Advertisement

Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry

, Volume 135, Issue 6, pp 3499–3518 | Cite as

Theoretical study of nanofluids behavior at critical Rayleigh numbers

  • J. A. EsfahaniEmail author
  • Behzad Forouzi Feshalami
Article

Abstract

The present work investigates the natural convection of nanofluids in Rayleigh–Benard problem. New models, particularly some enhancement factors, are presented in this research to calculate the heat transfer characteristics of nanofluids around critical Rayleigh numbers, including the criteria in which the creation of Rayleigh–Benard and transition to turbulent flow occurs. The present models are compared with available models in the literature to reveal discrepancies of theoretical models in prediction of nanofluids heat transfer characteristics. This research is conducted for \({\text{SiO}}_{2}\), \({\text{Cu}},{\text{CuO}}\) and \({\text{Al}}_{2} {\text{O}}_{3}\) as nanoparticle and water as the base fluid and discussed the SiO2–water nanofluid in more detail. Results indicate that the Nusselt number and convective heat transfer ratio are reduced for SiO2–water nanofluid for almost all volume fractions and as a result using \({\text{SiO}}_{2}\) as nanoparticle into water (the base fluid) is not desired for a natural convection in Rayleigh–Benard problem. Moreover, the onset of natural convection is delayed due to the reduction in enhancement factor.

Keywords

Nanofluid Natural convection Theoretical Instability Critical Rayleigh number 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Hussein AM, Kadirgama K, Noor MM. Nanoparticles suspended in ethylene glycol thermal properties and applications: an overview. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2017;69:1324–30.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Saidur R, Kazi SN, Hossain MS, Rahman MM, Mohammed HA. A review on the performance of nanoparticles suspended with refrigerants and lubricating oils in refrigeration systems. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2011;15(1):310–23.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rashidi S, Esfahani JA, Ellahi R. Convective heat transfer and particle motion in an obstructed duct with two side by side obstacles by means of DPM model. Appl Sci. 2017;7(4):431.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Huminic G, Huminic A. Application of nanofluids in heat exchangers: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2012;16(8):5625–38.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Esfahani JA, Akbarzadeh M, Rashidi S, Rosen MA, Ellahi R. Influences of wavy wall and nanoparticles on entropy generation over heat exchanger plat. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2017;109:1162–71.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Milani Shirvan K, Mamourian M, Mirzakhanlari S, Ellahi R. Numerical investigation of heat exchanger effectiveness in a double pipe heat exchanger filled with nanofluid: a sensitivity analysis by response surface methodology. Powder Technol. 2017;313:99–111.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ghafurian MM, Niazmand H, Ebrahimnia-Bajestan E, Elhami Nik H. Localized solar heating via graphene oxide nanofluid for direct steam generation. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-018-7496-0.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gautam A, Chamoli S, Kumar A, Singh S. A review on technical improvements, economic feasibility and world scenario of solar water heating system. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2017;68:541–62.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sadhishkumar S, Balusamy T. Performance improvement in solar water heating systems—A review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2014;37:191–8.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shrivastava RL, Vinod K, Untawale SP. Modeling and simulation of solar water heater: a TRNSYS perspective. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2017;67:126–43.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Singh R, Lazarus IJ, Souliotis M. Recent developments in integrated collector storage (ICS) solar water heaters: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2016;54:270–98.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Godson L, Raja B, Mohan Lal D, Wongwises S. Enhancement of heat transfer using nanofluids—an overview. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2010;14(2):629–41.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    McGrail BP, Thallapally PK, Blanchard J, Nune SK, Jenks JJ, Dang LX. Metal-organic heat carrier nanofluids. Nano Energy. 2013;2(5):845–55.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pinto RV, Fiorelli FAS. Review of the mechanisms responsible for heat transfer enhancement using nanofluids. Appl Therm Eng. 2016;108:720–39.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ghadimi A, Saidur R, Metselaar HSC. A review of nanofluid stability properties and characterization in stationary conditions. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2011;54(17):4051–68.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Li Y, Zhou JE, Tung S, Schneider E, Xi S. A review on development of nanofluid preparation and characterization. Powder Technol. 2009;196(2):89–101.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Murshed S, Leong K, Yang C. Thermophysical and electrokinetic properties of nanofluids—a critical review. Appl Therm Eng. 2008;28(17):2109–25.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Das SK, Choi SUS, Patel HE. Heat transfer in nanofluids—a review. Heat Transf Eng. 2006;27(10):3–19.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Devendiran DK, Amirtham VA. A review on preparation, characterization, properties and applications of nanofluids. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2016;60:21–40.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Saidur R, Leong KY, Mohammad HA. A review on applications and challenges of nanofluids. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2011;15(3):1646–68.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Babita, Sharma SK, Gupta SM. Preparation and evaluation of stable nanofluids for heat transfer application: a review. Exp Therm Fluid Sci. 2016;79:202–12.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ellahi R. Special issue on recent developments of nanofluids. Appl Sci. 2018;8(2):1–4.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wen D, Lin G, Vafaei S, Zhang K. Review of nanofluids for heat transfer applications. Particuology. 2009;7(2):141–50.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Taghizadeh-Tabari Z, Zeinali Heris S, Moradi M, Kahani M. The study on application of TiO2/water nanofluid in plate heat exchanger of milk pasteurization industries. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2016;58:1318–26.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fsadni AM, Whitty JPM, Adeniyi AA, Simo J, Brooks HL. A review on the application of nanofluids in coiled tube heat exchangers. In: Jackson MJ, Ahmed W, editors. Micro and nanomanufacturing, vol. II. Cham: Springer; 2018. p. 443–65.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Khond VW, Kriplani VM. Effect of nanofluid additives on performances and emissions of emulsified diesel and biodiesel fueled stationary CI engine: a comprehensive review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2016;59:1338–48.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Milani Shirvan K, Ellahi R, Mamourian M, Moghiman M. Effects of wavy surface characteristics on natural convection heat transfer in a cosine corrugated square cavity filled with nanofluid. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2017;107:1110–8.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ijaz N, Zeeshan A, Bhatti MM, Ellahi R. Analytical study on liquid–solid particles interaction in the presence of heat and mass transfer through a wavy channel. J Mol Liq. 2018;250:80–7.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ellahi R, Tariq MH, Hassan M, Vafai K. On boundary layer nano-ferroliquid flow under the influence of low oscillating stretchable rotating disk. J Mol Liq. 2017;229:339–45.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hassan M, Zeeshan A, Majeed A, Ellahi R. Particle shape effects on ferrofuids flow and heat transfer under influence of low oscillating magnetic field. J Magn Magn Mater. 2017;443:36–44.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hayat T, Sajjad R, Muhammad T, Alsaedi A, Ellahi R. On MHD nonlinear stretching flow of Powell–Eyring nanomaterial. Res Phys. 2017;7:535–43.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hayat T, Sajjad R, Alsaedi A, Muhammad T, Ellahi R. On squeezed flow of couple stress nanofluid between two parallel plates. Res Phys. 2017;7:553–61.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zeeshan A, Shehzad N, Ellahi R. Analysis of activation energy in Couette–Poiseuille flow of nanofluid in the presence of chemical reaction and convective boundary conditions. Res Phys. 2018;8:502–12.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Rashidi S, Mahian O, Languri EM. Applications of nanofluids in condensing and evaporating systems. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2017;131(3):2027–39.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bahiraei M, Mashaei PR. Using nanofluid as a smart suspension in cooling channels with discrete heat sources. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2015;119(3):2079–91.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sharma AK, Tiwari AK, Dixit AR. Progress of nanofluid application in machining: a review. Mater Manuf Process. 2015;30(7):813–28.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Mahian O, Kianifar A, Kalogirou SA, Pop I, Wongwises S. A review of the applications of nanofluids in solar energy. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2013;57(2):582–94.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Srivastva U, Malhotra RK, Kaushik SC. Review of heat transport properties of solar heat transfer fluids. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2017;130(2):605–21.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Bellos E, Tzivanidis C. A review of concentrating solar thermal collectors with and without nanofluids. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2018;2018:1–24.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-018-7183-1.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Rashidi S, Akar S, Bovand M, Ellahi R. Volume of fluid model to simulate the nanofluid flow and entropy generation in a single slope solar still. Renew Energy. 2018;115:400–10.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Putra N, Roetzel W, Das SK. Natural convection of nano-fluids. Heat Mass Transf. 2003;39(8–9):775–84.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Nnanna A. Experimental model of temperature-driven nanofluid. J Heat Transf. 2007;129(6):697–704.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Khanafer K, Vafai K, Lightstone M. Buoyancy-driven heat transfer enhancement in a two-dimensional enclosure utilizing nanofluids. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2003;46(19):3639–53.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Hwang KS, Lee J-H, Jang SP. Buoyancy-driven heat transfer of water-based Al2O3 nanofluids in a rectangular cavity. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2007;50(19):4003–10.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Abouali O, Falahatpisheh A. Numerical investigation of natural convection of Al2O3 nanofluid in vertical annuli. Heat Mass Transf. 2009;46(1):15–23.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Sheikhzadeh G, Arefmanesh A, Kheirkhah M, Abdollahi R. Natural convection of Cu–water nanofluid in a cavity with partially active side walls. Eur J Mech B/Fluids. 2011;30(2):166–76.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Saleh H, Roslan R, Hashim I. Natural convection heat transfer in a nanofluid-filled trapezoidal enclosure. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2011;54(1):194–201.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Quintino A, Ricci E, Grignaffini S, Corcione M. Heat transfer correlations for natural convection in inclined enclosures filled with water around its density-inversion point. Int J Therm Sci. 2017;116:310–9.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Rao SS, Srivastava A. Interferometric study of natural convection in a differentially-heated cavity with Al2O3–water based dilute nanofluids. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2016;92:1128–42.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Jahanshahi M, Hosseinizadeh S, Alipanah M, Dehghani A, Vakilinejad G. Numerical simulation of free convection based on experimental measured conductivity in a square cavity using water–SiO2 nanofluid. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2010;37(6):687–94.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Lin KC, Violi A. Natural convection heat transfer of nanofluids in a vertical cavity: effects of non-uniform particle diameter and temperature on thermal conductivity. Int J Heat Fluid Flow. 2010;31(2):236–45.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Xuan Y, Roetzel W. Conceptions for heat transfer correlation of nanofluids. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2000;43(19):3701–7.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Corcione M. Heat transfer features of buoyancy-driven nanofluids inside rectangular enclosures differentially heated at the sidewalls. Int J Thermal Sci. 2010;49(9):1536–46.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Pakravan HA, Yaghoubi M. Analysis of nanoparticles migration on natural convective heat transfer of nanofluids. Int J Therm Sci. 2013;68:79–93.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Bahiraei M. A comprehensive review on different numerical approaches for simulation in nanofluids: traditional and novel techniques. J Dispers Sci Technol. 2014;35(7):984–96.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Haddad Z, Oztop HF, Abu-Nada E, Mataoui A. A review on natural convective heat transfer of nanofluids. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2012;16(7):5363–78.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Kakaç S, Pramuanjaroenkij A. Single-phase and two-phase treatments of convective heat transfer enhancement with nanofluids—a state-of-the-art review. Int J Thermal Sci. 2016;100:75–97.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Kim J, Kang YT, Choi CK. Analysis of convective instability and heat transfer characteristics of nanofluids. Phys Fluids. 2004;16(7):2395–401.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Elhajjar B, Bachir G, Mojtabi A, Fakih C, Charrier-Mojtabi MC. Modeling of Rayleigh–Bénard natural convection heat transfer in nanofluids. CR Mec. 2010;338(6):350–4.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Jou R-Y, Tzeng S-C. Numerical research of nature convective heat transfer enhancement filled with nanofluids in rectangular enclosures. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2006;33(6):727–36.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Rashmi W, Ismail AF, Khalid M, Faridah Y. CFD studies on natural convection heat transfer of Al2O3–water nanofluids. Heat Mass Transf. 2011;47(10):1301–10.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Abu-Nada E, Masoud Z, Hijazi A. Natural convection heat transfer enhancement in horizontal concentric annuli using nanofluids. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2008;35(5):657–65.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Meng X, Li Y. Numerical study of natural convection in a horizontal cylinder filled with water-based alumina nanofluid. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2015;10(1):142.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Abouali O, Ahmadi G. Computer simulations of natural convection of single phase nanofluids in simple enclosures: a critical review. Appl Therm Eng. 2012;36:1–13.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Mahian O, Kianifar A, Heris SZ, Wongwises S. Natural convection of silica nanofluids in square and triangular enclosures: theoretical and experimental study. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2016;99:792–804.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Eslamian M, Ahmed M, El-Dosoky MF, Saghir MZ. Effect of thermophoresis on natural convection in a Rayleigh–Benard cell filled with a nanofluid. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2015;81:142–56.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Savithiri S, Pattamatta A, Das SK. Rayleigh–Benard convection in water-based alumina nanofluid: a numerical study. Numer Heat Transf A. 2017;71(2):202–14.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Siddheshwar PG, Kanchana C, Kakimoto Y, Nakayama A. Steady finite-amplitude Rayleigh–Bénard convection in nanoliquids using a two-phase model: theoretical answer to the phenomenon of enhanced heat transfer. J Heat Transf. 2016;139(1):012402–8.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Nield DA, Kuznetsov AV. The onset of convection in a horizontal nanofluid layer of finite depth. Eur J Mech B/Fluids. 2010;29(3):217–23.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Khalili E, Saboonchi A, Saghafian M. Experimental study of nanoparticles distribution in natural convection of Al2O3–water nanofluid in a square cavity. Int J Therm Sci. 2017;112:82–91.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Incropera FP, Lavine AS, Bergman TL, DeWitt DP. Fundamentals of heat and mass transfer. 6th ed. New York: Wiley; 2007.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Drazin PG, Reid WH. Hydrodynamic stability. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2004.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Boyadjiev CB, Babak VN. Non-linear mass transfer and hydrodynamic stability. 1st ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2000.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Cengel YA. Heat transfer: a practical approach. 2nd ed. New York: WBC McGraw-Hill; 1998.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Wang X-Q, Mujumdar AS. Heat transfer characteristics of nanofluids: a review. Int J Therm Sci. 2007;46(1):1–19.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Sabour M, Ghalambaz M, Chamkha A. Natural convection of nanofluids in a cavity: criteria for enhancement of nanofluids. Int J Numer Method Heat Fluid Flow. 2017;27(7):1504–34.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Solangi KH, Kazi SN, Luhur MR, Badarudin A, Amiri A, Sadri R, et al. A comprehensive review of thermo-physical properties and convective heat transfer to nanofluids. Energy. 2015;89:1065–86.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Bashirnezhad K, Rashidi MM, Yang Z, Bazri S, Yan W-M. A comprehensive review of last experimental studies on thermal conductivity of nanofluids. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2015;122(2):863–84.Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Azmi WH, Sharma KV, Mamat R, Najafi G, Mohamad MS. The enhancement of effective thermal conductivity and effective dynamic viscosity of nanofluids—a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2016;53:1046–58.Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Leong KY, Ku Ahmad KZ, Ong HC, Ghazali MJ, Baharum A. Synthesis and thermal conductivity characteristic of hybrid nanofluids—a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2017;75:868–78.Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Sundar LS, Sharma KV, Singh MK, Sousa ACM. Hybrid nanofluids preparation, thermal properties, heat transfer and friction factor—a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2017;68(Part 1):185–98.Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Abu-Nada E. Effects of variable viscosity and thermal conductivity of Al2O3–water nanofluid on heat transfer enhancement in natural convection. Int J Heat Fluid Flow. 2009;30(4):679–90.Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Ho C-J, Chen M, Li Z. Numerical simulation of natural convection of nanofluid in a square enclosure: effects due to uncertainties of viscosity and thermal conductivity. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2008;51(17):4506–16.Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Aminossadati S, Ghasemi B. Enhanced natural convection in an isosceles triangular enclosure filled with a nanofluid. Comput Math Appl. 2011;61(7):1739–53.Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Haddad Z, Abid C, Mohamad A, Rahli O, Bawazer S. Natural convection of silica–water nanofluids based on experimental measured thermophysical properties: critical analysis. Heat Mass Transf. 2015;52:1649–63.Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Abu-Nada E, Chamkha AJ. Effect of nanofluid variable properties on natural convection in enclosures filled with a CuO–EG–water nanofluid. Int J Therm Sci. 2010;49(12):2339–52.Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    He Y, Qi C, Hu Y, Qin B, Li F, Ding Y. Lattice Boltzmann simulation of alumina-water nanofluid in a square cavity. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2011;6(1):1–8.Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Hu Y, He Y, Qi C, Jiang B, Schlaberg HI. Experimental and numerical study of natural convection in a square enclosure filled with nanofluid. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2014;78:380–92.Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Corcione M. Empirical correlating equations for predicting the effective thermal conductivity and dynamic viscosity of nanofluids. Energy Convers Manag. 2011;52(1):789–93.Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Vanaki SM, Ganesan P, Mohammed H. Numerical study of convective heat transfer of nanofluids: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2016;54:1212–39.Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Haddad Z, Abu-Nada E, Oztop HF, Mataoui A. Natural convection in nanofluids: are the thermophoresis and Brownian motion effects significant in nanofluid heat transfer enhancement? Int J Therm Sci. 2012;57:152–62.Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Yu W, Choi SUS. The role of interfacial layers in the enhanced thermal conductivity of nanofluids: a renovated Maxwell model. J Nanopart Res. 2003;5(1):167–71.Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Prasher R, Bhattacharya P, Phelan PE. Thermal conductivity of nanoscale colloidal solutions (nanofluids). Phys Rev Lett. 2005;94(2):025901–4.Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Hassani S, Saidur R, Mekhilef S, Hepbasli A. A new correlation for predicting the thermal conductivity of nanofluids; using dimensional analysis. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2015;90:121–30.Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Sharma K, Sarm P, Azmi W, Mamat R, Kadirgama K. Correlations to predict friction and forced convection heat transfer coefficients of water based nanofluids for turbulent flow in a tube. Int J Microscale Nanoscale Therm Fluid Trans Phenom. 2012;3(4):283–307.Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Vajjha RS, Das DK. Experimental determination of thermal conductivity of three nanofluids and development of new correlations. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2009;52(21–22):4675–82.Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Tawfik MM. Experimental studies of nanofluid thermal conductivity enhancement and applications: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2017;75:1239–53.Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Murshed SMS, Estellé P. A state of the art review on viscosity of nanofluids. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2017;76:1134–52.Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    Gupta M, Singh V, Kumar R, Said Z. A review on thermophysical properties of nanofluids and heat transfer applications. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2017;74:638–70.Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    Mahbubul IM, Saidur R, Amalina MA. Latest developments on the viscosity of nanofluids. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2012;55(4):874–85.Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    Bashirnezhad K, Bazri S, Safaei MR, Goodarzi M, Dahari M, Mahian O, et al. Viscosity of nanofluids: a review of recent experimental studies. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2016;73:114–23.Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    Meyer JP, Adio SA, Sharifpur M, Nwosu PN. The viscosity of nanofluids: a review of the theoretical, empirical, and numerical models. Heat Transf Eng. 2016;37(5):387–421.Google Scholar
  103. 103.
    Masoud Hosseini S, Moghadassi AR, Henneke DE. A new dimensionless group model for determining the viscosity of nanofluids. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2010;100(3):873–7.Google Scholar
  104. 104.
    Hemmati-Sarapardeh A, Varamesh A, Husein MM, Karan K. On the evaluation of the viscosity of nanofluid systems: Modeling and data assessment. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2018;81(Part 1):313–29.Google Scholar
  105. 105.
    Koo J, Kleinstreuer C. A new thermal conductivity model for nanofluids. J Nanopart Res. 2004;6(6):577–88.Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    Rudyak VY. Viscosity of nanofluids. Why it is not described by the classical theories. Adv Nanopart. 2013;2(03):266–79.Google Scholar
  107. 107.
    Abu-Nada E. Rayleigh–Bénard convection in nanofluids: effect of temperature dependent properties. Int J Therm Sci. 2011;50(9):1720–30.Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    Koca HD, Doganay S, Turgut A, Tavman IH, Saidur R, Mahbubul IM. Effect of particle size on the viscosity of nanofluids: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2017;82(1):1664–74.Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    Shahrul IM, Mahbubul IM, Khaleduzzaman SS, Saidur R, Sabri MFM. A comparative review on the specific heat of nanofluids for energy perspective. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2014;38:88–98.Google Scholar
  110. 110.
    Bergman TL. Effect of reduced specific heats of nanofluids on single phase, laminar internal forced convection. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2009;52(5):1240–4.Google Scholar
  111. 111.
    Ganvir RB, Walke PV, Kriplani VM. Heat transfer characteristics in nanofluid—a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2017;75:451–60.Google Scholar
  112. 112.
    Corcione M. Rayleigh–Bénard convection heat transfer in nanoparticle suspensions. Int J Heat Fluid Flow. 2011;32(1):65–77.Google Scholar
  113. 113.
    Zhang L, Li Y-R, Zhang J-M. Numerical simulation of Rayleigh–Bénard convection of nanofluids in rectangular cavities. J Mech Sci Technol. 2017;31(8):4043–50.Google Scholar
  114. 114.
    Tzou DY. Instability of nanofluids in natural convection. J Heat Transf. 2008;130(7):072401–9.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringFerdowsi University of MashhadMashhadIran

Personalised recommendations