Advertisement

Atmospheric control of gel-oxide transformation in sol–gel derived Al2O3-Y2O3 fibers

  • Reinhard KrügerEmail author
  • Peer Löbmann
Original Paper

Abstract

Via sol–gel processing metal–organic fibers were produced and dried up to 140 °C. For these gel fibers the influence of a treatment in different atmospheres was investigated for the temperature range of 200–850 °C. The atmospheres were nitrogen, water vapor, evaporated nitric and hydrochloric acid and evaporated hydrogen peroxide. In the presence of moisture and especially with acidic moisture fibers were transformed almost completely to their oxide composition (82 mol% Al2O3·18 mol% Y2O3). In these inorganic amorphous structures considerable differences were observed on several structural levels. On the atomic scale, the coordination of Al ions was investigated by 27Al MAS NMR and skeletal density by He-pycnometry. Porosity in the nm scale was characterized by N2-sorption. As a macroscopic effect of different treatment atmospheres, the longitudinal shrinkage was observed. For fibers treated at 500 °C the relative shrinkage varied by 100% (comparing water vapor and nitrogen atmosphere). No simple correlation between the release of organic constituents, the formation of porosity and the shrinkage could be found. These aspects were controlled by the rigidity of the inorganic network against atomic reconstitution. The kind of atmosphere was found to be an effective parameter to control various aspects of the xerogel structure.

Keywords

Sol–gel fibers Pyrolysis Densification Al2O3-Y2O3 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are indebted to Dr. Rüdiger Bertermann (Institute of Inorganic Chemistry, University of Würzburg) for performing 27Al-MAS-NMR measurements and to Mr. Oliver Schüßler (Fraunhofer ISC) for synthesis of the sols.

References

  1. 1.
    Bunsell AR, Berger M-H (2000) Fine diameter ceramic fibres. J Eur Ceram Soc 20:2249–2260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Krüger R, Glaubitt W, Löbmann P (2002) Structural evolution in sol–gel-derived yttrium aluminum garnet–alumina precursor fibers. J Am Ceram Soc 85(11):2827–2833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hirano S-I, Yogo T, Kikuta K, Araki Y, Saitoh M, Ogasahara S (1992) Synthesis of highly oriented lead zirconate-lead titanate film using metallo-organics. J Am Ceram Soc 75(10):2785–2789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kitaoka K, Takahara K, Kozuka H, Yoko T (1999) Sol–gel processing of transparent PLZT((Pb, La)(Zr, Ti)O3) fibers. J Sol Gel Sci Technol 16:183–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stacey MH, Taylor MD (1989) Inorganic fibres and their production, European Patent Application EP 0 318 203 A2, Imperial Chemical Industries PLCGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pullar RC, Taylor MD, Bhattacharya AK (1998) Manufacture of yttrium aluminium garnet (YAG) fibres by blow spinning from a sol–gel-precursor. J Eur Ceram Soc 18:1759–1764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pullar RC, Taylor MD, Bhattacharya AK (1999) The sintering behaviour, mechanical properties, and creep resistance of alingned polycrystalline yttrium aluminium garnet (YAG) fibres, produced from aqueous sol–gel precursor. J Eur Ceram Soc 19:1747–1758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    French JD, Harmer MP, Chan HM, Miller GA (1990) Coarsening-resistant dual-phase interpenetrating microstructures. J Am Ceram Soc 73(8):2508–2510 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Harmer MP, Chan HM, Miller GA (1992) Unique opportunities for microstructural engineering with duplex and laminar ceramic composites. J Am Ceram Soc 75(7):1715–1728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Krüger R (2002) Pyrolyse- und Sinterverhalten sol–gel-abgeleiteter Al2O3-YAG Fasern. Dissertation, Bayerische Julius-Maximilians-Universität, WürzburgGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mei D, Ge Q, Szani J, Peden CHF (2009) First principles analysis of nox adsorption on anhydrous γ-alumina surfaces. J Phys Chem 113:7779–7789Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pocengal DA (1999) Characterization of the uptake of nitrogen oxides by alumina adsorbents. Master Thesis, University of FloridaGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Acosta S, Corriu SR, Leclercq D, Mutin PH, Vioux A (1994) Novel non-hydrolytic sol–gel route to metal oxides. J Sol Gel Sci Technol 2:25–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Deng W, Bodart P, Pruski M, Shanks BH (2002) Characterization of mesoporous alumina molecular sieves synthesized by nonionic templating. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 52:169–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bagwell RB, Messing GL (1999) Effect of seeding and water vapor on the nucleation and growth of α-Al2O3 from γ-Al2O3. J Am Ceram Soc 82(4):825–832Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Coster D, Gruver V, Blumfeld A, Fripiat JJ (1994) Relationships between the structure and the surface activity of nano-sized alumina in acid catalysis. In: Cheetham AK, Brinker CJ, Mecartney ML, Sanchez C (eds) Better ceramics through chemistry VI. Materials research society symposia proceedings, vol 346. Pittsburgh, PA, #286070Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Truba M, Trasatti SP (2005) γ-Alumina as a support fo catalysts: a review of fundamental aspects. Eur J Inorg Chem 3393–3403Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Allwardt JR, Stebbins JF, Schmidt BC, Frost DJ, Withers AC, Hirschmann MM (2005) Aluminum coordination and the densification of high-pressure aluminosilicate glasses. Am Mineral 90(7):1218–1222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rouquerol F, Rouquerol J, Sing K (1999) Adsorption by powders and porous solids. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ji L, Lin J, Tan KL, Zeng HC (2000) Synthesis of high-surface-area alumina using aluminum tri-sec-butoxide-2, 4-pentanedione-2-propanol-nitric acid precursors. Chem Mater 12:931–939CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pierre AC (1998) Introduction to sol–gel processing. Kluwer, BostonGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Scherer GW (1997) Sintering of sol–gel films. J Sol Gel Sci Technol 8:353–363Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bockmeyer M, Löbmann P (2007) Crack formation in TiO2 films prepared by sol–gel processing: quantification and characterization. Thin Solid Films 515(13):5212–5219CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fraunhofer-Institut für SilicatforschungWürzburgGermany
  2. 2.Department of Functional Materials in Medicine and DentistryUniversitätsklinikum WürzburgWürzburgGermany

Personalised recommendations