Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry

, Volume 134, Issue 3, pp 2359–2365 | Cite as

Isothermal drying kinetics of paddy using thermogravimetric analysis

  • Jing Zhang
  • Peiyong MaEmail author
  • Xianwen Zhang
  • Baogang Wang
  • Jinzhou Wu
  • Xianjun Xing


The isothermal drying kinetics of paddy with three initial dry basis moisture content of 17.18, 21.05 and 30.12% have been studied by thermogravimetric analyzer. The results indicated that the final moisture content of the three samples with initial moisture content of 17.18, 21.05 and 30.12% decreased to 4.61, 5.63 and 7.61%, respectively, under the drying temperature of 50 °C. Moreover, the peak drying rate of the three samples speeds up from 1.41% min−1 to 2.18% min−1 with the increase in initial moisture content. Subsequently, five types of drying models were compared to determine the goodness of fit of the different experimental data generated under the drying temperature of 50 °C for the three samples. It is showed that correlation coefficients (R2) determined by Midilli et al. model for the three samples were larger than that in other four models, indicating that the model could fit the experimental data perfectly. Different drying temperature of 40, 50, 60 and 70 °C was selected for the calculation of the effective moisture diffusivity ranging from 3.9747 × 10−10 to 5.2519 × 10−10 m2s−1, which was eventually used to determine the activation energy. The results show that the activation energy of the three samples is 3.92, 5.23 and 6.82 kJ mol−1, respectively.


Paddy Thermogravimetric analysis Drying kinetics Effective moisture diffusivity Activation energy 



This study was supported by the Anhui Province Key Research and Development Project (1704a07020087), Anhui Province, China.


  1. 1.
    Lilhare SF, Bawane NG. Artificial neural network based control strategies for paddy drying process. Int J Inf Technol Comput Sci. 2014;6(11):28–35.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mohsen R, Bagher E, Dariush Z. CFD simulation of deep-bed paddy drying process and performance. Drying Technol. 2014;32(8):919–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Djaeni M, Asiah N, Hargono H. Paddy drying in mixed adsorption dryer with zeolite: drying rate and time estimation. Reaktor. 2014.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Delgado T, Pereira J A, Ramalhosa E, et al. Comparison of different drying methods on the chemical and sensory properties of chestnut (Castanea sativa, M.) slices. Eur Food Res Technol. 2017: 1–15.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Petrova I, Bantle M, Eikevik T M. Manufacture of dry-cured ham: A review. Part 2. Drying kinetics, modeling and equipment. Eur Food Res Technol. 2015; 241(4):447–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gebreegziabher T, Oyedun AO, Chi WH. Optimum biomass drying for combustion: a modeling approach. Energy. 2013;53(5):67–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Krokida MK, Karathanos VT, Maroulis ZB, et al. Drying kinetics of some vegetable. J Food Eng. 2003;59(4):391–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Meziane S. Drying kinetics of olive pomace in a fluidized bed dryer. Energy Convers Manag. 2011;52(52):1644–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Thao H M, Noomhorm A. Modeling and Effects of various drying methods on sweet potato starch properties. Walailak J Sci Technol. 2011; 8(2).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lopes DDC, Neto AJS, Santiago JK. Comparison of equilibrium and logarithmic models for grain drying. Biosyst Eng. 2014;118(1):105–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Page GE. Factors influencing the maximum rates of air drying shelled corn in thin layers. 1949.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Togrul IT, Pehlivan D. Mathematical modeling of solar drying of apricots in thin layers. J Food Eng. 2002;55(3):209–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Midilli A, Kucuk H, Yapar Z. A new model for single-layer drying. Drying Technol. 2002;20(7):1503–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Reis F R, Ivahashi M M, Rosa A H G. Effect of vacuum drying temperature on drying kinetics, effective moisture diffusivity and quality of peeled litchi (litchi chinensis, Sonn.). J Food Process Eng. 2016.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hematian S, Hormozi F. Drying kinetics of coated sodium percarbonate particles in a conical fluidized bed dryer. Powder Technol. 2015;269:30–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Igual M, García-Martínez E, Martín-Esparza ME, et al. Effect of processing on the drying kinetics and functional value of dried apricot. Food Res Int. 2012;47(2):284–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Huang Y W, Chen M Q. Thin-layer isothermal drying kinetics of municipal sewage sludge based on two falling rate stages during hot-air-forced convection. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2017:1–9.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bezerra CV, Meller Da Silva LH, Corrêa DF, et al. A modeling study for moisture diffusivities and moisture transfer coefficients in drying of passion fruit peel. Int J Heat Mass Transfer. 2015;85:750–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fu BA, Chen MQ. Thin-layer drying kinetics of lignite during hot air forced convection. Chem Eng Res Des. 2015;102:416–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Barati E, Esfahani JA. Mathematical simulation of convective drying: spatially distributed temperature and moisture in carrot slab. Int J Therm Sci. 2012;56(2):86–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Vegagálvez A, Miranda M, Bilbaosáinz C, et al. Empirical modeling of drying process for apple (CV. Granny Smith) slices at different air temperatures. J Food Process Preserv. 2008;32(6):972–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Silva WPD, Silva CSE, Gama FJA, et al. Mathematical models to describe thin-layer drying and to determine drying rate of whole bananas. J Saudi Soc Agric Sci. 2014;13(1):67–74.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jabeen R, Aijaz T, Gul K. Drying kinetics of potato using a self-designed cabinet dryer. Cogent Food Agric. 2015; 1(1).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Goergens JF, Carrier M, Knoetze JH, et al. Thermogravimetric study of the pyrolysis characteristics and kinetics of coal blends with corn and sugarcane residues. Fuel Process Technol. 2013;106(2):310–20.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zhang XY, Chen MQ. A comparison of isothermal with nonisothermal drying kinetics of municipal sewage sludge. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2016;123(1):1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chen D, Zheng Y, Zhu X. Determination of effective moisture diffusivity and drying kinetics for poplar sawdust by thermogravimetric analysis under isothermal condition. Bioresour Technol. 2012;107(3):451–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tomassetti M, Campanella L, Aureli T. Thermogravimetric analysis of some spices and commercial food products: comparison with other analytical methods for moisture content determination (part 3). Thermochim Acta. 2010;143(143):15–26.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cai J, Li T, Liu R. A critical study of the miura–maki integral method for the estimation of the kinetic parameters of the distributed activation energy model. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102(4):3894–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lei C, Wang XH, Yang HP, et al. Study on pyrolysis behaviors of non-woody lignins with TG-FTIR and Py-GC/MS. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis. 2015;113:499–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Li Y, Xing X, Xu B, et al. Effect of the particle size on co-combustion of municipal solid waste and biomass briquette under N2/O2 and CO2/O2 atmospheres. Energy Fuels. 2017;31(1):932–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Vaccarezza LM, Chirife J. On the application of Fick’s law for the kinetic analysis of air drying of foods. J Food Sci. 1978;43(1):236–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Vega-Gálvez A, Miranda M, Díaz LP, et al. Effective moisture diffusivity determination and mathematical modelling of the drying curves of the olive-waste cake. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101(19):7265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jing Zhang
    • 1
  • Peiyong Ma
    • 1
    Email author
  • Xianwen Zhang
    • 2
  • Baogang Wang
    • 2
  • Jinzhou Wu
    • 1
  • Xianjun Xing
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringHefei University of TechnologyHefeiChina
  2. 2.School of Automobile and Transportation EngineeringHefei University of TechnologyHefeiChina

Personalised recommendations