Advertisement

Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry

, Volume 322, Issue 3, pp 1529–1535 | Cite as

Neutron activation analysis of ancient Italian tile samples

  • Amanda M. JohnsenEmail author
  • Chad B. Durrant
  • Kenan Ünlü
Article
  • 25 Downloads

Abstract

Fifteen tile samples from archaeological digs in central Italy were analyzed for trace element content using comparative neutron activation analysis. To accommodate the simultaneous irradiation of a large number of samples and standard reference materials, we designed a custom sample holder for the Penn State Breazeale Reactor 2″ × 6″ tube and characterized the thermal and epithermal neutron flux across all sample locations. Analysis of sample irradiation data produced concentration values for 14 elements. Statistical analyses of the data set using agglomerative hierarchical clustering indicated that the samples are from two distinct sites, which was confirmed by provenance information received after analysis.

Keywords

Neutron activation analysis (NAA) TRIGA reactor Non-destructive testing Gamma ray spectroscopy Archaeological provenance Ancient pottery 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was performed in collaboration with Dr. Rebecca Ammerman and Dr. Albert Ammerman of Colgate University, who kindly provided the samples for analysis. This work was supported by the National Science Foundation, Colgate University, and the The Pennsylvania State University Radiation Science and Engineering Center.

References

  1. 1.
    Perlman I, Asaro F, Michel H (1972) Nuclear applications in art and archaeology. Annu Rev Nucl Part Sci 22:383–426.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ns.22.120172.002123 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Perlman I, Asaro F (1969) Pottery analysis by neutron activation. Archaeometry 11:21–38.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4754.1969.tb00627.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hevesy G, Levi H (1936) The action of neutrons on the rare earth elements. Det Kgl Dan Vidensk Selsk Methematisk-Fys Meddelelser XIV:1–34Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sayre EV, Dodson RW, Thompson DB (1957) Neutron activation study of Mediterranean potsherds. Am J Archaeol 61:35–41.  https://doi.org/10.2307/501078 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Glascock MD, Neff H (2003) Neutron activation analysis and provenance research in archaeology. Meas Sci Technol 14:1516.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/14/9/304 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ammerman AJ, Iliopoulos I, Bondioli F et al (2008) The clay beds in the Velabrum and the earliest tiles in Rome. J Roman Archaeol 21:7–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yavar A, Sarmani S, Wood AK et al (2012) Development and implementation of Hogdahl convention and Westcott formalism for k(0)-INAA application at Malaysian Nuclear Agency reactor. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 291:521–527.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-011-1574-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Aggarwal CC, Reddy CK (2013) Data clustering: algorithms and applications. CRC Press LLC, PhiladelphiaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Greenacre M, Primicerio R (2013) Multivariate analysis of ecological data. Fundación BBVA, BilbaoGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Grant CN, Antoine JM (2018) Instrumental neutron activation analysis in forensic science in Jamaica: the case of the Coral Springs beach theft. Forensic Chem 7:88–93.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forc.2017.10.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Grant CN, Dennis HT, Antoine JMR et al (2013) Agglomerative hierarchical clustering analysis of twenty-six rice samples analysed by instrumental neutron activation analysis and other techniques. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 297:233–239.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-012-2379-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    ASTM Committee E10 on Nuclear Technology and Applications (2003) Standard test method for determining thermal neutron reaction and fluence rates by radioactivation techniques. ASTM InternationalGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    ASTM Committee E10 on Nuclear Technology and Applications (2010) Standard practice for determining neutron fluence, fluence rate, and spectra by radioactivation techniques. ASTM InternationalGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ünlü K, Pearson C, Hauck DK, Kuniholm PI (2009) Dating volcanic eruptions with tree-ring chemistry. IEEE Potentials 28:36–44.  https://doi.org/10.1109/MPOT.2009.934193 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Minitab. https://www.minitab.com. Accessed 18 July 2019

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Nuclear EngineeringThe Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA
  2. 2.Radiation Science and Engineering CenterThe Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations