA

Analysis of variance

ASTM

American society of testing and materials

bTDC

Before top dead center

FFA

Free fatty acid

p test

Probability test

F test

Fisher’s test

B20

20% biodiesel + 80% diesel

B40

40% biodiesel + 60% diesel

B60

60% biodiesel + 40% diesel

B80

80% biodiesel + 20% diesel

B100

100% biodiesel

List of symbols

Pmax

Combustion pressure (bar)

R2

Coefficient of determination

adj

Adjusted

X

Test statistics

σ

Standard deviation

μ

Mean

θ

Crank angle

g

Gauge pressure

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE), Government of India, for providing grant (No. 8024/RID/BOR/MOD/70/08/09) under Modernization and Removal of Obsolescence (MODROB) Scheme and the Management of PSNA college of Engineering and Technology for providing matching grant for the purchase of variable compression ratio multi-fuel engine test rig. The research work has been carried out in this test rig.

References

  1. 1.
    Tompkins BT, Song H, Bittle JA, Jacobs TJ. Efficiency considerations for the use of blended biofuel in diesel engines. Appl Energy. 2012;98:209–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Godiganur S, Murthy CS, Reddy RP. 6BTA 5.9 G2-1 cummins engine performance and emission tests using methyl ester mahua (Madhuca indica) oil/diesel blends. Renew Energy. 2009;34(10):2172–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Grau B, Bernat E, Rita P, Jordi-Roger R, Antoni R. Environmental life cycle assessment of rapeseed straight vegetable oil as self-supply agricultural biofuel. Renew Energy. 2013;50:142–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kapilan N, Babu TA, Reddy RP. Characterization and effect of using Mahua oil biodiesel as fuel in compression ignition engine. J Therm Sci. 2009;18(4):382–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wu X, Daniel R, Tian G, Xu H, Huang Z, Richardson D. Dual-injection: the flexible, bi-fuel concept for spark-ignition engines fuelled with various gasoline and biofuel blends. Appl Energy. 2011;88(7):2305–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Atabani AE, Silitonga AS, Ong HC, Mahlia TMI, Masjuki HH, Badruddin IA, Fayaz H. Non-edible vegetable oils: a critical evaluation of oil extraction, fatty acid compositions, biodiesel production, characteristics, engine performance and emissions production. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2013;18:211–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lujaji F, Bereczky A, Janosi L, Novak C, Mbarawa M. Cetane number and thermal properties of vegetable oil, biodiesel, 1-butanol and diesel blends. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2010;102(3):1175–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ramadhas AS, Jayaraj S, Muraleedharan C. Biodiesel production from high FFA rubber seed oil. Fuel. 2005;84(4):335–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gimbun J, Ali S, Kanwal CCSC, Shah LA, Muhamad NH, Cheng CK, Nurdin S. Biodiesel production from rubber seed oil using activated cement clinker as catalyst. Proc Eng. 2013;53:13–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kumar SS, Purushothaman K. High FFA rubber seed oil as an alternative fuel for diesel engine—an overview. Int J Eng Sci. 2012;1(10):16–24.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Devi VM, Prasad PN, Syndia LAM, Rajakohila M, Ariharan VN. Physico-chemical characterization of rubber seed oil (Hevea Brasiliensis)—a promising feedstock for biodiesel production. Int J Chem Anal Sci. 2012;3(5):1402–4.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gopinath A, Sairam K, Velraj R. A review on combustion, performance, and emission characteristics of fuels derived from oil seed crops (biodiesels). Aus J Crop Sci. 2013;7(9):1350–4.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ramadhas AS, Jayaraj S, Muraleedharan C. Characterization and effect of using rubber seed oil as fuel in the compression ignition engines. Renew Energy. 2005;30(5):795–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pradeep V, and RP Sharma. Evaluation of performance, emission and combustion parameters of a CI engine fuelled with bio-diesel from rubber seed oil and its blends. SAE paper no. 200526353 (2005).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Geo VE, Nagarajan G, Nagalingam B. Studies on improving the performance of rubber seed oil fuel for diesel engine with DEE port injection. Fuel. 2010;89(11):3559–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rao GAP, Mohan PR. Effect of supercharging on the performance of a DI diesel engine with cotton seed oil. Energy Convers Manag. 2003;44(6):937–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jagadish D, Kumar PR, Murthy KM. The effect of supercharging on performance and emission characteristics of compresion ignition engine with diesel-ethanol-ester blends. Therm Sci. 2011;15(4):1165–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Singh N, Kumar H, Jha MK, Sarma AK. Complete heat balance, performance, and emission evaluation of a CI engine fueled with Mesua ferrea methyl and ethyl ester’s blends with petrodiesel. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2015;122(2):907–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ebrahimi R, Sherafati M. Thermodynamic simulation of performance of a dual cycle with stroke length and volumetric efficiency. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2013;111(1):951–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ebrahimi R, Dehkordi NS. Effects of design and operating parameters on entropy generation of a dual cycle. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2018;133(3):1609–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sivaramakrishnan K, Ravikumar P. Optimization of operational parameters on performance and emissions of a diesel engine using biodiesel. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2014;11(4):949–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bharadwaz YD, Rao BG, Rao VD, Anusha C. Improvement of biodiesel methanol blend performance in a variable compression ratio engine using response surface methodology. Alexa Eng J. 2016;55(2):1201–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Murugapoopathi S, and D Vasudevan. Energy and exergy analysis on variable compression ratio multi-fuel engine. J Therm Anal Calorim, 2018: 1-12.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ramadhas AS, Muraleedharan C, Jayaraj S. Performance and emission evaluation of a diesel engine fueled with methyl esters of rubber seed oil. Renew energy. 2005;30(12):1789–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Maurya RK, Agarwal AK. Experimental investigation on the effect of intake air temperature and air–fuel ratio on cycle-to-cycle variations of HCCI combustion and performance parameters. Appl Energ. 2011;88(4):1153–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cox DD, Snell EJ. The analysis of binary data. 2nd ed. London: Chapman and Hall; 1989.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Montgomery DC, Myers RH. Response surface methodology. In: Design and analysis of experiments. 1995. pp. 445–74.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wilson VH. Optimization of diesel engine parameters using Taguchi method and design of evolution. J Bras Soc Mech Sci Eng. 2012;34(4):423–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Muralidharan K, Vasudevan D. Performance, emission and combustion characteristics of a variable compression ratio engine using methyl esters of waste cooking oil and diesel blends. Appl Energy. 2011;88(11):3959–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kannan GR, Anand R. Experimental investigation on diesel engine with diestrol–water micro emulsions. Energy. 2011;36(3):1680–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Muralidharan K, Vasudevan D, Sheeba KN. Performance, emission and combustion characteristics of biodiesel fuelled variable compression ratio engine. Energy. 2011;36(8):5385–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    VenkateswaraRao B, Rao GAP. Prediction of heat-release patterns for modeling diesel engine performance and emissions. Int J Adv Eng Tech. 2012;3(1):262–9.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Planells RC, Amengual AC, Larruy AC. Motores de combustión interna—Fundamentos. Barcelona: Edicions UPC; 1995.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Vinukumar K, Azhagurajan A, Vettivel SC, Vedaraman N. Rice husk as nanoadditive in diesel–biodiesel fuel blends used in diesel engine. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2018;131(2):1333–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bora BJ, Saha UK. Experimental evaluation of a rice bran biodiesel–biogas run dual fuel diesel engine at varying compression ratios. Renew Energy. 2016;87:782–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Andrade RD, Faria EA, Silva AM, Araujo WC, Jaime GC, Costa KP, Prado AG. Heat of combustion of biofuels mixed with fossil diesel oil. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2011;106(2):469–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hardenberg HO, & Hase FW. An empirical formula for computing the pressure rise delay of a fuel from its cetane number and from the relevant parameters of direct-injection diesel engines. SAE paper no. 790493 (1979).Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Heywood JB. Internal combustion engine fundamentals. New York: McGraw-Hill Intern. Editions; 1988.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Saravanan S, Nagarajan G, Rao GLN, Sampath S. Combustion characteristics of a stationary diesel engine fuelled with a blend of crude rice bran oil methyl ester and diesel. Energy. 2010;35(1):94–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Paul G, Datta A, Mandal BK. An experimental and numerical investigation of the performance, combustion and emission characteristics of a diesel engine fueled with Jatropha biodiesel. Energy Proc. 2014;54:455–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Raheman H, Jena PC, Jadav SS. Performance of a diesel engine with blends of biodiesel (from a mixture of oils) and high-speed diesel. Int J Energy Environ Eng. 2013;4(1):6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Tamilvanan A, Balamurugan K, Vijayakumar M. Effects of nano-copper additive on performance, combustion and emission characteristics of Calophyllum inophyllum biodiesel in CI engine. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2018;136:1–14.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Reshad AS, Barman P, Chaudhari AJ, Tiwari P, Kulkarni V, Goud VV, Sahoo N. Rubber seed oil methyl ester synthesis, engine performance, and emission characteristics of blends. Energy Fuels. 2015;29(8):5136–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ramadhas AS, Jayaraj S, Muraleedharan C. Dual fuel mode operation in diesel engines using renewable fuels: rubber seed oil and coir-pith producer gas. Renew Energy. 2008;33(9):2077–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Reksowardojo IK, Bui HN, Sok R, Kilgour AJ, Brodjonegoro TP, Soerawidjaja TH, Arismunandar W. The effect of biodiesel fuel from rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) seed oil on a direct injection (DI) diesel engine. Bandung Inst Teknologi Bandung. 2011;1(1):65–81.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Vallinayagam R, Vedharaj S, Yang WM, Lee PS. Operation of neat pine oil biofuel in a diesel engine by providing ignition assistance. Energy Convers Manag. 2014;88:1032–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Clean Air Technology Center. (1999). Nitrogen oxides (NOx): why and how they are controlled.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringPSNA College of Engineering and TechnologyDindigulIndia

Personalised recommendations