Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology

, Volume 85, Issue 2, pp 382–393 | Cite as

ZnO-Al2O3-promoted CuO/ZrO2 catalyst prepared by oxalate gel-coprecipitation for the conversion of water-bearing materials

Original Paper: Sol-gel and hybrid materials for catalytic, photoelectrochemical and sensor applications
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:
  • 105 Downloads

Abstract

Generally, ZrO2 facilitates the reactions of O-containing species, which result in the loss of activity or the sintering of Cu species via intimate interaction between water and CuO/ZrO2 catalysts. Indeed, the CuO/ZrO2 catalysts (CZo) prepared by oxalate gel-coprecipitation technique possessed a high dispersion of Cu and a certain degree of alkalinity. Unfortunately, it exhibited inferior catalytic activity in conversion of bio-ethanol (37.6% conversion). In contrast, the CuO–ZnO–Al2O3–ZrO2 catalysts (CZAZo) with extra addition of ZnO and Al2O3 showed a good catalytic performance and stability (>600 h on line). For example, the 92.5% selectivity of ethyl acetate based on 62.2% conversion of ethanol, was achieved. Besides, it performed better in hydrogenation of hydrous ethyl acetate than CZo. Evidently, the excellent performance in conversion of water-bearing materials was mainly due to the addition of ZnO and Al2O3 to CuO/ZrO2 catalysts. Besides, the uniform combination of each component could be achieved successfully by the employment of oxalate gel-coprecipitation. As a result, the surface electronic properties are tuned effectively and the affinity for water decreases sharply. Most importantly, the associated loss of active sites could be effectively avoided because of the reduced water coverage over CZAZo.

Graphical abstract

Open image in new window

Keywords

Oxalate gel-coprecipitation CuO–ZnO–Al2O3–ZrO2 catalyst Bio-ethanol Additives Water-resistance. 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Mr. Wenbin Zhang for the facilitation in the equipment maintenance, Dr. Shenke Zheng and Zhikai Li for the helpful discussions. This work was supported by the Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology Innovation Fund (Grant No. 2016QDL-B33) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 21466029 and No. 21673272).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. 1.
    Angelici C, Weckhuysen BM, Bruijnincx PC (2013) Chemocatalytic conversion of ethanol into butadiene and other bulk chemicals. ChemSusChem 6:1595–1614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rodrigues CP, Zonetti PC, Silva CG, Gaspar AB, Appel LG (2013) Chemicals from ethanol–the acetone one-pot synthesis. Appl Catal A 458:111–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gao D, Feng Y, Yin H, Wang A, Jiang T (2013) Coupling reaction between ethanol dehydrogenation and maleic anhydride hydrogenation catalyzed by Cu/Al2O3, Cu/ZrO2, and Cu/ZnO catalysts. Chem Eng J 233:349–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jagadeesh RV, Junge H, Pohl MM, Radnik J, Brückner A, Beller M (2013) Selective oxidation of alcohols to esters using heterogeneous Co3O4-N@C catalysts under mild conditions. J Am Chem Soc 135:10776–10782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bartholomew CH (2001) Mechanisms of catalyst deactivation. Appl Catal A 212:17–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gunanathan C, Milstein D (2013) Applications of acceptorless dehydrogenation and related transformations in chemical synthesis. Science 341:249–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nielsen M, Junge H, Kammer A, Beller M (2012) Towards a green process for bulk–scale synthesis of ethyl acetate: efficient acceptorless dehydrogenation of ethanol. Angew Chem Int Ed 51:5711–5713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zeng G, Chen T, He L, Pinnau I, Lai Z, Huang KW (2012) A green approach to ethyl acetate: quantitative conversion of ethanol through direct dehydrogenation in a Pd–Ag membrane reactor. Chem Eur J 18:15940–15943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zonetti PC, Celnik J, Letichevsky S, Gaspar AB, Appel LG (2011) Chemicals from ethanol—the dehydrogenative route of the ethyl acetate one-pot synthesis. J Mol Catal A 334:29–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sushkevich VL, Ivanova II, Taarning E (2013) Mechanistic study of ethanol dehydrogenation over silica-supported silver. ChemCatChem 5:10776–10782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhu Y, Kong X, Cao DB, Cui J, Zhu Y, Li YW (2014) The rise of calcination temperature enhances the performance of Cu catalysts: contributions of support. ACS Catal 4:3675–3681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ding J, Liu Y, Zhang J, Dong M, Wang Y, He W, Han X, Liu K, Jiang Z, Chen J (2017) Synergism from interfaces between Cu and crystalline ZrO2 nanosheets fabricated by acetic complex method for oxalates hydrogenation. Mol Catal 438:93–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Agrell J, Birgersson H, Boutonnet M, Melián-Cabrera I, Navarro RM, Fierro JLG (2003) Production of hydrogen from methanol over Cu/ZnO catalysts promoted by ZrO2 and Al2O3. J Catal 219:389–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Patel S, Pant KK (2006) Influence of preparation method on performance of Cu(Zn)(Zr)-alumina catalysts for the hydrogen production via steam reforming of methanol. J Porous Mater 13:373–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Inui K, Kurabayashi T, Sato S (2002) Direct synthesis of ethyl acetate from ethanol over Cu–Zn–Zr–Al–O catalyst. Appl Catal A 237:53–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ding J, Chen J (2015) Synthesis of Cu–Zn–Zr–Al–O catalysts via a citrate complex route modified by different solvents and their dehydrogenation/hydrogenation performance. RSC Adv 5:82822–2833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Liao F, Huang Y, Ge J, Zheng W, Tedsree K, Collier P, Hong X, Tsang SC (2011) Morphology-dependent interactions of ZnO with Cu nanoparticles at the materials’ interface in selective hydrogenation of CO2 to CH3OH. Angew Chem Int Ed 50:2162–2165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lunkenbein T, Schumann J, Behrens M, Schlögl R, Willinger MG (2015) Formation of a ZnO overlayer in industrial Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 catalysts induced by strong metal–support interactions. Angew Chem Int Ed 54:4544–4548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ding J, Liu Y, Zhang J, Liu K, Xiao H, Kong F, Sun Y, Chen J (2016) The excellent performance in hydrogenation of esters over Cu/ZrO2 catalyst prepared by bio-derived salicylic acid. Catal Sci Technol 6:7220–7230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    He L, Chen X, Ma J, He H, Wang W (2010) Characterization and catalytic performance of sol–gel derived Cu/SiO2 catalysts for hydrogenolysis of diethyl oxalate to ethylene glycol. J Sol–Gel Sci Technol 55:285–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Li JL, Zhang XG, Inui T (1996) Improvement in the catalyst activity for direct synthesis of dimethyl ether from synthesis gas through enhancing the dispersion of CuO/ZnO/γ-Al2O3 in hybrid catalysts. Appl Catal A 147:23–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hadipour A, Sohrabi M (2008) Synthesis of some bifunctional catalysts and determination of kinetic parameters for direct conversion of syngas to dimethyl ether. Chem Eng J 137:294–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zeng HY, Deng X, Wang YJ, Liao KB (2009) Preparation of Mg–Al hydrotalcite by urea method and its catalytic activity for transesterification. AIChE J 55:1229–1235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sun Q, Zhang Y, Chen H, Deng J, Wu D, Chen S (1996) A novel process for preparation of a Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 ultrafine catalyst: structure, surface properties, and activity for methanol synthesis from CO2+H2. J Catal 167:92–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Van Der Grift C, Wielers A, Jogh B, Van Beunum J, De Boer M, Versluijs-Helder M, Geus J (1991) Effect of the reduction treatment on the structure and reactivity of silica-supported copper particles. J Catal 131:178–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ding J, Zhang J, Zhang C, Liu K, Xiao H, Kong F, Chen J (2015) Hydrogenation of diethyl oxalate over Cu/SiO2 catalyst with enhanced activity and stability: contribution of the spatial restriction by varied pores of support. Appl Catal A 508:68–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Santacesaria E, Carotenuto G, Tesser R, Di Serio M (2012) Ethanol dehydrogenation to ethyl acetate by using copper and copper chromite catalysts. Chem Eng J 179:209–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sing KSW (1985) Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity (Recommendations 1984). Pure Appl Chem 57:603–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Boon AQM, van Looij F, Geus JW (1992) Influence of surface oxygen vacancies on the catalytic activity of copper oxide. J Mol Catal A 75:277–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sato A, Volanti D, Meira D, Damyanova S, Longo E, Bueno J (2013) Effect of the ZrO2 phase on the structure and behavior of supported Cu catalysts for ethanol conversion. J Catal 307:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Chen L, Horiuchi T, Osaki T, Mori T (1999) Catalytic selective reduction of NO with propylene over Cu–Al2O3 catalysts: influence of catalyst preparation method. Appl Catal B 23:259–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ma ZY, Yang C, Wei W, Li WH, Sun YH (2005) Surface properties and CO adsorption on zirconia polymorphs. J Mol Catal A 227:119–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Arena F, Italiano G, Barbera K, Bordiga S, Bonura G, Spadaro L, Frusteri F (2008) Solid-state interactions, adsorption sites and functionality of Cu-ZnO/ZrO2 catalysts in the CO2 hydrogenation to CH3OH. Appl Catal A 350:16–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sato AG, Volanti DP, de Freitas IC, Longo E, Bueno JMC (2012) Site-selective ethanol conversion over supported copper catalysts. Catal Commun 26:122–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Gaspar AB, Barbosa FG, Letichevsky S, Appel LG (2010) The one-pot ethyl acetate syntheses: the role of the support in the oxidative and the dehydrogenative routes. Appl Catal A 380:113–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Inui K, Kurabayashi T, Sato S, Ichikawa N (2004) Effective formation of ethyl acetate from ethanol over Cu–Zn–Zr–Al–O catalyst. J Mol Catal A 216:147–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Dai W (2008) In: Ertl G, Knozinger H, Schuth F, Weitkamp J (eds) Handbook of heterogeneous catalysis, vol 7, 2nd ed, Wiley, pp 3256–3265Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Inui K, Kurabayashi T, Sato S (2002) Direct synthesis of ethyl acetate from ethanol carried out under pressure. J Catal 212:207–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Freitas I, Damyanova S, Oliveira D, Marques C, Bueno J (2014) Effect of Cu content on the surface and catalytic properties of Cu/ZrO2 catalyst for ethanol dehydrogenation. J Mol Catal A 381:26–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sun JT, Metcalfe IS, Sahibzada M (1999) Deactivation of Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 methanol synthesis catalyst by sintering. Ind Eng Chem Res 38:3868–3872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Hughes R (1989) Activation, deactivation and poisoning of catalysts. Chem Eng Sci 44:1747–1748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Twigg MV, Spencer MS (2001) Deactivation of supported copper metal catalysts for hydrogenation reactions. Appl Catal A 212:161–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Wang LC, Liu Q, Chen M, Liu YM, Cao Y, He HY, Fan KN (2007) Structural evolution and catalytic properties of nanostructured Cu/ZrO2 catalysts prepared by oxalate gel-coprecipitation technique. J Phys Chem C 111:16549–16557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ding J, Liu Y, Zhang J, Dong M, Wang Y, He W, Lang Z, Liu K, Chen J (2017) Synergetic effect of Cu and pentacoordinate Al3+ sites: direct synthesis of ethyl ethoxyacetate via hydrogenation of diethyl oxalate. Catal Commun 89:106–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Inner Mongolia University of Science & TechnologyBaotouP. R. China
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory of Coal Conversion, Shanxi Institute of Coal Chemistry, Chinese Academy of SciencesTaiyuanP. R. China

Personalised recommendations