Advertisement

In situ mucoadhesive hydrogel based on methylcellulose/xyloglucan for periodontitis

Graphical Abstract
  • Namon Hirun
  • Vimon TantishaiyakulEmail author
  • Tanatchaporn Sangfai
  • Passaporn Ouiyangkul
  • Lin Li
Original Paper: Sol–gel and hybrid materials for biological and health (medical) applications
  • 30 Downloads

Abstract

Novel hydrogels of 5, 6, and 7% w/v of methylcellulose (5MC, 6MC, and 7MC) with 1.5% w/v of tamarind seed xyloglucan (TSX) were developed via an in situ gel forming process. The MC and MC/TSX solutions formed two gel types: a soft gel and a turbid hard gel respectively upon heating. These samples were characterized using a test-tube-tilting method (TTM), rheological, and turbidity measurements. The interactions and the mechanism of gelation were studied using ATR-FTIR. The release of metronidazole (MTZ) from the hydrogels was also investigated. Based on the TTM results, 6MC/TSX, 7MC, and 7MC/TSX were solution at room temperature but could form gel at body temperature. ATR-FTIR demonstrated stronger hydrophobic associations of MC in the turbid gel than in the soft gel which corresponded to the higher intensity of the C–O band of MC. The peak intensity was greater in the presence of TSX, reflecting the role of TSX to increase hydrophobicity and decrease gelation temperature of MC. SEM revealed a microporous morphology of 6MC/TSX, 7MC, and 7MC/TSX and the pore size of the soft gel was greater than that of the turbid gel. The high relative rheological synergism at 37 °C indicated a high mucoadhesive property of the MC/TSX hydrogels. MC and MC/TSX exhibited a suitable syringeability to ease of administration at 25 °C. MTZ exhibited a more sustained release from 7MC/TSX than from a commercial formulation. Therefore, 7MC/TSX hydrogel could be potentially used for the in situ delivery of MTZ for the treatment of periodontitis.

Highlights

  • Novel MC/TSX hydrogels were developed for in situ delivery of a drug.

  • MC/TSX formed soft and turbid gels at body and higher temperatures, respectively.

  • Increasing hydrophobicity by TSX facilitated the gelation of MC in the blend.

  • MC/TSX soft gel was highly mucoadhesive and showed suitable syringeability.

Keywords

Xyloglucan Methylcellulose Mucoadhesion Soft gel Turbid gel 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Office of the Higher Education Commission, through its program of Center of Excellence Network and Prince of Songkla University Strategic Research Project (Grant no. PHA610372S).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

10971_2018_4878_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (414 kb)
Supplemental Figure

References

  1. 1.
    Andrews GP, Jones DS (2006) Rheological characterization of bioadhesive binary polymeric systems designed as platforms for drug delivery implants. Biomacromolecules 7:899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sankar V, Hearnden V, Hull K, Juras DV, Greenberg MS, Kerr AR, Lockhart PB, Patton LL, Porter S, Thornhill M (2011) Local drug delivery for oral mucosal diseases: challenges and opportunities. Oral Dis 17:73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jones DS, Lawlor MS, Woolfson AD (2003) Rheological and mucoadhesive characterization of polymeric systems composed of poly(methylvinylether-co-maleic anhydride) and poly(vinylpyrrolidone), designed as platforms for topical drug delivery. J Pharm Sci 92:995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chaubal MV (2006) Polymeric excipients for controlled release applications. In: Katdare A, Chaubal MV, eds. Excipient development for pharmaceutical, biotechnology, and drug delivery systems. Informa Healthcare USA, Inc., New York, p 341Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bansal K, Rawat M, Jain A, Rajput A, Chaturvedi T, Singh S (2009) Development of satranidazole mucoadhesive gel for the treatment of periodontitis. AAPS PharmSciTech 10:716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mayol L, Quaglia F, Borzacchiello A, Ambrosio L, Rotonda MIL (2008) A novel poloxamers/hyaluronic acid in situ forming hydrogel for drug delivery: rheological, mucoadhesive and in vitro release properties. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 70:199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hoare T, Zurakowski D, Langer R, Kohane DS (2010) Rheological blends for drug delivery. I. Characterization in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res A 92A:575Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Li L, Thangamathesvaran PM, Yue CY, Tam KC, Hu X, Lam YC (2001) Gel network structure of methylcellulose in water. Langmuir 17:8062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kim JK, Won Y-W, Lim KS, Kim Y-H (2012) Low-molecular-weight methylcellulose-based thermo-reversible gel/pluronic micelle combination system for local and sustained docetaxel delivery. Pharm Res 29:525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tate MC, Shear DA, Hoffman SW, Stein DG, LaPlaca MC (2001) Biocompatibility of methylcellulose-based constructs designed for intracerebral gelation following experimental traumatic brain injury. Biomaterials 22:1113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nasatto PL, Pignon F, Silveira JLM, Duarte MER, Noseda MD, Rinaudo M (2015) Influence of molar mass and concentration on the thermogelation of methylcelluloses. Int J Polym Anal Charact 20:110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gad HA, El-Nabarawi MA, Abd El-Hady SS (2008) Formulation and evaluation of secnidazole or doxycycline dento-oral gels. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 34:1356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tomšič M, Prossnigg F, Glatter O (2008) A thermoreversible double gel: characterization of a methylcellulose and κ-carrageenan mixed system in water by SAXS, DSC and rheology. J Colloid Interface Sci 322:41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gupta D, Tator CH, Shoichet MS (2006) Fast-gelling injectable blend of hyaluronan and methylcellulose for intrathecal, localized delivery to the injured spinal cord. Biomaterials 27:2370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Martin BC, Minner EJ, Wiseman SL, Klank RL, Gilbert RJ (2008) Agarose and methylcellulose hydrogel blends for nerve regeneration applications. J Neural Eng 5:221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ghelardi E, Tavanti A, Davini P, Celandroni F, Salvetti S, Parisio E, Boldrini E, Senesi S, Campa M (2004) A mucoadhesive polymer extracted from tamarind seed improves the intraocular penetration and efficacy of rufloxacin in topical treatment of experimental bacterial keratitis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 48:3396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sano M, Miyata E, Tamano S, Hagiwara A, Ito N, Shirai T (1996) Lack of carcinogenicity of tamarind seed polysaccharide in B6C3F1 mice. Food Chem Toxicol 34:463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Suisha F, Kawasaki N, Miyazaki S, Shirakawa M, Yamatoya K, Sasaki M, Attwood D (1998) Xyloglucan gels as sustained release vehicles for the intraperitoneal administration of mitomycin C. Int J Pharm 172:27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nisbet DR, Crompton KE, Hamilton SD, Shirakawa S, Prankerd RJ, Finkelstein DI, Horne MK, Forsythe JS (2006) Morphology and gelation of thermosensitive xyloglucan hydrogels. Biophys Chem 121:14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shirakawa M, Yamatoya K, Nishinari K (1998) Tailoring of xyloglucan properties using an enzyme. Food Hydrocolloid 12:25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hirun N, Tantishaiyakul V, Pichayakorn W (2010) Effect of Eriochrome Black T on the gelatinization of xyloglucan investigated using rheological measurement and release behavior of Eriochrome Black T from xyloglucan gel matrices. Int J Pharm 388:196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hirun N, Bao HQ, Li L, Deen GR, Tantishaiyakul V (2012) Micro-DSC, rheological and NMR investigations of the gelation of gallic acid and xyloglucan. Soft Matter 8:7258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sangfai T, Tantishaiyakul V, Hirun N, Li L (2015) Preparation and characterization of kappa-carrageenan and xyloglucan blends for sustained release of a hydrophilic drug. Polym Bull 72:1647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pahkla ER, Koppel T, Saag M, Pahkla R (2005) Metronidazole concentrations in plasma, saliva and periodontal pockets in patients with periodontitis. J Clin Periodontol 32:163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rizzo A, Paolillo R, Guida L, Annunziata M, Bevilacqua N, Tufano MA (2010) Effect of metronidazole and modulation of cytokine production on human periodontal ligament cells. Int Immunopharmacol 10:744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Behera B, Patil V, Sagiri SS, Pal K, Ray SS (2012) Span-60-based organogels as probable matrices for transdermal/topical delivery systems. J Appl Polym Sci 125:852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kwon KW, Park MJ, Hwang J, Char K (2001) Effects of alcohol addition on gelation in aqueous solution of poly(ethylene oxide)-poly(propylene oxide)-poly(ethylene oxide) triblock copolymer. Polym J 33:404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Li L (2002) Thermal gelation of methylcellulose in water: scaling and thermoreversibility. Macromolecules 35:5990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Almomen A, Cho S, Yang CH, Li Z, Jarboe EA, Peterson CM, Huh KM, Janat-Amsbury MM (2015) Thermosensitive progesterone hydrogel: a safe and effective new formulation for vaginal application. Pharm Res 32:2266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rossi S, Bonferoni MC, Caramella C, Ironi L, Tentoni S (1999) Model-based interpretation of creep profiles for the assessment of polymer–mucin interaction. Pharm Res 16:1456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Madsen F, Eberth K, Smart JD (1998) A rheological examination of the mucoadhesive/mucus interaction: the effect of mucoadhesive type and concentration. J Control Release 50:167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Liu L, Fishman ML, Hicks KB, Kende M (2005) Interaction of various pectin formulations with porcine colonic tissues. Biomaterials 26:5907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Simoes SM, Veiga F, Torres-Labandeira JJ, Ribeiro AC, Sandez-Macho MI, Concheiro A, Alvarez-Lorenzo C (2012) Syringeable Pluronic-α-cyclodextrin supramolecular gels for sustained delivery of vancomycin. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 80:103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Jones DS, Woolfson AD, Brown AF, Coulter WA, McClelland C, Irwin CR (2000) Design, characterisation and preliminary clinical evaluation of a novel mucoadhesive topical formulation containing tetracycline for the treatment of periodontal disease. J Control Release 67:357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kelly HM, Deasy PB, Ziaka E, Claffey N (2004) Formulation and preliminary in vivo dog studies of a novel drug delivery system for the treatment of periodontitis. Int J Pharm 274:167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Bonacucina G, Cespi M, Misici-Falzi M, Palmieri GF (2006) Rheological, adhesive and release characterisation of semisolid carbopol/tetraglycol systems. Int J Pharm 307:129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bramer T, Paulsson M, Edwards K, Edsman K (2003) Catanionic drug–surfactant mixtures: phase behavior and sustained release from gels. Pharm Res 20:1661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Jones DS, Woolfson AD, Brown AF, O’Neill MJ (1997) Mucoadhesive, syringeable drug delivery systems for controlled application of metronidazole to the periodontal pocket: In vitro release kinetics, syringeability, mechanical and mucoadhesive properties. J Control Release 49:71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hirun N, Tantishaiyakul V, Sangfai T, Rugmai S, Soontaranon S (2016) Nano-structure, phase transition and morphology of gallic acid and xyloglucan hydrogel. Polym Bull 73:2211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Eggenhuisen TM, Becer CR, Fijten MWM, Eckardt R, Hoogenboom R, Schubert US (2008) Libraries of statistical hydroxypropyl acrylate containing copolymers with LCST properties prepared by NMP. Macromolecules 41:5132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Mishra A, Malhotra AV (2009) Tamarind xyloglucan: a polysaccharide with versatile application potential. J Mater Chem 19:8528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kuang QL, Cheng GX, Zhao J, Li YJ (2006) Thermogelation hydrogels of methylcellulose and glycerol–methylcellulose systems. J Appl Polym Sci 100:4120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Kim MH, Park H, Park WH (2018) Effect of pH and precursor salts on in situ formation of calcium phosphate nanoparticles in methylcellulose hydrogel. Carbohydr Polym 191:176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Nasatto PL, Pignon F, Silveira JLM, Duarte MER, Noseda MD, Rinaudo M (2015) Methylcellulose, a cellulose derivative with original physical properties and extended applications. Polymers 7:777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Li L, Shan H, Yue CY, Lam YC, Tam KC, Hu X (2002) Thermally induced association and dissociation of methylcellulose in aqueous solutions. Langmuir 18:7291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Tang Y, Wang X, Li Y, Lei M, Du Y, Kennedy JF, Knill CJ (2010) Production and characterisation of novel injectable chitosan/methylcellulose/salt blend hydrogels with potential application as tissue engineering scaffolds. Carbohydr Polym 82:833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Park H, Kim MH, Yoon YI, Park WH (2017) One-pot synthesis of injectable methylcellulose hydrogel containing calcium phosphate nanoparticles. Carbohydr Polym 157:775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Zheng PJ, Li L, Hu X, Zhao XY (2004) Sol–gel transition of methylcellulose in phosphate buffer saline solutions. J Polym Sci Pol Phys 42:1849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Nishimoto Y, Eguchi H, Shimoda E, Suzuki T (2015) Analysis of water state and gelation of methylcellulose thermo-reversible hydrogels by thermal analysis and NMR. Anal Sci 31:929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Korsmeyer RW, Gurny R, Doelker E, Buri P, Peppas NA (1983) Mechanisms of solute release from porous hydrophilic polymers. Int J Pharm 15:25CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Namon Hirun
    • 1
  • Vimon Tantishaiyakul
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Tanatchaporn Sangfai
    • 1
  • Passaporn Ouiyangkul
    • 3
  • Lin Li
    • 4
  1. 1.School of PharmacyWalailak UniversityNakhon Si ThammaratThailand
  2. 2.Drug Delivery System Excellence Center, Faculty of Pharmaceutical SciencesPrince of Songkla UniversityHat-YaiThailand
  3. 3.Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmaceutical SciencesPrince of Songkla UniversityHat-YaiThailand
  4. 4.School of Mechanical and Aerospace EngineeringNanyang Technological UniversitySingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations