Advertisement

Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology

, Volume 90, Issue 1, pp 127–139 | Cite as

Light scattering and haze in TMOS-co-APTES silica aerogels

  • Chandana Mandal
  • Suraj Donthula
  • Rushi Soni
  • Massimo Bertino
  • Chariklia Sotiriou-Leventis
  • Nicholas LeventisEmail author
Original Paper: Nano- and macroporous materials (aerogels, xerogels, cryogels, etc.)

Abstract

TMOS-co-APTES wet-gels have been used as templates for polymer crosslinked aerogels, which in turn have been used as strong materials and as starting materials for ceramic aerogels. Such wet-gels are prepared in acetonitrile (CH3CN) via co-gelation of tetramethylorthosilicate (TMOS) and 3-aminopropyl silane (APTES) in a 3:1 v/v ratio. Qualitatively, native monolithic TMOS-co-APTES aerogels appear more clear than the corresponding straight TMOS-derived materials, suggesting applications in thermally insulating daylighting. For that application, it is important to understand and minimize haze. Haze from the bulk of silica aerogels may be due to scattering from particles or pores, but study of its origin may be complicated by scattering and reflections from the surface of the monolith. In this report, using wet-gels as proxy materials for aerogels, haze from TMOS-co-APTES was investigated as a function of density, which is controlled by the amount of TMOS + APTES in the sol. The wet-gel approach to the study of haze of aerogels has the advantages of eliminating surface scattering issues from aerogel monoliths, and owing to better refractive index matching between the skeletal framework and the surrounding medium (CH3CN), bulk scattering is also reduced, facilitating study of lower-density materials. Haze from the bulk was traced to Rayleigh scattering down to 0.017 g cm−3 aerogels. The opacity of even lower-density samples (down to 0.006 g cm−3) was attributed to the Mie scattering. The scatterer size was obtained via Rayleigh’s law, and matched the secondary particle sizes of silica. The size of those particles increased as the density decreased, producing higher haze. Results suggest that in order to keep haze low at lower densities, one must keep the particle size low, for example, by increasing the rate of gelation.

Highlights

  • The haze of the title silica aerogels increases as their density decreases.

  • Wet-gels are good proxy materials for measuring haze in lower-density silica aerogels.

  • Wet-gels do not have surface scattering issues, and better index matching reduces haze, allowing measurements at lower densities.

  • The haze of the title silica aerogels was traced to Rayleigh scattering from secondary skeletal silica particles to densities as low as 0.017 g cm−3.

  • Increased haze at lower densities was attributed to increasing particle size.

Keywords

Haze Clarity Rayleigh scattering TMOS APTES Aerogels Wet-gels 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank ArpaE under Award Number 1425-1506 and the NSF under Award No. 1530603 for financial support. We also thank the Materials Research Center of the Missouri University of Science and Technology for support with materials characterization.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

10971_2018_4801_MOESM1_ESM.docx (26 kb)
Supplementary information

References

  1. 1.
    Kistler SS (1931) Nature 127:741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nicolaon GA, Teichner SJ (1968) Bull Soc Chim Fr 5:1900–1906Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fricke J, Arduini-Schuster MC, Buttner D, Ebert H-P, Heinemann U, Hetfleisch J, Hummer E, Kuhn J, Lu X (1990) In: Cremers CJ, Fine HA (eds) Thermal conductivity 21. Plenum Press, New York, NY, pp 235–245Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pierre AC, Rigacci A (2011) In: Aegerter M, Leventis N, Koebel M (eds) Aerogels handbook—advances in sol-gel derived materials and technologies, Chap 2. Springer, New York, NY, pp 21–45,  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7589-8_2
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
    Zhao L, Yang S, Bhatia B, Strobach E, Wang EN (2016) AIP Adv 6:025123–1-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rubin M, Lampert CM (1983) Sol Energy Mater 7:393–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Beck A, Gelsen O, Wang P, Fricke J (1989) J Phys Colloq 50:C4-203–C4-208Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Katti A, Shimpi N, Roy S, Lu H, Fabrizio EF, Das A, Capadona LA, Leventis N (2006) Chem Mater 18:285–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Leventis N (2007) Acc Chem Res 40:874–884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pajonk G (1998) J Non-Cryst Solids 225:307–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    ASTM. ASTM D1003-13-Standard test method for haze and luminous transmittance of transparent plastics, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2013, www.astm.org
  13. 13.
    Hunt AJ, Ayers MR (2001) J Non-Cryst Solids 285:162–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Boonstra AH, Meeuwsen TPM, Baken JME, Aben GVA (1989) J Non-Cryst Solids 109:153–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kistler SS (1932) J Phys Chem 36:52–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kerker M (1969) The scattering of the light and other electromagnetic radiation, Chap 3. Clarkson College of Technology, Potsdam, NYGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wang P, Korner W, Emmerling A, Beck A, Kuhn J, Fricke J (1992) J Non-Cryst Solids 145:141–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Emmerling A, Petricevic R, Beck A, Wang P, Scheller H, Frickey J (1995) J Non-Cryst Solids 185:240–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rewatkar PM, Taghvaee T, Saeed AM, Donthula S, Mandal C, Chandrasekaran N, Leventis T, Shruthi TK, Sotiriou-Leventis C, Leventis N (2018) Chem Mater 30:1635–1647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mohite DP, Larimore ZJ, Lu H, Mans JT, Sotiriou-Leventis C, Leventis N (2012) Chem Mater 24:3434–3448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wu MK (1996) Aerosol Sci Technol 25:392–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Banerji A, Ghosh I (2009) PLoS ONE 4:e7361–1-13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Beaucage G (1996) J Appl Crystallogr 29:134–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mang JT, Son SF, Hjelm RP, Peterson PD, Jorgensen BS (2007) J Mater Res 22:1907–1920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Porod G (1951) Kolloid Z 124:83–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
  27. 27.
    Howell JR, Siegel R, Mengüc MP (2010) Thermal radiation heat transfer, 5th edn, Chap 15. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, p 767Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Polyanskiy MN Refractive Index Database. https://refractiveindex.info. Accessed 22 May 2018
  29. 29.
    Tillotson TM, Hrubesh LW (1992) J Non-Cryst Solids 145:44–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ChemistryMissouri University of Science and TechnologyRollaUSA
  2. 2.Department of PhysicsVirginia Commonwealth UniversityRichmondUSA

Personalised recommendations