Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry

, Volume 137, Issue 6, pp 1877–1890 | Cite as

Using isothermal calorimetry, X-ray diffraction, thermogravimetry and FTIR to monitor the hydration reaction of Portland cements associated with red mud as a supplementary material

  • Roberto Cesar de Oliveira RomanoEmail author
  • Heitor Montefusco Bernardo
  • Marcel Hark Maciel
  • Rafael Giuliano Pileggi
  • Maria Alba Cincotto


This study is part of a global project to find some large-scale application for red mud. A previous work confirmed that the use of RM as partial substitution for cement can affect its rheological properties; however, it is possible to produce cementitious materials without lose mechanical performances at harden state. The main goal of the work was to assess the impact of red mud (RM) as replacement of different Brazilian Portland cements by monitoring the formation of hydrated products over time, by thermogravimetry, X-ray diffraction and FTIR. Results show that the presence of RM increases the induction period, the gypsum and portlandite consumption as well as the amount of ettringite and monosulfoaluminate produced. The formation of sodium silicoaluminate hydrate (NASH) was also observed, regardless the kind of cement, as a result of the reaction with aluminates and silicates from the binder.


Red mud Portland cement Hydration reaction 



The authors wish to thank the Alcoa Foundation, the Laboratory of Microstructure and Eco-efficiency in Materials—LME, and CNPq—The National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (research grant—155357/2016-6) and FAPESP—The Foundation of Support to the Research of the State of São Paulo (research grant—2012/19262-2), for their financial support to this research work.


  1. 1.
    Scrivener KL, John VM, Gartner EM (2016) Eco-efficient cements: potential economically viable solutions for a low-CO2 cement-based materials industry. United Nations Environment Programme.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Romano RCO, Bernardo HM, Niza DA, Mesquita JAFS, Cincotto MA, Pileggi RG. Evaluation of the hardened state properties of zero-cement mortars produced using bauxite residue as an activator to ground blast furnace slag. Athens: An Serbruyns; 2018. p. 293–300.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    John VM, Damineli BL, Quattrone M, Pileggi RG. Fillers in cementitious materials: experience, recent advances and future potential. Cem Concr Res. 2018. Scholar
  4. 4.
    Damineli BL, John VM. Developing low CO2 concretes: Is clinker replacement sufficient? The need of cement use efficiency improvement. Key Eng Mater. 2012;517:342–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Romano RCO, Mesquita JAFS, Bernardo HM, Brasileiro GCP, Muniz GHU, Cincotto MA, Pileggi RG. Impact of using bauxite residue in microconcrete and comparison with other kind of supplementary cementitious material. Hamburg: Travaux ICSOBA; 2017. p. 505–18.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    de Oliveira Romano RC, Liberato CC, Montini M, Gallo JB, Cincotto MA, Pileggi RG. Evaluation of transition from fluid to elastic solid of cementitious pastes with bauxite residue using oscillation rheometry and isothermal calorimetry. Appl Rheol. 2013;23:23830.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Roth J, Falter J. Potential commercial processes for the utilization of bauxite residues. In: 35th Conference on exhibit. ICSOBA—bauxite alumina and aluminium industry European New Global Development ICSOBA, Hamburg; 2017. p. 539–546.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Arnout L, Hertel T, Liard M, Lootens D, Pontikes Y. Use of bauxite residue slurry as single activator in a hybrid binder system. In: 35th Conference on exhibit. ICSOBA—bauxite alumina and aluminium industry European New Global Development ICSOBA, Hamburg; 2017. p 519–528.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gräfe M, Power G, Klauber C. Bauxite residue issues: III. Alkalinity and associated chemistry. Hydrometallurgy. 2011;108:60–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pontikes Y, Nikolopoulos P, Angelopoulos GN. Thermal behaviour of clay mixtures with bauxite residue for the production of heavy-clay ceramics. J Eur Ceram Soc. 2007;27:1645–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wang S, Ang HM, Tadé MO. Novel applications of red mud as coagulant, adsorbent and catalyst for environmentally benign processes. Chemosphere. 2008;72:1621–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cooling DJ, Hay PS, Guilfoyle L. Carbonation of bauxite residue. In: Proceedings of 6th international alumina quality workshop, Brisbane; 2002. p. 185–190.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kasliwal P, Sai PST. Enrichment of titanium dioxide in red mud: a kinetic study. Hydrometallurgy. 1999;53:73–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sujana MG, Thakur RS, Acharya BC, Das SN, Rao SB. Effect of calcination and physico-chemical properties of red mud; 1996.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Klauber C, Gräfe M, Power G. Bauxite residue issues: II. Options for residue utilization. Hydrometallurgy. 2011;108:11–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Romano RCO. Avaliação das interações físico-químicas entre resíduo de bauxita e cimento Portland; 2016.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Romano RCO, Bernardo HM, Maciel MH, Pileggi RG, Cincotto MA. Hydration of Portland cement with red mud as mineral addition. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2018;131:2477–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Maciel MH, Soares GS, de Oliveira Romano RC, Cincotto MA. Monitoring of Portland cement chemical reaction and quantification of the hydrated products by XRD and TG in function of the stoppage hydration technique. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2018. Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fujii AL, dos Reis Torres D, de Oliveira Romano RC, Cincotto MA, Pileggi RG. Impact of superplasticizer on the hardening of slag Portland cement blended with red mud. Constr Build Mater 101 Part. 2015;1:432–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Scrivener KL, Juilland P, Monteiro PJM. Advances in understanding hydration of Portland cement. Cem Concr Res. 2015;78:38–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Begarin F, Garrault S, Nonat A, Nicoleau L. Hydration of alite containing aluminium. Adv Appl Ceram. 2011;110:127–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Quennoz A, Scrivener KL. Interactions between alite and C3A-gypsum hydrations in model cements. Cem Concr Res. 2013;44:46–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nicoleau L, Schreiner E, Nonat A. Ion-specific effects influencing the dissolution of tricalcium silicate. Cem Concr Res. 2014;59:118–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bentz DP. Modeling the influence of limestone filler on cement hydration using CEMHYD3D. Cem Concr Compos. 2006;28:124–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    De Weerdt K, Haha MB, Le Saout G, Kjellsen KO, Justnes H, Lothenbach B. Hydration mechanisms of ternary Portland cements containing limestone powder and fly ash. Cem Concr Res. 2011;41:279–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Duchesne J, Be MA. Effect of supplementary cementing materials on the composition of cement hydration products. Adv Cem Based Mater. 1995;2:43–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Snellings R, Mertens G, Cizer Ö, Elsen J. Early age hydration and pozzolanic reaction in natural zeolite blended cements: reaction kinetics and products by in situ synchrotron X-ray powder diffraction. Cem Concr Res. 2010;40:1704–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Elgalhud AA, Dhir RK, Ghataora G. Limestone addition effects on concrete porosity. Cem Concr Compos. 2016;72:222–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ramezanianpour AM, Hooton RD. A study on hydration, compressive strength, and porosity of Portland-limestone cement mixes containing SCMs. Cem Concr Compos. 2014;51:1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Singh M, Upadhayay SN, Prasad PM. Preparation of special cements from red mud. Waste Manag. 1996;16:665–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kumar R, Bhattacharjee B. Porosity, pore size distribution and in situ strength of concrete. Cem Concr Res. 2003;33:155–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Tsakiridis PE, Agatzini-Leonardou S, Oustadakis P. Red mud addition in the raw meal for the production of Portland cement clinker. J Hazard Mater. 2004;116:103–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zhang J, Weissinger EA, Peethamparan S, Scherer GW. Early hydration and setting of oil well cement. Cem Concr Res. 2010;40:1023–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Garrault S, Nonat A, Sallier Y, Nicoleau L. On the origin of the dormant period of cement hydration. In: XVIII international congress on cement chemistry; 2011.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hughes TL, Methven CM, Jones TGJ, Pelham SE, Fletcher P, Hall C. Determining cement composition by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Adv Cem Based Mater. 1995;2:91–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Mollah MYA, Kesmez M, Cocke DL. An X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic (FT-IR) investigation of the long-term effect on the solidification/stabilization (S/S) of arsenic(V) in Portland cement type-V. Sci Total Environ. 2004;325:255–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Trezza MA, Lavat AE. Analysis of the system 3CaO·Al2O3–CaSO4·2H2O–CaCO3–H2O by FT-IR spectroscopy. Cem Concr Res. 2001;31:869–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ylmén R, Jäglid U, Steenari B-M, Panas I. Early hydration and setting of Portland cement monitored by IR, SEM and Vicat techniques. Cem Concr Res. 2009;39:433–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil Construction EngineeringUniversity of São PauloSão PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations