Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry

, Volume 134, Issue 3, pp 2265–2274 | Cite as

Application of inductive forced heating as a new approach to food industry heat exchangers

A case study—Tomato paste pasteurization
  • Anıl Başaran
  • Tuncay Yılmaz
  • Can Çivi


Heat exchangers are one of the main equipment used in food industry because of their convenience to transfer energy to both auxiliary facilities and various food products. In food industry, there are several reasons for heat transfer such as pre-heating, pasteurizing and sterilizing in which heat exchangers require high amount of energy. On the other hand, as being a unique quality assurance unit heat exchangers should be cleaned easily and extensively. Having high operating costs due to energy consumption and requiring high investment cost due to ensure a reliable hygienic design make heat transfer units an expensive and energy-consuming unit. Therefore, developing new approaches to generate energy and transferring it hygienically with minimum loses will be an opportunity for the food industry. With the view of developing new equipment for industry, induction-driven heating system was investigated in this study and energy and exergy efficiencies were calculated and compared with conventional heat exchanger system. Selected food system was the tomato paste sterilization/pasteurization which is a part of tomato paste production line. After assumptions and theoretical calculations for both conventional application and inductive heating, it was found that inductive heating system has 95.00% energy efficiency and 46.56% second law efficiency while the conventional heating system with electric boiler has 75.43% energy efficiency and 16.63% exergy efficiency. As a consequence, inductive method was found more beneficial compared to a commercial method having higher energy and exergy efficiencies.


Heat exchangers Food industry Efficiency Exergy analysis Induction heating 

List of symbols


Energy rate (kW)


Exergy rate (kW)


Specific enthalpy (kJ kg−1)


Mass flow rate (kg s−1)


Pressure (MPa)


Specific entropy (kJ kg−1 K−1)


Entropy rate (kW K−1)


Heat transfer rate (kW)


Velocity (ms−2)


Gravitational acceleration (ms−2)


Elevation (m)


Temperature (K)


Work rate power (kW)


Irreversibility (kW)

Greek letters


Energy or first law efficiency (%)


Flow exergy (kJ kg−1)


Exergy or second law efficiency (%)



Control volume


Destroyed, destruction


Restricted dead state










Working fluid


  1. 1.
    Heldman DR. Handbook of food Engineering. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2007.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rahman SM. Handbook of food preservation. Boca Raton: CRC; 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shah RK, Sekuliâc DP. Fundamentals of heat exchanger design. Hoboken: Wiley; 2012.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Varzakas T, Tzia C. Handbook of food processing. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2016.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zinn S, Semiatin SL. Elements of induction heating design, control and applications EPRI. New York: ASM International; 1988.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    German RM. Sintering theory and practice. New York: Wiley; 1996.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rapoport E, Pleshivtseva Y. Optimal control of induction heating processes. Milton Park: Taylor & Francis; 2006.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rudnev V, Loveless D, Cook R, Black M. Handbook of induction heating. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2003.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schivazappa C, Virgili R, Simoncini N, Tiso S, Alvarez J, Rodríguez JM. Application of the magnetic induction technique for the nondestructive assessment of salt gain after the salting process of Parma ham. Food Control. 2017;80:92–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Barai A, Watson S, Griffiths H, Patz R. Magnetic induction spectroscopy: non-contact measurement of electrical conductivity spectra of biological samples. Meas Sci Technol. 2012;23:1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Euring F, Russ W, Wilke W, Grupa U. Development of an impedance measurement system for the detection of decay of apples. Proc Food Sci. 2011;1:1188–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Miyuki T, Sadayuki M, Takayoshi N, Ryota A, Takuya Y, Hayato Y, Kazuhiro K, Hirokazu K. Induction cooking apparatus, combined cooking apparatus, and induction cooking system equipped with these. International Patent. No: Wo2017064804 (A1)—2017-04-20.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Reinhard M. Induction holding, warming, and cooking system having in-unit magnetic control. International Patent. No: Wo2017044150 (A1)—2017-03-16.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Warren GS, Reinhard M. Food warming device and system. International Patent. No: Us2009095736 (A1)—2009-04-16.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Arnel C. Graphite composite cooking plat. International Patent. No: Au2015305776 (A1)—2017-03-16.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hong PC. Mixer capable of high frequency induction heating. International Patent. No: Wo2017043875 (A1)—2017-03-16.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hyunwoo P, Dongjae L, Seungyoun K. Combination type cooker. International Patent. No: Wo2017034285 (A1)—2017-03-02.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Umali Ignacio R, Jr. Elmido Dennis U, Elmido Lowell U. Multipurpose induction cooking utensil. International Patent. No: Ph12015000089 (A1)—2016-10-03.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yangqi C, Zheng L, Jiansheng W, Jiquan X. Follow-up type induction cooker. International Patent. No: Cn106051845 (A)—2016-10-26.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wei S, Song D, Xiao Y. Food cooking machine. International Patent. No: Cn205729177 (U)—2016-11-30.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zisheng L, Zengmin D. Electromagnetic induction type fries in shallow oil kitchen coil. International Patent. No: Cn204598350 (U)—2015-08-26.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kanoglu M, Dincer I, Rosen MA. Understanding energy and exergy efficiencies for improved energy management in power plants. Energy Policy. 2003;35(7):3967–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Akar S, Rashidi S, Esfahani JA. Second law of thermodynamic analysis for nanofluid turbulent flow around a rotating cylinder. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2017. Scholar
  24. 24.
    Prabakaran R, Lal DM. A novel exergy based charge optimisation for a mobile air conditioning system. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2018. Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pandey K, Tyagi VV, Rahim NA, Kaushik SC, Tyagi SK. Thermal performance evaluation of direct flow solar water heating system using exergetic approach. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2015;121:1365–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Basaran A, Ozgener L. Investigation of the effect of different refrigerants on performances of binary geothermal power plants. Energy Convers Manag. 2013;76:483–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Szargut J, Morris DR, Stewart FR. Exergy analysis of thermal, chemical, and metallurgical processes. New York: Edwards Brothers Inc.; 1998.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pandey AK, Tyagi VV, Park SR, Tyagi SK. Comparative experimental study of solar cookers using exergy analysis. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2012;109:425–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rosen MA, Dincer I, Kanaglu M. Role of exergy in increasing efficiency and sustainability and reducing environmental impact. Energy Policy. 2008;36:128–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Jongen WE. Fruit and vegetable processing—improving quality. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2005.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Unver U. Efficiency analysis of induction air heater and investigation of distribution of energy losses. Tehnicki Vjesnik-Technical Gazette. 2016;23(5):1259–67.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bodziak K, Goleman R, Nalewaj K. Induction heater in the electric pasteurizer. Int Agrophys. 1999;3:323–31.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kreith F, The CRC. Handbook of thermal engineering. Berlin: Springer; 2016.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (Atlanta, Estados Unidos). Handbook of fundamentals: heating, refrigerating, ventilating and air conditioning. New York: ASHRAE; 2010.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kotas TJ. The exergy method of thermal plant analysis. Tiptree: Anchor Brendon Ltd.; 1985.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Bejan A. Fundamentals of exergy analysis, entropy generation minimization, and the generation of flow architecture. Int J Energy Res. 2002;26:545–65.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical Engineering, Engineering FacultyManisa Celal Bayar UniversityManisaTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Food Engineering, Engineering FacultyManisa Celal Bayar UniversityManisaTurkey

Personalised recommendations