Advertisement

Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology

, Volume 89, Issue 1, pp 244–254 | Cite as

Single cyanobacteria@silica porous microcapsules via a sol–gel layer by layer for heavy-metal remediation

  • Cyrille Delneuville
  • Emeric P. Danloy
  • Li WangEmail author
  • Bao-Lian SuEmail author
Original Paper: Sol–gel and hybrid materials for biological and health (medical) applications
  • 116 Downloads

Abstract

Heavy-metal removal from industrial wastewater is a major issue. The use of microbial biosorbent is a low cost, sustainable, and efficient way for water cleaning, but the living organisms are limited by their sensitivity and fragility and subjected to water contamination by other relevant bacteria. In order to improve the use of the powerful photosynthetic prokaryote, this work focused on the development of a new protection method of cyanobacterial strains of the genus Synechococcus sp. PCC7002 by a multiple coating including an external layer made of silica. This surfacing was performed using the layer-by-layer method and different polyelectrolytes. Polydiallyldimethylammonium chloride, a cationic polymer is used as a link between the cell wall and silica shell, while polystyrene sulfonate is inserted to play a protective role against ultraviolet light irradiation. This study discloses the synthesis of a highly efficient hybrid material and the excellent protection brought by the silica material. First of all, the layers, in particular four layers, deposited around single cells offer a strong protection against very harmful UV-C light irradiation while maintaining high viability and the same bioadsorption capacity for heavy-metal ions in solution. The long-term viability of this living material and its successful use for copper and lead sequestration, confirms the possibility of exploiting encapsulated cyanobacteria to improve current biotechnologies for wastewater purification.

A single cyanobacterium@silica porous microcapsule synthesized via a sol–gel layer-by-layer method presents long-term viability, the resistance against UV-C light irradiation, and the bioadsorption capacity of heavy-metal ions in solution.

Highlights

  • Individual cyanobacterium encapsulation within hybrid porous layers via a sol–gel method

  • Biohybrid materials with UV-C irradiation resistance

  • Biohybrid materials with a long-term viability

  • Biohybrid materials for wastewater treatment

Keywords

Individual cell encapsulation Silica Cyanobacteria Heavy-metal remediation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

C. Delneuville thanks the Belgian Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique—FNRS for his Fonds pour la Formation à la Recherche dans l’Industrie et dans l’Agriculture (FRIA) scholarship. The authors thank A. Krief for the useful help and comments on this manuscript, P. Campier for his relevant advice and assistance with atomic absorption (URBV, UNamur), C. Charlier from the microscopy service (UNamur) for technical assistance and equipment, A. Felten and the SIAM technology platform (UNamur) for the XPS measurement, and E. Perpete (CPB, UNamur) for the zeta-potential measurements.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with animals or human participants performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Jarup L (2003) Hazards of heavy metal contamination. Brit Med Bull 68(1):167–182Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gaetke L, Chow CK (2003) Copper toxicity, oxidative stress, and antioxidant nutrients. Toxicology 189(1-2):147–163Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Singh KK, Talat M, Hasan SH (2006) Removal of lead from aqueous solutions by agricultural waste maize bran. Bioresour Technol 97(16):2124–2130Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ku Y, Jung IL (2001) Photocatalytic reduction of Cr(VI) in aqueous solutions by UV irradiation with the presence of titanium dioxide. Water Res 35(1):135–142Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Alyüz B, Veli S (2009) Kinetics and equilibrium studies for the removal of nickel and zinc from aqueous solutions by ion exchange resins. J Hazard Mater 167(1-3):482–488Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fu F, Wang Q (2011) Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewaters: a review. J Environ Manag 92(3):407–418Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wang J, Chen C (2009) Biosorbents for heavy metals removal and their future. Biotechnol Adv 27(2):195–226Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Apiratikul R, Pavasant P (2008) Batch and column studies of biosorption of heavy metals by Caulerpa lentillifera. Bioresour Technol 99(8):2766–2777Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gupta R, Seema Khan PA, Saxena RK, Mohapatra H (2000) Microbial biosorbents: Meeting challenges of heavy metal pollution in aqueous solutions. Curr Sci 78(8):967–973Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ayangbenro AS, Babalola OO (2017) A new strategy for heavy metal polluted environments: a review of microbial biosorbents. Int J Environ Res Public Health 14(1):94–110Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Léonard A, Rooke JC, Meunier CF, Sarmento H, Descy JP, Su BL (2010) Cyanobacteria immobilised in porous silica gels: exploring biocompatible synthesis routes for the development of photobioreactors. Energy Environ Sci 3:370–377Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dickson DJ, Ely RL (2011) Evaluation of encapsulation stress and the effect of additives on viability and photosynthetic activity of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 encapsulated in silica gel. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 91(6):1633–1646Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Coiffier A, Coradin T, Roux C, Bouvet OM, Livage J (2001) Sol–gel encapsulation of bacteria: a comparison between alkoxide and aqueous routes. J Mat Chem 11(8):2039–2044Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Weiner S (2003) An overview of biomineralization processes and the problem of the vital effect. Rev Mineral Geochem 54(1):1–29Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kröger N, Poulsen N (2008) Diatoms-from cell wall biogenesis to nanotechnology. Annu Rev Genet 42:83–107Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nassif N, Livage J (2011) From diatoms to silica-based biohybrids. Chem Soc Rev 40(2):849–859Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nassif N, Roux C, Coradin T, Rager M, Bouvet OM, Livage J (2003) A sol–gel matrix to preserve the viability of encapsulated bacteria. J Mat Chem 13(2):203–208Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rooke JC, Meunier CF, Léonard A, Su BL (2008) Energy from photobioreactors: bioencapsulation of photosynthetically active molecules, organelles, and whole cells within biologically inert matrices. Pure Appl Chem 80(11):2345–2376Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bisceglie V (1934) Über die antineoplastische Immunität. Z für Krebsforsch 40(1):122–140Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Desmet J, Meunier CF, Danloy EP, Duprez ME, Lox F, Thomas D, Hantson AL, Crine M, Toye D, Rooke JC, Su BL (2015) Highly efficient, long life, reusable and robust photosynthetic hybrid core-shell beads for the sustainable production of high value compounds. J Colloid Interface Sci 448:79–87Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fennouh S, Guyon S, Jourdat C, Livage J, Roux C (1999) Encapsulation of bacteria in silica gels. Comptes Rendus De l’Académie Des Sci - Ser IIC - Chem 2(11-13):625–630Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Meunier CF, Dandoy P, Su BL (2010) Encapsulation of cells within silica matrixes: towards a new advance in the conception of living hybrid materials. J Colloid Interface Sci 342(2):211–224Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Xie J, Chang HL, Kilbane JJ (1996) Removal and recovery of metal ions from wastewater using biosorbents and chemically modified biosorbents. Biores Technol 57(2):127–136Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Blanco A, Sanz B, Llama MJ, Serra JL (1999) Biosorption of heavy metals to immobilised Phormidium laminosum biomass. J Biotechnol 69(2-3):227–240Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yang SH, Lee KB, Kong B, Kim JH, Kim HS, Choi IS (2009) Biomimetic encapsulation of individual cells with silica. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 48(48):9160–9163Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wang B, Liu P, Tang R (2010) Cellular shellization: surface engineering gives cells an exterior. Bioessays 32(8):698–708Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Fakhrullin RF, Zamaleeva AI, Minullina RT, Konnova SA, Paunovb VN (2012) Cyborg cells: functionalisation of living cells with polymers and nanomaterials. Chem Soc Rev 41(11):4189–4206Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Geng W, Wang L, Jiang N, Cao J, Xiao YX, Wei H, Yetisen AK, Yang XY, Su BL (2018) Single cells in nanoshells for the functionalization of living cells. Nanoscale 10(7):3112–3129Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Carnes EC, Lopez DM, Donegan NP, Cheung A, Gresham H, Timmins GS, Brinker CJ (2010) Confinement-induced quorum sensing of individual Staphylococcus aureus bacteria. Nat Chem Biol 6(1):41–45Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Saxon E, Bertozzi CR (2000) Cell surface engineering by a modified staudinger reaction. Science 287(5460):2007–2010Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wang B (2014) Functional multilayered polyelectrolyte assemblies on biological cells. In: Cell surface engineering: fabrication of functional nanoshells. RSC Smart Materials, Cambrige, UK Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zhao C, Li Z, Li T, Zhang Y, Bryant DA, Zhao J (2015) High-yield production of extracellular type-I cellulose by the cyanobacterium Synechococcus sp. PCC 7002. Cell Discov 1:15004Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Liu Y, Alessi DS, Owttrim GW, Petrash DA, Mloszewska AM, Lalonde SV, Martinez RE, Zhou Q, Konhauser KO (2015) Cell surface reactivity of Synechococcus sp. PCC 7002: implications for metal sorption from seawater. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 169:30–44Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Eby DM, Harbaugh S, Tatum RN, Farrington KE, Kelley-Loughnane N, Johnson GR (2012) Bacterial sunscreen: layer-by-layer deposition of UV-absorbing polymers on whole-cell biosensors. Langmuir 28(28):10521–10527Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Meunier CF, Yang XY, Rooke JC, Su BL (2011) Biofuel cells based on the immobilization of photosynthetically active bioentities. ChemCatChem 3(3):476–488Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Troschl C, Fritz I, Sodnikar K, Drosg B (2017) Contaminations in mass cultivation of cyanobacteria: Highly resilient Colpoda steinii leads to rapid crash of Synechocystis sp. cultures and is inhibited by partially anoxic conditions. Algal Res 28:229–234Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Foster JS, Green SJ, Ahrendt SR, Golubic S, Reid RP, Hetherington KL, Bebout L (2009) Molecular and morphological characterization of cyanobacterial diversity in the stromatolites of Highborne Cay, Bahamas. ISME J 3(5):573–587Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Renner WA, Jordan M, Eppenberger HM, Leist C (1993) Cell–cell adhesion and aggregation: influence on the growth behavior of CHO cells. Biotechnol Bioeng 41(2):188–193Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory of Inorganic Materials Chemistry (CMI)University of NamurNamurBelgium
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology for Materials Synthesis and ProcessingWuhan University of TechnologyWuhanChina

Personalised recommendations