Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry

, Volume 104, Issue 1, pp 389–398 | Cite as

Methodological considerations for using thermal analysis in the characterization of soil organic matter

  • José M. Fernández
  • Alain F. Plante
  • Jens Leifeld
  • Craig Rasmussen
Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Thermal analysis is primarily used in the field of materials science, but has a long history in the geosciences. Soil organic matter (SOM) has received a great deal of recent scientific interest because of its role in the global carbon cycle. Conventional methods of characterizing SOM quality are unsatisfactory because they do not adequately capture the complete quality continuum that SOM comprises or the various mechanisms that act to stabilize it in the soil matrix. Thermal analysis techniques have the potential to capture this quality continuum, but are dependent on numerous experimental conditions that limit the comparability of results among different studies. Published methodology on thermal analysis of soils and sediments has largely focused on the characterization of the mineral component, while the organic component has received little attention. We tested several experimental conditions for their effects on the exothermic region of curves generated by thermal analysis of easily dispersed soil clay fractions and non-protected light-density particulate organic matter fractions isolated from the surface horizon of a forest soil. Results were found to be highly repeatable but strongly sensitive to crucible material, heating rate, and sample amount, and relatively insensitive to the use of a reference material. Thermal analysis is an important addition to the set of analytical tools used to characterize SOM quality because it provides direct, quantitative information of the energy potentially available for microbial metabolism. However, users will need to balance the needs of specific scientific objectives with the need for standardized methods and comparability between studies.

Keywords

Soil organic matter Thermogravimetry Differential scanning calorimetry Crucible material Heating rate 

Abbreviations

SOM

Soil organic matter

TG

Thermogravimetry

DSC

Differential scanning calorimetry

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Alfonso Martín Escudero Foundation for a fellowship to Fernández. This project was supported by NIFA-USDA grant 2010-65107-20351.

References

  1. 1.
    Amundson R. The carbon budget in soils. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci. 2001;29:535–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lal R. Global potential of soil carbon sequestration to mitigate the greenhouse effect. Crit Rev Plant Sci. 2003;22(2):151–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bosatta E, Ågren GI. Soil organic matter quality interpreted thermodynamically. Soil Biol Biochem. 1999;31(13):1889–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Smith P, Fang CM, Dawson JJC, Moncrieff JB. Impact of global warming on soil organic carbon. Advances in Agronomy, vol 97. Advances in Agronomy. San Diego: Elsevier Academic Press Inc; 2008. p. 1–43.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gruber N, Friedlingstein P, Field CB, Valentini R, Heimann M, Richey JE, et al. The vulnerability of the carbon cycle in the 21st century: an assessment of carbon-climate-human interactions. In: Field CB, Raupach MR, editors. The global carbon cycle: integrating humans, climate, and the natural world. Washington, DC: Island Press; 2004. p. 45–76.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Smith P. An overview of the permanence of soil organic carbon stocks: influence of direct human-induced, indirect and natural effects. Eur J Soil Sci. 2005;56(5):673–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Denef K, Plante AF, Six J. Characterization of soil organic matter. In: Kutsch W, Bahn M, Heinemeyer A, editors. Soil carbon dynamics: an integrated methodology. London, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2009. p. 91–126.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Smykatz-Kloss W. Application of differential thermal analysis in mineralogy. J Therm Anal. 1982;23(1–2):15–44.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mackenzie RC, Mitchell BD. Soil. In: Mackenzie RC, editor. Differential thermal analysis. New York: Academic Press; 1972. p. 267–97.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Langier-Kuzniarowa A. Evolution of the approach to thermal studies of clays. J Therm Anal. 1993;39(1993):1169–79.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Plante AF, Fernández JM, Leifeld J. Application of thermal analysis techniques in soil science. Geoderma. 2009;153(1–2):1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Smykatz-Kloss W. Differential thermal analysis: application and results in mineralogy. Berlin: Springer; 1974.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Group SCW. The Canadian system of soil classification. Ottawa: NRC Research Press; 1998.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Staff SS. Keys to soil taxonomy. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service; 2003.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Six J, Elliot ET, Paustian K. Soil macroaggregate turnover and microaggregate formation: a mechanism for C sequestration under notillage agriculture. Soil Biol Biochem. 2000;32:2099–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Six J, Elliot ET, Paustian K, Doran JW. Aggregation and soil organic matter accumulation in cultivated and native grassland soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1998;62:1367–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Plante AF, Stewart CE, Conant R, Paustian K, Six J. Soil management effects on organic carbon storage in fractions physically isolated from a Gray Luvisol soil. Can J Soil Sci. 2006;86(1):141–51.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Stewart CE, Plante AF, Paustian K, Conant RT, Six J. Soil carbon saturation: linking concept and measurable carbon pools. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 2008;72(2):379–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Stevenson FJ. Humus chemistry: genesis, composition, reactions. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley; 1994.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lopez-Capel E, Sohi SP, Gaunt JL, Manning DAC. Use of thermogravimetry-differential scanning calorimetry to characterize modelable soil organic matter fractions. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 2005;69(1):136–40.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rovira P, Kurz-Besson C, Coûteaux M, Vallejo VR. Changes in litter properties during decomposition: a study by differential thermogravimetry and scanning calorimetry. Soil Biol Biochem. 2008;40(1):172–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chatterjee A, Lal R, Wielopolski L, Martin MZ, Ebinger MH. Evaluation of different soil carbon determination methods. Crit Rev Plant Sci. 2009;28:164–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Schulte EE, Hopkins BG. Estimation of soil organic matter by weightloss-on-ignition. In: Magdoff FR, editor. Soil organic matter: analysis and interpretation, SSSA special publication no. 46. Madison: Soil Science Society of America, Inc; 1996. p. 21–31.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Atanasov O, Rustschev D. Thermal analysis of peat and peat soils. Thermochim Acta. 1985;90:373–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tan KH, Hajek BF, Barshad I. Thermal analysis techniques. In: Klute A, editor. Methods of soil analysis, part I. Physical and mineralogical methods. 2nd ed. Madison: Agronomy Monograph No 9, American Society of Agronomy; 1986. p. 151–83.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Howard PJA, Howard DM. Use of organic carbon and loss-on-ignition to estimate soil organic matter in different soil types and horizons. Biol Fertil Soils. 1990;9:306–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    De Vos B, Vandecasteele B, Deckers J, Muys B. Capability of loss-on-ignition as a predictor of total organic carbon in non-calcareous forest soils. Commun Soil Sci Plan. 2005;36:2899–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hsieh YP, Bugna GC. Analysis of black carbon in sediments and soils using multi-element scanning thermal analysis (MESTA). Org Geochem. 2008;39:1562–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Dell’abate MT, Benedetti A, Trinchera A, Dazzi C. Humic substance along the profile of two Typic Haploxerert. Geoderma. 2002;107:281–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Strezov V, Moghtaderi B, Lucas JA. Computational calorimetric investigation of the reactions during thermal conversion of wood biomass. Biomass Bioenergy. 2004;27(5):459–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Langier-Kuźniarowa A. Thermal analysis of organo-clay complexes. In: Yariv S, Cross H, editors. Organo-clay complexes and interactions. New York: Marcel-Dekker; 2002. p. 273–344.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Todor DN. Thermal analysis of minerals. Tunbridge Wells: Abacus Press; 1976.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    ASTM. Standard test method for Arrhenius kinetic constants for thermally unstable materials using DSC. E-698-04. American Society for Testing and Materials; 2005.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Leifeld J. Thermal stability of black carbon characterised by oxidative differential scanning calorimetry. Org Geochem. 2007;38(1):112–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Mackenzie RC. The differential thermal investigation of Clays. London: Mineralogical Society (Clay Minerals Group); 1957.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Cebulak S, Langier-Kùzniarowa A. Application of oxyreactive thermal analysis to the examination of organic matter associated with rocks. J Therm Anal Calorim. 1997;50(1–2):175–90.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Dell’abate MT, Benedetti A, Brookes PC. Hyphenated techniques of thermal analysis for characterisation of soil humic substances. J Sep Sci. 2003;26:433–40.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Francioso O, Montecchio D, Gioacchini P, Ciavatta C. Thermal analysis (TG-DTA) and isotopic characterization (13C-15N) of humic acids from different origins. Appl Geochem 2005;20:537–44.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Plante AF, Pernes M, Chenu C. Changes in clay-associated organic matter quality in a C depletion sequence as measured by differential thermal analyses, Geoderma. 2005;129:186–99.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Baffi C, Dell’abate MT, Nassisi A, Silva S, Benedetti A, Genevini PL, Adani F. Determination of biological stability in compost: a comparison of methodologies. Soil Biol Biochem. 2007;39:1284–93.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Dorodnikov M, Fangmeier A, Kuzyakov Y. Thermal stability of soil organic matter pools and their δ13C values after C3-C4 vegetation change. Soil Biol Biochem. 2007;39:1173–80.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    De la Rosa JM, González-Perez JA, González-Vázquez R, Knicker H, Lopez-Capel E, Manning DAC, González-Vila FJ. Use of pyrolisis/GC-MS combined with thermal analysis to monitor C and N changes in soil organic matter from a Mediterranean fire affected forest. Catena. 2008;74:296–303.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Lopez-Capel E, Krull ES, Bol R, Manning DAC. Influence of recent vegetation on labile and recalciltrant carbon soil pools in central Queensland, Australia: evidence from thermal analysis-quadrupole mass spectrometry-isotope ratio mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2008;22:1751–8.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Rasmussen C, White DA. Vegetation effects on soil organic carbon quality in an arid hyperthermic ecosystem. Soil Sci. 2010;175:438–46.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • José M. Fernández
    • 1
  • Alain F. Plante
    • 1
  • Jens Leifeld
    • 2
  • Craig Rasmussen
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Earth and Environmental ScienceUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.Agroscope Reckenholz-Tänikon Research Station ARTZürichSwitzerland
  3. 3.Department of Soil, Water and Environmental ScienceUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations