Isothermal combustion characteristics of anthracite and spent coffee grounds briquettes
The isothermal combustion characteristics of anthracite and spent coffee grounds briquettes in a bench-scale fixed-bed furnace were examined by using a macro-thermogravimetric analysis approach between 873 and 1173 K. The combustion performances in terms of the conversion rates, flame evolution, pollutant emissions, ash compositions and ash fusion temperatures of two anthracite/spent coffee grounds blend briquettes with blending ratios of 40% and 60% were also compared with those of their individuals. There was only an obvious peak in DTG profile for every sample at each temperature. At 973 K, the average burning rate of the spent coffee grounds was about 8 times higher than that of the anthracite. The average burning rate of 60% anthracite/40% spent coffee grounds blend at 1173 K increased by about 3 times in comparison with that at 873 K. NO2 emissions for the four samples were much less than other gaseous emissions. The four ash fusion temperatures for the anthracite were higher than 1791 K. The deformation temperature, softening temperature, hemispherical temperature and flow temperature for the spent coffee grounds were 1526, 1626, 1687 and 1791 K. The ash fusion characteristics of the spent coffee grounds were improved by blending the anthracite.
KeywordsIsothermal combustion Spent coffee grounds Anthracite Macro-thermogravimetric analysis Emissions Fixed bed
List of symbols
Temperature (K °C−1)
Subscripts and superscripts
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under No 51376017.
- 18.Mitchell EJS, Lea-Langton AR, Jones JM, Williams A, Layden P, Johnson R. The impact of fuel properties on the emissions from the combustion of biomass and other solid fuels in a fixed bed domestic stove. Fuel Process Technol. 2016;142:115–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2015.09.031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Duffy NTM, Eaton JA. Investigation of factors affecting channelling in fixed-bed solid fuel combustion using CFD. Combust Flame. 2013;160(10):2204–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2013.04.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Fornasini P. The uncertainty in physical measurements: an introduction to data analysis in the physics laboratory. Berlin: Springer; 2010.Google Scholar
- 29.Jamal Y, Kim M, Park H-S. Isothermal combustion kinetics of synthetic refuse plastic fuel (RPF) blends by thermogravimetric analysis. Appl Therm Eng. 2016;104:16–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.04.151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 40.Garba MU, Musa U, Azare PE, Ishaq K, Usman S, Onoduku S, Mohammad Y. Characterization and chemistry of selected nigerian coals for solid fuel combustion. Pet Coal. 2016;58(6):646–54.Google Scholar