Measurement of neutron spectrum parameters for NAA irradiation holes in the Jordan research and training reactor

  • Jong-Hwa MoonEmail author
  • Sun-Ha Kim
  • Yasser Senjlawi


Three irradiation holes coupled to a pneumatic transfer system were installed for neutron activation analysis in the Jordan Research and Training Reactor (JRTR), which is the first research reactor in Jordan. To perform instrumental neutron activation analysis, neutron spectrum parameters, such as thermal neutron flux, α and f for the irradiation holes, should be measured. The Cd-ratio method was applied for the determination of the aforementioned parameters. For this purpose, 0.1% Au–Al wires and Zr foils were irradiated with and without Cd-cover, and the Cd ratios were determined for Au-198, Zr-95, and Zr-97/Nb-97m nuclides. Then, the parameters were calculated and determined at three irradiation holes.


Jordan Research and Training Reactor Instrumental neutron activation analysis Neutron irradiation holes Neutron spectrum parameters Cd-ratio method 



This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) Grant funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (NRF-2018M2A2B3A06071695), and by the JRTR operation support project.


  1. 1.
    Greenberg RR, Bode P, De Nadai Fernandes EA (2011) Neutron activation analysis: a primary method of measurement. Spectrochim Acta Part B 66:193–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Luzio MD, Oddone M, Prata M, Alloni D (2017) Measurement of the neutron flux parameters f and α at the Pavia TRIGA Mark II reactor. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 312:75–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dias MS, Cardoso V, Koskinas MF, Yamazaki IM (2010) Determination of the neutron spectrum shape parameter α in k 0 NAA methodology using covariance analysis. Appl Radiat Isot 68:592–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kennedy G, St-Pierre J, Wang K, Zhang Y, Preston J, Grant C, Vutchkov M (2000) Activation constant for Slowpoke and MNS reactors calculated from the neutron spectrum and k 0 and Q 0 values. J Radioannal Nucl Chem 245(1):167–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bounouira H, Embarch K, Amsil H, Bounakhla M, Blaauw M (2014) Neutron flux characterization of the Moroccan TRIGA Mark II research reactor and validation of the k 0 standardization method of NAA using k 0-IAEA program. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 300(2):465–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    De Corte F (1987) The k 0 standardization method—a move to the optimization of NAA. Rijksuniversiteit, GentGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    De Corte F, Sordo-El Hammami K, Moens L, Simonits A, De Wispelaere A, Hoste J (1981) The accuracy and precision of the experimental α-determination in the 1/E1+ α epithermal reactor neutron spectrum. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 62(1–2):209–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chung YS, Dung HM, Moon JH, Park KW, Kim HR (2006) Implementation of the k 0-NAA method in the NAA#3 irradiation hole of the HANARO research reactor. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A 564:702–706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dung HM, Sasajima F (2003) Determination of α and f for k 0-NAA in irradiation sites with high thermalized neutrons. J Radioannal Nucl Chem 257(3):509–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Moon JH, Kim SH, Chung YS, Kim YJ (2007) Application of the k 0-NAA method at the HANARO research reactor. J Radioannal Nucl Chem 271(2):289–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    EG&G ORTEC, GammaVision-32(A66-B32) Software User’s Manual, USAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Korea Atomic Energy Research InstituteDaejeonKorea
  2. 2.Jordan Research and Training ReactorJordan Atomic Energy CommissionAmmanJordan

Personalised recommendations