Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry

, Volume 131, Issue 1, pp 215–224 | Cite as

Using DSC for the detection of diffusion-controlled phenomena in Cu-based shape memory alloys

  • Nicoleta Monica Lohan
  • Bogdan Pricop
  • Lucian Burlacu
  • Leandru-Gheorghe Bujoreanu
Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

The thermally induced reversible diffusionless martensitic transformation, that governs the mechanism of shape memory alloys (SMAs), can be conveniently illustrated, on differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) curves, by a close variation loop of heat flow with temperature. Cooling-induced direct (forward) martensitic formation causes an exothermic maximum, while martensite reversion, on heating, is associated with an endothermic peak. The occurrence of diffusion-controlled phenomena is emphasized by discontinuities of heat flow variations, such as those observed in the case of Cu–Zn–Al SMAs, experiencing thermoelastic martensitic transformation. When heating such a martensitic Cu–Zn–Al SMA, four solid-state transitions were observed on DSC curves, under the form of: (1) an endothermic minimum ascribed to martensite reversion to parent phase; (2) an endothermic minimum associated with transitory formation of bainite; (3) an exothermic maximum corresponding to the precipitation of equilibrium α-phase and (4) an endothermic peak representing the order–disorder transition of parent phase. The first transition is diffusionless, while the other three are diffusion-controlled. The DSC equipment was used to investigate the effects of: (1) heat treatment temperature, (2) number of cycles of thermomechanical treatment and (3) thermal cycling within the temperature range where diffusion-controlled solid-state transitions occur in a Cu–Zn–Al SMA, the results being corroborated with that obtained by optical (OM) and transmission (TEM) electron microscopy.

Keywords

DSC Martensite Thermomechanical cycling Diffusion-controlled phenomena Reversibility Microstructure 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Special thanks are brought to Dr. T. Kikuchi, from NIMS Tsukuba, for his expertise in TEM observations. This work was financially supported by UEFISCU by means of the research grant PN-II-ID-PCE-2012-4-0033, contract no. 13/02.09.2012.

References

  1. 1.
    Tadaki T. Cu-based shape memory alloys. In: Otsuka K, Wayman CM, editors. Shape memory materials. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998. p. 97–116.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kumar PK, Lagoudas DC. Introduction to shape memory alloys. In: Lagoudas DC, editor. Shape memory alloys. Modeling and engineering applications. New York: Springer; 2008. p. 1–51.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Harrison JD. Measurable changes concomitant with the shape memory effect transformation. In: Duerig TW, Melton N, Stöckel D, Wayman CM, editors. Engineering aspects of shape memory alloys. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1990. p. 106–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    De Jonghe W, De Baptist R, Delaey L, De Bonte M. Internal friction measurements on copper-zinc based martensite. In: Perkins J, editor. Shape memory effects in alloys. New York: Plenum Press; 1975. p. 451–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Griffin VJ, Laye PG. Differential thermal analysis and differential scanning calorimetry. In: Charsley EL, Warrington SB, editors. Thermal analysis—Techniques and applications. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry; 1992. p. 17–30.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pelegrina JL, Torra V. Comment on “Effects of heat-flux features on the differential scanning calorimetry curve of a thermoelastic martensitic transformation” by Benke, et al. [Mater. Sci. Eng. A 481–482(2008) 522]. Mater Sci Eng A. 2010;527:2437–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ortín J, Planes A. Thermodynamic analysis of thermal measurements in thermoelastic martensitic transformations. Acta Metall. 1988;36:1873–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zare M, Ketabchi M. Effect of chromium element on transformation, mechanical and corrosion behavior of thermomechanically induced Cu–Al–Ni shape-memory alloys. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2016. doi: 10.1007/s10973-016-5839-2.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Spielfield J. Marforming and martempering of a Cu–Zn–Al shape memory alloy. Mater Sci Eng A. 1999;273–275:639–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bujoreanu LG. On the influence of austenitization on the morphology of α-phase in tempered Cu–Zn–Al shape memory alloys. Mater Sci Eng A. 2008;481–482:395–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bujoreanu LG, Stanciu S, Bârsănescu P, Lohan NM. Study of the transitory formation of α1 bainite, as a precursor of α-phase in tempered SMAs. Proc SPIE, 2000. doi: 10.1117/12.823620.
  12. 12.
    Dasgupta R. A look into Cu-based shape memory alloys: present scenario and future prospects. J Mater Res. 2014;29:1681–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Delaey L, Suzuki T, Van Humbeeck J. The stabilisation of step-quenched copper-zinc-aluminum martensite part II: Crystal structure and reordering. Scripta Metall. 1984;18:899–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bujoreanu LG, Lohan NM, Pricop B, Cimpoeşu N. On role of atomic migration in amnesia occurrence during complex thermal cycling of Cu–Zn–Al shape memory alloy. Mater Sci Tech-Lond. 2012;28:658–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bujoreanu LG, Lohan NM, Pricop B, Cimpoeşu N. Thermal memory degradation in a Cu–Zn–Al shape memory alloy during thermal cycling with free air cooling. J Mater Eng Perform. 2011;20:468–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vitel G, Paraschiv AL, Suru MG, Cimpoesu N, Bujoreanu LG. New calorimetric-structural aspects of temperature memory effect in hot rolled Cu–Zn–Al SMAs. Optoelectron Adv Mat. 2011;5:858–62.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bujoreanu LG, Craus ML, Rusu I, Stanciu S, Sutiman D. On the β2 to α phase transformation in a Cu–Zn–Al—Based shape memory alloy. J Alloy Compd. 1998;278:190–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bujoreanu LG. Formation of transitory bainite as a precursor of α-phase during tempering of martensitic Cu–Zn–Al SMAs. In: Chen HR, editor. Shape memory alloys: manufacture, properties and applications. Nova Science Publishers: New York; 2010. p. 267–85.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bujoreanu LG, Craus ML, Stanciu S, Dia V. Thermally and stress induced changes in three phase structure of Cu–Zn–Al–Fe shape memory alloy. Mater Sci Tech-Lond. 2000;16:612–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bujoreanu LG, Stanciu S, Enache A, Lohan C, Rusu I. Influence of some extrinsic factors on the two way shape memory effect of electric actuators. J Optoelectron Adv M. 2008;10:602–6.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Suru MG, Paraschiv AL, Lohan NM, Pricop B, Ozkal B, Bujoreanu LG. Loading mode and environment effects on surface profile characteristics of martensite plates in Cu-based SMAs. J Mater Eng Perform. 2014;23:2669–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Vitel G, Pricop B, Suru MG, Lohan NM, Bujoreanu LG. Study of temperature memory effect during the thermal cycling in hydraulic systems. J Test Eval. 2016;44:1525–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lohan NM, Pricop B, Bujoreanu LG, Cimpoeşu N. Heating rate effects on reverse martensitic transformation in a Cu–Zn–Al shape memory alloy. Int J Mater Res. 2011;102(11):1345–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Vitel G, Suru MG, Paraschiv AL, Lohan NM, Pricop B, Baciu M, Bujoreanu LG. Structural effects of training cycles in shape memory actuators for temperature control. Mater Manu Process. 2013;28:79–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Vitel G, Paraschiv AL, Suru MG, Cimpoeşu N, Bujoreanu LG. Tempering effects in a normalized hot forged Cu–Zn–Al shape memory alloy. Optoelectron Adv Mat. 2012;6:339–42.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Delaey L, De Vos R. ZTU-Diagramme einiger Kupfer–Zink–Aluminium Legierungen. Z Metallkde. 1979;70:33–7.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    De Graef M, Van Humbeeck J, Delaey L. The observation of stabilized Cu–Zn–Al martensite. Proc ICOMAT-86, Nara: The Japan Institute of Metals; 1986;850–5.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Andrade M, Delaey L, Chandrasekaran M. On some lesser known planar defects in β1′ Cu-Zn-Al martensite. Proc ICOMAT-82 J Phys. 1982;43:673–8.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Cornelis I, Wayman CM. Phase transformations in metastable β’ CuZn alloys—I. Isothermal transformations. Acta Metal. 1974;22:301–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Spielfield J, Hornbogen E, Franz M. Ausforming and marforming of a Cu–Zn26.3–Al3.9 shape memory alloy. J Phys IV. 1997;C5:239–44.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wu MH, Wayman CM. Studies of substitutional bainite formation in the Cu-Zn-Al system. Proc ICOMAT-86, Nara: The Japan Institute of Metals. 1986; 619–24.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lovey FC, Torra V. Shape memory in Cu-based alloys: phenomenological behavior at the mesoscale level and interaction of martensitic transformation with structural defects in Cu–Zn–Al. Prog Mater Sci. 1999;44:189–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Jani JM, Leary M, Subic A, Gibson MA. A review of shape memory alloy research, applications and opportunities. Mater Des. 2014;56:1078–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sampath V. Effect of thermal processing on microstructure and shape-memory characteristics of a copper–zinc–aluminum shape memory alloy. Mater Manuf Process. 2007;22:9–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Yildiz K, Kök M, Dağdelen F. Cobalt addition effects on martensitic transformation and microstructural properties of high-temperature Cu–Al–Fe shape-memory alloys. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2015;120:1227–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Saud SN, Hamzah E, Abubakar T, Bakhsheshi-Rad HR, Hosseinian R. X-phase precipitation in aging of Cu–Al–Ni–xTi shape memory alloys and its influence on phase transition behaviour. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2016;123:377–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lohan NM, Bujoreanu LG, Baciu C. Influence of temperature variation rate on the calorimetric response during heating and on the martensite structure obtained after subsequent cooling of a Cu–Zn–Al shape memory alloy. Micro Nano Lett. 2012;7:540–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lohan NM, Suru MG, Pricop B, Bujoreanu LG. Cooling rate effects on the structure and transformation behavior of Cu–Zn–Al shape memory alloys. Int J Min Met Mater. 2014;21:1109–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ahlers M. Martensite and equilibrium phases in Cu–Zn and Cu–Zn–Al alloys. Progr Mater Sci. 1986;30:135–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Yildiz K. Oxidation of high-temperature Cu–Al–Fe shape memory alloy. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2016;123:409–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicoleta Monica Lohan
    • 1
  • Bogdan Pricop
    • 1
  • Lucian Burlacu
    • 1
  • Leandru-Gheorghe Bujoreanu
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Materials Science and Engineering“Gheorghe Asachi” Technical University of IasiIasiRomania

Personalised recommendations