Advertisement

Photocatalytic activity and antibacterial behavior of TiO2 coatings co-doped with copper and nitrogen via sol–gel method

  • Nasim Tahmasebizad
  • Mohammad Taghi Hamedani
  • Mehdi Shaban GhazaniEmail author
  • Yaghoub Pazhuhanfar
Original Paper: Sol-gel and hybrid materials for catalytic, photoelectrochemical and sensor applications
  • 2 Downloads

Abstract

The sol–gel process is used to prepare photocatalytic coatings with antibacterial properties. Also, doping with metallic or non-metallic elements has an impact on the antibacterial and photocatalytic activity of these coatings. Although there are many studies in this field, the effect of co-doping with Cu and N and their concentrations on the antibacterial properties of TiO2 coatings against the E. coli and S. aureus bacteria has not been studied. In the present investigation, the sol–gel method was employed to deposit both undoped and Cu-N co-doped TiO2 photocatalytic coatings on glass surface, which are expected to degrade bacterial and chemical contaminants in water while exposed to visible sunlight wavelengths. Before the coating process, an appropriate heat treatment was applied on the samples and the quality of coatings, band gap energy, and also photocatalytic and antibacterial properties were evaluated. Results showed that, in the presence of dopants, the band gap become narrower and the absorption spectrum is transferred from the ultraviolet to the visible light range. Also, it was demonstrated that, under the visible light radiation, all of the co-doped samples show higher photocatalytic activity than the undoped ones. Meanwhile, the antibacterial characteristics of TiO2 coatings was enhanced by increasing the dopant concentration when exposing to sunlight.

Highlights

  • TiO2 coatings co-doped with different concentrations of copper and nitrogen were applied on glass surface using sol–gel process.

  • The influence of the dopant concentration on the photocatalytic activity and antibacterial properties was discussed.

  • Under the visible light radiation, all of the co-doped samples have higher photocatalytic activities than the undoped ones, while the 0.75%Cu-N sample has the best photocatalytic activity, even better than the 1% Cu-N one.

Keywords

Titanium dioxide Co-doping Sol–gel method Band gap Photocatalyric activity 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical standards

This work complies with the ethical rules of this journal.

References

  1. 1.
    Byrne JA, Fernandez-Ibanez PA, Dunlop PS, Alrousan D, Hamilton JW (2011) Photocatalytic enhancement for solar disinfection of water: a review. Int J Photoenergy 2011:798051Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Caslake LF, Connolly DJ, Menon V, Duncanson CM, Rojas R, Tavakoli J (2004) Disinfection of contaminated water by using solar irradiation. Appl Environ Microbiol 70(2):1145–1151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Parsons JJC (2002) Evaluating solar disinfection for point-of-use water treatment in non-tropical climates. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Harvard, MAGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pattison DI, Rahmanto AS, Davies MJ (2012) Photo-oxidation of proteins. Photochem Photobiol Sci 11(1):38–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rule Wigginton K, Menin L, Montoya JP, Kohn T (2010) Oxidation of virus proteins during UV254 and singlet oxygen mediated inactivation. Environ Sci Technol 44(14):5437–5443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Liu Y, Hussain M, Memon H, Yasin S (2015) Solar irradiation and nageia nagi extract assisted rapid synthesis of silver nanoparticles and their antibacterial activity. Dig J Nanomater Biostructure 10(3):1019–1024Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Memon H, Wang H, Yasin S, Halepoto A (2018) Influence of incorporating silver nanoparticles in protease treatment on fiber friction, antistatic and antibacterial properties of wool fibers, J Chem 2018:4845687.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4845687
  8. 8.
    Memon H, Kumari N, Jatoi AW, Khoso NA (2016) Study of the indoor decontamination using nanocoated woven polyester fabric. Int Nano Lett 7(1):1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Memon H, Kumari N (2016) Study of multifunctional nanocoated cold plasma treated polyester cotton blended curtains. Surf Rev Lett 23(5):1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Guan K (2005) Relationship between photocatalytic activity, hydrophilicity and self-cleaning effect of TiO2/SiO2 films. Surf Coat Technol 191(2–3):155–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yu JC, Ho W, Lin J, Yip H, Wong PK (2003) Photocatalytic activity, antibacterial effect, and photoinduced hydrophilicity of TiO2 films coated on a stainless steel substrate. Environ Sci Technol 37(10):2296–2301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Li J, Wang D, Liu H, Zhu Z (2012) Multilayered Mo-doped TiO2 nanofibers and enhanced photocatalytic activity. Mater Manuf Process 27(6):631–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sakthivel S, Kisch H (2003) Photocatalytic and photoelectrochemical properties of nitrogen‐doped titanium dioxide. Chem Phys Chem 4(5):487–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Songara S, Patra M, Manoth M, Saini L, Gupta V, Gowd G, Vadera S, Kumar N (2010) Synthesis and studies on photochromic properties of vanadium doped TiO2 nanoparticles. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem 209(1):68–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shankar K, Basham JI, Allam NK, Varghese OK, Mor GK, Feng X, Paulose M, Seabold JA, Choi K-S, Grimes CA (2009) Recent advances in the use of TiO2 nanotube and nanowire arrays for oxidative photoelectrochemistry. J Phys Chem C 113(16):6327–6359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dvoranova D, Brezova V, Mazúr M, Malati MA (2002) Investigations of metal-doped titanium dioxide photocatalysts. Appl Catal B Environ 37(2):91–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wang Y, Hao Y, Cheng H, Ma J, Xu B, Li W, Cai S (1999) The photoelectrochemistry of transition metal-ion-doped TiO2 nanocrystalline electrodes and higher solar cell conversion efficiency based on Zn2+-doped TiO2 electrode. J Mater Sci 34(12):2773–2779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Burda C, Lou Y, Chen X, Samia AC, Stout J, Gole JL (2003) Enhanced nitrogen doping in TiO2 nanoparticles. Nano Lett 3(8):1049–1051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kim S-W, Khan R, Kim T-J, Kim W-J (2008) Synthesis, characterization, and application of Zr, S Co-doped TiO2 as visible-light active photocatalyst. Bull Korean Chem Soc 29(6):1217–1223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Serpone N (2006) Is the band gap of pristine TiO2 narrowed by anion-and cation-doping of titanium dioxide in second-generation photocatalysts? ACS Publications, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wang H, Lewis J (2005) Second-generation photocatalytic materials: anion-doped TiO2. J Phys Condens Matter 18(2):421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Diwald O, Thompson TL, Goralski EG, Walck SD, Yates JT (2004) The effect of nitrogen ion implantation on the photoactivity of TiO2 rutile single crystals. J Phys Chem B 108(1):52–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sakthivel S, Janczarek M, Kisch H (2004) Visible light activity and photoelectrochemical properties of nitrogen-doped TiO2. J Phys Chem B 108(50):19384–19387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ashkarran AA, Hamidinezhad H, Haddadi H, Mahmoudi M (2014) Double-doped TiO2 nanoparticles as an efficient visible-light-active photocatalyst and antibacterial agent under solar simulated light. Appl Surf Sci 301:338–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yuan Y, Ding J, Xu J, Deng J, Guo J (2010) TiO2 nanoparticles co-doped with silver and nitrogen for antibacterial application. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 10:4868–4874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wang Y, Yang H, Xue X (2014) Synergistic antibacterial activity of TiO2 co-doped with zinc and yittrium. Vacuum 107:28–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mahmood Q, Afzal A, Siddiqi HM, Habib A (2013) Sol–gel synthesis of tetragonal ZrO2 nanoparticles stabilized by crystallite size and oxygen vacancies. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 67(3):670–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Suwanboon S, Amornpitoksuk P, Sukolrat A (2011) Dependence of optical properties on doping metal, crystallite size and defect concentration of M-doped ZnO nanopowders (M= Al, Mg, Ti). Ceram Int 37(4):1359–1365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kurniawan C (2016) Spectroelectrochemical study of electron transfer steps at ITO electrode modified by molecular layer with viologen moieties with and without Pt complexes, PhD thesis, Hokkaido UniversityGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Fisher MB, Keane DA, Fernandez-Ibanez P, Colreavy J, Hinder SJ, McGuigan KG, Pillai SC (2013) Nitrogen and copper doped solar light active TiO2 photocatalysts for water decontamination. Appl Catal B Environ 130:8–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mungkalasiri J, Bedel L, Emieux F, Vettese-Di Cara A, Freney J, Maury F, Renaud FN (2014) Antibacterial properties of TiO2–Cu composite thin films grown by a one step DLICVD process. Surf Coat Technol 242:187–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Memon H, Yasin S, Khoso NA, Hussain M (2015) Indoor decontamination textiles by photocatalytic oxidation: a review. J Nanotechnol 2015:104142.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/104142
  33. 33.
    Yamashita K, Yoshioka Y, Higashisaka K et al. (2015) Silica and titanium dioxide nanoparticles cause pregnancy complications in mice. Nat Nanotechnol 6(5):321–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ai J, Biazar E, Jafrpour M, Montazeri M, Majdi A, Aminifard S, Zafari M, Akbari HR, Rad HG (2011) Nanotoxicology and nanoparticle safety in biomedical designs. Int J Nanomed 6:1117–1127Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Materials Science Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of TabrizTabrizIran
  2. 2.Department of Materials Science EngineeringUniversity of BonabBonabIran
  3. 3.Department of Materials Science EngineeringSahand University of TechnologyTabrizIran

Personalised recommendations