Advertisement

Methyltrichlorosilane modified hydrophobic silica aerogels and their kinetic and thermodynamic behaviors

Graphical Abstract
  • Wei Zhang
  • Zhi LiEmail author
  • Long Shi
  • Zhicheng Li
  • Yan Luo
  • Qiong Liu
  • Rui Huang
Original Paper: Nano- and macroporous materials (aerogels, xerogels, cryogels, etc.)
  • 98 Downloads

Abstract

To reduce the flammability, hydrophobic silica aerogels (SAs) were modified by replacing commonly used trimethylchlorosilane (TMCS) with methyltrichlorosilane (MTCS). It was observed that the MTCS modified SAs (MSA) showed similar physicochemical properties to those TMCS modified SAs (TSA), including the density, thermal conductivity, hydrophobicity, and even thermal stability. However, the flammability of MSA was observed much lower than that of TSA, which was reflected by the significantly decreased gross calorific value (GCV). Furthermore, it was known from the kinetic and thermodynamic analyses that the pyrolysis of MSA became more difficult with the increasing conversion rate (α), which was evidenced by the fact that the apparent activation energy (E) kept rising to about 194 kJ/mol during the whole pyrolysis. Based on the changed E along the time, the pyrolysis process could be divided into two stages, in which α = 0.4 was considered as the turning point. Those main thermodynamic parameters, including pre-exponential factor (A) and the changes of enthalpy (ΔH) and entropy (ΔS), showed a quite consistent tendency with the E, whereas the change of Gibbs free energy (ΔG) almost kept unchanged. The research outcome of this study can provide a deep understanding of the pyrolysis process of SAs and render the public realize the thermal hazard risk of SAs.

Highlights

  • MTCS replaced TMCS to modify silica aerogels to reduce the flammability.

  • Gross calorific value of MTCS modified silica aerogels (MSA) decreased over 50%.

  • Kinetic and thermodynamic behaviors of MSA were studied in detail.

  • The pyrolysis of MSA was difficult to proceed along the time.

  • This study provided a technical basis for the thermal hazards of silica aerogels.

Keywords

Silica aerogels Methyltrichlorosilanes Thermal conductivity Thermostability Kinetics Thermodynamics 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (grant number 202501003, 202045001 and 502211841).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Koebel M, Rigacci A, Achard P (2012) Aerogel-based thermal superinsulation: an overview. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 63:315–339.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-012-2792-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Liang Y, Wu H, Huang G, Yang J, Wang H (2017) Thermal performance and service life of vacuum insulation panels with aerogel composite cores. Energy Build 154:606–617.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.08.085 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yang J, Wu H, Huang G, Liang Y, Liao Y (2017) Modeling and coupling effect evaluation of thermal conductivity of ternary opacifier/fiber/aerogel composites for super-thermal insulation. Mater Des 133:224–236.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.07.056 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhu P, Zheng M, Zhao S, Wu J, Xu H, Novel A (2016) Environmental route to ambient pressure dried thermal insulating silica aerogel via recycled coal gangue. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2016:1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9831515 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stahl T, Brunner S, Zimmermann M, Wakili KGhazi (2012) Thermo-hygric properties of a newly developed aerogel based insulation rendering for both exterior and interior applications. Energy Build 44:114–117.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.09.041 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Galliano R, Ghazi Wakili K, Stahl T, Binder B, Daniotti B (2016) Performance evaluation of aerogel-based and perlite-based prototyped insulations for internal thermal retrofitting: HMT model validation by monitoring at demo scale. Energy Build 126:275–286.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.05.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Reynolds JohnG, Coronado PaulR, Hrubesh LawrenceW (2001) Hydrophobic aerogels for oil-spill clean up – synthesis and characterization. J Non-Cryst Solids 292:127–137.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3093(01)00882-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    He S, Cheng X, Li Z, Shi X, Yang H, Zhang H (2016) Green and facile synthesis of sponge-reinforced silica aerogel and its pumping application for oil absorption. J Mater Sci 51:1292–1301.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-015-9427-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang Q, Yu M, Chen G, Chen Q, Tian J (2017) Robust fabrication of fluorine-free superhydrophobic steel mesh for efficient oil/water separation. J Mater Sci 52:2549–2559.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-016-0548-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yu Y, Wu X, Fang J (2015) Superhydrophobic and superoleophilic “sponge-like” aerogels for oil/water separation. J Mater Sci 50:5115–5124.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-015-9034-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wu J, Yang H (2013) Platinum-based oxygen reduction electrocatalysts. Acc Chem Res 46:1848–1857.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ar300359w CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Randall JP, Meador MAB, Jana SC (2011) Tailoring mechanical properties of aerogels for aerospace applications. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 3:613–626.  https://doi.org/10.1021/am200007n CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Maghsoudi K, Motahari S (2018) Mechanical, thermal, and hydrophobic properties of silica aerogel-epoxy composites. J Appl Polym Sci 135:45706.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.45706 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ma J, Ye F, Yang C, Ding J, Lin S, Zhang B, Liu Q (2017) Heat-resistant, strong alumina-modified silica aerogel fabricated by impregnating silicon oxycarbide aerogel with boehmite sol. Mater Des 131:226–231.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.06.036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Han Y, Zhang X, Wu X, Lu C (2015) Flame retardant, heat insulating cellulose aerogels from waste cotton fabrics by in situ formation of magnesium hydroxide nanoparticles in cellulose gel nanostructures, ACS sustain. Chem Eng 3:1853–1859.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b00438 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wang L, Sánchez-Soto M, Maspoch ML (2013) Polymer/clay aerogel composites with flame retardant agents: mechanical, thermal and fire behavior. Mater Des 1980-2015 52:609–614.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.05.096 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chen H-B, Wang Y-Z, Schiraldi DA (2014) Preparation and flammability of poly(vinyl alcohol) composite aerogels. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:6790–6796.  https://doi.org/10.1021/am500583x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wang Y-T, Liao S-F, Shang K, Chen M-J, Huang J-Q, Wang Y-Z, Schiraldi DA (2015) Efficient approach to improving the flame retardancy of poly(vinyl alcohol)/clay aerogels: incorporating piperazine-modified ammonium polyphosphate. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:1780–1786.  https://doi.org/10.1021/am507409d CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Siligardi C, Miselli P, Francia E, Gualtieri MLassinantti (2017) Temperature-induced microstructural changes of fiber-reinforced silica aerogel (FRAB) and rock wool thermal insulation materials: a comparative study. Energy Build 138:80–87.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.12.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Motahari S, Motlagh GH, Moharramzadeh A (2015) Thermal and flammability properties of polypropylene/silica aerogel composites. J Macromol Sci Part B 54:1081–1091.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00222348.2015.1078619 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ghazi Wakili K, Remhof A (2017) Reaction of aerogel containing ceramic fibre insulation to fire exposure: reaction of aerogel containing insulation to fire. Fire Mater 41:29–39.  https://doi.org/10.1002/fam.2367 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kashiwagi T, Gilman JW, Butler KM, Harris RH, Shields JR, Asano A (2000) Flame retardant mechanism of silica gel/silica. Fire Mater 24:277–289.  https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1018(200011/12)24:6<277::AID-FAM746>3.0.CO;2-A CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Li Z, Cheng X, Gong L, Liu Q, Li S (2018) Enhanced flame retardancy of hydrophobic silica aerogels by using sodium silicate as precursor and phosphoric acid as catalyst. J Non-Cryst Solids 481:267–275.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2017.10.053 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Li Z, Cheng X, Shi L, He S, Gong L, Li C, Zhang H (2016) Flammability and oxidation kinetics of hydrophobic silica aerogels. J Hazard Mater 320:350–358.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.07.054 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mahadik SA, Pedraza F, Parale VG, Park H-H (2016) Organically modified silica aerogel with different functional silylating agents and effect on their physico-chemical properties. J Non-Cryst Solids 453:164–171.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2016.08.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rao AV, Pajonk GM, Bhagat SD, Barboux P (2004) Comparative studies on the surface chemical modification of silica aerogels based on various organosilane compounds of the type RnSiX4−n. J Non-Cryst Solids 350:216–223.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2004.06.034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mahadik DB, Rao AV, Rao AP, Wagh PB, Ingale SV, Gupta SC (2011) Effect of concentration of trimethylchlorosilane (TMCS) and hexamethyldisilazane (HMDZ) silylating agents on surface free energy of silica aerogels. J Colloid Interface Sci 356:298–302.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2010.12.088 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Li Z, Cheng X, He S, Shi X, Yang H (2015) Characteristics of ambient-pressure-dried aerogels synthesized via different surface modification methods. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 76:138–149.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-015-3760-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    He F, Zhao H, Qu X, Zhang C, Qiu W (2009) Modified aging process for silica aerogel. J Mater Process Technol 209:1621–1626.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.04.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Nadargi DY, Kalesh RR, Rao AV (2009) Rapid reduction in gelation time and impregnation of hydrophobic property in the tetraethoxysilane (TEOS) based silica aerogels using NH4F catalyzed single step sol–gel process. J Alloy Compd 480:689–695.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.02.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Turmanova SC, Genieva SD, Dimitrova AS, Vlaev LT (2008) Non-isothermal degradation kinetics of filled with rise husk ash polypropene composites. Express Polym Lett 2:133–146.  https://doi.org/10.3144/expresspolymlett.2008.18 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Chen Y, Wang Q (2007) Thermal oxidative degradation kinetics of flame-retarded polypropylene with intumescent flame-retardant master batches in situ prepared in twin-screw extruder. Polym Degrad Stab 92:280–291.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2006.11.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Vlaev LT, Georgieva VG, Genieva SD (2007) Products and kinetics of non-isothermal decomposition of vanadium(IV) oxide compounds. J Therm Anal Calorim 88:805–812.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-005-7149-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ozawa T (1992) Estimation of activation energy by isoconversion methods. Thermochim Acta 203:159–165.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-6031(92)85192-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    M Sharara, S Sadaka (2014) Thermogravimetric analysis of swine manure solids obtained from farrowing, and growing-finishing farms, J Sustain Bioenergy Syst 2014.  https://doi.org/10.4236/jsbs.2014.41008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Starink MJ (1996) A new method for the derivation of activation energies from experiments performed at constant heating rate. Thermochim Acta 288:97–104.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-6031(96)03053-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Xu Y, Chen B (2013) Investigation of thermodynamic parameters in the pyrolysis conversion of biomass and manure to biochars using thermogravimetric analysis. Bioresour Technol 146:485–493.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.07.086 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Maia AAD, de Morais LC (2016) Kinetic parameters of red pepper waste as biomass to solid biofuel. Bioresour Technol 204:157–163.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.12.055 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kim YS, Kim YS, Kim SH (2010) Investigation of thermodynamic parameters in the thermal decomposition of plastic waste−waste lube oil compounds. Environ Sci Technol 44:5313–5317.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es101163e CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wu X, Fan M, Shen X, Cui S, Tan G (2018) Silica aerogels formed from soluble silicates and methyl trimethoxysilane (MTMS) using CO2 gas as a gelation agent. Ceram Int 44:821–829.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.10.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Cheng X, Li C, Shi X, Li Z, Gong L, Zhang H (2017) Rapid synthesis of ambient pressure dried monolithic silica aerogels using water as the only solvent. Mater Lett 204:157–160.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2017.05.107 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    He S, Sun G, Cheng X, Dai H, Chen X (2017) Nanoporous SiO 2 grafted aramid fibers with low thermal conductivity. Compos Sci Technol 146:91–98.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.04.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Gurav JL, Rao AV, Rao AP, Nadargi DY, Bhagat SD (2009) Physical properties of sodium silicate based silica aerogels prepared by single step sol–gel process dried at ambient pressure. J Alloy Compd 476:397–402.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2008.09.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Mahadik DB, Venkateswara Rao A, Parale VG, Kavale MS, Wagh PB, Ingale SV, Gupta SC (2011) Effect of surface composition and roughness on the apparent surface free energy of silica aerogel materials. Appl Phys Lett 99:104104.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3635398 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Sing KSW (1985) Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems-with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity. Pure Appl Chem 57:603–619.  https://doi.org/10.1351/pac198557040603 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Rojas F, Kornhauser I, Felipe C, Esparza JM, Cordero S, Dominguez A, Riccardo JL (2002) Capillary condensation in heterogeneous mesoporous networks consisting of variable connectivity and pore-size correlation. Phys Chem Chem Phys 4:2346–2355.  https://doi.org/10.1039/b108785a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Lermontov SA, Malkova AN, Yurkova LL, Straumal EA, Gubanova NN, Baranchikov AY, Ivanov VK (2014) Diethyl and methyl-tert-buthyl ethers as new solvents for aerogels preparation. Mater Lett 116:116–119.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2013.10.080 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Li Z, Cheng X, He S, Shi X, Yang H, Zhang H (2016) Tailoring thermal properties of ambient pressure dried MTMS/TEOS co-precursor aerogels. Mater Lett 171:91–94.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2016.02.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Wu G, Yu Y, Cheng X, Zhang Y (2011) Preparation and surface modification mechanism of silica aerogels via ambient pressure drying. Mater Chem Phys 129:308–314.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2011.04.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Li Z, Cheng X, Shi L, He S, Gong L, Li C, Zhang H (2016) Flammability and oxidation kinetics of hydrophobic silica aerogels. J Hazard Mater 320:350–358.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.07.054 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    S He, Y Huang, G Chen, M Feng, H Dai, B Yuan, X Chen (2018) Effect of heat treatment on hydrophobic silica aerogel. J Hazard Mater.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.08.087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Zhuravlev LT (2000) The surface chemistry of amorphous silica. Zhuravlev model. Colloids Surf Physiochem Eng Asp 173:1–38.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-7757(00)00556-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Yuan X, He T, Cao H, Yuan Q (2017) Cattle manure pyrolysis process: kinetic and thermodynamic analysis with isoconversional methods. Renew Energy 107:489–496.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.02.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Kim YS, Kim YS, Kim SH (2010) Investigation of thermodynamic parameters in the thermal decomposition of plastic waste−waste lube oil compounds. Environ Sci Technol 44:5313–5317.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es101163e CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Ruvolo-Filho A, Curti PS (2006) Chemical kinetic model and thermodynamic compensation effect of alkaline hydrolysis of waste poly(ethylene terephthalate) in nonaqueous ethylene glycol solution. Ind Eng Chem Res 45:7985–7996.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ie060528y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Matin SS, Chelgani SC (2016) Estimation of coal gross calorific value based on various analyses by random forest method. Fuel 177:274–278.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.03.031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Llorente MJF, García JEC (2008) Suitability of thermo-chemical corrections for determining gross calorific value in biomass. Thermochim Acta 468:101–107.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2007.12.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Mancini M, Rinnan A, Pizzi Å, Toscano G (2018) Prediction of gross calorific value and ash content of woodchip samples by means of FT-NIR spectroscopy Fuel Process Technol 169:77–83.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2017.09.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Rhén C (2004) Chemical composition and gross calorific value of the above-ground biomass components of young Picea abies, Scand. J For Res 19:72–81.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02827580310019185 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Resource and Safety EngineeringCentral South UniversityChangshaP. R. China
  2. 2.Civil and Infrastructure Engineering DisciplineSchool of Engineering, RMIT UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  3. 3.School of Materials Science and EngineeringCentral South UniversityChangshaP. R. China

Personalised recommendations