Advertisement

Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry

, Volume 135, Issue 3, pp 1667–1675 | Cite as

Ternary nanotube α-MnO2/GO/AC as an excellent alternative composite modifier for cathode electrode of microbial fuel cell

  • Arezu Tofighi
  • Mostafa RahimnejadEmail author
  • Mohsen Ghorbani
Article

Abstract

Microbial fuel cells (MFCs) are known as innovative alternatives to non-renewable energy by providing significant opportunities to convert chemical energy of organic or inorganic matters into electricity. Although they are capable of operating on diverse types of carbohydrates, they are able to function on complex substrates. However, low power density is one of their most challenging drawbacks. Using various types of catalytic materials is a typical method to overcome low performance of MFC. Mixture of graphene oxide (GO) and α-manganese dioxide nanotubes (α-MnO2) was applied as a cathode catalyst. Oxygen reduction reaction and MFC’s output power were enhanced by constructing nanocomposite with high catalytic activity mixed with simple and cost-effective activated carbon (AC), which was 280-fold of the bare electrode. Moreover, MFC’s output was compared by applying ternary nanotube α-MnO2/GO/AC catalyst with 5, 10, 15 and 20% of GO. Consequently, the composite with 10% GO achieved 148.4 mW m−2 maximum power density which indicated the best performance among other amounts of GO.

Keywords

Ternary nanotube α-MnO2/GO/AC Cathode catalyst Oxygen reduction reaction Microbial fuel cells Power density 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to appreciate Biofuel & Renewable Energy Research Center at BNUT for the facilities provided, Danesh Gostar Hamgam ba Sanat Company for fabricating MFC setup and data logger and also Dr. Masoomeh Pourali, Mehrdad Mashkour, Khashayar Sabbagh, Hoda Ezoji and Marjan Fallah who helped the authors finish this research.

References

  1. 1.
    Rabaey K, Verstraete W. Microbial fuel cells: novel biotechnology for energy generation. Trends Biotechnol. 2005;23:291–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mashkour M, Rahimnejad M, Mashkour M, Bakeri G, Luque R, Oh SE. Application of wet nanostructured bacterial cellulose as a novel hydrogel bioanode for microbial fuel cells. ChemElectroChem. 2017;4:648–54.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Awan Z, Nahm KS, Xavier JS. Nanotubular MnO2/graphene oxide composites for the application of open air-breathing cathode microbial fuel cells. Biosens Bioelectron. 2014;53:528–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Roche I, Katuri K. Scott K.A microbial fuel cell using manganese oxide oxygen reduction catalysts. J Appl Electrochem. 2010;40:13.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dekker A, Heijne AT, Saakes M, Hameles HVM, Buisman CJN. Analysis and improvement of a scaled-up and stacked microbial fuel cell. Environ Sci Technol. 2009;43:9038–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Santoro C, Serov A, Villarrubia CWN, Stariha S, Babanova S, Artyushkova K, Schuler AJ, Atanassov P. High catalytic activity and pollutants resistivity using Fe-AAPyr cathode catalyst for microbial fuel cell application. Sci Rep. 2015;5:16596.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Santoro C, Serov A, Narvaez Villarrubia CW, Stariha S, Babanova S, Schuler AJ, Artyushkova K, Atanassov P. Double-chamber microbial fuel cell with a non-platinum-group metal Fe–N–C cathode catalyst. ChemSusChem. 2015;8:828–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fraiwan A, Lee H, Choi S. A multianode paper-based microbial fuel cell: a potential power source for disposable biosensors. IEEE Sens J. 2014;14:3385–90.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sun H, Xu K, Lu G, Lv H, Liu Z. Graphene-supported silver nanoparticles for pH-neutral electrocatalytic oxygen reduction. IEEE Trans Nanotechnol. 2014;13:789–94.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mashkour M, Rahimnejad M. Effect of various carbon-based cathode electrodes on the performance of microbial fuel cell. Biofuel Res J. 2015;8:296–300.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Singh I, Chandra A. Use of the oxygen storage material CeO2 as co-catalyst to improve the performance of microbial fuel cells. Int J Hydrog Energy. 2016;41:1913–20.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pandit S, Sengupta A, Kale S, Das D. Performance of electron acceptors in catholyte of a two-chambered microbial fuel cell using anion exchange membrane. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102:2736–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Eliato TR, Pazuki G, Majidian N. Potassium permanganate as an electron receiver in a microbial fuel cell. Energy Sour A. 2016;38:644–51.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Khilari S, Pandit S, Ghangrekar M, Das D, Pradhan D. Graphene supported α-MnO 2 nanotubes as a cathode catalyst for improved power generation and wastewater treatment in single-chambered microbial fuel cells. RSC Adv. 2013;3:7902–11.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ghasemi M, Daud WRW, Hassan SHA, Oh SE, Ismail M, Rahimnejad M, Jahim JM. Nano-structured carbon as electrode material in microbial fuel cells. A comprehensive review. J Alloy Compd. 2013;580:245–55.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Li M, Zhou S, Xu M. Graphene oxide supported magnesium oxide as an efficient cathode catalyst for power generation and wastewater treatment in single chamber microbial fuel cells. Chem Eng J. 2017;328:106–16.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jiang B, Muddemann T, Kunz U, e Silva LGS, Bormann H, Niedermeiser M, Haupt D, Schlafer O, Sievers M. Graphite/MnO2 and MoS2 composites used as catalysts in the oxygen reduction cathode of microbial fuel cells. J Electrochem Soc. 2017;164:519–24.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cai W, Liu W, Han J, Wang A. Enhanced hydrogen production in microbial electrolysis cell with 3D self-assembly nickel foam-graphene cathode. Biosens Bioelectron. 2016;80:118–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zheng D, Sun S, Fan W, Yu H, Fan C, Cao G, Yin Z, Song X. One-step preparation of single-crystalline β-MnO2 nanotubes. J Phys Chem B. 2005;109:16439–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yang Z, Zhang Y, Zhang W, Wang X, Qian Y, Wen X, Yang S. Nanorods of manganese oxides: synthesis, characterization and catalytic application. J Solid State Chem. 2006;179:679–84.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Luo J, Zhu H, Fan H, Liang J, Shi H, Rao G, Li J, Du Z, Shen Z. Synthesis of single-crystal tetragonal r-MnO2 nanotubes. J Phys Chem C. 2008;112(33):12594–8.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Liu Z, Ge B, Li K, Zhang X, Huang K. The excellent performance and mechanism of activated carbon air cathode doped with different type of cobalt for microbial fuel cells. Fuel. 2016;176:173–80.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Huang Q, Zhou P, Yang H, Zhu L, Wu H. CoO nanosheets in situ grown on nitrogen-doped activated carbon as an effective cathodic electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction reaction in microbial fuel cells. Electrochim Acta. 2017;232:339–47.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Vayssilov GN, Lykhach Y, Migani A, Staudt T, Petrova GP, Tsud N, Skala T, Bruix A, Illas F, Prince KC. Support nanostructure boosts oxygen transfer to catalytically active platinum nanoparticles. Nat Mater. 2011;10:310–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mistry H, Varela AS, Kühl S, Strasser P, Cuenya BR. Nanostructured electrocatalysts with tunable activity and selectivity. Nat Rev Mater. 2016;1:16009.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pan Y, Mo X, Li K, Pu L, Liu D, Yang T. Iron–nitrogen–activated carbon as cathode catalyst to improve the power generation of single-chamber air-cathode microbial fuel cells. Bioresour Technol. 2016;206:285–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Marcano DC, Kosynkin DV, Berlin JM, Sinitskii A, Sun Z, Slesarev A, Alemany LB, Lu W, Tour JM. Improved synthesis of graphene oxide. ACS Nano. 2010;4:4806–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dong H, Yu H, Wang X, Zhou Q. Feng J.A novel structure of scalable air-cathode without Nafion and Pt by rolling activated carbon and PTFE as catalyst layer in microbial fuel cells. Water Res. 2012;46:5777–87.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bakeri G, Ismail A, Matsuura T, Abdullah M, Ng B, Mashkour M. Effect of PVDF blending on the structure and performance of PEI hollow fiber membrane in CO2 separation process. Chem Eng Res Des. 2015;104:367–75.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mashkour M, Rahimnejad M, Mashkour M. Bacterial cellulose-polyaniline nano-biocomposite: a porous media hydrogel bioanode enhancing the performance of microbial fuel cell. J Power Sources. 2016;325:322–8.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Logan BE. Microbial fuel cells. Hoboken: Wiley; 2008.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    He Z, Mansfeld F. Exploring the use of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) in microbial fuel cell studies. Energy Environ Sci. 2009;2:215–9.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Dominguez-Benetton X, Sevda S, Vanbroekhoven K, Pant D. The accurate use of impedance analysis for the study of microbial electrochemical systems. Chem Soc Rev. 2012;41:7228–46.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Stankovich S, Dikin DA, Piner RD, Kohlhaas KA, Kleinhammes A, Jia Y, Wu Y, Nguyen ST, Ruoff RS. Synthesis of graphene-based nanosheets via chemical reduction of exfoliated graphite oxide. Carbon. 2007;45:1558–65.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Figueiredo J, Pereira M, Freitas M, Orfao J. Modification of the surface chemistry of activated carbons. Carbon. 1999;37:1379–89.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Marcano DC, Kosynkin DV, Berlin JM, Sinitskii A, Sun Z, Slesarev A, Alemany LB, Lu W, Tour JM. Improved synthesis of graphene oxide. ACS Nano. 2010;4(8):4806–4814.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Stobinski L, Lesiak B, Malolepszy A, Mazurkiewicz M, Mierzwa B, Zemek J, Jiricek P, Bieloshapka I. Graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide studied by the XRD, TEM and electron spectroscopy methods. J Electron Spectrosc Relat Phenom. 2014;195:145–54.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wu J, Wang Q, Umar A, Sun S, Huang L, Wang J, Gao Y. Highly sensitive p-nitrophenol chemical sensor based on crystalline α-MnO2 nanotubes. New J Chem. 2014;38:4420–6.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wang H, Lu Z, Qian D, Li Y, Zhang W. Single-crystal α-MnO2 nanorods: synthesis and electrochemical properties. Nanotechnology. 2007;18:115616.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Cao Y, Yang H, Ai X, Xiao L. The mechanism of oxygen reduction on MnO2-catalyzed air cathode in alkaline solution. J Electroanal Chem. 2003;557:127–34.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Lima FH, Calegaro ML, Ticianelli EA. Investigations of the catalytic properties of manganese oxides for the oxygen reduction reaction in alkaline media. J Electroanal Chem. 2006;590:152–60.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Zhang L, Liu C, Zhuang L, Li W, Zhou S, Zhang J. Manganese dioxide as an alternative cathodic catalyst to platinum in microbial fuel cells. Biosens Bioelectron. 2009;24:2825–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Benhaddad L, Makhloufi L, Messaoudi B, Rahmouni K, Takenouti H. Reactivity of nanostructured MnO2 in alkaline medium studied with a microcavity electrode: effect of oxidizing agent. J Mater Sci Technol. 2011;27:585–93.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Yang T, Li K, Pu L, Liu Z, Ge B, Pan Y, Liu Y. Hollow-spherical Co/NC nanoparticle as an efficient electrocatalyst used in air cathode microbial fuel cell. Biosens Bioelectron. 2016;86:129–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Mashkour M, Rahimnejad M, Pourali S, Ezoji H, ElMekawy A, Pant D. Catalytic performance of nano-hybrid graphene and titanium dioxide modified cathodes fabricated with facile and green technique in microbial fuel cell. Prog. Nat. Sci.: Materials. International. 2017;27:647–51.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Hou Y, Yuan H, Wen Z, Cui S, Guo X, He Z, Chen J. Nitrogen-doped graphene/CoNi alloy encased within bamboo-like carbon nanotube hybrids as cathode catalysts in microbial fuel cells. J Power Sour. 2016;307:561–8.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Zhao F, Slade RC, Varcoe JR. Techniques for the study and development of microbial fuel cells: an electrochemical perspective. Chem Soc Rev. 2009;38:1926–39.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Rabaey K, Rozendal RA. Microbial electrosynthesis–revisiting the electrical route for microbial production. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010;8:706–16.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arezu Tofighi
    • 1
  • Mostafa Rahimnejad
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mohsen Ghorbani
    • 1
  1. 1.Biofuel and Renewable Energy Research Center, Chemical Engineering DepartmentBabol Noshirvani University of TechnologyBabolIran

Personalised recommendations