Anti-soiling effect of porous SiO2 coatings prepared by sol–gel processing

  • Walther Glaubitt
  • Peer LöbmannEmail author
Original Paper


Thin films being composed of a nanoporous SiO2 network and silica nanoparticles were prepared on glass substrates by sol–gel processing. The surfaces combine anti-reflective (AR) and anti-soiling properties as demonstrated in laboratory testing and long term outdoor exposure. Films were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). It is shown that both, the structure of the nanoporous matrix as well as the particle density, contribute to this effect, the influence of relative humidity (RH) during dust exposure was investigated. Due to their generally improved solar transmittance and dust-repellant properties the coatings are believed to have a vast potential for many photovoltaic and solar thermal applications.


SiO2 thin film Anti-soiling Nanostructured surface 


  1. 1.
    Lombardo T, Ionescu A, Chabas A, Lefèvre R, Ausset P, Candau Y (2010) Dose–response function for the soiling of silica–soda–lime glass due to dry deposition. Sci Total Environ 408:976–984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hammond R, Srinivasan D, Harris A, Whitfield K (1997) Effects of soiling on PV module and radiometer performance. Conference record of the 26th IEEE photovoltaic specialists conference, pp 1121–1124Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Toprak S, Aksu R, Pesava P, Horvath H (1997) The soiling of materials under simulated atmospheric conditions in a wind tunnel. J Aerosol Sci 28(Suppl 1):S585–S587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pesava P, Aksu R, Toprak S, Horvath H, Seidl S (1999) Dry deposition of particles to building surfaces and soiling. Sci Total Environ 235:25–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pio C, Ramos M, Durate A (1998) Atmospheric aerosol and soiling of external surfaces in an urban environment. Atmospheric Environ 32:1979–1989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ionescu A, Lefèvre R, Chabas A, Lombardo T, Ausset P, Candau Y, Rosseman L (2006) Modeling of soiling based on silica-soda-lime glass exposure at six European sites. Scie Total Environ 369:246–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Barthlott W, Neinhuis C (1997) Purity of the sacred Lotus, or escape from contamination in biological surfaces. Planta 202:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gould P (2003) Smart, clean surfaces. Mater Today 6(11):44–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Carp O, Huisman C, Reller A (2004) Photoinduced reactivity of titanium dioxide. Prog Solid State Chem 32:33–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Diaz-Parralejo A, Caruso R, Ortiz A, Guiberteau F (2004) Densification and porosity evaluation of ZrO2–3 mol.% Y2O3 sol–gel thin films. Thin Solid Films 458:92–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gombert A, Glaubitt W (2000) Antireflective transparent coatings for solar devices. Sol Energy 68:357–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Glaubitt W, Kursawe M, Gombert A, Hofmann T (2002) Novel hybrid sol for producing abrasion-resistant SiO2 antireflection coatings on glass. PCT/EP 2002/010492Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jones R, Pollock H, Cleaver J, Hodges C (2002) Adhesion forces between glass and silicon surfaces in air studied by AFM: effects of relative humidity, particle size, roughness, and surface treatment. Langmuir 18:8045–8055CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fraunhofer-Institut für SilicatforschungWürzburgGermany

Personalised recommendations