Advertisement

Journal of Science Teacher Education

, Volume 19, Issue 6, pp 513–521 | Cite as

Framing the Professional Development of Members of the Science Teacher Education Community

  • Adam Johnston
  • John Settlage
Article

Introduction

On office walls, we used to display photos and posters with the aid of yellow gummy stuff or with special squares of poster-mounting tape found during raids of the office supply cabinet. The assemblage of pictures and a few clippings on the walls looked okay—for a college dormitory. More recently, we have had the need to remove items from an office wall (either for a new coat of paint or for a move to a new space); and in the process, we discovered that a more enduring display of materials improves the overall look of an office wall. Specifically, framing a photo from the High Sierras or the picture of a loved one not only frees us from the need for that yellow gum, but also gives a new perspective and brings a new importance to the image. The frame improves the image and sets it apart from the background, distinguishing it clearly from the other pieces on the wall.

This essay is not meant to be a piece about office artwork or how to create an inspiring and productive work...

Keywords

Professional Development Science Teacher Science Teacher Educator Professional Development Opportunity Professional Development Initiative 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Abell, S., Gagnon, M., Hanuscin, D., Lee, M., & Rogers, M. P. (2007, January). Methods or madness: Preparing the next generation of elementary science teacher educators. Paper Presentation at the Annual Meeting of the Association for Science Teacher Education, Clearwater Beach, FL.Google Scholar
  2. Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. San Francisco: Wiley.Google Scholar
  3. Davis, E. A., Petish, D., & Smithey, J. (2006). Challenges new science teachers face. Review of Educational Research, 76, 607–651. doi: 10.3102/00346543076004607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Eisenhart, M., & DeHaan, R. L. (2005). Doctoral preparation of scientifically based education researchers. Educational Researcher, 34(4), 3–13. doi: 10.3102/0013189X034004003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record, 103, 1013–1055. doi: 10.1111/0161-4681.00141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hewson, P. (2007). Teacher professional development in science. In S. Abell & N. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1179–1203). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  7. Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., & Stigler, J. (2002). A knowledge base for the teaching profession: What would it look like and how can we get one? Educational Researcher, 31(5), 3–15. doi: 10.3102/0013189X031005003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Huberman, M. (1989). The professional life-cycle of teachers. Teachers College Record, 91, 31–57.Google Scholar
  9. Jablon, P. C. (2002, September). The status of science education doctoral programs in the United States: The need for core knowledge and skills. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 7(1). Available online at http://unr.edu/homepage/crowther/ejse/jablon.pdf.
  10. Labaree, D. F. (2003). The peculiar problems of preparing educational researchers. Educational Researcher, 32(4), 13–22. doi: 10.3102/0013189X032004013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lieberman, A. (1992). The meaning of scholarly activity and the building of community. Educational Researcher, 21(6), 5–12.Google Scholar
  12. Nasir, N. S., & Hand, V. M. (2006). Exploring sociocultural perspectives on race, culture, and learning. Review of Educational Research, 76, 449–475. doi: 10.3102/00346543076004449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Rahm, J., Miller, H. C., Hartley, L., & Moore, J. C. (2003). The value of an emergent notion of authenticity: Examples from two student/teacher–scientist partnership programs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 737–756. doi: 10.1002/tea.10109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Roehrig, G. H., & Luft, J. A. (2006). Does one size fit all? The induction experience of beginning science teachers from different teacher-preparation programs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 963–985. doi: 10.1002/tea.20103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rogoff, B., Paradise, R., Arauz, R. M., Correa-Chavez, M., & Angelillo, C. (2003). Firsthand learning through intent participation. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 175–203. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Settlage, J., & Johnston, A. (2008, March). Communities of learning, practice, and scholarship: Applying social learning systems theory to an association of educational stakeholders. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.Google Scholar
  17. Settlage, J., Johnston, A., Meadows, L., Harkins, H., & Kittleson, J. (2007, January). Professional development at a crossroads: Using vexations as the focal point. Workshop Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for Science Teacher Education, Clearwater Beach, FL.Google Scholar
  18. Snyder, T. D., Dillow, S. A., & Hoffman, C. M. (2008). Digest of education statistics [Document No. NCES 2008022]. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.Google Scholar
  19. Villenas, S. (1996). The colonizer/colonized Chicana ethnographer: Identity, marginalization, and co-optation in the field. Harvard Educational Review, 66, 711–731.Google Scholar
  20. Walker, G. E., Golde, C. M., Jones, L., Bueschel, A. C., & Hutchings, P. (2008). The formation of scholars: Rethinking doctoral education for the twenty-first century. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  21. Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Weber State UniversityOgdenUSA
  2. 2.University of ConnecticutStorrsUSA

Personalised recommendations