Advertisement

Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry

, Volume 114, Issue 2, pp 629–634 | Cite as

Novel approach for thermal diffusivity measurements in inert atmosphere using the flash method

  • Carsten Pohlmann
  • Thomas HutschEmail author
  • Lars Röntzsch
  • Thomas Weißgärber
  • Bernd Kieback
Article

Abstract

Determining the thermal conductivity is crucial whenever heat transfer issues are considered which play a major role in many technological applications. However, various materials are sensitive to oxygen or moisture and, therefore, cannot be examined with commonly used equipment under ambient conditions. Here, we present a novel approach which combines the inert requirements of ambient-sensitive specimens with the flash method in which the apparatus, a Netzsch LFA 447 NanoFlash®, is placed under ambient conditions. A new measuring cell with flash-transparent windows was constructed which resembles a gas-tight specimen chamber. This device can be easily adapted to other apparatuses based on the flash method. The thermal conductivities of reference materials in inert and ambient conditions were examined in a temperature range from 25 to 275 °C. In general an excellent agreement was found. Further, the usability of this special sample cell is demonstrated for the investigation of the thermal conductivities of two complex hydride systems which are important for solid-state hydrogen storage applications.

Keywords

Sample holder Inert atmosphere Thermal conductivity Flash method Complex hydride Hydrogen storage 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work has been performed in the framework of the European Centre for Emerging Materials and Processes Dresden (ECEMP) which is funded by the European regional development fund and the Free State of Saxony. Furthermore, the authors would like to acknowledge financial support from the German-Chinese Sustainable Fuel Partnership project (contract no. 03BV108B) and the Fraunhofer Attract program.

References

  1. 1.
    Vozár L, Hohenauer W. Flash method of measuring the thermal diffusivity. A review. High Temp–High Press. 2003; 35/36: 253–64.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mojumdar SC, Sain M, Prasad RC, Sun L, Venart JES. Selected thermoanalytic methods and their applications from medicine to construction part I. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2007;90(3):653–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fukushima H, Drzal LT, Rook BP, Rich MJ. Thermal conductivity of exfoliated graphite nanocomposites. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2006;85(1):235–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shinzato K, Baba TA. Laser flash apparatus for thermal diffusivity and specific heat capacity measurements. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2001;64(413):422.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    NETZSCH-Gerätebau GmbH. Thermal diffusivity measurements—made easy. 2013. http://www.netzsch-thermal-analysis.com/en/products-solutions/thermal-diffusivity-conductivity/lfa-447-nanoflash.html. Accessed 01 Feb 2013.
  6. 6.
    Pan Z, Zhang L, Wu J. Effects of Al doping on the transport performances of CrSi2 single crystals. Scr Mater. 2007;56:245–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bogdanovic B, Schwickardi M. Ti-doped alkali metal aluminium hydrides as potential novel reversible hydrogen storage materials. J Alloy Compd. 1997;253–254:1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nakamori Y, Kitahara G, Miwa K, Ohba N, Noritake T, Towata S, Orimo S. Hydrogen storage properties of Li–Mg–N–H systems. J Alloy Compd. 2005;404–406:396–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Züttel A. Materials for hydrogen storage. Mater Today. 2003;6:24–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ross DK. Hydrogen storage: the major technological barrier to the development of hydrogen fuel cell cars. Vacuum. 2006;80:1084–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhang J, Fisher TS, Ramachandran PV, Gore JP, Mudawar I. A review of heat transfer issues in hydrogen storage technologies. J Heat Transf. 2005;127:1391–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lozano GA, Eigen N, Keller C, Dornheim M, Bormann R. Effects of heat transfer on the sorption kinetics of complex hydride reacting systems. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2009;34:1896–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gesellschaft VDI. VDI-Wärmeatlas. 10th ed. Berlin: Springer; 2006.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Touloukian YS, Purdue University, TPRC and Laboratory AF. Thermophysical properties of high temperature solid materials, vol. 4. New York: Macmillan; 1967. p. 8–44.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hao H, Maijer D, Wells M, Cockcroft S, Sediako D, Hibbins S. Development and validation of a thermal model of the direct chill casting of AZ31 magnesium billets. Metal Mater Trans A. 2004;35:3843–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pohlmann C, Röntzsch L, Kalinichenka S, Hutsch T, Kieback B. Magnesium alloy–graphite composites with tailored heat conduction properties for hydrogen storage applications. Int J Hydrogen Energ. 2010;35:12829–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pohlmann C, Röntzsch L, Kalinichenka S, Hutsch T, Weißgärber T, Kieback B. Hydrogen storage properties of compacts of melt-spun Mg90Ni10 flakes and expanded natural graphite. J Alloy Compd. 2011;509(Supplement 2):S625–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pohlmann C, Röntzsch L, Hu J, Weißgärber T, Kieback B, Fichtner M. Tailored heat transfer characteristics of pelletized LiNH2–MgH2 and NaAlH4 hydrogen storage materials. J Power Sources. 2012;205:173–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carsten Pohlmann
    • 1
  • Thomas Hutsch
    • 2
    Email author
  • Lars Röntzsch
    • 2
  • Thomas Weißgärber
    • 2
  • Bernd Kieback
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute for Materials ScienceTechnische Universität DresdenDresdenGermany
  2. 2.Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Technology and Advanced MaterialsBranch Lab DresdenDresdenGermany

Personalised recommendations