Advertisement

Superhydrophobic and oleophobic textiles with hierarchical micro-nano structure constructed by sol–gel method

  • Xiongfang Luo
  • Yuqing Weng
  • Shaofei Wang
  • Jinmei DuEmail author
  • Hongbo Wang
  • Changhai Xu
Original Paper: Sol–gel and hybrid materials with surface modification for applications
  • 5 Downloads

Abstract

In this study, hierarchical micro-nano structures were constructed on cotton surface followed by low surface tension agent treatment to obtain superhydrophobic and oleophobic textile materials. The static contact angle of water, ethylene glycol, olive oil, and dodecane on treated fabric was 154 ± 3°, 145 ± 3°, 141 ± 3°, and 128 ± 1°, respectively. Hierarchical particles were prepared by chemical bonding of nanosilica onto microsilica through the reaction of epoxy group of (3-glycidyloxypropyl)trimethoxysilane and amino group of 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane. The chemical groups were characterized by FTIR. The surface morphology and surface roughness were characterized by SEM and AFM, and the primary silica particles’ size was obtained based on TEM images. The constructed micro-nano structure was demonstrated robust enough that even can maintain a good superhydrophobic and oleophobic performance after the crocking test and 50 times standard home laundering. Moreover, the tensile strength and whiteness performance of fabric still remained quite good after the treatment. This study provides a useful method to construct a robust micro-nano structure on fabric, which is meaningful for producing durable superhydrophobic and oleophobic textiles.

Highlights

  • Hierarchical micro-nano structure was constructed on fabric by sol–gel method.

  • Superhydrophobic and oleophobic performace of fabric was durable even after washing and crocking.

  • Tensile strength and whiteness of fabric still remained quite good after treatment.

Keywords

Superhydrophobic Oleophobic Hierarchical micro-nano structure Durable Textile 

Abbreviations

AATCC

American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists

AFM

Atomic force microscope

APS

3-Aminopropyltriethoxysilane

CA

Contact angle

CIE

Commission internationale de l’ éclairage (International Commission on Illumination)

FS

1H,1H,2H,2H-Perfluorodecyltrimethoxysilane

FTIR

Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy

GPTMS

3-Glycidyloxypropyltrimethoxysilane

MNS

Micro-nano silica (structure)

MS

Micro silica

NH3·H2O

Ammonia solution

NS

Nano silica

RA

Roll-off angle

SEM

Scanning electron microscope

TEM

Transmission electron microscope

TEOS

Tetraethyl orthosilicate

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51203065); National Key Research and Development Program (Grant No.2017YFB0309700); and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. JUSRP51622A).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Lee HJ, Michielsen S (2006) Lotus effect: Superhydrophobicity. J Text I 97:455–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barthlott W, Neinhuis C (1997) Purity of the sacred lotus, or escape from contamination in biological surfaces. Planta 202:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Feng L, Li S, Li Y, Li H, Zhang L, Zhai J, Song Y, Liu B, Jiang L, Zhu D (2002) Super-hydrophobic surfaces: from natural to artificial. Adv Mater 14:1857–1860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gao X, Jiang L (2004) Biophysics: water-repellent legs of water striders. Nature 432:36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Parker AR, Lawrence CR (2001) Water capture by a desert beetle. Nature 414:33–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Neinhuis C, Barthlott W (1997) Characterization and distribution of water-repellent, self-cleaning plant surfaces. Ann Bot 79:667–677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Byun D, Hong J, Saputra KoJH, Lee YJ, Park HC, Byun B, Lukes JR (2009) Wetting characteristics of insect wing surfaces. J Bionic Eng 6:63–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Li H, Wang X, Song Y, Liu Y, Li Q, Jiang L, Zhu D (2001) Super-“amphiphobic” aligned carbon nanotube films. Angw Chem Int Ed 40:1743–1746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dorrer C, Ruehe J (2009) Some thoughts on superhydrophobic wetting. Soft Matter 5:51–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tuvshindorj U, Yildirim A, Ozturk FE, Bayindir M (2014) Robust Cassie state of wetting in transparent superhydrophobic coatings. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:9680–9688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cha TG, Yi JW, Moon M, Lee K, Kim HY (2010) Nanoscale patterning of microtextured surfaces to control superhydrophobic robustness. Langmuir 26:8319–8326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kwon HM, Paxson AT, Varanasi KK, Patankar NA (2011) Rapid deceleration-driven wetting transition during pendant drop deposition on superhydrophobic surfaces. Phys Rev Lett 106:036102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Onda T, Shibuichi S, Satoh N, TsujiiKao K (1996) Super-water-repellent fractal surfaces. Langmuir 12:2125–2127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Patankar NA (2003) On the modeling of hydrophobic contact angles on rough surfaces. Langmuir 19:1249–1253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chen W, Fadeev AY, Hsieh CM, Öner D, Youngblood J (1999) Ultrahydrophobic and ultralyophobic surfaces: some comments and examples. Langmuir 15:3395–3399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Baldacchini T, Carey JE, Zhou M, Mazur E (2006) Superhydrophobic surfaces prepared by microstructuring of silicon using a femtosecond laser. Langmuir 22:4917–4919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gu G, Tian Y, Li Z, Lu D (2011) Electrostatic powder spraying process for the fabrication of stable superhydrophobic surfaces. Appl Surf Sci 257:4586–4588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Han JT, Xu XR, Cho KW (2005) Diverse access to artificial superhydrophobic surfaces using block copolymers. Langmuir 21:6662–6665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sun M, Luo C, Ji H, Ouyang Q, Yu D, Chen Y (2005) Artificial lotus leaf by nanocasting. Langmuir 21:8978–8981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Feng X, Zhai J, Jiang L (2005) The fabrication and switchable superhydrophobicity of TiO2 nanorod films. Angew Chem Int Ed 44:5115–5118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bravo J, Zhai L, Wu Z, Cohen R, Rubner MF (2007) Transparent superhydrophobic films based on silica nanoparticles. Langmuir 23:7293–7298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Badre C, Pauporté T, Turmine M, Dubot P, Lincot D (2008) Water-repellent ZnO nanowires films obtained by octadecylsilane self-assembled monolayers. Phys E 40:2454–2456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Li S, Li H, Wang X, Song Y, Liu Y, Jiang L, Zhu D (2002) Super-hydrophobicity of large-area honeycomb-like aligned carbon nanotubes. J Phys Chem B 106:9274–9276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Shang HM, Shang HM, Wang Y, Limmer SJ, Chou TP, Takahashi K, Cao GZ (2005) Optically transparent superhydrophobic silica-based films. Thin Solid Films 472:37–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Xu QF, Wang JN, Smith IH, Sanderson KD (2008) Directing the transportation of a water droplet on a patterned superhydrophobic surface. Appl Phys Let 93:233112–23112-3Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wang H, Fang J, Cheng T, Ding J, Qu L, Dai L, Wang X, Lin T (2008) One-step coating of fluoro-containing silica nanoparticles for universal generation of surface superhydrophobicity. Chem Commun 7:877–879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Xue C, Jia S, Zhang J, Tian L (2009) Superhydrophobic surfaces on cotton textiles by complex coating of silica nanoparticles and hydrophobization. Thin Solid Films 517:4593–4598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hoefnagels HF, Wu D, With G, Ming W (2007) Biomimetic superhydrophobic and highly oleophobic cotton textiles. Langmuir 23:13158–13163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Shi Y, Wang Y, Feng X, Yue G, Yang W (2012) Fabrication of superhydrophobicity on cotton fabric by sol–gel. Appl Surf Sci 258:8134–8138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Huang W, Song Y, Xing Y, Dai J (2010) Durable hydrophobic cellulose fabric prepared with polycarboxylic acid catalyzed silica sol. Ind Eng Chem Res 49:9135–9142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Huang W, Xing Y, Yu Y, Shang S, Dai J (2011) Enhanced washing durability of hydrophobic coating on cellulose fabric using polycarboxylic acids. Appl Surf Sci 257:4443–4448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lam YL, Kan CW, Yuen CWM (2011) Wrinkle-resistant finishing of cotton fabric with BTCA - the effect of co-catalyst. Text Res J 81:482–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Luo X, Dong J, Zhang L, Du J, Wang H, Gao W (2017) Preparation of silica micro spheres via a semibatch sol-gel method. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 81:669–677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mukbaniani O, Aneli J, Esartia I, Tatrishvili T, Markarashvili E, Jalagonia N (2013) Siloxane oligomers with epoxy pendant groups. Macromol Symp 328:25–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Majoul N, Aouida S, Bessais B (2015) Progress of porous silicon APTES-functionalization by FTIR investigations. Appl Surf Sci 331:388–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Riccardi CC, Williams RJJ (1986) A kinetic scheme for an amine-epoxy reaction with simultaneous etherification. J Appl Polym Sci 32:3445–3456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Serier A, Pascault JP, My LT (1991) Reactions in aminosilane-epoxy prepolymer systems I. Kinetics of epoxy-amine reactions. J Polym Sci Pol Chem 29:209–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Talbot JDR (2004) The kinetics of the epoxy amine cure reaction from a solvation perspective. J Polym Sci Pol Chem 42:3579–3586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ming W, Wu D, Benthem RV, With GD (2005) Superhydrophobic films from raspberry-like particles. Nano Let 5:2298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Cassie ABD, Baxter S (1944) Wettability of porous surfaces. Trans Faraday Soc 40:546–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Mock U, Forster R, Menz W, Ruhe J (2005) Towards ultrahydrophobic surfaces: a biomimetic approach. J Phys-Condes Mat 17:S639–S648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Otten A, Herminghaus S (2004) How plants keep dry: A physicist’s point of view. Langmuir 20:2405–2408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Sheng Q, White AJ, Müftü S (2016) An experimental study of friction and durability of a thin PTFE film on rough aluminum substrates. Tribol T 59:632–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Gashti MP, Alimohammadi F, Shamei A (2012) Preparation of water-repellent cellulose fibers using a polycarboxylic acid/hydrophobic silica nanocomposite coating. Surf Coat Tech 206:3208–3215CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Eco-textiles of Ministry of Education, College of Textiles and ClothingJiangnan UniversityWuxiChina

Personalised recommendations