Journal of Science Teacher Education

, Volume 23, Issue 3, pp 291–318 | Cite as

A Review of Empirical Literature on Inquiry Professional Development: Alignment with Best Practices and a Critique of the Findings

  • Daniel K. Capps
  • Barbara A. Crawford
  • Mark A. Constas
Article

Abstract

This review brings together the literature on inquiry-based teaching and learning and science teacher professional development (PD). We present a targeted critical review of research focused specifically on the nature of PD programs purported to emphasize inquiry. Our review analyzes the features of each program and critiques the reported outcomes of each study. Findings from this review suggest a general alignment with recommended features of effective PD as outlined in the literature with a few notable exceptions, including: supporting teachers in developing inquiry-based lesson plans, providing authentic inquiry experiences, and focusing on science content for teachers. More importantly, our review reveals that no reported study has connected participation in inquiry-based PD with all the desired outcomes of teacher PD: enhanced teacher knowledge, change in beliefs and practice, and enhanced student achievement. Implications for future research on inquiry-based PD programs are discussed.

Keywords

Review Inquiry-based Professional development 

References

  1. Abrams, E., Southerland, S. A., & Evans, C. A. (2008). Inquiry in the classroom: Identifying necessary components of a useful definition. In E. A. Abrams, S. A. Southerland, & P. Silva (Eds.), Integrating inquiry in the classroom: realities and opportunities. Hartford, CT: Age of Information Press.Google Scholar
  2. Akerson, V. L., & Hanuscin, D. L. (2007). Teaching nature of science through inquiry: Results of a 3-year professional development program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(5), 653–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Akerson, V. L., Hanson, D. L., & Cullen, T. A. (2007). The influence of guided inquiry and explicit instruction on K-6 teachers’ views of nature of science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18, 751–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. American Association for the Advancement of Sciences. (1989). Project 2061: Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Anderson, R. D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1–12.Google Scholar
  7. Basista, B., & Mathews, S. (2002). Integrated science and mathematics professional development programs. School Science and Mathematics, 102(7), 359–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blanchard, M. R., Southerland, S. A., & Granger, E. M. (2009). No silver bullet for inquiry: Making sense of teacher change following an inquiry-based research experience for teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 93(2), 322–360.Google Scholar
  9. Blank, R. K., de las Alas, N., & Smth, C. (2008). Does teacher professional development have effects on teaching and learning? Analysis of evaluation finding from programs for mathematics and science teachers in 14 states. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State.Google Scholar
  10. Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33, 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Britzman, D. (1991). Practice makes practice: A critical study of learning to teach. Albany: State University of New York press.Google Scholar
  12. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.Google Scholar
  13. Bybee, R. W. (2004). Scientific inquiry and science teaching. In L. B. Flick & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and nature of science: Implications for teaching, learning, and teacher education. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  14. Chinn, C. A., & Malhotra, B. A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86, 175–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Committee on Science and Mathematics Teacher Preparation. (2001). Educating teachers of science, mathematics, and technology: New practices for the new millennium. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  16. Crawford, B. A. (2000). Embracing the essence of inquiry: New roles for science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 916–937.Google Scholar
  17. Crawford, B. A. (2007). Learning to teach science as inquiry in the rough and tumble of practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(4), 613–642.Google Scholar
  18. Darling-Hammond, L., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1995). Policies that support professional development in an era of reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 76(8), 597–604.Google Scholar
  19. Deboer, G. E. (2004). Historical perspectives on inquiry teaching in schools. In L. B. Flick & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and nature of science: Implications for teaching, learning, and teacher education. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  20. Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Collier Books.Google Scholar
  22. Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5–12.Google Scholar
  23. Dubner, J., Silverstein, S. C., Carey, N., Frechtling, J., Busch-Johnsen, T., & Han, J. (2001). Evaluating science research experience for teachers programs and their effects on student interest and academic performance: A preliminary report on an ongoing collaborative study by eight programs. In Paper presented at the materials research society symposium proceedings.Google Scholar
  24. Eisenhart, M., Finkel, E., & Marion, S. F. (1996). Creating the conditions for scientific literacy: A re-examination. American Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 261–295.Google Scholar
  25. Fishman, B. J., Marx, R. W., Best, S., & Tal, R. T. (2003). Linking teacher and student learning to improve professional development in systemic reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(6), 643–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Frechtling, J. A., Sharp, L., Carey, N., & Vanden-Kieman Westat, N. (1995). Teacher enhancement programs: A perspective on the last four decades. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.Google Scholar
  27. Fullan, M., & Steigelbauer, S. (1991). The new meaning of educational change (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  28. Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915–945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Guskey, T. T. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and practice, 8(3/4), 381–391.Google Scholar
  30. Hewson, P. W. (2007). Teacher professional development in science. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education. Mahwah: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  31. Holliday, W. G. (2004). A balanced approach to science inquiry teaching. In L. B. Flick & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and nature of science: Implications for teaching, learning, and teacher education. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  32. Jeanpierre, B., Oberhauser, K., & Freeman, C. (2005). Characteristics of professional development that effect change in secondary science teachers’ classroom practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(6), 668–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Johnson, C. C. (2007). Whole-school collaborative sustained professional development and science teacher change: Sings of progress. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18, 629–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Johnson, C. C., Kahle, J. B., & Fargo, J. D. (2007). A study of the effect of sustained, whole-school professional development on student achievement in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(6), 775–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kagen, D. M. (1992). Professional growth among preservice and beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 62, 129–169.Google Scholar
  36. Kennedy, M. (1998). Form and substance in in-service teacher education. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.Google Scholar
  37. Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Krajcik, J. S., Blumenfeld, P., Marx, R. W., & Soloway, E. (2000a). Instructional, curricular, and technological supports for inquiry in science classrooms. In J. Minstrell & E. H. van Zee (Eds.), Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science (pp. 283–315). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.Google Scholar
  39. Krajcik, J. S., Mamlok, R., & Hug, B. (2000b). Modern content and the enterprise of science: Science education in the twentieth century. In L. Como (Ed.), Education across a century: The centennial volume—One-hundredth yearbook of the national society for the study of education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  40. Krathwohl, D. R. (1998). Methods of educational and social science research: An integrated approach. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley Longman.Google Scholar
  41. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Lederman, N. G. (2004). In L. B. Flick & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and nature of science: Implications for teaching, learning, and teacher education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  43. Lee, O., Hart, J. E., Cuevas, P., & Enders, C. (2004). Professional development in inquiry-based science for elementary teachers of diverse student groups. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 1021–1043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lee, O., Deaktor, R. A., Hart, J. E., Cuevas, P., & Enders, C. (2005). An instructional intervention’s impact on the science and literacy achievement of culturally and linguistically diverse elementary students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(8), 857–887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lee, O., Deaktor, R., Enders, C., & Lambert, J. (2008a). Impact of a multiyear professional development intervention on science achievement of culturally and linguistically diverse elementary students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(6), 726–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lee, O., Lewis, S., Adamson, K., Maerten-Rivera, J., & Secada, W. G. (2008b). Urban elementary school teachers’ knowledge and practices in teaching science to English language learners. Science Education, 92(4), 733–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lee, O., Maerten-Rivera, J., Penfield, R. D., LeRoy, K., & Secada, W. G. (2008c). Science achievement of English language learners in urban elementary schools: Results of a first-year professional development intervention. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(1), 31–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lortie, D. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  49. Lotter, C., Harwood, W. S., & Bonner, J. J. (2006). Overcoming a learning bottleneck: Inquiry professional development for secondary science teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17, 185–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lotter, C., Harwood, W. S., & Bonner, J. J. (2007). The influence of core teaching conceptions on teachers’ use of inquiry teaching practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(9), 1318–1347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Loucks-Horsley, S., Hewson, P. W., Love, N., & Stiles, K. E. (1998). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  52. Loucks-Horsley, S., Love, N., Stiles, K. E., Mundry, S., & Hewson, P. W. (2003). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  53. Loughran, J. J. (2002). Effective reflective practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(1), 33–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Luft, J. A. (2001). Changing inquiry practices and beliefs: The impact of an inquiry-based professional development programme on beginning and experienced secondary science teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 517–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P., Krajcik, J. S., & Soloway, E. (1997). Enacting project-based science: Challenges for practice and policy. The Elementary School Journal, 97(4), 341–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P., Krajcik, J. S., & Soloway, E. (1998). New technologies for teacher professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14, 33–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P. C., Krajcik, J. S., Fishman, B., Soloway, E., Geier, R., et al. (2004). Inquiry-based science in the middle grades: Assessment of learning in urban systemic reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 1063–1080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. McDermott, L. C., & DeWater, L. S. (2000). The need for special science courses for teachers: Two perspectives. In J. Minstrell & E. H. van Zee (Eds.), Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  59. McNeill, K. L., & Krajcik, J. (2008). Scientific explanations: Characterizing and evaluating the effects of teachers’ instructional practices on student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(1), 53–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  61. National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  62. National Science Teachers Association. (1998). The national science education standards: A vision for the improvement of science teaching and learning. Arlington, VA: NSTA.Google Scholar
  63. Penuel, W. R., Fishman, B. J., Yamaguchi, R., & Gallagher, L. P. (2007). What makes professional development effective? Strategies that foster curriculum implementation. American Educational Research Journal, 44(4), 921–958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Radford, D. L. (1998). Transferring theory into practice: A model for professional development for science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(1), 73–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Schwab, J. J. (1966). The teaching of science as enquiry. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Schwab, J. J. (1976). Education and the state: Learning community. In R. M. Hutchins (Ed.), The great ideas today. Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica.Google Scholar
  67. Shepardson, D. P., & Harbor, J. (2004). ENVISION: The effectiveness of a dual-level professional development model for changing teacher practice. Environmental Education Research, 10(4), 471–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Smylie, M. A. (1996). From bureaucratic control to building human capital: The importance of teacher learning in education reform. Educational Researcher, 25(9), 9–11.Google Scholar
  69. Stake, R., & Easley, J. (1978). Case studies in science education. Urbana, IL: The University of Illinois.Google Scholar
  70. Taitelbaum, D., Mamlok-Naaman, R., Carmeli, M., & Hofstein, A. (2008). Evidence for teachers’ change while participating in a continuous professional development programme and implementing the inquiry approach in the chemistry laboratory. International Journal of Science Education, 30(5), 593–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Tobin, K., & LaMaster, S. U. (1995). Relationships between metaphors, beliefs, and actions in a context of science curriculum change. Science Education, 32(3), 225–242.Google Scholar
  72. Tobin, K., Briscoe, C., & Holman, J. R. (1990). Overcoming constraints to effective elementary science teaching. Science Education, 74(4), 409–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Wayne, A. J., Yoon, K. S., Zhu, P., Cronen, S., & Garet, M. S. (2008). Experimenting with teacher professional development: Motives and methods. Educational Researcher, 37(8), 469–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wee, B., Shepardson, D. P., Fast, J., & Harbor, J. (2007). Teaching and learning about inquiry: Insights and challenges in professional development. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18(1), 63–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wells, G. (1995). Language and the inquiry-oriented curriculum. Curriculum Inquiry, 25(3), 233–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Westerlund, J. F., Garcia, D. M., Koke, J. R., Taylor, T. A., & Mason, D. S. (2002). Summer scientific research for teachers: The experience and its effect. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 63–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Wheeler, G. F. (2000). The three faces of inquiry. In J. Minstrell & E. H. van Zee (Eds.), Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  78. Wilson, S. M., & Berne, J. (1999). Teacher learning and the acquisition of professional knowledge: An examination of research on contemporary professional development. Review of Research in Education, 24, 173–209.Google Scholar
  79. Windschitl, M. (2002). Inquiry projects in science teacher education: What can investigative experiences reveal about teacher thinking and eventual classroom practice? Science Education, 87(1), 112–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Yarrick, R., Parke, H., & Nugent, J. (1997). Struggling to report deeply rooted change: The “filtering effects” on teachers’ beliefs on understanding transformation views of teaching science. Science Education, 81(2), 137–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Young, B., & Lee, S. (2005). The effects of a kit-based science curriculum and intensive science professional development on elementary student science achievement. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14(5), 471–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Zeichner, K. M. (2005). A research agenda for teacher education. In M. Cochran-Smith & K. M. Zeichner (Eds.), Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education. Washington, DC: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Association for Science Teacher Education, USA 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel K. Capps
    • 1
  • Barbara A. Crawford
    • 2
  • Mark A. Constas
    • 3
  1. 1.University of MaineOronoUSA
  2. 2.University of GeorgiaAthensUSA
  3. 3.Cornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations