Advertisement

Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry

, Volume 322, Issue 3, pp 1953–1964 | Cite as

Contribution of micro-PIXE to the characterization of settled dust events in an urban area affected by industrial activities

  • A. R. Justino
  • N. CanhaEmail author
  • C. Gamelas
  • J. T. Coutinho
  • Z. Kertesz
  • S. M. Almeida
Article

Abstract

This study aimed to identify possible sources of settled dust events that occurred in an urban area nearby an industrial park, which alarmed the local population. Settled dust was collected in January 2019 and its chemical characterization was assessed by micro-PIXE, focusing on a total of 29 elements. Comparison with chemical profiles of particulate matter from different types of environment was conducted, along with the assessment of crustal enrichment factors and Spearman correlations, allowing to understand which sources were contributing to this settled dust event. A nearby industrial area’s influence was identified due to the contents of Fe, Cr and Mn, which are typical tracers of iron and steel industries.

Keywords

Air pollution Industrial environments Pollution sources Settled dust Micro-PIXE 

Notes

Acknowledgements

N. Canha acknowledges the support of the Portuguese Science Foundation (FCT, Portugal) through the Postdoc Grant SFRH/BPD/102944/2014 and the contract IST-ID/098/2018 (Nuno Canha). The FCT support is also gratefully acknowledged by C2TN/IST authors (through the UID/Multi/04349/2013 project) and by CESAM author (through the CESAM’s strategic programme UID/AMB/50017/2013). The authors also acknowledge the support of Câmara Municipal do Seixal (Portugal) for their availability throughout all the study.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Supplementary material

10967_2019_6860_MOESM1_ESM.docx (1.6 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 1663 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Kim KH, Kabir E, Kabir S (2015) A review on the human health impact of airborne particulate matter. Environ Int 74:136–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Landrigan PJ, Fuller R, Acosta NJR et al (2018) The lancet commission on pollution and health. Lancet (London, England) 391:462–512.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32345-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Levy JI, Hammitt JK, Spengler JD (2000) Estimating the mortality impacts of particulate matter: what can be learned from between-study variability? Environ Health Perspect 108:109–117.  https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.00108109 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lelieveld J, Evans JS, Fnais M et al (2015) The contribution of outdoor air pollution sources to premature mortality on a global scale. Nature 525:367–371.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15371 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Li P, Xin J, Wang Y et al (2014) Association between particulate matter and its chemical constituents of urban air pollution and daily mortality or morbidity in Beijing city. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:358–368.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3301-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Miri M, Alahabadi A, Ehrampush MH et al (2018) Mortality and morbidity due to exposure to ambient particulate matter. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 165:307–313.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.09.012 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhao H, Che H, Zhang X et al (2013) Characteristics of visibility and particulate matter (PM) in an urban area of Northeast China. Atmos Pollut Res 4:427–434.  https://doi.org/10.5094/apr.2013.049 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Meszaros E (1999) Fundamentals of atmospheric aerosol chemistry. Akadémiai Kiadó, BudapestGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fuzzi S, Baltensperger U, Carslaw K et al (2015) Particulate matter, air quality and climate: lessons learned and future needs. Atmos Chem Phys 15:8217–8299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    IARC (2013) Outdoor air pollution a leading environmental cause of cancer deaths. World Health OrganizationGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Loomis D, Grosse Y, Lauby-Secretan B et al (2013) The carcinogenicity of outdoor air pollution. Lancet Oncol 14:1262–1263.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70487-X CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    EEA (2018) Air quality in Europe—2018 report. EEA Report No 12/2018, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    WHO Regional Office for Europe (2013) Health effects of particulate matter, p 20Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schwartz J (2006) Air pollution: why is public perception so different from reality? Environ Prog 25:291–297.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.10160 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bickerstaff K, Walker G (2001) Public understandings of air pollution: the “localisation” of environmental risk. Glob Environ Change 11:133–145.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-3780(00)00063-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kelly FJ, Fussell JC (2015) Air pollution and public health: emerging hazards and improved understanding of risk. Environ Geochem Health 37:631–649.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-015-9720-1 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nali C, Lorenzini G (2007) Air quality survey carried out by schoolchildren: an innovative tool for urban planning. Environ Monit Assess 131:201–210.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-006-9468-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ramírez AS, Ramondt S, Van Bogart K, Perez-Zuniga R (2019) Public awareness of air pollution and health threats: challenges and opportunities for communication strategies to improve environmental health literacy. J Health Commun 24:75–83.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2019.1574320 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    PORDATA—Seixal Municipality (2019) https://www.pordata.pt/Municipios/Quadro+Resumo/Seixal+(Município)-233085. Accessed 5 May 2019
  20. 20.
    Rajta I, Borbély-Kiss I, Mórik G et al (1996) The new ATOMKI scanning proton microprobe. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect B Beam Interact Mater Atoms 109–110:148–153.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-583X(95)00897-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kertész Z, Szikszai Z, Szoboszlai Z et al (2009) Study of individual atmospheric aerosol particles at the Debrecen ion microprobe. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect B Beam Interact Mater Atoms 267:2236–2240.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2009.03.050 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Campbell JL, Boyd NI, Grassi N et al (2010) The Guelph PIXE software package IV. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect B Beam Interact Mater Atoms 268:3356–3363.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2010.07.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Canha N, Almeida SM, Freitas MC, Wolterbeek HT (2014) Indoor and outdoor biomonitoring using lichens at urban and rural primary schools. J Toxicol Environ Heal Part A Curr Issues 77:900–915.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15287394.2014.911130 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Belis CA, Karagulian F, Larsen BR, Hopke PK (2013) Critical review and meta-analysis of ambient particulate matter source apportionment using receptor models in Europe. Atmos Environ 69:94–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kothai P, Saradhi IV, Pandit GG et al (2011) Chemical characterization and source identification of particulate matter at an urban site of Navi Mumbai, India. Aerosol Air Qual Res 11:560–569.  https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2011.02.0017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Calvo AI, Alves C, Castro A et al (2013) Research on aerosol sources and chemical composition: past, current and emerging issues. Atmos Res 120–121:1–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mason B, Moore CB (1982) Principles of geochemistry. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Amato F, Alastuey A, Karanasiou A et al (2016) AIRUSE-LIFE+ : a harmonized PM speciation and source apportionment in five southern European cities. Atmos Chem Phys 16:3289–3309.  https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3289-2016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Almeida SML (2004) Composiçao e origem do aerossol atmosférico em zona urbano-industrial. Universidade de AveiroGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Aldabe J, Elustondo D, Santamaría C et al (2011) Chemical characterisation and source apportionment of PM2.5 and PM10 at rural, urban and traffic sites in Navarra (North of Spain). Atmos Res 102:191–205.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2011.07.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rodríguez S, Querol X, Alastuey A et al (2004) Comparative PM10–PM2.5 source contribution study at rural, urban and industrial sites during PM episodes in Eastern Spain. Sci Total Environ 328:95–113.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(03)00411-X CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hueglin C, Gehrig R, Baltensperger U et al (2005) Chemical characterisation of PM2.5, PM10 and coarse particles at urban, near-city and rural sites in Switzerland. Atmos Environ 39:637–651.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.10.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mohiuddin K, Strezov V, Nelson PF, Stelcer E (2014) Characterisation of trace metals in atmospheric particles in the vicinity of iron and steelmaking industries in Australia. Atmos Environ 83:72–79.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.11.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Alleman LY, Lamaison L, Perdrix E et al (2010) PM10 metal concentrations and source identification using positive matrix factorization and wind sectoring in a French industrial zone. Atmos Res 96:612–625.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2010.02.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sylvestre A, Mizzi A, Mathiot S et al (2017) Comprehensive chemical characterization of industrial PM2.5 from steel industry activities. Atmos Environ 152:180–190.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.12.032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Gladtke D, Volkhausen W, Bach B (2009) Estimating the contribution of industrial facilities to annual PM10 concentrations at industrially influenced sites. Atmos Environ 43:4655–4665.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.04.063 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Voutsa D, Samara C, Kouimtzis T, Ochsenkühn K (2002) Elemental composition of airborne particulate matter in the multi-impacted urban area of Thessaloniki, Greece. Atmos Environ 36:4453–4462.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(02)00411-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Larsen BR, Junninen H, Mønster J et al (2008) The Krakow receptor modelling inter-comparison exercise. JRC Scientific and Technical Reports, EUR 23621 EN 2008, Ispra.  https://doi.org/10.2788/33914
  39. 39.
    Querol X, Viana M, Alastuey A et al (2007) Source origin of trace elements in PM from regional background, urban and industrial sites of Spain. Atmos Environ 41:7219–7231.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.05.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Yatkin S, Bayram A (2008) Determination of major natural and anthropogenic source profiles for particulate matter and trace elements in Izmir, Turkey. Chemosphere 71:685–696.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.10.070 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Čabanová K, Hrabovská K, Matějková P et al (2019) Settled iron-based road dust and its characteristics and possible association with detection in human tissues. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:2950–2959.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3841-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Alves CA, Evtyugina M, Vicente AMP et al (2018) Chemical profiling of PM10 from urban road dust. Sci Total Environ 634:41–51.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.338 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Lage J, Wolterbeek HT, Reis MA et al (2016) Source apportionment by positive matrix factorization on elemental concentration obtained in PM10 and biomonitors collected in the vicinities of a steelworks. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 309:397–404.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-016-4751-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Widory D, Liu X, Dong S (2010) Isotopes as tracers of sources of lead and strontium in aerosols (TSP & PM2.5) in Beijing. Atmos Environ 44:3679–3687.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.06.036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Pekney N, Davidson C, Zhou L, Hopke P (2006) Application of PSCF and CPF to PMF-modeled sources of PM2.5 in Pittsburgh. In: Aerosol science and technology. Taylor & Francis Group, pp 952–961Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Canha N, Almeida SM, Freitas MDC et al (2014) Particulate matter analysis in indoor environments of urban and rural primary schools using passive sampling methodology. Atmos Environ 83:21–34.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.10.061 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Shi J, Wang N, Gao H et al (2019) Phosphorus solubility in aerosol particles related to particle sources and atmospheric acidification in Asian continental outflow. Atmos Chem Phys 19:847–860.  https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-847-2019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Srinivas B, Sarin MM (2012) Atmospheric pathways of phosphorous to the Bay of Bengal: contribution from anthropogenic sources and mineral dust. Tellus B Chem Phys Meteorol 64:17174.  https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v64i0.17174 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Mahowald N, Jickells TD, Baker AR et al (2008) Global distribution of atmospheric phosphorus sources, concentrations and deposition rates, and anthropogenic impacts. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 22:GB4026.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GB003240 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Zhao H, Wang X, Li X (2017) Quantifying grain-size variability of metal pollutants in road-deposited sediments using the coefficient of variation. Int J Environ Res Public Health 14:850.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14080850 CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Chang HH, Peng RD, Dominici F (2011) Estimating the acute health effects of coarse particulate matter accounting for exposure measurement error. Biostatistics 12:637–652.  https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxr002 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Almeida SM, Silva AV, Freitas MC, et al (2012) Characterization of dust material emitted during harbour activities by k0-INAA and PIXE. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 291:77–82.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-011-1279-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Silva AV, Almeida SM, Freitas MC et al (2012) INAA and PIXE characterization of heavy metals and rare earth elements emissions from phosphorite handling in harbours. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 294:277–281.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-011-1524-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Frampton MW, Rich DQ (2016) Does particle size matter? ultrafine particles and hospital visits in eastern Europe. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 194:1180–1182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Cassee FR, Héroux M-E, Gerlofs-Nijland ME, Kelly FJ (2013) Particulate matter beyond mass: recent health evidence on the role of fractions, chemical constituents and sources of emission. Inhal Toxicol 25:802–812.  https://doi.org/10.3109/08958378.2013.850127 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Canha N, Mandin C, Ramalho O et al (2015) Exposure assessment of allergens and metals in settled dust in French nursery and elementary schools. Atmosphere (Basel) 6:1676–1694.  https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos6111676 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centro de Ciências e Tecnologias Nucleares, Instituto Superior TécnicoUniversidade de LisboaBobadela LRSPortugal
  2. 2.CESAM - Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies, Department of Environment and PlanningUniversity of AveiroAveiroPortugal
  3. 3.Escola Superior de Tecnologia de SetúbalInstituto Politécnico de SetúbalSetúbalPortugal
  4. 4.Laboratory of Ion Beam Applications, Institute for Nuclear ResearchHungarian Academy of SciencesDebrecenHungary

Personalised recommendations