Flexibly Adaptive Professional Development in Support of Teaching Science with Geospatial Technology
- 407 Downloads
The flexibly adaptive model of professional development, developed in the GIT Ahead project, enables secondary science teachers to incorporate a variety of geospatial technology applications into wide-ranging classroom contexts. Teacher impacts were evaluated quantitatively and qualitatively. Post-questionnaire responses showed significant growth in teachers’ perceived technological expertise, interest, and ability to integrate geospatial technology into their science teaching. Application of the Technical Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) framework to three case studies illustrates such growth. Crucial aspects of professional development in support of teaching science with geospatial technology include intensive training, ongoing support, a supportive learning community, and flexibility in terms of support provided and implementation expectations. Implications are presented for design of professional development and use of TPACK in evaluating impacts.
KeywordsTPACK or TPCK In-service education Professional development Geospatial technology GIS Google Earth
We appreciate the comments and suggestions offered by three anonymous reviewers and the editors of this journal. This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under DUE Grant No 0602751. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of NSF. For more information about GIT Ahead, see http://fli.hws.edu/gitahead/.
- Barab, S. A., & Duffy, T. (2000). From practice fields to communities of practice. In D. Jonassen & S. Land (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of learning environments. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32–42.Google Scholar
- Coulter, B., & Polman, J. L. (2004). Enacting technology-supported inquiry learning through mapping our environment. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
- Dedrick, R. (2009). Google Earth Tours. Retrieved December 9, 2009, from http://www.canandaiguaschools.org/webpages/dedrickr/index.cfm?subpage=10964.
- Garmire, E., & Pearson, G. (Eds.). (2006). Tech tally: Approaches to assessing technological literacy. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
- Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.Google Scholar
- Hall-Wallace, M. K., & McAuliffe, C. M. (2002). Design, implementation, and evaluation of GIS-based learning materials in an introductory geoscience course. Journal of Geoscience Education, 50, 5–14.Google Scholar
- Kluge, S., Patrick, D., & Fermann, E. (2007). Designing and creating earth science lessons with Google Earth. Retrieved December 1, 2007, from http://stevekluge.com/projects/dlesege/dlesegemanual/manual.html.
- Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9, 60–70.Google Scholar
- Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Loucks, S. F. (1983). Ensuring success: Good news from a study of school improvement. Educational Leadership, 41, 3–32.Google Scholar
- Loucks-Horsley, S., Love, N., Stiles, K., Hewson, P., & Mundry, S. (2003). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
- Malone, L., Palmer, A. M., Voigt, C. L., Napoleon, E., & Feaster, L. (2005). Mapping our world: GIS lessons for educators (ArcGIS desktop edition). Redlands, CA: ESRI Press.Google Scholar
- National Research Council. (2006). Learning to think spatially: GIS as a support system in the K-12 curriculum. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.Google Scholar
- Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1–22.Google Scholar
- Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Zeichner, K. M., & Liston, D. (1996). Reflective teaching. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar