Advertisement

Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology

, Volume 76, Issue 2, pp 349–357 | Cite as

Development and characterization of ion-imprinted sol–gel-derived fluorescent film for selective recognition of mercury(II) ion

  • Fehmi Karagöz
  • Orhan GüneyEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

In this work, an ion-imprinted fluorescent sensor by combining sol–gel processing and spin coating was developed. Fluorescent functional silane was first synthesized and reacted with tetramethoxysilane to obtain sol–gel-derived materials and then used as a receptor for selective removal and sensing of Hg2+ in aqueous solution. Ion-imprinted material synthesized in the presence of Hg2+ was characterized by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy, N2 adsorption–desorption analysis and thermogravimetric analysis by comparing with non-imprinted material obtained in the absence of Hg2+. Surface area, pore volume and diameter were analyzed from the profile of nitrogen adsorption. It was observed that fluorescent sol–gel film exhibits distinctive change in fluorescence emission upon interaction with Hg2+. Steady-state fluorescence experiments were performed for spectral characterization of the films, and the advancement of the reaction was defined. The shift in emission maxima and other spectral changes of the different matrices have been identified, and gelation time of sol–gel network was revealed by monitoring the emission of fluorescent silane in pre-gel solution. The corresponding selectivity factors of the imprinted fluorescent film toward Hg2+ against the other analogs were evaluated.

Graphical Abstract

Keywords

Optical sensor Sol–gel thin film Mercury ion-imprinting Fluorescence sensing 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Istanbul Technical University (BAP, Project No: 36236) for financial support.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Human rights and animal statement

This manuscript submitted does not contain any studies with human participants and animals.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Mudgal V, Madaan N, Mudgal A, Singh R, Mishra S (2010) Effect of toxic metals on human health. Open Nutraceuticals J 3:94–99Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Carvalho CM, Chew E-H, Hashemy SI, Lu J, Holmgren A (2008) Inhibition of the human thioredoxin system a molecular mechanism of mercury toxicity. J Biol Chem 283(18):11913–11923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    de Ferri L, Lottici PP, Lorenzi A, Montenero A, Vezzalini G (2013) Hybrid sol–gel based coatings for the protection of historical window glass. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 66(2):253–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hernández-Escolano M, Juan-Díaz M, Martínez-Ibáñez M, Suay J, Goñi I, Gurruchaga M (2013) Synthesis of hybrid sol–gel materials and their biological evaluation with human mesenchymal stem cells. J Mater Sci Mater Med 24(6):1491–1499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wencel D, Barczak M, Borowski P, McDonagh C (2012) The development and characterisation of novel hybrid sol–gel-derived films for optical pH sensing. J Mater Chem 22(23):11720–11729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tripathi VS, Kandimalla VB, Ju H (2006) Preparation of ormosil and its applications in the immobilizing biomolecules. Sensor Actuat B-Chem 114(2):1071–1082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kassal P, Šurina R, Vrsaljko D, Steinberg IM (2014) Hybrid sol–gel thin films doped with a pH indicator: effect of organic modification on optical pH response and film surface hydrophilicity. J Sol-Gel Technol 69(3):586–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tang Q, Gong C, Lam MH-W, Fu X (2011) Photoregulated uptake and release of drug by an organic–inorganic hybrid sol–gel material. J Sol-Gel Technol 59(3):495–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Markovics Á, Kovács B (2013) Fabrication of optical chemical ammonia sensors using anodized alumina supports and sol–gel method. Talanta 109:101–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lukowiak A, Strek W (2009) Sensing abilities of materials prepared by sol–gel technology. J Sol-Gel Technol 50(2):201–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Güney O, Cebeci FÇ (2010) Molecularly imprinted fluorescent polymers as chemosensors for the detection of mercury ions in aqueous media. J Appl Polym Sci 117(4):2373–2379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gupta R, Kumar A (2011) Synthesis and characterization of sol–gel-derived molecular imprinted polymeric materials for cholesterol recognition. J Sol-Gel Technol 58(1):182–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Amini M, Khezri B, Firooz A (2008) Development of a highly sensitive and selective optical chemical sensor for batch and flow-through determination of mercury ion. Sensor Actuat B-Chem 131(2):470–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Moorthy MS, Tapaswi PK, Park SS, Mathew A, Cho H-J, Ha C-S (2013) Ion-imprinted mesoporous silica hybrids for selective recognition of target metal ions. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 180:162–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fan H-T, Sun X-T, Li W-X (2014) Sol–gel derived ion-imprinted silica-supported organic–inorganic hybrid sorbent for selective removal of lead(II) from aqueous solution. J Sol-Gel Technol 72(1):144–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ciriminna R, Fidalgo A, Pandarus V, Fo Béland, Ilharco LM, Pagliaro M (2013) The sol–gel route to advanced silica-based materials and recent applications. Chem Rev 113(8):6592–6620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Back F, Bockmeyer M, Rudigier-Voigt E, Löbmann P (2013) Hybrid polymer sol–gel material for uv-nanoimprint: microstructure and thermal densification. J Sol-Gel Technol 66(1):73–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ghazzal M, Joseph M, Kebaili H, De Coninck J, Gaigneaux EM (2012) Tuning the selectivity and sensitivity of mesoporous dielectric multilayers by modifiying the hydrophobic–hydrophilic balance of the silica layer. J Mater Chem 22(42):22526–22532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Xu S, Chen L, Li J, Guan Y, Lu H (2012) Novel Hg2+-imprinted polymers based on thymine–Hg2+–thymine interaction for highly selective preconcentration of Hg2+ in water samples. J Hazard Mater 237:347–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Firouzzare M, Wang Q (2012) Synthesis and characterization of a high selective mercury(II)-imprinted polymer using novel aminothiol monomer. Talanta 101:261–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dakova I, Yordanova T, Karadjova I (2012) Non-chromatographic mercury speciation and determination in wine by new core–shell ion-imprinted sorbents. J Hazard Mater 231:49–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    He C, Zhu W, Xu Y, Chen T, Qian X (2009) Trace mercury (II) detection and separation in serum and water samples using a reusable bifunctional fluorescent sensor. Anal Chim Acta 651(2):227–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tan J, Wang H-F, Yan X-P (2009) A fluorescent sensor array based on ion imprinted mesoporous silica. Biosens Bioelectron 24(11):3316–3321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Karagöz F, Güney O (2014) Elucidation of selectivity for uranyl ions with an ICT organosilane-modified fluorescent receptor. J Fluoresc 24(3):727–733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Karagöz F, Güney O, Kandaz M, Bilgiçli AT (2012) Acridine-derivated receptor for selective mercury binding based on chelation-enhanced fluorescence effect. J Lumin 132(10):2736–2740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Badiei A, Goldooz H, Ziarani GM (2011) A novel method for preparation of 8-hydroxyquinoline functionalized mesoporous silica: aluminum complexes and photoluminescence studies. Appl Surf Sci 257(11):4912–4918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Monier M, Abdel-Latif DA (2013) Synthesis and characterization of ion-imprinted chelating fibers based on PET for selective removal of Hg2+. Chem Eng J 221:452–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wu G, Wang Z, Wang J, Hea C (2007) Hierarchically imprinted organic–inorganic hybrid sorbent for selective separation of mercury ion from aqueous solution. Anal Chim Acta 582:304–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    RandalláLee T (2015) Morphological control and plasmonic tuning of nanoporous gold disks by surface modifications. J Mater Chem-C 3(2):247–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    El-Safty SA, Shenashen MA (2013) Optical mesosensor for capturing of Fe(III) and Hg(II) ions from water and physiological fluids. Sensor Actuat B-Chem 183:58–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tsiourvas D, Tsetsekou A, Papavasiliou A, Arkas M, Boukos N (2013) A novel hybrid sol–gel method for the synthesis of highly porous silica employing hyperbranched poly(ethyleneimine) as a reactive template. Micropor Mesopor Mater 175:59–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Chen S-Y, Ting C-C, Li C-H (2002) Fluorescence enhancement and structural development of sol–gel derived Er3+-doped SiO2 by yttrium codoping. J Mater Chem 12(4):1118–1123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tan J, Wang H-F, Yan X-P (2009) A fluorescent sensor array based on ion imprinted mesoporous silica. Biosens Bioelectron 24:3316–3321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Güney O (2003) Multiple-point adsorption of terbium ions by lead ion templated thermosensitive gel: elucidating recognition of conformation in gel by terbium probe. J Mol Recognit 16(2):67–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Orłowska M, Kłonkowski AM, Jezierska J, Ryl J (2013) Luminescence recognition material as an INHIBIT logic gate in presence of Pb2+ and Cu2+ ions in aqueous solutions. Sensor Actuat B-Chem 186:396–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Yang Y, Cheng T, Zhu W, Xu Y, Xuhong Qian X (2011) Highly selective and sensitive near-infrared fluorescent sensors for cadmium in aqueous solution. Org Lett 13(2):264–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ChemistryIstanbul Technical UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations