Advertisement

Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry

, Volume 137, Issue 6, pp 1847–1855 | Cite as

A review on using nanofluids in heat pipes

  • Mohammad Alhuyi Nazari
  • Roghayeh GhasempourEmail author
  • Mohammad H. AhmadiEmail author
Article
  • 105 Downloads

Abstract

The thermophysical specifications of working fluid play a key role in thermal performance of various types of heat pipes. Fluids with high thermal conductivity, low viscosity and surface tension are more favorable to be applied in heat pipes. In order to have fluids with higher thermal conductivity, adding nanoparticles can be an acceptable idea. In the present study, the effects of using nanofluids in several types of heat pipes are reviewed. The nanofluids are categorized based on the types of particles (as carbonic, metallic, etc.). Based on the results of the literature review, applying nanostructures in the base fluid can significantly reduce the thermal resistance of heat pipes compared with utilizing pure as operating fluid. For instance, it is observed that using graphene oxide/water nanofluid in pulsating heat pipe reduces the thermal resistance up to 42% in comparison with the water-filled heat pipe. In addition, reviewed studies revealed that the type of nanoparticle, concentration and their stability are among the most important parameters affecting thermal performance. The enhancement in thermal performance of heat pipes by using nanofluid is mainly attributed to higher thermal conductivity of the nanofluids and increase in nucleation sites.

Keywords

Heat pipe Nanofluid Flow regime Thermal conductivity 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Nazari MA, Ghasempour R, Shafii MB, Ahmadi MH. Experimental investigation of triton X-100 solution on pulsating heat pipe thermal performance. J Thermophys Heat Transf. 2018.  https://doi.org/10.2514/1.t5295.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kargar Sharif Abad H, Ghiasi M, Jahangiri Mamouri S, Shafii MB. A novel integrated solar desalination system with a pulsating heat pipe. Desalination. 2013;311:206–10.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2012.10.029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Arab M, Soltanieh M, Shafii MB. Experimental investigation of extra-long pulsating heat pipe application in solar water heaters. Exp Therm Fluid Sci. 2012;42:6–15.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2012.03.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nazari MA, Ahmadi MH, Ghasempour R, Shafii MB, Mahian O, Kalogirou S, et al. A review on pulsating heat pipes: from solar to cryogenic applications. Appl Energy. 2018;222:475–84.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.04.020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Faegh M, Shafii MB. Experimental investigation of a solar still equipped with an external heat storage system using phase change materials and heat pipes. Desalination. 2017;409:128–35.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2017.01.023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kuznetsov GV, Al-Ani MA, Sheremet MA. Numerical analysis of convective heat transfer in a closed two-phase thermosyphon. J Eng Thermophys. 2011;20:201–10.  https://doi.org/10.1134/S1810232811020081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kumaresan G, Vijayakumar P, Ravikumar M, Kamatchi R, Selvakumar P. Experimental study on effect of wick structures on thermal performance enhancement of cylindrical heat pipes. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-018-7842-2.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Faghri A. Heat pipe science and technology. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis; 1995.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ahmadi MH, Tatar A, Nazari MA, Ghasempour R, Chamkha AJ, Yan W-M. Applicability of connectionist methods to predict thermal resistance of pulsating heat pipes with ethanol by using neural networks. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2018;126:1079–86.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.06.085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rahman ML, Salsabil Z, Yasmin N, Nourin FN, Ali M. Effect of using ethanol and methanol on thermal performance of a closed loop pulsating heat pipe (CLPHP) with different filling ratios. In: AIP conference proceedings, vol 1754, AIP Publishing LLC; 2016, p. 050014.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4958405.
  11. 11.
    Lv FY, Zhang P, Orejon D, Askounis A, Shen B. Heat transfer performance of a lubricant-infused thermosyphon at various filling ratios. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2017;115:725–36.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.07.062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wannapakhe S, Rittidech S, Bubphachot B, Watanabe O. Heat transfer rate of a closed-loop oscillating heat pipe with check valves using silver nanofluid as working fluid. J Mech Sci Technol. 2009;23:1576–82.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-009-0424-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Alizadeh H, Ghasempour R, Shafii MB, Ahmadi MH, Yan W-M, Nazari MA. Numerical simulation of PV cooling by using single turn pulsating heat pipe. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2018;127:203–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJHEATMASSTRANSFER.2018.06.108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Khalili M, Shafii MB. Experimental and numerical investigation of the thermal performance of a novel sintered-wick heat pipe. Appl Therm Eng. 2016;94:59–75.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.10.120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Khalili M, Shafii MB. Investigating thermal performance of a partly sintered-wick heat pipe filled with different working fluids. Sci Iran. 2016;23:2616–25.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ramezanizadeh M, Nazari MA, Ahmadi MH, Açıkkalp E. Application of nanofluids in thermosyphons: a review. J Mol Liq. 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2018.09.101.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wu Q, Xu R, Wang R, Li Y. Effect of C60 nanofluid on the thermal performance of a flat-plate pulsating heat pipe. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2016;100:892–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJHEATMASSTRANSFER.2016.05.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shafii MB, Arabnejad S, Saboohi Y, Jamshidi H. Experimental investigation of pulsating heat pipes and a proposed correlation. Heat Transf Eng. 2010;31:854–61.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01457630903547636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shafii MB, Faghri A, Zhang Y. Analysis of heat transfer in unlooped and looped pulsating heat pipes. Int J Numer Methods Heat Fluid Flow. 2002;12:585–609.  https://doi.org/10.1108/09615530210434304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Abolfazli Esfahani J, Safaiyan S, Rashidi S. Heat transfer in an eight-pass oscillating loop heat pipe equipped with cooling tower. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-018-7835-1.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wang S, Lin Z, Zhang W, Chen J. Experimental study on pulsating heat pipe with functional thermal fluids. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2009;52:5276–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2009.04.033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gonzalez M, Kim YJ. Experimental study of a pulsating heat pipe using nanofluid as a working fluid. In: Fourteenth intersociety conference on thermal and thermomechanical phenomena in electronic systems, IEEE; 2014, p. 541–6.  https://doi.org/10.1109/itherm.2014.6892328.
  23. 23.
    Mohamadian F, Eftekhar L, Haghighi Bardineh Y. Applying GMDH artificial neural network to predict dynamic viscosity of an antimicrobial nanofluid. Nanomed J. 2018;5:217–21.  https://doi.org/10.22038/NMJ.2018.05.00005.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Akbarianrad N, Mohammadian F, Nazari MA, Rahbani Nobar B. Applications of nanotechnology in endodontic: a review. Nanomed J. 2018;5:121–6.  https://doi.org/10.22038/NMJ.2018.005.0001.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ahmadi MH, Ahmadi MA, Nazari MA, Mahian O, Ghasempour R. A proposed model to predict thermal conductivity ratio of Al2O3/EG nanofluid by applying least squares support vector machine (LSSVM) and genetic algorithm as a connectionist approach. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-018-7035-z.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hemmat Esfe M, Abbasian Arani AA, Shafiei Badi R, Rejvani M. ANN modeling, cost performance and sensitivity analyzing of thermal conductivity of DWCNT–SiO2/EG hybrid nanofluid for higher heat transfer. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2018;131:2381–93.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-017-6744-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hemmat Esfe M, Esfandeh S, Rejvani M. Modeling of thermal conductivity of MWCNT–SiO2 (30:70%)/EG hybrid nanofluid, sensitivity analyzing and cost performance for industrial applications. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2018;131:1437–47.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-017-6680-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nazari MA, Ahmadi MH, Ghasempour R, Shafii MB. How to improve the thermal performance of pulsating heat pipes: a review on working fluid. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2018;91:630–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ahmadi MH, Mirlohi A, Nazari MA, Ghasempour R. A review of thermal conductivity of various nanofluids. J Mol Liq. 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2018.05.124.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ahmadi MH, Nazari MA, Ghasempour R, Madah H, Shafii MB, Ahmadi MA. Thermal conductivity ratio prediction of Al2O3/water nanofluid by applying connectionist methods. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp. 2018;541:154–64.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COLSURFA.2018.01.030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Haghighi Bardineh Y, Mohamadian F, Ahmadi MH, Akbarianrad N. Medical and dental applications of renewable energy systems. Int J Low-Carbon Technol. 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlct/cty040.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Chamkha AJ, Jena SK, Mahapatra SK. MHD convection of nanofluids: a review. J Nanofluids. 2015;4:271–92.  https://doi.org/10.1166/jon.2015.1166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Chamkha AJ, Ismael MA. Natural convection in differentially heated partially porous layered cavities filled with a nanofluid. Numer Heat Transf Part A Appl. 2014;65:1089–113.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10407782.2013.851560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Maddah H, Aghayari R, Mirzaee M, Ahmadi MH, Sadeghzadeh M, Chamkha AJ. Factorial experimental design for the thermal performance of a double pipe heat exchanger using Al2O3–TiO2 hybrid nanofluid. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2018;97:92–102.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ICHEATMASSTRANSFER.2018.07.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sheremet MA, Pop I, Mahian O. Natural convection in an inclined cavity with time-periodic temperature boundary conditions using nanofluids: application in solar collectors. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2018;116:751–61.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJHEATMASSTRANSFER.2017.09.070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sheremet MA, Pop I. Natural convection in a square porous cavity with sinusoidal temperature distributions on both side walls filled with a nanofluid: Buongiorno’s mathematical model. Transp Porous Media. 2014;105:411–29.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-014-0375-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sheremet M, Oztop H, Pop I, Abu-Hamdeh N, Sheremet MA, Oztop HF, et al. Analysis of entropy generation in natural convection of nanofluid inside a square cavity having hot solid block: Tiwari and Das’ model. Entropy. 2015;18:9.  https://doi.org/10.3390/e18010009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kasaeian A, Daneshazarian R, Mahian O, Kolsi L, Chamkha AJ, Wongwises S, et al. Nanofluid flow and heat transfer in porous media: a review of the latest developments. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2017;107:778–91.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJHEATMASSTRANSFER.2016.11.074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kahani M, Ahmadi MH, Tatar A, Sadeghzadeh M. Development of multilayer perceptron artificial neural network (MLP-ANN) and least square support vector machine (LSSVM) models to predict Nusselt number and pressure drop of TiO2/water nanofluid flows through non-straight pathways. Numer Heat Transf Part A Appl. 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10407782.2018.1523597.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wang W, Duan G, Li J, Zhao W, Li C, Liu Z. The preparation and thermal performance research of spherical Ag–H2O nanofluids & applied in heat pipe. Appl Therm Eng. 2017;116:811–22.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APPLTHERMALENG.2017.02.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Chen Y-J, Wang P-Y, Liu Z-H. Application of water-based SiO2 functionalized nanofluid in a loop thermosyphon. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2013;56:59–68.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2012.09.048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Jia H, Jia L, Tan Z. An experimental investigation on heat transfer performance of nanofluid pulsating heat pipe. J Therm Sci. 2013;22:484–90.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11630-013-0652-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Keshavarz Moraveji M, Razvarz S. Experimental investigation of aluminum oxide nanofluid on heat pipe thermal performance. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2012;39:1444–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ICHEATMASSTRANSFER.2012.07.024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Hung Y-H, Teng T-P, Lin B-G. Evaluation of the thermal performance of a heat pipe using alumina nanofluids. Exp Therm Fluid Sci. 2013;44:504–11.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EXPTHERMFLUSCI.2012.08.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Mashaei PR, Shahryari M, Madani S. Analytical study of multiple evaporator heat pipe with nanofluid; a smart material for satellite equipment cooling application. Aerosp Sci Technol. 2016;59:112–21.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AST.2016.10.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Marcelino EW, Riehl RR, Debora S de O. A review on thermal performance of CuO–water nanofluids applied to heat pipes and their characteristics. 2016 15th IEEE intersociety conference on thermal and thermomechanical phenomena in electronic systems, IEEE; 2016, p. 12–22.  https://doi.org/10.1109/itherm.2016.7517522.
  47. 47.
    Aramesh M, Pourfayaz F, Kasaeian A. Numerical investigation of the nanofluid effects on the heat extraction process of solar ponds in the transient step. Sol Energy. 2017;157:869–79.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOLENER.2017.09.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Brahim T, Jemni A. Numerical case study of packed sphere wicked heat pipe using Al2O3 and CuO based water nanofluid. Case Stud Therm Eng. 2016;8:311–21.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CSITE.2016.09.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Vijayakumar M, Navaneethakrishnan P, Kumaresan G. Thermal characteristics studies on sintered wick heat pipe using CuO and Al2O3 nanofluids. Exp Therm Fluid Sci. 2016;79:25–35.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EXPTHERMFLUSCI.2016.06.021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Manimaran R, Palaniradja K, Alagumurthi N, Hussain J. Experimental comparative study of heat pipe performance using CuO and TiO2 nanofluids. Int J Energy Res. 2014;38:573–80.  https://doi.org/10.1002/er.3058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Venkatachalapathy S, Kumaresan G, Suresh S. Performance analysis of cylindrical heat pipe using nanofluids—an experimental study. Int J Multiph Flow. 2015;72:188–97.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJMULTIPHASEFLOW.2015.02.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Pandiyaraj P, Gnanavelbabu A, Saravanan P. Experimental analysis on thermal performance of fabricated flat plate heat pipe using titanium dioxide nanofluid. Mater Today Proc. 2018;5:8414–23.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATPR.2017.11.536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Ghanbarpour M, Khodabandeh R. Entropy generation analysis of cylindrical heat pipe using nanofluid. Thermochim Acta. 2015;610:37–46.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TCA.2015.04.028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Subramaniyan AL, Govardhan MS, Lokesh, Rakappan M, Sundarakannan B, Kottaisamy M, et al. Investigation of thermal performance of a copper heat pipe with TiO2 nanoparticles. In: International conference on advanced nanomaterials and emerging engineering technologies, IEEE; 2013, p. 634–8.  https://doi.org/10.1109/icanmeet.2013.6609372.
  55. 55.
    Akbari A, Saidi MH. Experimental investigation of nanofluid stability on thermal performance and flow regimes in pulsating heat pipe. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-018-7388-3.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Mohammadi M, Mohammadi M, Ghahremani AR, Shafii MB, Mohammadi N. Experimental investigation of thermal resistance of a ferrofluidic closed-loop pulsating heat pipe. Heat Transf Eng. 2014;35:25–33.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01457632.2013.810086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Taslimifar M, Mohammadi M, Afshin H, Saidi MH, Shafii MB. Overall thermal performance of ferrofluidic open loop pulsating heat pipes: an experimental approach. Int J Therm Sci. 2013;65:234–41.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2012.10.016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Goshayeshi HR, Goodarzi M, Dahari M. Effect of magnetic field on the heat transfer rate of kerosene/Fe2O3 nanofluid in a copper oscillating heat pipe. Exp Therm Fluid Sci. 2015;68:663–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EXPTHERMFLUSCI.2015.07.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Lin YH, Kang SW, Chen HL. Effect of silver nano-fluid on pulsating heat pipe thermal performance. Appl Therm Eng. 2008;28:1312–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2007.10.019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Karthikeyan VK, Ramachandran K, Pillai BC, Brusly Solomon A. Effect of nanofluids on thermal performance of closed loop pulsating heat pipe. Exp Therm Fluid Sci. 2014;54:171–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EXPTHERMFLUSCI.2014.02.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Kang S-W, Wei W-C, Tsai S-H, Huang C-C. Experimental investigation of nanofluids on sintered heat pipe thermal performance. Appl Therm Eng. 2009;29:973–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APPLTHERMALENG.2008.05.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Ilyas SU, Pendyala R, Narahari M. Stability and thermal analysis of MWCNT-thermal oil-based nanofluids. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp. 2017;527:11–22.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COLSURFA.2017.05.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Beheshti A, Shanbedi M, Heris SZ. Heat transfer and rheological properties of transformer oil-oxidized MWCNT nanofluid. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2014;118:1451–60.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-014-4048-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Tharayil T, Asirvatham LG, Dau MJ, Wongwises S. Entropy generation analysis of a miniature loop heat pipe with graphene–water nanofluid: thermodynamics model and experimental study. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2017;106:407–21.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJHEATMASSTRANSFER.2016.08.035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Zhou Y, Cui X, Weng J, Shi S, Han H, Chen C. Experimental investigation of the heat transfer performance of an oscillating heat pipe with graphene nanofluids. Powder Technol. 2018;332:371–80.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.POWTEC.2018.02.048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Sadeghinezhad E, Mehrali M, Rosen MA, Akhiani AR, Tahan Latibari S, Mehrali M, et al. Experimental investigation of the effect of graphene nanofluids on heat pipe thermal performance. Appl Therm Eng. 2016;100:775–87.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APPLTHERMALENG.2016.02.071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Tharayil T, Asirvatham LG, Ravindran V, Wongwises S. Thermal performance of miniature loop heat pipe with graphene–water nanofluid. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2016;93:957–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Mehrali M, Sadeghinezhad E, Azizian R, Akhiani AR, Tahan Latibari S, Mehrali M, et al. Effect of nitrogen-doped graphene nanofluid on the thermal performance of the grooved copper heat pipe. Energy Convers Manag. 2016;118:459–73.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENCONMAN.2016.04.028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Kim KM, Bang IC. Effects of graphene oxide nanofluids on heat pipe performance and capillary limits. Int J Therm Sci. 2016;100:346–56.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJTHERMALSCI.2015.10.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Nazari MA, Ghasempour R, Ahmadi MH, Heydarian G, Shafii MB. Experimental investigation of graphene oxide nanofluid on heat transfer enhancement of pulsating heat pipe. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2018;91:90–4.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2017.12.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Xing M, Yu J, Wang R. Performance of a vertical closed pulsating heat pipe with hydroxylated MWNTs nanofluid. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2017;112:81–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJHEATMASSTRANSFER.2017.04.112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Bhuwakietkumjohn N, Rittidech S. Internal flow patterns on heat transfer characteristics of a closed-loop oscillating heat-pipe with check valves using ethanol and a silver nano-ethanol mixture. Exp Therm Fluid Sci. 2010;34:1000–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EXPTHERMFLUSCI.2010.03.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Gandomkar A, Saidi MH, Shafii MB, Vandadi M, Kalan K. Visualization and comparative investigations of pulsating ferro-fluid heat pipe. Appl Therm Eng. 2017;116:56–65.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APPLTHERMALENG.2017.01.068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Renewable Energy and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of TehranTehranIran
  2. 2.Faculty of Mechanical EngineeringShahrood University of TechnologyShahroodIran

Personalised recommendations