Advertisement

Characterization and electrochemical behavior of Ti/TiO2–RuO2–IrO2–SnO2 anodes prepared by sol–gel process

  • Iman Pouladvand
  • Shahin Khameneh Asl
  • Mir Ghasem Hoseini
  • Mohammad Rezvani
Original Paper: Sol-gel and hybrid materials for catalytic, photoelectrochemical and sensor applications
  • 23 Downloads

Abstract

The present study focused on the morphology and electrochemical properties of Ti/TiO2–RuO2–IrO2–SnO2 anodes prepared by sol–gel process, using field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM), atomic force microscopy (AFM), energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), X-ray diffraction (XRD), potentiostatic polarization, cyclic voltammetry, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), and accelerated corrosion test (ACT). The findings showed that the morphology of all the coatings is a cracked-mud morphology after heat treatment, including cracks with different widths between 100 nm and 1 μm. The results of phase analysis of the anode surfaces indicated a better coverage of substrate by Ti/TiO2–RuO2–IrO2–SnO2 anode with a molar ratio of 60:25:5:10 as compared to two other anodes with molar ratios of 60:25:10:5 and 60:20:5:15. It was also found that Ti/TiO2–RuO2–IrO2–SnO2 anode with a molar ratio of 60:25:5:10 exhibits a longer lifetime (543 min) and better electrocatalytic property, as it tends to enhance the chlorine gas evolution so that the reaction occurs at a lower potential with a lower slope. EDX analysis of this anode surface showed a less reduction in the content of active elements (Ru, Ir, and Sn) after ACT than anodes 1 and 3, to about 59%, 82%, and 75% of the original, respectively.

Ti/TiO2–RuO2–IrO2–SnO2 anodes were prepared by sol–gel process

The microstructure of all coatings exhibits a cracked-mud morphology

TiO2–RuO2–IrO2–SnO2 coating (molar ratio 60:25:5:10) offered enhanced lifetime and electrocatalytic property of anode

The lifetime and stability of the anode with a molar ratio of 60:25:5:10 are higher than other anodes

Highlights

  • TiO2–RuO2–IrO2–SnO2 coatings were prepared on Ti substrate by sol–gel process.

  • Results revealed heat treatment temperature independent of the coating composition.

  • The morphology of all coatings exhibited a cracked-mud morphology.

  • TiO2–RuO2–IrO2–SnO2 coating (molar ratio 60:25:5:10) offered enhanced electrocatalytic property.

  • The activity of anodes decreases due to the oxidation and dissolution of their active components.

Keywords

Mixed metal oxide anodes Electrocatalysts Sol–gel Chlorine evolution reaction Oxygen evolution reaction Electrochemical properties 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Xin Y, Xu L, Wang J (2015) The deactivation mechanism of RuO2–IrO2–SnO2/Ti anodes under alternative current electrolysis condition. ICMMITA, 1762–1765Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rosestolato D, Fregoni J, Ferro S, Battisti AD (2014) Influence of the nature of the electrode material and process variables on the kinetics of the chlorine evolution reaction. The case of IrO2-based electrocatalysts. Electrochim Acta 139:180–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Panic V, Dekanski A, Miskovic-Stankovic VB, Milonjic S, Nikolic B (2005) On the deactivation mechanism of RuO2–TiO2/Ti anodes prepared by the sol–gel procedure. J Electroanal Chem 579:67–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pilla AS, Cobo EO, Duarted MME, Salinas DR (1997) Evaluation of anode deactivation in chlor-alkali cells. J Appl Electrochem 27:1283–1289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Velikanova I, Ivanova NP, Zharskii IM (2008) Effects of synthesis conditions on the electrochemical activity of titanium anodes with iridium oxide coating. Russ J Electrochem 44:847–851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Panic VV, Dekanski A, Milonjic S, Atanasoski RT, Nikolic BZ (1999) RuO2–TiO2 coated titanium anodes obtained by the sol–gel procedure and their electrochemical behavior in the chlorine evolution reaction. Colloids Surf A 157:269–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lodi G, Sivieri E, Debattisti A, Trasatti S (1978) Ruthenium dioxide-based film electrodes. J Appl Electrochem 8:135–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lassali TAF, Boodts JFC, Bulhoes LOS (2000) Effect of Sn-precursor on the morphology and composition of Ir0.3Sn0.7O2 oxide films prepared by sol–gel process. J Non-Cryst Solids 273:129–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vazquez-Gomez L, Horvath E, Kristof J, Redey A, Battisti AD (2006) Investigation of IrO2–SnO2 thin film evolution from aqueous media. Appl Surf Sci 253:1178–1184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Forti JC, Olivi P, Andrade AR (2001) Characterisation of DSA-type coatings with nominal composition Ti/Ru0.3Ti(0.7−x)SnxO2 prepared via a polymeric precursor. Electrochim Acta 47:913–920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pocrifka LA, Goncalves C, Grossi P, Colpa PC, Pereira EC (2006) Development of RuO2–TiO2 (70–30) mol% for pH measurements. Sens Actuators B Chem 113:1012–1016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Panic VV, Nikolic BZ (2008) Electrocatalytic properties and stability of titanium anodes activated by the inorganic sol–gel procedure. J Serb Chem Soc 73:1083–1112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Panic VV, Nikolic BZ (2007) Sol–gel prepared active ternary oxide coating on titanium in cathodic protection. J Serb Chem Soc 72:1393–1402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Osman JR, Crayston JA, Pratt A, Richens DT (2007) Sol–gel processing of IrO2–TiO2 mixed metal oxides based on an hexachloroiridate precursor. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 44:219–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Malek J, Watanabe A, Mitsuhashi T (2000) Sol–gel preparation of rutile type solid solution in TiO2–RuO2 system. J Therm Anal Calorim 60:699–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hu JM, Zhang JQ, Cao CN (2004) Oxygen evolution reaction on IrO2-based DSA type electrodes: kinetics analysis of Tafel lines and EIS. Int J Hydrog Energy 29:791–797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shrivastava P, Moats MS (2009) Wet film application techniques and their effects on the stability of RuO2–TiO2 coated titanium anodes. J Appl Electrochem 39:107–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kroon DH, Ernes LM (2007) MMO-coated titanium anodes for cathodic protection—part 1. Mater Perform 46:26–29Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Panic V, Dekanski A, Milonjic S, Atanasoski R, Nikolic B (2000) The influence of the aging time of RuO2 and TiO2 sols on the electrochemical properties and behavior for the chlorine evolution reaction of activated titanium anodes obtained by the sol–gel procedure. Electrochim Acta 46:415–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Carneiro JF, Silva JR, Rocha RS, Ribeiro J, Lanza MRV (2016) Morphological and electrochemical characterization of Ti/MxTiySnzO2 (M = Ir or Ru) electrodes prepared by the polymeric precursor method. Adv Chem Eng Sci 6:364–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zeng X, Zhang M, Wang X, Chen X, Su X, Tang W (2012) Effects of Sn content on Ti/RuO2–SnO2–TiO2 anodes used in the generation of electrolyzed oxidizing water. J Electroanal Chem 677–680:133–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ferro S, Rosestolato D, Martinez-Huitle CA, Battisti AD (2015) On the oxygen evolution reaction at IrO2–SnO2 mixed-oxide electrodes. Electrochim Acta 146:257–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Liu Y, Li Z, Li J (2004) IrO2/SnO2 electrodes: prepared by sol–gel process and their electrocatalytic for pyrocatechol. Acta Mater 52:721–727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yi Z, Kangning CH, Wei W, Wang J, Lee S (2007) Effect of IrO2 loading on RuO2–IrO2–TiO2 anodes: a study of microstructure and working life for the chlorine evolution reaction. Ceram Int 33:1087–1091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Makgae ME, Theron CC, Przybylowicz WJ, Crouch AM (2005) Preparation and surface characterization of Ti/SnO2–RuO2–IrO2 thin films as electrode material for the oxidation of phenol. Mater Chem Phys 92:559–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pushpavanam S, Narashimham KC (1994) Morphology of (Ru–Ti–Sn) mixed-oxide coatings. J Mater Sci 29:939–942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gerrard WA, Steele BCH (1978) Microstructural investigations on mixed RuO2–TiO2 coatings. J Appl Electrochem 8:417–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yousefpour M, Shokuhy A (2012) Electrodeposition of TiO2–RuO2–IrO2 coating on titanium substrate. Superlattices Microstruct 51:842–853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Chen Y, Hong L, Xue H, Han W, Wang L, Sun X, Li J (2010) Preparation and characterization of TiO2-NTs/SnO2–Sb electrodes by electrodeposition. J Electroanal Chem 648:119–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Cui X, Zhao G, Lei Y, Li H, Li P, Liu M (2009) Novel vertically aligned TiO2 nanotubes embedded with Sb-doped SnO2 electrode with high oxygen evolution potential and long service time. Mater Chem Phys 113:314–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Materials Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of TabrizTabrizIran
  2. 2.Department of Physical Chemistry, Electrochemistry Research LaboratoryUniversity of TabrizTabrizIran
  3. 3.Engineering Faculty, Department of Materials Science and NanotechnologyNear East UniversityMersin 10Turkey

Personalised recommendations