Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry

, Volume 127, Issue 1, pp 363–370 | Cite as

Thermal properties of polysaccharide aerogels

  • Gabrijela Horvat
  • Tanja Fajfar
  • Amra Perva Uzunalić
  • Željko Knez
  • Zoran Novak
Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Polysaccharide aerogels are an advanced class of materials and recently the subject of much research. Most studies are based on their applications in the pharmaceutical field, yet some novel research proposes these materials as thermal insulators. In this study, polysaccharide aerogels (high-methoxyl pectin, low-methoxyl pectin, alginate, guar and xanthan) were prepared with alcohol-induced gelation and later supercritical drying, and nitrogen adsorption was used to determine their surface area and pore volume. Their thermal behaviour was analysed by DSC and TG, and their thermal conductivity was determined by DSC. Since polysaccharide aerogels produced by the alcohol gelation method consist entirely of pure polysaccharide, their thermal behaviour is very similar to that of pure polysaccharides. Aerogels are highly hygroscopic materials; thus, the initial dehydration step was present in all samples. The thermal conductivity measurements obtained varied between the different polysaccharides used for aerogel production. Low-methoxyl pectin provided the lowest thermal conductivity and guar the highest among our samples. The thermal conductivities were in the range of insulating materials, especially for low-methoxyl pectin aerogel, for which the conductivity was 21 mW m−1 K−1. The optimization of process parameters was tested later on with alginate, and it was observed that methanol-induced gelation forms more porous structures with lower thermal conductivity than the other forms tested. The lowest conductivity measured for alginate aerogel was 42 mW m−1 K−1.

Keywords

Thermal conductivity Aerogels DSC Insulating materials 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge the Slovenian Research Agency (Grant Number: 1000-11-860046) for its financial support and Mettler Toledo Slovenia for their help in applying the DSC method for thermal conductivity measurements.

References

  1. 1.
    Berge A, Johansson P. Literature review of high performance thermal insulation. Gothenburg: Chalmers University of Technology; 2012. Report No. 2.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Franco Júnior A, Shanafield DJ. Thermal conductivity of polycrystalline aluminum nitride (AlN) ceramics. Cerâmica. 2004;50:247–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Effting C, Güths S, Alarcon OE. Evaluation of the thermal comfort of ceramic floor tiles. Mater Res. 2007;10:301–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kistler SS. Coherent expanded aerogels and jellies. Nature. 1931;127:741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cohen E, Glicksman L. Thermal properties of silica aerogel formula. J Heat Transf. 2015;8:137–145.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cohen E, Glicksman L. Analysis of the transient hot-wire method to measure thermal conductivity of silica aerogel: influence of wire length, and radiation properties. J Heat Transf. 2014;4:136–144.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rudaz C, Courson R, Bonnet L, Calas-Etienne S, Sallée H, Budtova T. Aeropectin: fully biomass-based mechanically strong and thermal superinsulating aerogel. Biomacromolecules. 2014;15:2188–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sescousse R, Gavillon R, Budtova T. Aerocellulose from cellulose–ionic liquid solutions: preparation, properties and comparison with cellulose–NaOH and cellulose–NMMO routes. Carbohydr Polym. 2011;83:1766–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gurikov P, Raman SP, Weinrich D, Fricke M, Smirnova I. A novel approach to alginate aerogels: carbon dioxide induced gelation. RSC Adv. 2015;5:7812–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Raman SP, Gurikov P, Smirnova I. Organic and biopolymer aerogels for thermal superinsulation: synthesis and processing routes. Chem Ing Tech. 2014;86:1503–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Demilecamps A, Beauger C, Hildenbrand C, Rigacci A, Budtova T. Cellulose–silica aerogels. Carbohydr Polym. 2015;122:293–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Veronovski A, Tkalec G, Knez Ž, Novak Z. Characterisation of biodegradable pectin aerogels and their potential use as drug carriers. Carbohydr Polym. 2014;113:272–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chen H-B, Chiou B-S, Wang Y-Z, Schiraldi DA. Biodegradable pectin/clay aerogels. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2013;5:1715–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tønnesen HH, Karlsen J. Alginate in drug delivery systems. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2002;28:621–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    García-González CA, Carenza E, Zeng M, Smirnova I, Roig A. Design of biocompatible magnetic pectin aerogel monoliths and microspheres. RSC Adv. 2012;2:9816–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stephen AM, Phillips GO. Food polysaccharides and their applications. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2014.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    White RJ, Budarin VL, Clark JH. Pectin-derived porous materials. Chem Eur J. 2010;16:1326–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Job N, Théry A, Pirard R, Marien J, Kocon L, Rouzaud J-N, et al. Carbon aerogels, cryogels and xerogels: influence of the drying method on the textural properties of porous carbon materials. Carbon. 2005;43:2481–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wang X, Li W, Zhong B, Zhao D. Structural and textural evolution of bimodal mesopore silica xerogels during aging and drying. In: van Steen E, Claeys IM, Callanan LH, editors. Studies in surface science and catalysis. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2004. p. 555–61.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhao S, Manic MS, Ruiz-Gonzalez F, Koebel MM. Aerogels sol–gel handbook. Vol. 1. Wiley; 2015. p. 519–20.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Soares JP, Santos JE, Chierice GO, Cavalheiro ETG. Thermal behavior of alginic acid and its sodium salt. Eclética Quím. 2004;29:57–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gaal PS, Thermitus M-A, Stroe DE. Thermal conductivity measurements using the flash method. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2004;78:185–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hakvoort G, van Reijen LL, Aartsen AJ. Measurement of the thermal conductivity of solid substances by DSC. Thermochim Acta. 1985;93:317–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Marcus SM, Blaine RL. Thermal conductivity of polymers, glasses and ceramics by modulated DSC. Thermochim Acta. 1994;243:231–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sánchez-Rodríguez D, López-Olmedo JP, Farjas J, Roura P. Determination of thermal conductivity of powders in different atmospheres by differential scanning calorimetry. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2015;121:469–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Riesen R. Simple determination of the thermal conductivity of polymers by DSC. UserCom. 2005;2:19–23.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sing KS. IUPAC: reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems with special reference tot he determination of surface area and porosity. Pure Appl Chem. 1982;54:2201–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Groen JC, Peffer LAA, Pérez-Ramírez J. Pore size determination in modified micro- and mesoporous materials. Pitfalls and limitations in gas adsorption data analysis. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2003;60:1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Machrafi H, Lebon G. Size and porosity effects on thermal conductivity of nanoporous material with an extension to nanoporous particles embedded in a host matrix. Phys Lett A. 2015;379:968–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tkalec G, Kranvogl R, PervaUzunalić A, Knez Ž, Novak Z. Optimisation of critical parameters during alginate aerogels’ production. J Non-Cryst Solids. 2016;443:112–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ulker Z, Erkey C. An emerging platform for drug delivery: aerogel based systems. J Control Release. 2014;177:51–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    García-González CA, Alnaief M, Smirnova I. Polysaccharide-based aerogels—promising biodegradable carriers for drug delivery systems. Carbohydr Polym. 2011;86:1425–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gabrijela Horvat
    • 1
  • Tanja Fajfar
    • 1
  • Amra Perva Uzunalić
    • 1
  • Željko Knez
    • 1
  • Zoran Novak
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Chemistry and Chemical EngineeringUniversity of MariborMariborSlovenia

Personalised recommendations